{"id":148743,"date":"2025-09-11T10:52:11","date_gmt":"2025-09-11T10:52:11","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/us\/148743\/"},"modified":"2025-09-11T10:52:11","modified_gmt":"2025-09-11T10:52:11","slug":"down-to-the-wire-california-lawmakers-announce-last-minute-climate-and-energy-package","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/us\/148743\/","title":{"rendered":"Down to the wire: California lawmakers announce last-minute climate and energy package"},"content":{"rendered":"\n<p>After months of negotiation, California legislative leaders on Wednesday  reached an <a class=\"link\" href=\"https:\/\/www.gov.ca.gov\/2025\/09\/10\/governor-newsom-legislative-leaders-announce-major-deal-to-save-money-on-electric-bills-stabilize-gas-market-cut-pollution\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\">eleventh-hour agreement<\/a> on a suite of closely watched climate and energy bills.<\/p>\n<p>Gov. Gavin Newsom, state Senate President Pro Tempore Mike McGuire (D-Healdsburg) and Assembly Speaker Robert Rivas (D-Hollister) announced the deal just days before the the legislative session ends on Friday. It includes reauthorization of California\u2019s signature cap-and-trade program and the expansion of a regional electricity market, among other items.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cAfter months of hard work with the Legislature, we have agreed to historic reforms that will save money on your electric bills, stabilize gas supply, and slash toxic air pollution \u2014 all while fast-tracking California\u2019s transition to a clean, green job-creating economy,\u201d Newsom said in a statement.<\/p>\n<p>There were wins and losses for energy and environmental groups in the package, which is expected to pass by the end of the week before moving to Newsom\u2019s desk for his signature.<\/p>\n<p>Among the most prominent items is the <a class=\"link\" href=\"https:\/\/www.latimes.com\/environment\/story\/2025-08-14\/california-cap-and-trade-crossroads-climate-change\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\" target=\"_blank\">extension of California\u2019s nation-leading cap-and-trade program<\/a> beyond its 2030 expiration date to 2045. The program sets limits on greenhouse gas emissions and allows large polluters to buy and sell unused emission allowances at quarterly auctions. <\/p>\n<p>Cap-and-trade is seen as crucial for California to comply with its climate goals \u2014 including reaching <a class=\"link\" href=\"https:\/\/www.latimes.com\/environment\/story\/2022-11-16\/carlifornia-unveils-plan-to-reach-carbon-neutrailty-by-2045\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\" target=\"_blank\">carbon neutrality by 2045<\/a> \u2014 and also brings in billions in revenue that helps fund state climate efforts such as the high-speed rail and safe drinking water programs. Newsom for months had been pushing for the program to be reauthorized largely in its current form, while environmental groups were hoping to see changes in how the program is run and where the money is spent.<\/p>\n<p>Revised language released Wednesday, including Senate Bill 840 and Assembly Bill 1207, includes some but not all of the changes they had hoped for, such as prioritized funding for <a class=\"link\" href=\"https:\/\/california%20wants%20to%20harness%20more%20than%20half%20its%20land%20to%20combat%20climate%20change%20by%202045.xn--%20heres%20how-6b3h\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"nofollow\">nature-based climate solutions<\/a> and a proposal to provide direct consumer rebates from the California Climate Mitigation Fund to help address affordability concerns.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cBy aligning the future of cap-and-trade with the timeline of California\u2019s ambitious emission reduction targets, California is positioned to achieve its climate goals in the most cost-effective way possible,\u201d said Katelyn Roedner Sutter, California state director with the nonprofit Environmental Defend, who urged lawmakers to pass the bill. <\/p>\n<p>But there are also \u201cmissed opportunities,\u201d according to the nonprofit group the Climate Center, including the preservation of free allowances for the oil and gas industry \u2014 permits to pollute so that businesses are not at a disadvantage against competitors in other states.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cOverall, this proposal is better than a straight reauthorization of the cap-and-trade program, but not by much,\u201d said Ryan Schleeter, the Climate Center\u2019s communications director. \u201cIt leaves billions of dollars on the table that could have supported climate solutions and addressed the state\u2019s affordability challenges. California has a lot more work to do to shift the financial burden of the climate crisis from taxpayers to the wealthy, polluting corporations responsible.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>Also included in the package was AB 825, which creates a pathway for California to participate in a regional electricity market. If passed, the bill would expand partnership with other Western states to buy and sell more clean power in a move supporters say will improve grid reliability and save money for ratepayers. <\/p>\n<p>\u201cThis historic agreement puts California on a pathway with Western states to provide cleaner, cheaper, more reliable energy,\u201d Rivas said in a statement. \u201cIt\u2019s a landmark affordability agreement that will amount to billions of dollars in savings for Californians.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>Some supporters have argued that improved collaboration across the West will help accelerate climate progress, while opponents fear that California would yield control of its power grid to out-of-state authorities, including the federal government.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cIt\u2019s just going to be disastrous for California,\u201d said Loretta Lynch, former president of the California Public Utilities Commission. Among other concerns, Lynch said the bill would eliminate all statutory requirements that the California Independent System Operator, run its electricity market consistent with the state\u2019s public health and environmental laws, and would weaken the state\u2019s ability to withdraw from the regional plan if problems arise.<\/p>\n<p>Other groups said the language released Wednesday addresses many concerns and helps protect California\u2019s interests.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cThis proposal clears the way to stand up energy markets that can save Californians real money,\u201d Alex Jackson, director of the nonprofit American Clean Power California, said in a statement. \u201cIt means we can work with our neighbors to ensure the West has the affordable, reliable, clean power needed to meet surging demand.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>Also included in Wednesday\u2019s package was SB 352, which would establish an air pollution monitoring program in some of the state\u2019s most heavily polluted communities, and SB 254, which would replenish the state\u2019s wildfire liability fund to help cover wildfire damage and finance mitigation efforts, among other items. <\/p>\n<p>\u201cThis bold legislative package will deliver for every corner of the Golden State on energy affordability and wildfire prevention, expand clean drinking water to tens of thousands and it also cements historic agreements on California\u2019s signature climate policies,\u201d McGuire said in a statement.<\/p>\n<p>However, some advocacy groups were upset by what wasn\u2019t included in the package \u2014 including \u201cfixes\u201d to the state\u2019s overhaul of the California Environmental Quality Act. That overhaul eases new construction in the state. Meanwhile, another bill supported by many environmental groups that <a class=\"link\" href=\"https:\/\/www.latimes.com\/environment\/story\/2025-07-07\/why-californias-make-polluters-pay-plan-stalled-again\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\" target=\"_blank\">would have created a Climate Superfund<\/a> to hold fossil fuel companies liable for damage caused by their emissions was pushed to next year. <\/p>\n<p>Perhaps most controversial in the package is SB 237, a bill that could help increase the state\u2019s oil production  in what lawmakers say is an effort to stabilize the market and gird against future gasoline price spikes. It follows major announcements this year from the oil companies Phillips 66 and Valero that they were <a class=\"link\" href=\"https:\/\/www.latimes.com\/business\/story\/2025-06-27\/california-democrats-push-reforms-to-prevent-refinery-shutdowns\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\" target=\"_blank\">shutting down two big refineries<\/a> in the state.<\/p>\n<p>In something of a compromise, the bill would streamline environmental approvals for new oil wells in Kern County but make it more difficult for companies to get approval to drill off the coast. <\/p>\n<p>In a statement, the activist group Campaign for a Safe and Healthy California expressed concern about the legislation, which it said was \u201ccrammed in the Legislature\u2019s last 72 hours,\u201d and urged lawmakers to reject the proposal. <\/p>\n<p>\u201cThe transition from oil is well underway in California and across the world, with refineries closing from Texas to Los Angeles,\u201d the statement said. \u201cBut in California, Big Oil is using the threat of refinery closures as a bargaining chip to pressure lawmakers into approving more drilling.\u201d <\/p>\n<p>The governor\u2019s office told The Times that Newsom \u201clooks forward\u201d to signing the legislation when it reaches his desk. <\/p>\n<p>Times staff writers Laura Nelson and Melody Petersen contributed to this report. <\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"After months of negotiation, California legislative leaders on Wednesday reached an eleventh-hour agreement on a suite of closely&hellip;\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":148744,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[2],"tags":[92105,32530,4,450,92103,1687,92104,451,8208,3,39153,3310,92107,29679,92108,92106,13109,16329,452,453,6601],"class_list":["post-148743","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","category-breaking-news","tag-assembly-bill","tag-billion","tag-breaking-news","tag-breakingnews","tag-california-lawmaker","tag-climate","tag-energy-package","tag-headlines","tag-month","tag-news","tag-newsom","tag-oil","tag-other-state","tag-proposal","tag-regional-electricity-market","tag-signature-cap-and-trade-program","tag-state","tag-statement","tag-top-stories","tag-topstories","tag-wednesday"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/148743","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=148743"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/148743\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/148744"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=148743"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=148743"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=148743"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}