$$\\frac{{d\\vec{M}}}{dt} = – \\gamma^{\\prime}\\left( {\\vec{M} \\times \\vec{H}_{opt} + \\frac{\\alpha }{{M_{s} }}\\vec{M} \\times \\vec{M} \\times \\vec{H}_{opt} } \\right).$$<\/p>\n
\n (1)\n <\/p>\n
Fig. 1 Dependence of the torque on the pulse parameters. (a) Schematic illustration of the normalized longitudinal and transverse torques \\({T}_{z}\\) and \\({T}_{y}\\), respectively, induced by the optical pulse. (b) \\(|{T}_{z}|\\) after the application of an RCP Gaussian magnetic pulse as a function of \\({\\eta }_{H}\\), which is varied by sweeping \\({H}_{peak}\\) for each \\(\\alpha =0.025, 0.05\\) and \\(\\lambda =800, 640\\text{ nm}\\) value. \\({\\tau }_{p}=540\\text{ fsec}\\). Dashed lines correspond to quadratic fits. (c) Dependence of \\(|{T}_{z}|\\) on \\({\\tau }_{p}\\), under \\({\\eta }_{H}=2\\times {10}^{-4}\\). Dashed lines correspond to linear fits. (d) \\({T}_{z}\\) as a function of \\(\\phi\\), under \\({\\eta }_{H}=2\\times 1{0}^{-4}\\) and \\({\\tau }_{p}=540\\text{ fsec}\\). Dashed lines correspond to \\(-sin(\\phi )\\) fits. Panels (c) and (d) follow the color code of (b).<\/p>\n Here, \\({M}_{s}\\) is the saturation magnetization and \\({\\gamma }^{\\prime}=\\gamma {\\mu }_{0}\/(1+{\\alpha }^{2})\\), where \\({\\mu }_{0}\\) is the magnetic permeability. We apply a right circularly-polarized (RCP) Gaussian pulse of the form \\(\\vec{H}_{opt} \\left( t \\right) = H_{peak} \\left( {\\begin{array}{*{20}c} {\\cos \\left( {2\\pi f_{opt} t} \\right)} \\\\ {\\cos \\left( {2\\pi f_{opt} t – \\phi } \\right)} \\\\ 0 \\\\ \\end{array} } \\right)e^{{ – \\frac{{(t – t_{peak} )^{2} }}{{2\\tau_{p}^{2} }}}}\\) where \\(\\phi =90^\\circ\\). The full-width at half maximum (FWHM) of the intensity is \\(2\\sqrt{ln(2)}{\\tau }_{p}\\) and the peak amplitude \\({H}_{peak}\\) is reached at \\({t}_{peak}\\). Throughout the simulations, \\(\\overrightarrow{M}\\) is initialized in \\(\\widehat{x}\\) and \\({M}_{s}=3\\times 1{0}^{5} A\/m\\) which is typical of Co-based films used experimentally31<\/a>.<\/p>\n We first examine the dependence of the longitudinal torque on the optical fluence, \\(F\\), where the latter is proportional to the product of the intensity and pulse duration: \\(F \\propto H_{peak}^{2} \\tau_{p}\\). Following the interaction, the accumulated torque results in a tilting of \\(\\overrightarrow{M}\\). The longitudinal tilting is determined from the induced \\(\\widehat{z}\\) component of \\(\\overrightarrow{M}\\) after the interaction is completed, and is represented in normalized units, \\({T}_{z}={M}_{z}\/{M}_{s}\\). Figure\u00a01<\/a>b presents \\({T}_{z}\\) as a function of \\(\\eta\\) for different typical experimental conditions of \\(\\alpha\\) and wavelength, \\(\\lambda\\)1<\/a>,7<\/a>,13<\/a>,39<\/a>. \\(\\eta\\) is varied by sweeping over the relevant range of \\({H}_{peak}\\) values for each combination of \\(\\alpha\\) and \\(\\lambda\\). For clarity, we use the parameter \\({\\eta }_{H}\\) to indicate the sweeping over \\({H}_{peak}\\). The figure readily shows that \\({T}_{z}\\) is quadratic in \\({\\eta }_{H}\\), namely, \\({T}_{z}\\) is linear in the optical intensity. Figure\u00a01<\/a>c illustrates the dependence of \\({T}_{z}\\) on \\({\\tau }_{p}\\) for a constant \\({\\eta }_{H}\\) illustrating that \\({T}_{z}\\) is linear in \\({\\tau }_{p}\\) in agreement with the trend reported experimentally in Refs.5<\/a>,6<\/a>. This behavior indicates that the optically induced torque builds up with each optical cycle. Since \\({T}_{z}\\) scales with \\({H}_{peak}^{2}\\) and \\({\\tau }_{p}\\), it also scales with the fluence \\(F\\). A linear dependence of the torque on \\(F\\) was also reported experimentally5<\/a>,6<\/a>,13<\/a>,26<\/a>,37<\/a> and was attributed to the non-linear susceptibility \\({\\chi }_{NL}^{(2)}\\)34<\/a>,35<\/a>,37<\/a>. Following a detailed analytical derivation (see Supplemental Note 1<\/a>), we find that \\(T_{z} = \\frac{{\\gamma^{2} }}{2\\sqrt \\pi }\\frac{\\alpha }{{f_{opt} }}H_{peak}^{2} \\tau_{p} \\propto F\\alpha \/f_{opt}\\) (throughout the work we use \\({\\gamma }^{\\prime}\\approx \\gamma\\)). This relation also shows that the torque is enhanced with \\(\\alpha\\) and decreases with \\({f}_{opt}\\). Interestingly, the AO-HDS was demonstrated in a variety of multi-layered material systems that consist of heavy metals such as Pt and Pd which possess large \\(\\alpha\\)24<\/a>,26<\/a>,31<\/a>,39<\/a>. We point out that beyond the macrospin approximation, a spatial distribution could also affect the interaction. Such spatial dependence was recently investigated numerically by Zhang et al. in Ref.50<\/a>, where the optical profile and spin texture were calculated, enabling ultrafast excitation and control of the helicity of skyrmions using CP light.<\/p>\n The dependence \\({T}_{z}\\propto F\\) implies that the effect should be prominent for higher powers, where the pulse heating is higher, which may lead to electron heating due to absorption as explored by Kampfrath et al.20<\/a>,21<\/a>,22<\/a>. Maehrlein et al.20<\/a> demonstrated that angular momentum transfer in yttrium iron garnet occurs in two stages that are characterized by distinct time constants: rapid spin-phonon energy equilibration within 1 picosecond, followed by angular momentum transfer to the lattice over 100 ns. Furthermore, Rouzegar et al.22<\/a> showed that ultrafast demagnetization and terahertz spin transport, previously considered distinct phenomena, share a common origin driven by a generalized spin voltage in a ferromagnet. Interestingly, in Ref.21<\/a> Chekhov et al. reported that the demagnetization does not depend on the wavelength and can equally take place with optical and terahertz (THz) excitations. In this case, the torque induced by the optical magnetic field may be described in more detail by the LLB equation43<\/a>, where also longitudinal relaxation takes place. Such approach was explored by Korniienko et al.44<\/a>, where the interaction with intense ultrashort THz pulses was studied in the framework of the LLB equation and a two temperature model coupling electrons and phonons. In Supplemental Notes 2<\/a> and 3<\/a> we include the anisotropy field and the longitudinal relaxation term, respectively, where it is seen that they have a negligible effect on the optically induced torque for the typical experimental settings we consider.<\/p>\n For a general polarization state, \\({T}_{z}\\) is described by the difference between the RCP and LCP fluences. This is illustrated in Fig.\u00a01<\/a>d by plotting \\({T}_{z}\\) as a function of the polarization state \\(\\phi\\). It is readily seen that \\({T}_{z}\\) vanishes for linearly polarized (LP) beams (\\(\\phi =0^\\circ ,180^\\circ\\)) whereas for CP beams (\\(\\phi =90^\\circ ,270^\\circ\\)) it is maximal, which is typical of AO-HDS1<\/a>,6<\/a>,26<\/a>,51<\/a>. For a general \\(\\phi\\), \\({T}_{z}\\propto -\\mathit{sin}\\left(\\phi \\right)\\) (see Supplemental Note 1<\/a>) which is proportional to \\({I}_{RCP}-{I}_{LCP}\\) (see Supplemental Note 4<\/a>). Hence, \\({T}_{z}\\) is given by:<\/p>\n $$T_{z} = \\frac{{\\gamma^{2} }}{2\\sqrt \\pi c} \\cdot \\frac{\\alpha }{{f_{opt} }}\\left( {I_{RCP} – I_{LCP} } \\right)\\tau_{p} ,$$<\/p>\n \n (2)\n <\/p>\n where \\(c\\) is the speed of light. Equation\u00a0(2<\/a>) is valid for small angle dynamics corresponding to small values of \\(\\eta\\) (see Supplemental Note 1<\/a>).<\/p>\n The dependence of \\({T}_{z}\\) on \\({I}_{RCP}-{I}_{LCP}\\) also appears in Pershan\u2019s phenomenological description of the IFE which was derived from the free energy of the crystal in the presence of the electrical component of the radiation, \\(\\overrightarrow{E}\\). Accordingly, \\({M}_{z}\\propto {\\chi }_{NL}^{(2)}\\left|\\overrightarrow{E}\\times {\\overrightarrow{E}}^{*}\\right|\\propto {I}_{RCP}-{I}_{LCP}\\)34<\/a>,37<\/a>. The potential function derived from Pershan\u2019s Hamiltonian assumes a slowly varying optical intensity as compared to the thermal relaxation times of the system52<\/a>. This assumption does not hold in the ultrashort timescales and several studies37<\/a>,46<\/a>,47<\/a>,52<\/a>,53<\/a> showed that the standard dependence on \\(\\overrightarrow{E}\\times {\\overrightarrow{E}}^{*}\\) is incomplete in this limit. Reid46<\/a>, Popova52<\/a>, and Battiato et al.32<\/a> showed that on the subpicosecond timescales a stimulated magneto-Raman scattering process takes place which is known as the ultrafast-IFE.<\/p>\n The calculated transverse magnetization tilting also reproduces trends observed experimentally. It is represented by \\({T}_{y}={M}_{y}\/{M}_{S}\\) following the interaction. To illustrate this point, we examine the temporal evolution of \\(\\overrightarrow{M}\\). Figure\u00a02<\/a>a presents the normalized \\(\\overrightarrow{m}(t)=\\overrightarrow{M}\/{M}_{S}\\), for \\(\\alpha =0.025\\), \u03bb = 800\u00a0nm, \\({\\eta }_{H}=2\\times {10}^{-4}\\), and \\({\\tau }_{p}=540\\text{ fsec}\\) resulting in \\({T}_{y} \\sim -2\\times {10}^{-3}\\). Following the same numerical analysis and analytical derivation, we find that \\({T}_{y}\\) is independent of \\(\\alpha\\) such that \\({T}_{y}\\propto F\/{f}_{opt}\\) (see Supplemental Note 1<\/a>). The dependence (independence) of \\({T}_{z}\\) (\\({T}_{y}\\)) on \\(\\alpha\\) was also observed experimentally by Choi et al.31<\/a> using time-domain vectorial torque measurements, where \\(\\alpha\\) was varied by changing the metallic capping layer in ferromagnet (FM)\/metallic bilayers.<\/p>\n Fig. 2 CP and LP single pulse dynamics. (a) Temporal evolution of \\(\\overrightarrow{m}=\\overrightarrow{M}\/{M}_{s}\\) induced by an RCP Gaussian pulse under \\({\\eta }_{H}=2\\times 1{0}^{-4}\\) and \\({\\tau }_{p}=540 \\text{ fsec}, {t}_{peak}=2\\text{ psec}\\). Top and middle panels depict the temporal evolution of the \\(x\\) and \\(y\\) components of \\(\\overrightarrow{m}\\) and \\({\\overrightarrow{H}}_{opt}\\) in normalized units, and the bottom panel depicts \\({m}_{z}\\). Inset: zoomed in dynamics of \\({m}_{z}\\) following the pulse. (b) Dynamics under LP pulse. \\(\\alpha =0.025\\) and \u03bb = 800\u00a0nm in (a) and (b).<\/p>\n Interestingly, in Ref.30<\/a>, Ali et al. demonstrated that an effective IFE magnetic field can be induced even under an LP beam. The effect arises from the transfer of orbital angular momentum from a beam with a helical wavefront, where each of the orthogonal Laguerre-Gaussian modes composing the helical wavefront transfers its well-defined photon orbital angular momentum to the plasma. This result shows that angular momentum could also be transferred by means other than the circular polarization of light and stimulates the investigation of LP beams in our case. For comparison, in Fig.\u00a02<\/a>b we examine the temporal evolution of \\(\\overrightarrow{M}\\) driven by a single LP \\({\\overrightarrow{H}}_{opt}\\) pulse (\\(\\phi =0^\\circ\\)), under the same conditions used in Fig.\u00a02<\/a>a. It is readily seen that although at the end of the interaction the net induced torque is zero, \\(\\overrightarrow{M}\\) undergoes a non-trivial dynamical evolution. Further investigation of the dependence of the LP case on the pulse power, duration, and polarization direction is presented in Supplemental Note 5<\/a>, illustrating that the polarization direction affects the dynamical evolution while the resultant torque remains zero.<\/p>\n The torque induced by a single pulse can be equivalently achieved by applying multiple pulses whose total fluence equals that of the original pulse. Figure\u00a03<\/a>a presents the temporal response of \\(\\overrightarrow{m}\\) to \\(10\\) identical \\({\\overrightarrow{H}}_{opt}\\) pulses, applied as in Fig.\u00a02<\/a>a, except that each pulse has one tenth of the duration \\({\\tau }_{p}\\), and an arbitrary carrier phase. It is seen that following the entire interaction, the accumulated torque is equal to the torque induced by the original single pulse of Fig.\u00a02<\/a>a and is independent of the relative carrier phases. Figure\u00a03<\/a>b presents \\({T}_{z}\\) induced by multiple RCP \\({\\overrightarrow{H}}_{opt}\\) pulses as a function of \\({\\eta }_{H}\\) and the number of applied pulses. It is seen that \\({T}_{z}\\) is linear in the number of pulses and quadratic in \\({\\eta }_{H}\\). In this general case, \\({T}_{z}=\\frac{1}{2\\sqrt{\\pi }\\alpha }\\frac{\\#pulses\\times {\\tau }_{p}}{{t}_{cycle}}{\\eta }^{2}\\) (see Supplemental Note 6<\/a>) such that the optically-induced torque builds up with each applied pulse as also reported experimentally5<\/a>,6<\/a>,51<\/a>. The total torque can be induced either by a single pulse or by multiple pulses which further demonstrates that \\({\\rm T}_{z}\\) scales with the accumulated exposure time.<\/p>\n Fig. 3 Multi-pulse and CW regimes. (a) Temporal evolution of \\(\\overrightarrow{m}\\) under \\({\\eta }_{H}=2\\times 1{0}^{-4}\\) and \\({\\tau }_{p}=54 \\text{ fsec}\\), induced by 10 RCP Gaussian magnetic pulses. Top and middle panels depict the temporal evolution of the \\(x\\) and \\(y\\) components of \\(\\overrightarrow{m}\\) and \\({\\overrightarrow{H}}_{opt}\\) in normalized units, and the bottom panel depicts \\({m}_{z}\\). For visibility, brown dashed lines representing \\({T}_{z}\\) induced by each pulse are added and the interaction with the first pulse is highlighted. (b) Normalized \\(|{T}_{z}|\\) after the application of RCP pulses as a function of \\({\\eta }_{H}\\) and the number of pulses, where \\({\\tau }_{p}=54 \\text{ fsec}\\) for each pulse. Red and blue curves correspond to quadratic and linear fits, respectively, and are guides to the eye. (c) Temporal evolution of \\(\\overrightarrow{m}\\) induced by a CW RCP magnetic field under \\(\\eta ={10}^{-7}\\). Top, middle, and bottom panels depict the evolution of the \\(x\\), \\(y\\), and \\(z\\) components of \\(\\overrightarrow{m}\\), respectively. In (a) to (c), \\(\\overrightarrow{m}\\) is initialized in \\(\\widehat{x}\\), \\(\\alpha =0.025\\), and \u03bb = 800\u00a0nm as in Fig.\u00a02<\/a>.<\/p>\n The dependence on the exposure time suggests that the effect may be also relevant for longer pulses reaching the CW limit as reported recently by Stenning et al. 7<\/a>. The dynamics induced by a rectangular quasi-CW pulse are depicted schematically in Fig.\u00a03<\/a>c by introducing an RCP CW beam, \\({\\overrightarrow{H}}_{opt CW}\\left(t\\right)\\), at 800\u00a0nm for a duration of \\({t}_{CW}=50 \\text{nsec}\\). In the simulation, \\({\\overrightarrow{H}}_{opt CW}\\) corresponds to a \\(5 \\text{ mW}\\) laser beam that is focused to a diameter of \\(500\\text{ nm}\\). Under these settings, \\({H}_{peak}\\) was \\(\\sim 10 \\text{ mT}\\) for which \\(\\eta \\sim {10}^{-7}\\) with \\(\\alpha =0.025\\) as in Fig.\u00a02<\/a>. Figure\u00a03<\/a>c reveals similar features seen in the single- and multi-pulse cases with \\({T}_{z} = \\frac{1}{2\\pi \\alpha }\\frac{{t_{CW} }}{{t_{cycle} }}\\eta^{2}\\) (see Supplemental Note 7<\/a>). In Ref. 7<\/a> the magnetization reversal was induced by a 633\u00a0nm CW beam in Py nanomagnets. A deterministic low power switching was demonstrated over long exposure times of \\({t}_{CW} \\sim\\) 1 sec where the laser power was \\(\\sim\\) 2.5\u20135 mW focused to a spotsize of 580\u00a0nm diameter. Under these settings, the magnetic field amplitude is \\(\\sim\\) 6.5\u201310 mT. Considering \\(\\alpha =0.015\\), which is typical for Py, the corresponding \\(\\eta\\) is \\(\\sim 4-6\\times {10}^{-8}\\). Using the expression above for \\({T}_{z}\\), we find that in order to fully switch \\(\\overrightarrow{M}\\) and reach \\({T}_{z}=1\\), the required \\({t}_{CW}\\) is \\(\\sim\\) 0.1 sec which is of the same order of magnitude of the reported exposure times. We remark that the experiment was conducted with LP CW beams in highly magnetically anisotropic nanomagnets and the effect was attributed to an asymmetric absorption.<\/p>\n Implications to the FE<\/p>\n The relevance of the LLG equation to the IFE and to the CW regime suggests that the LLG framework may also be related to the direct FE. In the FE, an external magnetic field is applied which breaks the symmetry between LCP and RCP radiation while the interaction occurs in steady state, as depicted in Fig.\u00a04<\/a>a. Furthermore, in contrast to the case of the IFE, \\(\\overrightarrow{M}\\) is not spontaneous, rather, it is induced by the static magnetic field. To evaluate the FE stemming from the optical magnetic field, we calculate the Verdet constant, \\(V,\\) from the circular birefringence by calculating the magnetic susceptibilities for RCP and LCP states, \\({\\chi }_{RCP}\\) and \\({\\chi }_{LCP}\\), respectively. From the linearized LLG equation (see Supplemental Note 8<\/a>):<\/p>\n $$\\chi_{RCP} = \\frac{{ – \\gamma \\mu_{0} M_{S} }}{{\\omega – \\gamma \\mu_{0} H_{DC} – j\\omega \\alpha }} , \\chi_{LCP} = \\frac{{\\gamma \\mu_{0} M_{S} }}{{\\omega + \\gamma \\mu_{0} H_{DC} + j\\omega \\alpha }}$$<\/p>\n \n (3)\n <\/p>\n where \\({H}_{DC}\\) is the amplitude of the externally applied static field and \\(\\omega\\) is the optical angular frequency. The Faraday rotation angle, \\({\\Theta }_{FE}\\), is expressed by the product of the RCP and LCP wavenumber difference,\\({k}_{RCP}-{k}_{LCP}\\), and the optical length, \\(L\\): \\({\\Theta }_{FE}=\\frac{1}{2}\\left({k}_{RCP}-{k}_{LCP}\\right)L\\). Using \\({k}_{RCP\/LCP}=\\omega \\sqrt{{\\epsilon }_{r}(1+{\\chi }_{RCP\/LCP}) }\/c\\), for highly off-resonance conditions we obtain:<\/p>\n $$\\begin{array}{*{20}c} {{\\Theta }_{LLG}^{FE} = – \\frac{1}{2}\\frac{{\\gamma \\mu_{0} M_{S} }}{{1 + \\alpha^{2} }}\\frac{{\\sqrt {\\varepsilon_{r} } }}{c}L,} \\\\ \\end{array}$$<\/p>\n \n (4)\n <\/p>\n where \\({\\epsilon }_{r}\\) is the relative electrical permittivity. Using \\({\\Theta }_{FE}=V{\\mu }_{0}{H}_{DC}L\\) and substituting \\({M}_{S}={\\mu }_{0}{\\chi }_{DC}{H}_{DC}\\) with \\({\\chi }_{DC}\\) being the DC magnetic susceptibility, we obtain:<\/p>\n $$V_{LLG}^{FE} = – \\frac{1}{2}\\frac{{\\sqrt {\\varepsilon_{r} } }}{{1 + \\alpha^{2} }}\\frac{\\gamma }{c}\\mu_{0} \\chi_{DC} ,$$<\/p>\n \n (5)\n <\/p>\n where the notation \\({V}_{LLG}^{FE}\\) indicates \\(V\\) that is calculated from the LLG equation. \\({V}_{LLG}^{FE}\\) is wavelength-independent aside from the dispersion of \\({\\epsilon }_{r}\\).<\/p>\n Fig. 4 FE stemming from the optical magnetic field. (a) Schematic illustration of the steady dynamics induced by a CP CW optical beam in the presence of an external static field. (b) Comparison between the calculated \\({V}_{LLG}^{FE}\\) and the Verdet constants from Refs.45<\/a>,54<\/a>,55<\/a>. Empirical data adopted from Ref.45<\/a>.<\/p>\n To assess the calculation, we examine the well-studied paramagnetic Terbium-Gallium-Garnet (TGG) crystal that possesses a high magnetic susceptibility and is commonly used in FE-based optical components. Taking \\({\\chi }_{DC}=2\\times {10}^{4}\\frac{A}{m\\times T}\\) and \\({\\epsilon }_{r}=4\\) of TGG, we obtain \\({V}_{LLG}^{FE}=-14\\frac{rad}{m\\times T}\\) while the measured \\({V}_{TGG}\\) at 800\u00a0nm is \\({V}_{TGG}=-80\\frac{rad}{m\\times T}\\)56<\/a>,57<\/a>. \\({V}_{LLG}^{FE}\\) accounts for a significant yet partial \\(17.5\\%\\) contribution to \\({V}_{TGG}\\). The experimental observations show that in general \\(V\\) is inversely proportional to \\(\\lambda\\). According to Becquerel\u2019s classical theory of the FE58<\/a>, a \\({\\lambda }^{-1}\\) dependence arises from the circular trajectory of the charges subjected to the CP electrical field. More recent works showed that \\(V\\) is more accurately described by \\(V\\propto 1\/({\\lambda }^{2}-{\\lambda }_{0}^{2})\\) where \\({\\lambda }_{0}\\) is a constant45<\/a>,59<\/a>,60<\/a>. Overall, the smallest value of \\(V\\) is expected at the longer wavelengths. We remark that the minimal values of \\(\\left|{V}_{TGG}\\right|\\) recorded by Villora54<\/a>, Barnes55<\/a>, and Slezak45<\/a> were \\(39\\), \\(26.7\\), and \\(18.7 \\frac{rad}{m\\times T}\\) at \\(\\lambda =1.1\\), \\(1.2\\), and 1.3 \u00b5m, respectively, and are higher than the calculated \\(\\left|{V}_{LLG}^{FE}\\right|\\). This is illustrated in Fig.\u00a04<\/a>b by presenting \\({V}_{TGG}\\) as a function of \\(\\lambda\\) as measured by Villora, Barnes, and Slezak together with the lower bound predicted by \\({V}_{LLG}^{FE}\\). In addition, we present the contribution of the optical electrical field, obtained by subtraction of \\(\\left|{V}_{LLG}^{FE}\\right|\\), readily showing the significant role of \\({\\overrightarrow{H}}_{opt}\\) at long \\(\\lambda\\).<\/p>\n It is possible that in addition to the wavelength independent magnetic contribution, spin\u2013orbit coupling may give rise to a wavelength-dependence of \\({V}_{LLG}^{FE}\\). We remark that the exchange and anisotropy energies in non-magnetic materials that are subjected to an externally applied field, as in TGG, are generally much weaker as compared to those in ferro- and ferri- magnetic materials. This is due to the absence of spontaneous long-range magnetic ordering as well as a relatively small induced \\(\\overrightarrow{M}\\).<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"Implications of the optical magnetic field to the IFE To show the relevance of the magnetic component to…\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":301370,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[49],"tags":[1159,1160,26296,199,79],"class_list":{"0":"post-301369","1":"post","2":"type-post","3":"status-publish","4":"format-standard","5":"has-post-thumbnail","7":"category-physics","8":"tag-humanities-and-social-sciences","9":"tag-multidisciplinary","10":"tag-optics-and-photonics","11":"tag-physics","12":"tag-science"},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/301369","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=301369"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/301369\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/301370"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=301369"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=301369"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=301369"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}![\"figure](\"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/us\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/11\/41598_2025_24492_Fig1_HTML.png\")
<\/a><\/p>\n![\"figure](\"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/us\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/11\/41598_2025_24492_Fig2_HTML.png\")
<\/a><\/p>\n![\"figure](\"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/us\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/11\/41598_2025_24492_Fig3_HTML.png\")
<\/a><\/p>\n![\"figure](\"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/us\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/11\/41598_2025_24492_Fig4_HTML.png\")
<\/a><\/p>\n