Pro basketball\u2019s 30 franchises are all soaring high above the rim\u2014worth $5.4 billion on average, thanks to record sales of the Lakers and Celtics\u2014but no one is scoring quite like one $11 billion team.<\/p>\n
Private equity billionaire Mark Walter\u2019s agreement in June<\/a> to buy the Los Angeles Lakers at a $10 billion valuation, currently awaiting approval by the NBA, is set to establish a record sale price for a control stake in any sports team. Yet for all the attention the deal has attracted, the Lakers are not even the most valuable team in their league.<\/p>\n For the fourth year in a row, that honor belongs to the Golden State Warriors, who Forbes estimates could fetch $11 billion if owners Joe Lacob and Peter Guber were willing to part with them.<\/p>\n No other NBA team was within $300 million of the Warriors\u2019 estimated $880 million in revenue last season, with the club far outpacing the rest of the league with its income from sponsorships and premium seating<\/a> and ranking in the top three in virtually every category tracked by Forbes. In fact, Golden State more than doubled the $417 million league average for total revenue, and compared with the other North American sports leagues, the Warriors surpassed every franchise except the NFL\u2019s Dallas Cowboys<\/a>, who topped $1.2 billion in 2024 revenue.<\/p>\n Despite that financial muscle, not all NBA insiders agree that the Warriors should sit above the Lakers in the ranking of the league\u2019s most valuable teams\u2014or, for that matter, above the New York Knicks, who land at No. 3 on Forbes\u2019 2025 list at $9.75 billion. Then again, not everyone believes the Lakers are actually worth the $10 billion that Walter, who is also the controlling owner of MLB\u2019s Los Angeles Dodgers, was willing to pay. Some bankers, for instance, suggest the club\u2019s true value might be better captured with a blended valuation\u2014perhaps between $8 billion and $9 billion\u2014that reflects both this year\u2019s purchase and Walter\u2019s initial 2021 deal for a minority stake in the franchise.<\/p>\n The relative muddle at the top of the hierarchy stems in part from the fact that the Lakers\u2019 and the Knicks\u2019 valuations aren\u2019t entirely grounded in the franchises\u2019 ability to generate cash. Rather, they hinge on the teams\u2019 appealing home markets, storied history and global brand recognition, as well as their scarcity. In many cases, it takes decades for such a marquee asset to come up for sale.<\/p>\n So while Forbes\u2019 $11 billion valuation of the Warriors comes in at a robust 12.5 times their estimated 2024-25 revenue, the equivalent figure for the Lakers is 18.1\u2014in the words of one league insider, more like an \u201cold-school software multiple\u201d than a number typically associated with a sports team in a nearly 80-year-old league. The Knicks, meanwhile, are valued at 18.3 times their estimated 2024-25 revenue.<\/p>\n Those multiples are such outliers that they may not have much to say about the economics of pro basketball more generally. But even for the rest of the NBA, business these days is very, very good.<\/p>\n According to Forbes estimates, league-wide revenue last season was up 10% year-over-year, to roughly $12.5 billion, including money from non-NBA events held at teams\u2019 arenas but netting out arena debt service. Another significant jump is coming in 2025-26\u2014the first season of the 11-year, $76 billion national media package<\/a> the NBA signed last year with Disney, NBCUniversal and Amazon Prime Video. On average, the broadcast deals will pay roughly $4 billion more annually than the league\u2019s previous agreements.<\/p>\n With all of that cash pouring in, Forbes estimates that the 30 NBA teams are worth $5.4 billion on average\u2014or just over $160 billion collectively\u2014representing an increase of 21% over last year<\/a> and more than doubling the average of $2.5 billion from just four seasons ago<\/a>. The league\u2019s floor is also up 17%, with the Memphis Grizzlies rising to $3.5 billion, from $3 billion in 2024.<\/p>\n Two recent transactions give credence to those sky-high numbers. In August, a group led by private equity billionaire Bill Chisholm<\/a> took control of the Boston Celtics in a deal that, blending the price paid for the tranche that traded this year and a step-up for the remaining equity that will change hands by 2028, values the team at roughly $6.7 billion, or 14.6 times last season\u2019s estimated revenue. The same month, Tom Dundon, the owner of the NHL\u2019s Carolina Hurricanes, agreed to buy the Portland Trail Blazers\u2014a team that league insiders unanimously rank in the bottom third of the NBA\u2014at a valuation of around $4.25 billion, or 11.8 times last season\u2019s estimated revenue.<\/p>\n Forbes now pegs the average revenue multiple across the NBA at 12.9x, up from 11.7x last season and 7.3x in 2019-20<\/a>, which was Forbes\u2019 last NBA list before the Covid-19 pandemic. The comparable current figures are 10.7x for the NFL<\/a>, 9.3x for MLS<\/a>, 8.5x for the NHL<\/a> and 6.4x for MLB<\/a>\u2014a disparity that signals investors\u2019 appetite to break into basketball.<\/p>\n The steady rise in the NBA\u2019s multiples was driven in part by anticipation for the league\u2019s new national media package, and now that there is no single business-altering event on the immediate horizon, investors might reasonably start paying less of a premium as the incremental revenue kicks in. Yet league insiders almost universally say that the NBA ownership waiting list is so long that multiples are likely to stay elevated, at least in the near term.<\/p>\n There is less consensus as to whether the rise in revenue can keep up, and how, but there are reasons for optimism. For instance, the NBA has seen strong partnership growth\u2014climbing 91%<\/a> over the past five seasons at the team level, according to research firm SponsorUnited\u2014and while that trajectory is sure to flatten now that jersey patch sponsorships have caught on across the sport, the league has renewed some of its deals at significantly higher rates and is enticing brands in new categories and geographic markets.<\/p>\n Even more alluring for potential investors is the NBA\u2019s pipeline of new arenas and renovations. The Oklahoma City Thunder, for example, are in line to receive $850 million in public money toward construction costs. Meanwhile, voters in Texas\u2019 Bexar County are set to decide the fate of up to $311 million in funding toward an arena to replace the San Antonio Spurs\u2019 Frost Bank Center, on top of $489 million the city has already committed, and the Philadelphia 76ers and the Dallas Mavericks are also pursuing new homes.<\/p>\n For team owners, the benefits of a new building are difficult to overstate, as evidenced by the Los Angeles Clippers, who opened the Intuit Dome in 2024 after spending 25 years as a tenant at what is now called Crypto.com Arena. With the improved sponsorship and premium seating offerings, the move boosted the club\u2019s revenue 61% year-over-year, according to Forbes estimates, and sent the Clippers\u2019 valuation soaring 36% to $7.5 billion despite an ongoing scandal<\/a> around a now-bankrupt team sponsor, Aspiration.<\/p>\n The other big business opportunity is overseas, where the NBA holds a sizable lead on the other North American pro leagues in terms of cultivating an international fan base. How quickly and effectively the NBA can monetize those eyeballs isn\u2019t yet clear, but insiders believe its efforts to launch a European league as soon as 2027<\/a> could yield returns sooner than some expect, through expansion fees charged to new ownership groups.<\/p>\n There will, of course, be hurdles to clear both abroad and domestically\u2014such as the nationwide turbulence with regional sports networks<\/a>, draining one important local revenue source for certain teams\u2014and there won\u2019t be another $76 billion TV package coming along to smooth over the bumps. But nothing, it seems, can quench the thirst of investors eager to join the ranks of NBA owners.<\/p>\n \u201cWith leagues like the NBA where they control content and control IP, there are just things that will monetize that we don\u2019t even know about yet,\u201d notes one league insider. \u201cA few years ago, they were getting no fees for data rights\u2014what are they getting now? So there\u2019s going to be a lot of these different things that you and I probably don\u2019t even see right now that will influence valuations.\u201d<\/p>\n 2025 NBA TEAM VALUES\n<\/p>\n #1. $11 billion<\/p>\n One-Year Change: 25% | Revenue: $880 million | Operating Income: $409 million | Owners: Joe Lacob<\/a>, Peter Guber<\/a><\/p>\n Brandon Dill\/Associated Press<\/p>\n #2. $10 billion<\/p>\n One-Year Change: 41% | Revenue: $551 million | Operating Income: $170 million | Owners: Jerry Buss Family Trusts, Mark Walter<\/a>, Todd Boehly<\/a><\/p>\n Nate Billings\/Associated Press<\/p>\n #3. $9.75 billion<\/p>\n One-Year Change: 30% | Revenue: $532 million | Operating Income: $98 million | Owner: Madison Square Garden Sports<\/a> One-Year Change: 36% | Revenue: $569 million | Operating Income: $154 million | Owner: Steve Ballmer<\/a> One-Year Change: 12% | Revenue: $458 million | Operating Income: $116 million | Owners: Bill Chisholm<\/a>, Grousbeck family<\/a> One-Year Change: 20% | Revenue: $434 million | Operating Income: $160 million | Owner: Jerry Reinsdorf<\/a> One-Year Change: 20% | Revenue: $467 million | Operating Income: $191 million | Owner: Tilman Fertitta<\/a><\/p>\n Ashley Landis\/Associated Press<\/p>\n #8. $5.7 billion<\/p>\n One-Year Change: 34% | Revenue: $417 million | Operating Income: $110 million | Owner: Micky Arison<\/a> One-Year Change: 17% | Revenue: $402 million | Operating Income: $50 million | Owners: Joseph Tsai<\/a>, Koch family<\/a> One-Year Change: 18% | Revenue: $472 million | Operating Income: $204 million | Owners: Josh Harris<\/a>, David Blitzer<\/a><\/p>\n Matt Slocum\/Associated Press<\/p>\n #11. $5.425 billion<\/p>\n One-Year Change: 26% | Revenue: $455 million | Operating Loss: $33 million | Owners: Mat Ishbia<\/a>, Justin Ishbia<\/a> One-Year Change: 23% | Revenue: $380 million | Operating Income: $136 million | Owners: Rogers Communications<\/a>, Larry Tanenbaum<\/a> One-Year Change: 9% | Revenue: $407 million | Operating Income: $87 million | Owners: Adelson family<\/a>, Mark Cuban<\/a> One-Year Change: 32% | Revenue: $477 million | Operating Income: $203 million | Owner: Tony Ressler<\/a><\/p>\n Kevin C. Cox\/Getty Images<\/p>\n #15. $4.8 billion<\/p>\n One-Year Change: 22% | Revenue: $440 million | Operating Income: $127 million | Owner: Dan Gilbert<\/a> One-Year Change: 15% | Revenue: $389 million | Operating Income: $135 million | Owner: Ted Leonsis<\/a> One-Year Change: 18% | Revenue: $364 million | Operating Income: $67 million | Owner: E. Stanley Kroenke<\/a><\/p>\n Etienne Laurent\/Associated Press<\/p>\n #18. $4.45 billion<\/p>\n One-Year Change: 20% | Revenue: $354 million | Operating Income: $76 million | Owner: Vivek Ranadiv\u00e9 One-Year Change: 14% | Revenue: $401 million | Operating Income: $151 million | Owners: Peter J. Holt, Sixth Street One-Year Change: 19% | Revenue: $357 million | Operating Income: $114 million | Owners: Clayton Bennett, George Kaiser<\/a>, Aubrey McClendon estate<\/p>\n Nate Billings\/Associated Press<\/p>\n #21. $4.3 billion<\/p>\n One-Year Change: 8% | Revenue: $355 million | Operating Income: $26 million | Owners: Wes Edens<\/a>, Jimmy and Dee Haslam<\/a> One-Year Change: 21% | Revenue: $361 million | Operating Income: $111 million | Owner: Paul G. Allen Trust One-Year Change: 17% | Revenue: $342 million | Operating Income: $89 million | Owners: Herb Simon<\/a>, Stephen Simon<\/p>\n Jason Miller\/Getty Images<\/p>\n #24. $4.1 billion<\/p>\n One-Year Change: 15% | Revenue: $340 million | Operating Income: $103 million | Owners: Ryan and Ashley Smith<\/a> One-Year Change: 22% | Revenue: $318 million | Operating Income: $94 million | Owner: DeVos family<\/a> One-Year Change: 15% | Revenue: $328 million | Operating Income: $82 million | Owners: Rick Schnall, Gabe Plotkin<\/a>, Chris Shumway One-Year Change: 7% | Revenue: $321 million | Operating Income: $106 million | Owner: Tom Gores<\/a><\/p>\n Marta Lavandier\/Associated Press<\/p>\n #28. $3.6 billion<\/p>\n One-Year Change: 16% | Revenue: $320 million | Operating Loss: $41 million | Owners: Marc Lore<\/a>, Alex Rodriguez<\/a> One-Year Change: 16% | Revenue: $302 million | Operating Income: $78 million | Owner: Gayle Benson<\/a> One-Year Change: 17% | Revenue: $306 million | Operating Income: $28 million | Owner: Robert Pera<\/a> Revenue and operating income (earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization) are estimated for the 2024-25 regular season and are net of revenue sharing and arena debt service. Playoff revenue is excluded.<\/p>\n Team values are enterprise values (equity plus net debt) and include the economics of the team\u2019s arena (including non-NBA revenue that accrues to the team\u2019s owner) but not the value of the arena real estate itself. Team values also exclude other related businesses with separate financial statements, such as ancillary real estate developments or team-owned regional sports networks.<\/p>\n Team values are rounded to the nearest $25 million, and estimated revenue and operating income are rounded to the nearest $1 million. All figures are in U.S. dollars based on the average U.S.-Canada exchange rate during the 2024-25 season (1 CAD = 0.73 USD).<\/p>\n The information used to compile the valuations primarily came from interviews with teams, sports bankers and media consultants, as well as public documents, such as arena lease agreements and bond documents.<\/p>\n \nMore From ForbesForbesThe NBA\u2019s Highest-Paid Players 2025By Brett Knight<\/a>ForbesHow New Balance Went From \u2018Dad Shoe\u2019 To Scoring The No. 1 NBA Draft ProspectBy Justin Birnbaum<\/a>ForbesAmerica\u2019s Richest Sports Team Owners 2025By Justin Birnbaum<\/a>ForbesThe WNBA\u2019s Most Valuable Teams 2025By Brett Knight<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"Pro basketball\u2019s 30 franchises are all soaring high above the rim\u2014worth $5.4 billion on average, thanks to record…\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":245853,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[64],"tags":[134547,2243,1055,134548,134544,355,134549,134545,134543,134542,134546,99],"class_list":["post-245852","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","category-nba","tag-basketball-team-values","tag-golden-state-warriors","tag-los-angeles-lakers","tag-most-valuable-basketball-teams","tag-most-valuable-nba-teams","tag-nba","tag-nba-most-valuable","tag-nba-net-worth","tag-nba-team-values","tag-nba-valuations","tag-richest-nba-teams","tag-sports"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/245852","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=245852"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/245852\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/245853"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=245852"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=245852"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=245852"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}
\n#4. $7.5 billion<\/p>\n
\n#5. $6.7 billion<\/p>\n
\n#6. $6 billion<\/p>\n
\n#7. $5.9 billion<\/p>\n
\n#9. $5.6 billion<\/p>\n
\n#10. $5.45 billion<\/p>\n
\n#12. $5.4 billion<\/p>\n
\n#13. $5.1 billion<\/p>\n
\n#14. $5 billion<\/p>\n
\n#16. $4.7 billion<\/p>\n
\n#17. $4.6 billion<\/p>\n
\n#19. $4.4 billion<\/p>\n
\n#20. $4.35 billion<\/p>\n
\n#22. $4.25 billion<\/p>\n
\n#23. $4.2 billion<\/p>\n
\n#25. $3.9 billion<\/p>\n
\n#26. $3.8 billion<\/p>\n
\n#27. $3.65 billion<\/p>\n
\n#29. $3.55 billion<\/p>\n
\n#30. $3.5 billion<\/p>\n
\nMETHODOLOGY<\/p>\n