{"id":31783,"date":"2025-07-23T18:06:05","date_gmt":"2025-07-23T18:06:05","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/us\/31783\/"},"modified":"2025-07-23T18:06:05","modified_gmt":"2025-07-23T18:06:05","slug":"coherent-spectroscopy-with-a-single-antiproton-spin","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/us\/31783\/","title":{"rendered":"Coherent spectroscopy with a single antiproton spin"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Precision measurements of the magnetic properties of simple systems stand as a powerful tool for investigating fundamental physics, enabling some of the most precise tests of symmetry violations. For instance, the experiments described in ref.\u2009<a data-track=\"click\" data-track-action=\"reference anchor\" data-track-label=\"link\" data-test=\"citation-ref\" aria-label=\"Reference 11\" title=\"Allmendinger, F. et al. New limit on Lorentz-invariance- and CPT-violating neutron spin interactions using a free-spin-precession 3He-129Xe comagnetometer. Phys. Rev. Lett. 112, 110801 (2014).\" href=\"http:\/\/www.nature.com\/articles\/s41586-025-09323-1#ref-CR11\" id=\"ref-link-section-d11398050e868\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\" target=\"_blank\">11<\/a> used a 3He\/129Xe comagnetometer to place tight constraints on CPT-invariance-violating and Lorentz-invariance-violating parameters for neutrons<a data-track=\"click\" data-track-action=\"reference anchor\" data-track-label=\"link\" data-test=\"citation-ref\" aria-label=\"Reference 12\" title=\"Kostelecky, V. A. &amp; Russell, N. Data tables for Lorentz and CPT violation. Rev. Mod. Phys. 83, 11 (2011).\" href=\"http:\/\/www.nature.com\/articles\/s41586-025-09323-1#ref-CR12\" id=\"ref-link-section-d11398050e876\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\" target=\"_blank\">12<\/a>. Incoherent studies of the magnetic properties of single electrons<a data-track=\"click\" data-track-action=\"reference anchor\" data-track-label=\"link\" data-test=\"citation-ref\" aria-label=\"Reference 13\" title=\"Fan, X., Myers, T. G., Sukra, B. A. D. &amp; Gabrielse, G. Measurement of the electron magnetic moment. Phys. Rev. Lett. 130, 071801 (2023).\" href=\"http:\/\/www.nature.com\/articles\/s41586-025-09323-1#ref-CR13\" id=\"ref-link-section-d11398050e880\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\" target=\"_blank\">13<\/a> provide unparalleled tests of the Standard Model, while also setting constraints on the parameter space in which the dark photon could exist<a data-track=\"click\" data-track-action=\"reference anchor\" data-track-label=\"link\" data-test=\"citation-ref\" aria-label=\"Reference 14\" title=\"Fan, X. et al. One-electron quantum cyclotron as a milli-eV dark-photon detector. Phys. Rev. Lett. 129, 261801 (2022).\" href=\"http:\/\/www.nature.com\/articles\/s41586-025-09323-1#ref-CR14\" id=\"ref-link-section-d11398050e885\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\" target=\"_blank\">14<\/a>. Meanwhile, direct measurements on 3He+ and 9Be+ ions have established the most precise absolute magnetometers so far<a data-track=\"click\" data-track-action=\"reference anchor\" data-track-label=\"link\" data-test=\"citation-ref\" aria-label=\"Reference 15\" title=\"Schneider, A. et al. Direct measurement of the 3He+ magnetic moments. Nature 606, 878&#x2013;883 (2022).\" href=\"http:\/\/www.nature.com\/articles\/s41586-025-09323-1#ref-CR15\" id=\"ref-link-section-d11398050e897\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\" target=\"_blank\">15<\/a> and test multi-electron shielding factors<a data-track=\"click\" data-track-action=\"reference anchor\" data-track-label=\"link\" data-test=\"citation-ref\" aria-label=\"Reference 16\" title=\"Dickopf, S. et al. Precision spectroscopy on 9Be overcomes limitations from nuclear structure. Nature 632, 757&#x2013;761 (2024).\" href=\"http:\/\/www.nature.com\/articles\/s41586-025-09323-1#ref-CR16\" id=\"ref-link-section-d11398050e902\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\" target=\"_blank\">16<\/a>. Our experiments focus on antimatter-based magnetometry<a data-track=\"click\" data-track-action=\"reference anchor\" data-track-label=\"link\" data-test=\"citation-ref\" aria-label=\"Reference 17\" title=\"Smorra, C. et al. BASE&#x2013;the Baryon Antibaryon Symmetry Experiment. Eur. Phys. J. Spec. Top. 224, 3055&#x2013;3108 (2015).\" href=\"http:\/\/www.nature.com\/articles\/s41586-025-09323-1#ref-CR17\" id=\"ref-link-section-d11398050e906\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\" target=\"_blank\">17<\/a> using cryogenic multi-Penning-trap systems. We have measured the proton (p) magnetic moment with a fractional accuracy of 300\u2009ppt (ref.\u2009<a data-track=\"click\" data-track-action=\"reference anchor\" data-track-label=\"link\" data-test=\"citation-ref\" aria-label=\"Reference 18\" title=\"Schneider, G. et al. Double-trap measurement of the proton magnetic moment at 0.3 parts per billion precision. Science 358, 1081&#x2013;1084 (2017).\" href=\"http:\/\/www.nature.com\/articles\/s41586-025-09323-1#ref-CR18\" id=\"ref-link-section-d11398050e910\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\" target=\"_blank\">18<\/a>) and determined that of the antiproton \\((\\bar{p})\\) with 1.5\u2009ppb resolution<a data-track=\"click\" data-track-action=\"reference anchor\" data-track-label=\"link\" data-test=\"citation-ref\" aria-label=\"Reference 8\" title=\"Smorra, C. et al. A parts-per-billion measurement of the antiproton magnetic moment. Nature 550, 371&#x2013;374 (2017).\" href=\"http:\/\/www.nature.com\/articles\/s41586-025-09323-1#ref-CR8\" id=\"ref-link-section-d11398050e952\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\" target=\"_blank\">8<\/a>. These experiments are based on incoherent spin-projection measurements using the continuous Stern\u2013Gerlach effect<a data-track=\"click\" data-track-action=\"reference anchor\" data-track-label=\"link\" data-test=\"citation-ref\" aria-label=\"Reference 19\" title=\"Dehmelt, H. Continuous Stern-Gerlach effect: principle and idealized apparatus. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 83, 2291&#x2013;2294 (1986).\" href=\"http:\/\/www.nature.com\/articles\/s41586-025-09323-1#ref-CR19\" id=\"ref-link-section-d11398050e956\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\" target=\"_blank\">19<\/a>,<a data-track=\"click\" data-track-action=\"reference anchor\" data-track-label=\"link\" data-test=\"citation-ref\" aria-label=\"Reference 20\" title=\"Dehmelt, H. Continuous Stern-Gerlach effect: noise and the measurement process. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 83, 3074&#x2013;3077 (1986).\" href=\"http:\/\/www.nature.com\/articles\/s41586-025-09323-1#ref-CR20\" id=\"ref-link-section-d11398050e959\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\" target=\"_blank\">20<\/a>, combined with decoherent measurements of the Larmor \u03bdL and the cyclotron \u03bdc frequencies in the magnetic field B0\u2009=\u20091.945\u2009T of our PT (ref.\u2009<a data-track=\"click\" data-track-action=\"reference anchor\" data-track-label=\"link\" data-test=\"citation-ref\" aria-label=\"Reference 21\" title=\"Mooser, A. et al. Direct high-precision measurement of the magnetic moment of the proton. Nature 509, 596&#x2013;599 (2014).\" href=\"http:\/\/www.nature.com\/articles\/s41586-025-09323-1#ref-CR21\" id=\"ref-link-section-d11398050e976\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\" target=\"_blank\">21<\/a>). The ratio of the measured frequencies gives the gyromagnetic g-factor g\/2\u2009=\u2009\u03bdL\/\u03bdc. Decoherent Larmor resonance spectroscopy results in suppressed spin inversion and contributes to the broadening of the measured resonance lines, both of which diminish measurement resolution. Establishing coherent techniques to overcome these limitations is an exciting prospect and represents a key advancement towards establishing nuclear magnetic moment measurements at substantially improved resolution.<\/p>\n<p>Here we demonstrate the coherent quantum transition spectroscopy of a single nuclear spin 1\/2 particle\u2014a single trapped antiproton. The measurements are carried out in the multi-Penning-trap system of the BASE collaboration<a data-track=\"click\" data-track-action=\"reference anchor\" data-track-label=\"link\" data-test=\"citation-ref\" aria-label=\"Reference 17\" title=\"Smorra, C. et al. BASE&#x2013;the Baryon Antibaryon Symmetry Experiment. Eur. Phys. J. Spec. Top. 224, 3055&#x2013;3108 (2015).\" href=\"http:\/\/www.nature.com\/articles\/s41586-025-09323-1#ref-CR17\" id=\"ref-link-section-d11398050e998\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\" target=\"_blank\">17<\/a> at the Antiproton Decelerator (AD)\/ELENA facility of CERN. By applying our unique two-particles\/three-traps technique<a data-track=\"click\" data-track-action=\"reference anchor\" data-track-label=\"link\" data-test=\"citation-ref\" aria-label=\"Reference 8\" title=\"Smorra, C. et al. A parts-per-billion measurement of the antiproton magnetic moment. Nature 550, 371&#x2013;374 (2017).\" href=\"http:\/\/www.nature.com\/articles\/s41586-025-09323-1#ref-CR8\" id=\"ref-link-section-d11398050e1002\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\" target=\"_blank\">8<\/a>, supported by our cooling trap (CT)<a data-track=\"click\" data-track-action=\"reference anchor\" data-track-label=\"link\" data-test=\"citation-ref\" aria-label=\"Reference 22\" title=\"Latacz, B. M. et al. Orders of magnitude improved cyclotron-mode cooling for nondestructive spin quantum transition spectroscopy with single trapped antiprotons. Phys. Rev. Lett. 133, 053201 (2024).\" href=\"http:\/\/www.nature.com\/articles\/s41586-025-09323-1#ref-CR22\" id=\"ref-link-section-d11398050e1006\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\" target=\"_blank\">22<\/a>, we observe Rabi oscillations of a single \\(\\bar{p}\\) spin and achieve spin coherence times greater than 50\u2009s. In line-shape scans, in which we vary an applied spin-flip radiofrequency \u03bdrf with respect to the Larmor frequency \\({\\nu }_{{\\rm{L}}}=\\left(\\frac{{g}_{\\bar{p}}}{2}\\right)\\times {\\nu }_{{\\rm{c}}}\\), we obtain spin inversions greater than 70% and a full width at half maximum (FWHM) of the spin-transition resonance that is below 200\u2009mHz. This is more than ten times narrower than in our previous antiproton magnetic moment measurements<a data-track=\"click\" data-track-action=\"reference anchor\" data-track-label=\"link\" data-test=\"citation-ref\" aria-label=\"Reference 8\" title=\"Smorra, C. et al. A parts-per-billion measurement of the antiproton magnetic moment. Nature 550, 371&#x2013;374 (2017).\" href=\"http:\/\/www.nature.com\/articles\/s41586-025-09323-1#ref-CR8\" id=\"ref-link-section-d11398050e1131\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\" target=\"_blank\">8<\/a>. We show that the FWHM is, at present, limited by decoherence induced by cyclotron frequency measurement noise. This is a crucial step towards improved measurements of the p and \\(\\bar{p}\\) magnetic moments with a fractional accuracy less than 100\u2009ppt and will allow for searches of time signatures of asymmetric antimatter\/dark matter coupling<a data-track=\"click\" data-track-action=\"reference anchor\" data-track-label=\"link\" data-test=\"citation-ref\" aria-label=\"Reference 23\" title=\"Smorra, C. et al. Direct limits on the interaction of antiprotons with axion-like dark matter. Nature 575, 310&#x2013;314 (2019).\" href=\"http:\/\/www.nature.com\/articles\/s41586-025-09323-1#ref-CR23\" id=\"ref-link-section-d11398050e1160\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\" target=\"_blank\">23<\/a> at improved mass resolution and increased data-taking rate, thanks to the higher signal-to-noise ratio and smaller FWHM of the coherent measurements.<\/p>\n<p>The heart of our experiment is a superconducting solenoid magnet with a horizontal bore, operated at a magnetic field of B0,PT\u2009=\u20091.945\u2009T. Inside the bore, the cryogenic multi-Penning-trap system, shown in Fig. <a data-track=\"click\" data-track-label=\"link\" data-track-action=\"figure anchor\" href=\"http:\/\/www.nature.com\/articles\/s41586-025-09323-1#Fig1\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\" target=\"_blank\">1<\/a>, is mounted. Most important for this study are the AT, in which the continuous Stern\u2013Gerlach effect is applied<a data-track=\"click\" data-track-action=\"reference anchor\" data-track-label=\"link\" data-test=\"citation-ref\" aria-label=\"Reference 19\" title=\"Dehmelt, H. Continuous Stern-Gerlach effect: principle and idealized apparatus. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 83, 2291&#x2013;2294 (1986).\" href=\"http:\/\/www.nature.com\/articles\/s41586-025-09323-1#ref-CR19\" id=\"ref-link-section-d11398050e1174\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\" target=\"_blank\">19<\/a>, the homogeneous PT, in which precision frequency measurements take place, and a park trap (PKT). AT and PT centres are separated by 73.4\u2009mm and PT and PKT centres are separated by 18.6\u2009mm. The trap stack is placed inside a cylindrical hermetically sealed, pinched, cryo-pumped vacuum chamber, in which pressures less than 10\u221218\u2009mbar and (anti)particle storage times of years are achieved<a data-track=\"click\" data-track-action=\"reference anchor\" data-track-label=\"link\" data-test=\"citation-ref\" aria-label=\"Reference 24\" title=\"Sellner, S. et al. Improved limit on the directly measured antiproton lifetime. New J. Phys. 19, 083023 (2017).\" href=\"http:\/\/www.nature.com\/articles\/s41586-025-09323-1#ref-CR24\" id=\"ref-link-section-d11398050e1183\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\" target=\"_blank\">24<\/a>. The trap electrodes, designed as in ref.\u2009<a data-track=\"click\" data-track-action=\"reference anchor\" data-track-label=\"link\" data-test=\"citation-ref\" aria-label=\"Reference 25\" title=\"Gabrielse, G., Haarsma, L., &amp; Rolston, S. Open-endcap Penning traps for high precision experiments. Int. J. Mass Spectrom. Ion Process. 88, 319&#x2013;332 (1989).\" href=\"http:\/\/www.nature.com\/articles\/s41586-025-09323-1#ref-CR25\" id=\"ref-link-section-d11398050e1188\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\" target=\"_blank\">25<\/a>, are primarily made out of gold-plated copper. The central ring electrode of the AT is made of ferromagnetic CoFe, also gold-plated, which distorts the magnetic field in the centre of the trap to BAT(z)\u2009=\u2009B0,AT\u2009+\u2009B2,AT\u2009\u00d7\u2009(z\u2009\u2212\u2009zAT,0)2, in which B0,AT\u2009=\u20091.231\u2009T, B2,AT\u2009=\u2009266(5)\u2009kT\u2009m\u22122 and zAT,0 is the trap centre (Fig. <a data-track=\"click\" data-track-label=\"link\" data-track-action=\"figure anchor\" href=\"http:\/\/www.nature.com\/articles\/s41586-025-09323-1#Fig1\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\" target=\"_blank\">1a<\/a>). The magnetic field in the centre of the PT is BPT(z)\u2009=\u2009B0,PT\u2009+\u2009B1,PT\u2009\u00d7\u2009(z\u2009\u2212\u2009zPT,0)\u2009+\u2009B2,PT\u2009\u00d7\u2009(z\u2009\u2212\u2009zPT,0)2, with zPT,0 being the centre of the trap. Achieved with a local persistent magnet system, the coefficient B2,PT can be tuned in a range of about \u00b1350\u2009mT\u2009m\u22122. The gradient field B1,PT can be adjusted in a range between 10\u2009mT\u2009m\u22121 and 24\u2009mT\u2009m\u22121. Also part of the magnet system is a set of self-shielding solenoids<a data-track=\"click\" data-track-action=\"reference anchor\" data-track-label=\"link\" data-test=\"citation-ref\" aria-label=\"Reference 26\" title=\"Gabrielse, G., &amp; Tan, J. Self-shielding superconducting solenoid systems. J. Appl. Phys. 63, 5143&#x2013;5148 (1988).\" href=\"http:\/\/www.nature.com\/articles\/s41586-025-09323-1#ref-CR26\" id=\"ref-link-section-d11398050e1294\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\" target=\"_blank\">26<\/a>,<a data-track=\"click\" data-track-action=\"reference anchor\" data-track-label=\"link\" data-test=\"citation-ref\" aria-label=\"Reference 27\" title=\"Devlin, J. A. et al. Superconducting solenoid system with adjustable shielding factor for precision measurements of the properties of the antiproton. Phys. Rev. Appl. 12, 044012 (2019).\" href=\"http:\/\/www.nature.com\/articles\/s41586-025-09323-1#ref-CR27\" id=\"ref-link-section-d11398050e1299\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\" target=\"_blank\">27<\/a>, with a shielding factor greater than 50. The trap electrodes are biased with ultrastable voltage sources. The applied voltages are selected such that, in the trap centres, homogeneous quadrupolar potentials \u03a6(z,\u2009\u03c1)\u2009=\u2009V0C2(z2\u2009\u2212\u2009\u03c12\/2) are formed<a data-track=\"click\" data-track-action=\"reference anchor\" data-track-label=\"link\" data-test=\"citation-ref\" aria-label=\"Reference 25\" title=\"Gabrielse, G., Haarsma, L., &amp; Rolston, S. Open-endcap Penning traps for high precision experiments. Int. J. Mass Spectrom. Ion Process. 88, 319&#x2013;332 (1989).\" href=\"http:\/\/www.nature.com\/articles\/s41586-025-09323-1#ref-CR25\" id=\"ref-link-section-d11398050e1328\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\" target=\"_blank\">25<\/a>. Here V0 is the voltage applied to the central ring electrode, C2 is a geometry coefficient (Extended Data Table <a data-track=\"click\" data-track-label=\"link\" data-track-action=\"table anchor\" href=\"http:\/\/www.nature.com\/articles\/s41586-025-09323-1#Tab1\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\" target=\"_blank\">1<\/a> and <a data-track=\"click\" data-track-label=\"link\" data-track-action=\"section anchor\" href=\"http:\/\/www.nature.com\/articles\/s41586-025-09323-1#Sec2\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\" target=\"_blank\">Methods<\/a>) and z and \u03c1 are cylindrical coordinates, for which z points along the magnetic field axis. A single particle in such crossed static fields oscillates at three independent frequencies<a data-track=\"click\" data-track-action=\"reference anchor\" data-track-label=\"link\" data-test=\"citation-ref\" aria-label=\"Reference 28\" title=\"Brown, L. S. &amp; Gabrielse, G. Geonium theory: physics of a single electron or ion in a Penning trap. Rev. Mod. Phys. 58, 233 (1986).\" href=\"http:\/\/www.nature.com\/articles\/s41586-025-09323-1#ref-CR28\" id=\"ref-link-section-d11398050e1357\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\" target=\"_blank\">28<\/a>, at the modified cyclotron frequency \u03bd+,PT\u2009\u2248\u200929.645\u2009MHz, the axial frequency \u03bdz,PT\u2009\u2248\u2009637\u2009kHz and the magnetron frequency \u03bd\u2212,PT\u2009\u2248\u20097\u2009kHz. An invariance theorem \\({\\nu }_{{\\rm{c}}}^{2}={\\nu }_{+}^{2}+{\\nu }_{z}^{2}+{\\nu }_{-}^{2}\\) (ref.\u2009<a data-track=\"click\" data-track-action=\"reference anchor\" data-track-label=\"link\" data-test=\"citation-ref\" aria-label=\"Reference 28\" title=\"Brown, L. S. &amp; Gabrielse, G. Geonium theory: physics of a single electron or ion in a Penning trap. Rev. Mod. Phys. 58, 233 (1986).\" href=\"http:\/\/www.nature.com\/articles\/s41586-025-09323-1#ref-CR28\" id=\"ref-link-section-d11398050e1478\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\" target=\"_blank\">28<\/a>) relates the free cyclotron frequency \u03bdc\u2009=\u2009(qB0)\/(2\u03c0m) to \u03bd+, \u03bdz and \u03bd\u2212; here q and m are the charge and the mass of the single trapped particle, respectively. Details on the eigenfrequencies and their measurements using non-destructive detection (see Fig. <a data-track=\"click\" data-track-label=\"link\" data-track-action=\"figure anchor\" href=\"http:\/\/www.nature.com\/articles\/s41586-025-09323-1#Fig1\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\" target=\"_blank\">1b<\/a>) are described in <a data-track=\"click\" data-track-label=\"link\" data-track-action=\"section anchor\" href=\"http:\/\/www.nature.com\/articles\/s41586-025-09323-1#Sec2\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\" target=\"_blank\">Methods<\/a> and summarized in Extended Data Tables <a data-track=\"click\" data-track-label=\"link\" data-track-action=\"table anchor\" href=\"http:\/\/www.nature.com\/articles\/s41586-025-09323-1#Tab1\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\" target=\"_blank\">1<\/a> and <a data-track=\"click\" data-track-label=\"link\" data-track-action=\"table anchor\" href=\"http:\/\/www.nature.com\/articles\/s41586-025-09323-1#Tab2\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\" target=\"_blank\">2<\/a>.<\/p>\n<p>Fig. 1: Experimental set-up.<a class=\"c-article-section__figure-link\" data-test=\"img-link\" data-track=\"click\" data-track-label=\"image\" data-track-action=\"view figure\" href=\"https:\/\/www.nature.com\/articles\/s41586-025-09323-1\/figures\/1\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\" target=\"_blank\"><img decoding=\"async\" aria-describedby=\"Fig1\" src=\"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/us\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/07\/41586_2025_9323_Fig1_HTML.png\" alt=\"figure 1\" loading=\"lazy\" width=\"685\" height=\"378\"\/><\/a><\/p>\n<p>a, Multi-Penning trap to demonstrate coherent spin quantum transitions with a single trapped antiproton. The trap stack consists of an antiproton reservoir trap, a park trap, a highly homogeneous and shielded precision trap, an analysis trap to apply the continuous Stern\u2013Gerlach effect and a trap to cool the antiproton\u2019s modified cyclotron mode. The trap electrodes (golden) are spaced by sapphire rings (blue shading). b, Schematic of a single-particle detection system. The detector is represented by a parallel RLC circuit, with inductance L\u2009\u2248\u20092\u2009mH, capacitance Cp\u2009\u2248\u200925\u2009pF and Rp\u2009\u2248\u2009150\u2009M\u03a9. c, Magnetic bottle strength in the centre of the precision trap, as a function of current applied to the persistent local superconducting magnet. Error bars are smaller than the size of the data points. d, Non-destructive detection of spin transitions in the centre of the analysis trap by measuring the axial frequency of the single trapped antiproton. Each frequency measurement takes around 120\u2009s.<\/p>\n<p>To implement the coherent spin transition spectroscopy, we use the two-particles\/three-traps technique described in ref.\u2009<a data-track=\"click\" data-track-action=\"reference anchor\" data-track-label=\"link\" data-test=\"citation-ref\" aria-label=\"Reference 8\" title=\"Smorra, C. et al. A parts-per-billion measurement of the antiproton magnetic moment. Nature 550, 371&#x2013;374 (2017).\" href=\"http:\/\/www.nature.com\/articles\/s41586-025-09323-1#ref-CR8\" id=\"ref-link-section-d11398050e1576\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\" target=\"_blank\">8<\/a>. The measurement protocol is shown in Fig. <a data-track=\"click\" data-track-label=\"link\" data-track-action=\"figure anchor\" href=\"http:\/\/www.nature.com\/articles\/s41586-025-09323-1#Fig2\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\" target=\"_blank\">2<\/a>. First, we initialize the spin state of a cold \u2018Larmor\u2019 particle in the AT. A second antiproton, the \u2018cyclotron\u2019 particle, is prepared in the PT for high-precision \u03bdc,PT measurements to determine the magnetic field of the trap<a data-track=\"click\" data-track-action=\"reference anchor\" data-track-label=\"link\" data-test=\"citation-ref\" aria-label=\"Reference 29\" title=\"Borchert, M. et al. A 16-parts-per-trillion measurement of the antiproton-to-proton charge&#x2013;mass ratio. Nature 601, 53&#x2013;57 (2022).\" href=\"http:\/\/www.nature.com\/articles\/s41586-025-09323-1#ref-CR29\" id=\"ref-link-section-d11398050e1587\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\" target=\"_blank\">29<\/a>. After initialization, the Larmor particle is transported to the PT, at which a spin-flip drive is applied. The particle is then returned to the AT to determine whether a spin transition has occurred.<\/p>\n<p>Fig. 2: Measurement protocol.<a class=\"c-article-section__figure-link\" data-test=\"img-link\" data-track=\"click\" data-track-label=\"image\" data-track-action=\"view figure\" href=\"https:\/\/www.nature.com\/articles\/s41586-025-09323-1\/figures\/2\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\" target=\"_blank\"><img decoding=\"async\" aria-describedby=\"Fig2\" src=\"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/us\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/07\/41586_2025_9323_Fig2_HTML.png\" alt=\"figure 2\" loading=\"lazy\" width=\"685\" height=\"647\"\/><\/a><\/p>\n<p>Illustration of the experiment sequence described in the text.<\/p>\n<p>To begin, we first use the magnetic shimming system (Fig. <a data-track=\"click\" data-track-label=\"link\" data-track-action=\"figure anchor\" href=\"http:\/\/www.nature.com\/articles\/s41586-025-09323-1#Fig1\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\" target=\"_blank\">1a,c<\/a>) and use measurements with the cyclotron particle to tune the magnetic coefficient B2,PT. In the case of finite B2,PT, interaction of the particle with the axial detector causes axial rms-amplitude fluctuations \\(\\propto ({k}_{{\\rm{B}}}{T}_{z}\/\\)\\(m{\\omega }_{z}^{2})\\). These shift the Larmor frequency by \\({\\Delta \\nu }_{{\\rm{L}}}=(1\/{4{\\rm{\\pi }}}^{2})({\\nu }_{{\\rm{L}}}\/{\\nu }_{z}^{2})({B}_{2}\/{B}_{0})({k}_{{\\rm{B}}}{T}_{z}\/m)\\) with the particle-to-detector correlation time of about 100\u2009ms, causing motional spin decoherence. We thus tune B2,PT\u2009=\u20091.2(1.8)\u2009mT\u2009m\u22122, corresponding at the temperature Tz,PT\u2009=\u20098.5(3) K of the PT axial detector to spin coherence times longer than 1\u2009h (ref.\u2009<a data-track=\"click\" data-track-action=\"reference anchor\" data-track-label=\"link\" data-test=\"citation-ref\" aria-label=\"Reference 28\" title=\"Brown, L. S. &amp; Gabrielse, G. Geonium theory: physics of a single electron or ion in a Penning trap. Rev. Mod. Phys. 58, 233 (1986).\" href=\"http:\/\/www.nature.com\/articles\/s41586-025-09323-1#ref-CR28\" id=\"ref-link-section-d11398050e1921\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\" target=\"_blank\">28<\/a>). Next, we apply the cooling protocol described in ref.\u2009<a data-track=\"click\" data-track-action=\"reference anchor\" data-track-label=\"link\" data-test=\"citation-ref\" aria-label=\"Reference 22\" title=\"Latacz, B. M. et al. Orders of magnitude improved cyclotron-mode cooling for nondestructive spin quantum transition spectroscopy with single trapped antiprotons. Phys. Rev. Lett. 133, 053201 (2024).\" href=\"http:\/\/www.nature.com\/articles\/s41586-025-09323-1#ref-CR22\" id=\"ref-link-section-d11398050e1925\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\" target=\"_blank\">22<\/a> to the Larmor particle and cool it to a cyclotron energy E+\/kB\u2009=\u2009T+\u2009&lt;\u2009100\u2009mK. Owing to the presence of the strong magnetic bottle B2,AT, a spin transition induces an axial frequency shift of \u0394\u03bdz,SF\u2009=\u2009173(1)\u2009mHz (ref.\u2009<a data-track=\"click\" data-track-action=\"reference anchor\" data-track-label=\"link\" data-test=\"citation-ref\" aria-label=\"Reference 19\" title=\"Dehmelt, H. Continuous Stern-Gerlach effect: principle and idealized apparatus. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 83, 2291&#x2013;2294 (1986).\" href=\"http:\/\/www.nature.com\/articles\/s41586-025-09323-1#ref-CR19\" id=\"ref-link-section-d11398050e1953\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\" target=\"_blank\">19<\/a>). A sequence of axial frequency measurements \u03bdz,AT interleaved by spin transitions is shown in Fig. <a data-track=\"click\" data-track-label=\"link\" data-track-action=\"figure anchor\" href=\"http:\/\/www.nature.com\/articles\/s41586-025-09323-1#Fig1\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\" target=\"_blank\">1d<\/a>.<\/p>\n<p>To initialize the spin state of the Larmor particle, we apply a sequence of \u03bdz,AT measurements, each taking 120\u2009s, followed by a 10\u2009s injection of a magnetic spin-flip drive at \u03bdrf,AT\u2009=\u200951.651\u2009MHz. At the background \u03bdz,AT scatter<a data-track=\"click\" data-track-action=\"reference anchor\" data-track-label=\"link\" data-test=\"citation-ref\" aria-label=\"Reference 10\" title=\"Ulmer, S. et al. Observation of spin flips with a single trapped proton. Phys. Rev. Lett. 106, 253001 (2011).\" href=\"http:\/\/www.nature.com\/articles\/s41586-025-09323-1#ref-CR10\" id=\"ref-link-section-d11398050e1989\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\" target=\"_blank\">10<\/a> \u039eback,AT\u2009\u2248\u200932(2)\u2009mHz achieved in this trap, we identify a measured \u03bdz,AT difference \u0394\u03bdz,SF\u2009&gt;\u2009140\u2009mHz as a spin transition. This leads to spin-state initialization with a confidence of about 100%. Subsequently, we use the cyclotron particle in the PT to determine B0,PT in this trap. To that end, we measure \u03bdc,PT, using the technique described in ref.\u2009<a data-track=\"click\" data-track-action=\"reference anchor\" data-track-label=\"link\" data-test=\"citation-ref\" aria-label=\"Reference 29\" title=\"Borchert, M. et al. A 16-parts-per-trillion measurement of the antiproton-to-proton charge&#x2013;mass ratio. Nature 601, 53&#x2013;57 (2022).\" href=\"http:\/\/www.nature.com\/articles\/s41586-025-09323-1#ref-CR29\" id=\"ref-link-section-d11398050e2019\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\" target=\"_blank\">29<\/a>. A single cyclotron frequency measurement of approximately 180\u2009s resolves \u03bdc with a fractional uncertainty of \u03c3(\u03bdc,PT)\/\u03bdc,PT\u2009=\u20091.42(7)\u2009ppb. This frequency defines the radiofrequency that is irradiated to later induce the coherent spin transitions in the PT \u03bdrf,SF,PT\u2009=\u2009(gp\/2)\u2009\u00d7\u2009\u03bdc,PT, in which gp\/2\u2009=\u20092.7928473441 is used<a data-track=\"click\" data-track-action=\"reference anchor\" data-track-label=\"link\" data-test=\"citation-ref\" aria-label=\"Reference 8\" title=\"Smorra, C. et al. A parts-per-billion measurement of the antiproton magnetic moment. Nature 550, 371&#x2013;374 (2017).\" href=\"http:\/\/www.nature.com\/articles\/s41586-025-09323-1#ref-CR8\" id=\"ref-link-section-d11398050e2059\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\" target=\"_blank\">8<\/a>. Next, we move the cyclotron particle to the PKT centre and the Larmor particle from the AT to the PT, by applying voltage ramps to the transport electrodes that interconnect the traps. Then a spin-flip drive at \u03bdrf,PT is irradiated for a time tSF,PT, transmitted by a coil mounted close to the PT (Fig. <a data-track=\"click\" data-track-label=\"link\" data-track-action=\"figure anchor\" href=\"http:\/\/www.nature.com\/articles\/s41586-025-09323-1#Fig1\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\" target=\"_blank\">1a<\/a>). Afterwards, we move the Larmor particle back to the AT and the cyclotron particle to the PT and cool its magnetron mode. To identify whether the spin in the PT was flipped, we record a subsequent \u03bdz,AT\/spin flip sequence to compare the spin state in which the particle was leaving the AT and once it returns from the PT. Here we identify a measured \u03bdz jump of \u0394\u03bdz\u2009&gt;\u2009\u0394\u03bdz,SF\/2\u2009=\u20090.173\/2\u2009Hz as a detected spin transition<a data-track=\"click\" data-track-action=\"reference anchor\" data-track-label=\"link\" data-test=\"citation-ref\" aria-label=\"Reference 21\" title=\"Mooser, A. et al. Direct high-precision measurement of the magnetic moment of the proton. Nature 509, 596&#x2013;599 (2014).\" href=\"http:\/\/www.nature.com\/articles\/s41586-025-09323-1#ref-CR21\" id=\"ref-link-section-d11398050e2102\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\" target=\"_blank\">21<\/a>. The error rate of identifying the spin flips driven in the PT depends on the axial frequency scatter of the \u03bdz,AT sequences; the formalism to correctly estimate the error rate is described in refs.\u2009<a data-track=\"click\" data-track-action=\"reference anchor\" data-track-label=\"link\" data-test=\"citation-ref\" aria-label=\"Reference 30\" title=\"Smorra, C. et al. Observation of individual spin quantum transitions of a single antiproton. Phys. Lett. B 769, 1&#x2013;6 (2017).\" href=\"http:\/\/www.nature.com\/articles\/s41586-025-09323-1#ref-CR30\" id=\"ref-link-section-d11398050e2114\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\" target=\"_blank\">30<\/a>,<a data-track=\"click\" data-track-action=\"reference anchor\" data-track-label=\"link\" data-test=\"citation-ref\" aria-label=\"Reference 31\" title=\"Mooser, D. et al. Resolution of single spin flips of a single proton. Phys. Rev. Lett. 110, 140405 (2013).\" href=\"http:\/\/www.nature.com\/articles\/s41586-025-09323-1#ref-CR31\" id=\"ref-link-section-d11398050e2117\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\" target=\"_blank\">31<\/a>. The median axial frequency scatter of 32(2)\u2009mHz corresponds to an error rate less than 5%.<\/p>\n<p>By applying this protocol and adjusting the radiofrequency interrogation time tSF,PT to drive spin transitions in the PT, we repeat the procedure 20 times for each value of tSF,PT, thereby obtaining the spin-flip probability P(tSF,PT), shown as the blue data points in Fig. <a data-track=\"click\" data-track-label=\"link\" data-track-action=\"figure anchor\" href=\"http:\/\/www.nature.com\/articles\/s41586-025-09323-1#Fig3\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\" target=\"_blank\">3<\/a>. This corresponds to the first observation of Rabi oscillations with a single nuclear spin 1\/2 antiparticle. The red line is a Monte Carlo fit (<a data-track=\"click\" data-track-label=\"link\" data-track-action=\"section anchor\" href=\"http:\/\/www.nature.com\/articles\/s41586-025-09323-1#Sec2\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\" target=\"_blank\">Methods<\/a> and Extended Data Table <a data-track=\"click\" data-track-label=\"link\" data-track-action=\"table anchor\" href=\"http:\/\/www.nature.com\/articles\/s41586-025-09323-1#Tab3\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\" target=\"_blank\">3<\/a>) of<\/p>\n<p>$$L({\\varOmega }_{0},\\Delta ,t)={\\int }_{-\\infty }^{\\infty }{P}_{{\\rm{SF,PT}}}({\\varOmega }_{0},\\Delta +\\sigma ,t)G(\\sigma \\,;\\mu ,\\sigma ){\\rm{d}}\\sigma ,$$<\/p>\n<p>in which the function<\/p>\n<p>$${P}_{{\\rm{SF,PT}}}({\\varOmega }_{0},\\Delta ,t)=\\frac{{\\varOmega }_{0}^{2}}{{\\varOmega }_{0}^{2}+{\\Delta }^{2}}\\times {\\sin }^{2}({\\rm{\\pi }}\\sqrt{{\\varOmega }_{0}^{2}+{\\Delta }^{2}}\\times t),$$<\/p>\n<p>is the spin-flip probability with Rabi frequency \u03a90, detuning \u0394\u2009=\u2009\u03bdrf,PT\u2009\u2212\u2009\u03bdL and interrogation time t. The function G(\u00b5,\u2009\u03c3) is a Gaussian distribution, defined by the scatter \u03c3\u2009\u2248\u200952\u2009mHz, arising from the \u03bdc,PT measurement noise present during these experiments. This noise leads to an observed decay of spin inversion, to which an effective spin coherence time of \u03c4s,PT\u2009=\u200950.2(4.8)\u2009s can be assigned. For further details on the analysis, see <a data-track=\"click\" data-track-label=\"link\" data-track-action=\"section anchor\" href=\"http:\/\/www.nature.com\/articles\/s41586-025-09323-1#Sec2\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\" target=\"_blank\">Methods<\/a>. This indicates that, in an optimized Rabi resonance scan, executed on the \u03c0-pulse, a FWHM \u0394\u03bdFWHM\u2009\u2248\u200920\u2009mHz or 250\u2009ppt could be achieved. We note that magnetic noise imposed by the accelerator reduces the spin coherence time to 5.6(4)\u2009s (Extended Data Fig. <a data-track=\"click\" data-track-label=\"link\" data-track-action=\"figure anchor\" href=\"http:\/\/www.nature.com\/articles\/s41586-025-09323-1#Fig5\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\" target=\"_blank\">1<\/a>).<\/p>\n<p>Fig. 3: Antiproton Rabi oscillations.<a class=\"c-article-section__figure-link\" data-test=\"img-link\" data-track=\"click\" data-track-label=\"image\" data-track-action=\"view figure\" href=\"https:\/\/www.nature.com\/articles\/s41586-025-09323-1\/figures\/3\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\" target=\"_blank\"><img decoding=\"async\" aria-describedby=\"Fig3\" src=\"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/us\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/07\/41586_2025_9323_Fig3_HTML.png\" alt=\"figure 3\" loading=\"lazy\" width=\"685\" height=\"435\"\/><\/a><\/p>\n<p>Observation of coherent Rabi oscillations of the spin of a single trapped antiproton. The blue points represent the measured data and the red line depicts a Monte Carlo fit, which assumes 52\u2009mHz cyclotron frequency measurement decoherence as determined in the related measurements. In grey are the uncertainties of the Monte Carlo simulation. The effective coherence time is \u03c4s,PT\u2009=\u200950.2(4)\u2009s. Each point is an average of 20 spin flip attempts, uncertainty bars represent the standard deviations of the measured data distributions. Throughout the measurement campaign we have recorded several of these plots for different Rabi frequencies.<\/p>\n<p>To optimize the spectral response of the coherent dynamics for measurements at optimum line-centre resolution, we first record Rabi oscillations at different drive amplitudes and determine the tSF,PT in the PT at which maximum inversion is achieved. At the determined optimum tSF,PT, we perform Larmor resonance scans, keeping tSF,PT constant while scanning the frequency \u03bdrf,PT of the spin-flip drive with respect to \u03bdL\u2009=\u2009(g\/2)\u2009\u00d7\u2009\u03bdc,PT. Here \u03bdc,PT is obtained with the cyclotron particle in the PT, extracted from a sequence of six frequency measurements, taken before the application of the spin-flip drive. To resolve the resonance, we sample ten points per irradiated \u03bdrf,PT and scan each resonance with a minimum amount of eight discrete frequency offsets, which typically takes 60\u2009h. The recorded cyclotron frequency sequence allows us to study \u0394\u03bdFWHM and the inversion S as a function of \u03bdc,PT averages used to reconstruct \u03bdL at the time when the spin-flip drive is applied in the PT. Averaging several magnetic field measurements for the \u03bdL reconstruction decreases the cyclotron frequency scatter \u03c3c,PT to about 30\u2009mHz, which narrows the width of the Larmor resonance while increasing the inversion. This is shown in Fig. <a data-track=\"click\" data-track-label=\"link\" data-track-action=\"figure anchor\" href=\"http:\/\/www.nature.com\/articles\/s41586-025-09323-1#Fig4\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\" target=\"_blank\">4a<\/a>, in which we plot the ratio of inversion S\u2009\u2208\u2009[0,\u20091] over the measured \u0394\u03bdFWHM as a function of the Rabi frequency \u03a90\/(2\u03c0) applied to sampled spin resonances. The purple data points are for one \u03bdc,PT measurement and the blue points are for four averages that are used to extrapolate \u03bdL. The grey lines represent the calculated scalings for different cyclotron frequency fluctuations between \u03c3\u2009=\u200930 and 100\u2009mHz. More than four \u03bdc,PT averages, due to a random walk in the field of the superconducting magnet, adds further fluctuation, broadening the Larmor resonance line again.<\/p>\n<p>Fig. 4: Antiproton spin resonance.<a class=\"c-article-section__figure-link\" data-test=\"img-link\" data-track=\"click\" data-track-label=\"image\" data-track-action=\"view figure\" href=\"https:\/\/www.nature.com\/articles\/s41586-025-09323-1\/figures\/4\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\" target=\"_blank\"><img decoding=\"async\" aria-describedby=\"Fig4\" src=\"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/us\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/07\/41586_2025_9323_Fig4_HTML.png\" alt=\"figure 4\" loading=\"lazy\" width=\"685\" height=\"707\"\/><\/a><\/p>\n<p>a, Signal S\/\u0394\u03bdFWHM for different Rabi frequencies and \u03c3c,PT. The grey lines are calculated results for \u03c3c,PT\u2009=\u200930, 40, 60, 80 and 100\u2009mHz. b, Measured coherent \u03bdL resonance at the optimized parameters found in the experiment, blue scatters and best least-squares fit of a Voigt profile to the data (solid red line). The grey data points are from the previously measured antiproton g-factor resonance<a data-track=\"click\" data-track-action=\"reference anchor\" data-track-label=\"link\" data-test=\"citation-ref\" aria-label=\"Reference 8\" title=\"Smorra, C. et al. A parts-per-billion measurement of the antiproton magnetic moment. Nature 550, 371&#x2013;374 (2017).\" href=\"http:\/\/www.nature.com\/articles\/s41586-025-09323-1#ref-CR8\" id=\"ref-link-section-d11398050e2718\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\" target=\"_blank\">8<\/a>. The coherent line has 1.54 times higher signal-to-noise ratio and a FWHM (green vertical lines) that is about 16 times narrower than the width in ref.\u2009<a data-track=\"click\" data-track-action=\"reference anchor\" data-track-label=\"link\" data-test=\"citation-ref\" aria-label=\"Reference 8\" title=\"Smorra, C. et al. A parts-per-billion measurement of the antiproton magnetic moment. Nature 550, 371&#x2013;374 (2017).\" href=\"http:\/\/www.nature.com\/articles\/s41586-025-09323-1#ref-CR8\" id=\"ref-link-section-d11398050e2723\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\" target=\"_blank\">8<\/a>. For both plots, the uncertainty bars represent the standard deviations of the measured data distributions.<\/p>\n<p>By systematically scanning the interrogation times and Rabi frequencies, we obtain at \u03a90\/(2\u03c0)\u2009\u2248\u200950\u2009mHz and a drive time of 16\u2009s a signal inversion of 0.77(4) at \u0394\u03bdFWHM\u2009=\u2009156(4)\u2009mHz, as shown in Fig. <a data-track=\"click\" data-track-label=\"link\" data-track-action=\"figure anchor\" href=\"http:\/\/www.nature.com\/articles\/s41586-025-09323-1#Fig4\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\" target=\"_blank\">4b<\/a>. The blue data points represent the measurement described here and the red line is a fit of a Voigt profile. Compared with the previous most precise measurement of the antiproton magnetic moment<a data-track=\"click\" data-track-action=\"reference anchor\" data-track-label=\"link\" data-test=\"citation-ref\" aria-label=\"Reference 8\" title=\"Smorra, C. et al. A parts-per-billion measurement of the antiproton magnetic moment. Nature 550, 371&#x2013;374 (2017).\" href=\"http:\/\/www.nature.com\/articles\/s41586-025-09323-1#ref-CR8\" id=\"ref-link-section-d11398050e2749\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\" target=\"_blank\">8<\/a> (grey data in Fig. <a data-track=\"click\" data-track-label=\"link\" data-track-action=\"figure anchor\" href=\"http:\/\/www.nature.com\/articles\/s41586-025-09323-1#Fig4\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\" target=\"_blank\">4b<\/a>), this corresponds to an increase of the inversion by a factor of 1.54 at a 16-fold reduction of the FWHM of the resonance line. The line-centre determination of the dataset is at a level of 12\u2009mHz or 150\u2009ppt statistical uncertainty, ten times more accurate than in ref.\u2009<a data-track=\"click\" data-track-action=\"reference anchor\" data-track-label=\"link\" data-test=\"citation-ref\" aria-label=\"Reference 8\" title=\"Smorra, C. et al. A parts-per-billion measurement of the antiproton magnetic moment. Nature 550, 371&#x2013;374 (2017).\" href=\"http:\/\/www.nature.com\/articles\/s41586-025-09323-1#ref-CR8\" id=\"ref-link-section-d11398050e2757\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\" target=\"_blank\">8<\/a>. Note that this resonance was sampled during a data-taking period of only about 60\u2009h, whereas the data accumulation in our previous measurement took place over a period of two months.<\/p>\n<p>The statistical uncertainty in determining the line centre of such g-factor resonances scales proportionally to \u0394\u03bdFWHM\/S. Consequently, on the basis of our coherent spin spectroscopy data, we infer that, under present experimental conditions\u2014relative to those reported in ref.\u2009<a data-track=\"click\" data-track-action=\"reference anchor\" data-track-label=\"link\" data-test=\"citation-ref\" aria-label=\"Reference 8\" title=\"Smorra, C. et al. A parts-per-billion measurement of the antiproton magnetic moment. Nature 550, 371&#x2013;374 (2017).\" href=\"http:\/\/www.nature.com\/articles\/s41586-025-09323-1#ref-CR8\" id=\"ref-link-section-d11398050e2774\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\" target=\"_blank\">8<\/a>\u2014an approximately 25-fold improvement in the statistical precision of the g-factor line-centre determination is achievable. However, the two-particle method introduces systematic limitations on the interpretation of the measured line centre. Specifically, the transfer of particles between the AT and the PT induces magnetic field variations and voltage settling drifts. These effects undermine the critical assumption that the magnetic field remains constant between the \u03bdc,PT measurements and the application of the Larmor drive\u2014a requirement for the precise determination of the antiproton magnetic moment. Quantifying the complete systematic uncertainty budget within the limited three-month annual shutdown of the accelerator remains a substantial challenge. Because accelerator operation reduces the spin coherence time by nearly an order of magnitude, systematic shifts during on and off periods differ. Although using a single-particle double-trap technique<a data-track=\"click\" data-track-action=\"reference anchor\" data-track-label=\"link\" data-test=\"citation-ref\" aria-label=\"Reference 21\" title=\"Mooser, A. et al. Direct high-precision measurement of the magnetic moment of the proton. Nature 509, 596&#x2013;599 (2014).\" href=\"http:\/\/www.nature.com\/articles\/s41586-025-09323-1#ref-CR21\" id=\"ref-link-section-d11398050e2786\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\" target=\"_blank\">21<\/a> could mitigate the present systematic uncertainties, this approach would substantially extend the required data acquisition time\u2014beyond what is feasible during the short shutdown windows. To address these limitations, we have developed the transportable antiproton trap BASE-STEP<a data-track=\"click\" data-track-action=\"reference anchor\" data-track-label=\"link\" data-test=\"citation-ref\" aria-label=\"Reference 32\" title=\"Smorra, C. et al. BASE-STEP: a transportable antiproton reservoir for fundamental interaction studies. Rev. Sci. Instrum. 94, 113201 (2023).\" href=\"http:\/\/www.nature.com\/articles\/s41586-025-09323-1#ref-CR32\" id=\"ref-link-section-d11398050e2790\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\" target=\"_blank\">32<\/a>, enabling the relocation of antiprotons to dedicated, quiet laboratory environments at HHU D\u00fcsseldorf and CERN. These facilities will host precision experiments not exposed to accelerator-induced magnetic field fluctuations. By combining coherent spin quantum spectroscopy with phase-coherent cyclotron frequency measurements in such an environment, it will become feasible to suppress magnetic field noise by at least a factor of five. This would allow statistical resolutions of the g-factor line centre at the level of approximately 10\u2009ppt. The application of these techniques to the proton would open the path towards one of the most stringent tests of CPT invariance in the baryon sector<a data-track=\"click\" data-track-action=\"reference anchor\" data-track-label=\"link\" data-test=\"citation-ref\" aria-label=\"Reference 12\" title=\"Kostelecky, V. A. &amp; Russell, N. Data tables for Lorentz and CPT violation. Rev. Mod. Phys. 83, 11 (2011).\" href=\"http:\/\/www.nature.com\/articles\/s41586-025-09323-1#ref-CR12\" id=\"ref-link-section-d11398050e2797\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\" target=\"_blank\">12<\/a>.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"Precision measurements of the magnetic properties of simple systems stand as a powerful tool for investigating fundamental physics,&hellip;\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":31784,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[49],"tags":[26616,1159,1160,199,3398,79],"class_list":{"0":"post-31783","1":"post","2":"type-post","3":"status-publish","4":"format-standard","5":"has-post-thumbnail","7":"category-physics","8":"tag-exotic-atoms-and-molecules","9":"tag-humanities-and-social-sciences","10":"tag-multidisciplinary","11":"tag-physics","12":"tag-quantum-metrology","13":"tag-science"},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/31783","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=31783"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/31783\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/31784"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=31783"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=31783"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=31783"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}