{"id":367112,"date":"2025-12-24T07:32:14","date_gmt":"2025-12-24T07:32:14","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/us\/367112\/"},"modified":"2025-12-24T07:32:14","modified_gmt":"2025-12-24T07:32:14","slug":"trump-is-manipulating-national-security-to-stop-energy-projects-he-doesnt-like","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/us\/367112\/","title":{"rendered":"Trump is manipulating national security to stop energy projects he doesn\u2019t like"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>On Monday, December 22, <a href=\"https:\/\/www.pbs.org\/newshour\/nation\/trump-administration-pauses-5-offshore-wind-projects-on-the-east-coast-citing-security-concerns\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\" target=\"_blank\">the Trump Administration announced<\/a> it was pausing five major offshore wind energy projects, citing \u201cnational security risks\u201d in <a href=\"https:\/\/www.doi.gov\/pressreleases\/trump-administration-protects-us-national-security-pausing-offshore-wind-leases\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\" target=\"_blank\">new classified studies<\/a> from the Defense Department that suggested the projects could cause \u201cclutter\u201d or radar interference. It\u2019s hard not to conclude that this claim is specious\u2014a new excuse to try to stop wind projects that Trump personally doesn\u2019t like\u2014especially since these projects had all previously been reviewed and approved by the Defense Department with no objections.<\/p>\n<p>Trump has long hated wind, now one of the cheapest forms of new electricity. Over the years <a href=\"https:\/\/www.fastcompany.com\/91264701\/why-donald-trump-hates-wind-power\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\" target=\"_blank\">he has claimed<\/a> that it is expensive (false), causes cancer (false), ruins the environment (false), harms whales (false), and, in what is probably the real problem, affects the views at some of his private golf courses, particularly in Scotland. Stopping wind development also aligns with his long-standing support for the fossil fuel industry. After losing his battle in the UK to stop an offshore wind project near his golf course, <a href=\"https:\/\/www.bbc.com\/news\/articles\/c15l3knp4xyo\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\" target=\"_blank\">he urged the country<\/a> to \u201cget rid of the windmills and bring back the oil.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>The timing of the new Defense Department assessment is also suspicious: Trump\u2019s previous effort to stop offshore wind, an Executive Order blocking offshore wind projects issued in January, was struck down by a federal judge just two weeks ago. A US District Court judge for the District of Massachusetts <a href=\"https:\/\/www.pbs.org\/newshour\/nation\/trump-administration-pauses-5-offshore-wind-projects-on-the-east-coast-citing-security-concerns\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\" target=\"_blank\">vacated that executive order<\/a>, calling it \u201carbitrary and capricious\u201d and a violation of US law, thus forcing the administration to try to cobble together another excuse to stop the projects.<\/p>\n<p>Moreover, if any energy projects should be cancelled because they threaten national security it should be fossil fuel plants, since the US defense and intelligence communities have issued literally dozens of reports, over decades, consistently and clearly identifying fossil-fuel use and climate change as threats to national security and to the facilities and operations of the US military.<\/p>\n<p>For more than fifty years, the US intelligence and defense communities have worked to understand the threats to national and international security from a range of environmental factors, including pollution, population, water and energy resources, and the accelerating impacts of climate change. These assessments have concluded that environmental threats from fossil fuels will both increase the potential for violence, conflict, and war, and have growing impacts on US military forces and infrastructure.<\/p>\n<p>I\u2019ve been reviewing and documenting these assessments for many years, and summaries of them can be found <a href=\"https:\/\/www.gleick.com\/blog\/climate-change-water-the-environment-and-national-security-an-annotated\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\" target=\"_blank\">here<\/a>. The public documents themselves have long been available on government websites, but in the past year many have been censored or deleted (though almost all been archived by different organizations). A few examples?<\/p>\n<p>In December 1974, <a href=\"https:\/\/archive.org\/details\/henry-kissenger-us-gov-pcaab-500\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\" target=\"_blank\">the Nixon administration issued a classified study<\/a> (since declassified) asking:<\/p>\n<p>\u201cShould the U.S. initiate a major research effort to address the growing problems of fresh water supply, ecological damage, and adverse climate?\u201d<\/p>\n<p>The <a href=\"https:\/\/history.defense.gov\/Historical-Sources\/National-Security-Strategy\/\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\" target=\"_blank\">January 1988 National Security Strategy<\/a> from the Reagan White House concluded:<\/p>\n<p>\u201cThe dangerous depletion or contamination of the natural endowments of some nations-soil, forests, water, air \u2026 all create potential threats to the peace and prosperity that are in our national interest, as well as the interests of the affected nations.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>In May 1990, <a href=\"http:\/\/documents.theblackvault.com\/documents\/weather\/climatechange\/globalclimatechange-navy.pdf\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\" target=\"_blank\">a report from the US Naval War College<\/a> concluded:<\/p>\n<p>\u201cNaval operations in the coming half century may be drastically affected by the impact of global climate change. For the Navy to be fully prepared for operations in this future climate environment, resources of both mind and money must be committed to the problem.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>A <a href=\"https:\/\/www.hsdl.org\/?view&amp;did=27823\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\" target=\"_blank\">December 2007 report from the US Joint Forces Command<\/a> said:<\/p>\n<p>\u201c\u2026Projected climate change will seriously exacerbate \u2026 widespread political instability and the likelihood of failed states. Unlike most conventional security threats characterized by the activities of single entities acting in specific ways, climate change has the potential to result in multiple chronic conditions, occurring globally within the same time frame.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>Trump has long tried to hide this information. In March 2019, during the first Trump administration, 58 senior military and national security leaders <a href=\"https:\/\/climateandsecurity.files.wordpress.com\/2019\/03\/letter-to-the-president_senior-military-and-national-security-leaders-denounce-nsc-climate-panel_2019_3_05-1.pdf\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\" target=\"_blank\">sent a letter to him<\/a> decrying his effort \u201cto dispute and undermine military and intelligence judgments on the threat posed by climate change.\u201d Part of that letter said:<\/p>\n<p>\u201cClimate change is real, it is happening now, it is driven by humans, and it is accelerating\u2026 Imposing a political test on reports issued by the science agencies, and forcing a blind spot onto the national security assessments that depend on them, will erode our national security.\u201d<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/www.gleick.com\/blog\/climate-change-water-the-environment-and-national-security-an-annotated-014add79-6222-4e71-b48b-20ff0f4b1d4b\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\" target=\"_blank\">Dozens of other assessments<\/a> all support the same conclusion: Climate changes driven by fossil-fuel combustion pose a clear and present danger to US national security and military operations. Not one of these earlier assessments concluded that wind, solar, or other renewable energy sources posed any national security threat.<\/p>\n<p>For Trump to try to hide this information, while simultaneously producing biased information on non-fossil fuel energy options from a captive \u201cDepartment of War\u201d makes a mockery of our defense and intelligence communities that have a responsibility to produce clear, unbiased, and independent assessments of risks to the country. Climate change is an indisputable threat to peace and security, as is a president willing to manipulate facts to push personal grievances and the interests of his powerful fossil-fuel industry supporters.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"On Monday, December 22, the Trump Administration announced it was pausing five major offshore wind energy projects, citing&hellip;\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":367113,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[47],"tags":[192,79],"class_list":["post-367112","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","category-environment","tag-environment","tag-science"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/367112","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=367112"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/367112\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/367113"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=367112"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=367112"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=367112"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}