{"id":418334,"date":"2026-01-20T08:27:11","date_gmt":"2026-01-20T08:27:11","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/us\/418334\/"},"modified":"2026-01-20T08:27:11","modified_gmt":"2026-01-20T08:27:11","slug":"koepkas-return-rolapps-leadership-livs-next-move","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/us\/418334\/","title":{"rendered":"Koepka&#8217;s return, Rolapp&#8217;s leadership, LIV&#8217;s next move"},"content":{"rendered":"<p class=\"first\">Check in\u00a0<a href=\"https:\/\/golf.com\/tour-confidential\/\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\" target=\"_blank\">every week<\/a>\u00a0for the unfiltered opinions of our writers and editors as they break down the hottest topics in the sport, and join the conversation by tweeting us at\u00a0<a href=\"https:\/\/x.com\/GOLF_com\" rel=\"nofollow\">@golf_com<\/a>. This week, we break down Brooks Koepka\u2019s return to the PGA Tour, how the Tour made it happen and how LIV might respond.<\/p>\n<p>Major news shook the golf world on Monday, when the PGA Tour announced a new <a href=\"https:\/\/golf.com\/news\/brooks-koepka-forfeit-lot-money-rejoin-pga-tour\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener nofollow\">\u201cReturning Member Program\u201d<\/a> that would allow a select number of players who fell under a certain criteria to rejoin the Tour with some penalties and conditions, and that Brooks Koepka had already accepted. What do you believe ultimately led to Koepka\u2019s return?<\/p>\n<p>Josh Berhow, managing editor (<a href=\"http:\/\/x.com\/josh_berhow\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener nofollow\">@Josh_Berhow<\/a>): I don\u2019t think he was ever truly happy at LIV, or at least it wasn\u2019t long before he realized he wasn\u2019t. Sure the money was good but we know Koepka thrives on competition and it simply wasn\u2019t as good or meaningful on LIV. That\u2019s why he\u2019s been so good in the majors, and I think that was hard on him. Plus, while the LIV schedule isn\u2019t as frequent as the PGA Tour, it\u2019s more international travel, which can also be taxing and tough on a guy with a young family. You also have to wonder, with Scottie Scheffler winning 13 times over the last two years, if that motivated him at all. He wants to be measured against the best and no one is better than Scottie right now.<\/p>\n<p>Josh Sens, senior writer (<a href=\"http:\/\/x.com\/joshsens\" rel=\"nofollow\">@joshsens<\/a>): Before he moved to LIV, Koepka made it clear he wasn\u2019t all that interested in regular Tour events. They didn\u2019t fire him up. Ironically, he then jumped to a circuit where every event must have felt like that to him. Clearly he wanted to be back in a more competitive mix.\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>Josh Schrock, news editor (<a href=\"http:\/\/x.com\/schrock_and_awe\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener nofollow\">@Schrock_and_awe<\/a>): Brooks admitted he initially went to LIV because of the uncertainty surrounding his health. He never bought into being a \u201cLIV guy\u201d in the way that Bryson DeChambeau has. He took the money but didn\u2019t do so as some great soldier in pro golf\u2019s civil war. He soured on the idea pretty quickly and once he won the 2023 PGA it seemed like he truly regretted the initial decision. Think Berhow makes a good point about Scheffler\u2019s dominance. You add in Rory McIlroy winning the career Grand Slam and it\u2019s clear that Koepka wanted to come back to compete against the best and feel better prepared to reassert himself as a force at major championships.\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>After winning the 2023 PGA Championship, Koepka has failed to finish in the top 10 in his last 10 major starts, which includes missing three of four cuts last year. Now back on the PGA Tour, do you expect Koepka to return to his former world-beating self?<\/p>\n<p>Berhow: I wouldn\u2019t be surprised to see him bounce back a little. I don\u2019t expect another year that includes three missed cuts but I do think he will find a little better form now that he\u2019s in a better spot personally and playing more regularly. But don\u2019t discount motivation. He knows eyeballs will be on him now and would love to prove to people he hasn\u2019t lost a step.<\/p>\n<p>Sens: I do. Few players are better with a chip on their shoulder. I think he\u2019ll thrive off feeling like he needs to prove himself all over again. He will have to stay healthy, of course.\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>Schrock: Yes. I think preparing for the Masters in Houston or San Antonio and not having to fly to Singapore and South Africa before Augusta should make him sharper and more rested for the big weeks. After a few years of subpar major showings, I expect Koepka to be motivated to silence his \u201cdoubters\u201d again.<\/p>\n<p>Three other LIV players \u2014 Jon Rahm, Bryson DeChambeau and Cameron Smith \u2014 also have the option to return, although they must decide by Feb. 2. In <a href=\"https:\/\/golf.com\/news\/liv-golfers-respond-brooks-koepka\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener nofollow\">press conferences last week<\/a> they said they were staying loyal to LIV, although there\u2019s still time to flip. Do you think any will?<\/p>\n<p>Berhow: I don\u2019t think we will see it, although it\u2019s not a complete zero chance. I can\u2019t see Cam Smith flipping. Bryson has one year left and while his press conference tone was, ahem, interesting, he might play it out and see where he is a year from now. This also gives him a ton of leverage. If there\u2019s anyone who I think could flip, it might be Rahm. He said he wasn\u2019t interested a few days ago but he\u2019s still got two weeks to think about it. And time is a dangerous thing for the mind.<\/p>\n<p>            <a href=\"https:\/\/golf.com\/news\/bryson-dechambeau-new-sponsor-not-work-pga-tour\/\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\" target=\"_blank\"><br \/>\n                <img class=\"lazy inner\" src=\"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/us\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/01\/BrysonKalshi.jpg\" alt=\"Bryson Dechambeau kalshi\"   style=\"background-image: url(https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/us\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/01\/BrysonKalshi.jpg?width=30);\" decoding=\"async\" loading=\"lazy\"\/>            <\/a><\/p>\n<p>            <a href=\"https:\/\/golf.com\/news\/bryson-dechambeau-new-sponsor-not-work-pga-tour\/\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\" target=\"_blank\">Bryson DeChambeau\u2019s newest sponsor would not fly on PGA Tour<\/a><\/p>\n<p>        By:<\/p>\n<p>                    <a href=\"https:\/\/golf.com\/writers\/sean-zak\/\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\" target=\"_blank\"><br \/>\n                Sean Zak            <\/a><\/p>\n<p>Sens: Agreed, Josh. Rahm would be the guy. And as we\u2019ve seen more than once in the LIV era, what players say they\u2019re going to do isn\u2019t always what they end up doing.\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>Schrock: Rahm is the one who all eyes should be on, but we don\u2019t know what his contract looks like and the potential penalty he\u2019d face for trying to bolt. I think he\u2019ll come back but it won\u2019t be by Feb. 2.<\/p>\n<p>The fine print of this rule said only winners of the Players or majors since 2022 would be allowed to return, which notably left out other major winners like Phil Mickelson, Dustin Johnson, Patrick Reed and Sergio Garcia, including non-major winners but big names such as Tyrrell Hatton and Joaquin Niemann. Why was it so specific when it could have been tweaked to allow more?<\/p>\n<p>Berhow: The Tour knows it\u2019s product is driven by stars and these are the guys \u2014 especially Koepka, Rahm and DeChambeau \u2014 who can really make a difference. Plus, with everything that\u2019s happened between the Tour and Mickelson, this seemed like a not-so-subtle way to thumb their nose at him. If the big names leave LIV, that damages it much more than a handful of top-50 guys. You could even make the case that making this group so small puts more pressure on them to make a decision, as they wouldn\u2019t want to be the marquee name left behind.<\/p>\n<p>Sens: The Tour-LIV battle has always been for the big names. This was clearly a play for the guys with the most wattage. That it was also structured in a way that explicitly left out Mickelson must have been a particularly gratifying bonus to the folks in Ponte Vedra.\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>Schrock: Brian Rolapp correctly identified the players who have legitimate value to the PGA Tour. That\u2019s Bryson, Rahm and Brooks. Cam Smith fits into the category they created to shoehorn in the other three. Rolapp is trying to walk a tightrope in bringing back players who improve the PGA Tour\u2019s product without upsetting his current membership. We saw <a href=\"https:\/\/golf.com\/news\/major-champ-critiques-brooks-koepka-tour-return\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener nofollow\">Wyndham Clark say he was \u201cvery torn\u201d<\/a> that Koepka was allowed back with what he deemed a light penalty. But I think players can understand that there are different rules for players who have achieved a certain level of success in the game. It\u2019s a lot harder to sell some of the rank and file on opening the doors for LIV\u2019s non-elite players than it is for Koepka, Rahm and DeChambeau.<\/p>\n<p>In his short time as PGA Tour CEO, Brian Rolapp has already made a major impact. Are you surprised how fast he\u2019s acted? And if you are a rank-and-file PGA Tour player, are you happy, annoyed or indifferent at this move?<\/p>\n<p>Berhow: This is the perfect example of why it was probably beneficial to bring in someone from outside the sport (like Rolapp, from the NFL) who made it simple and said we need to find a way to get our best players back. I can\u2019t imagine this move being made a year or two ago, when it seemed like the sentiment was more, \u201cwe don\u2019t need you.\u201d As for fellow Tour players, I\u2019m sure it\u2019s a mixed reaction, but they won\u2019t get bumped out of events and that\u2019s probably all they care about. The ones who might have more reason to be angry are those who were offered lucrative LIV contracts, turned them down and now realize they could have done both.<\/p>\n<p>Sens: \u00a0Rolapp promised from Day 1 he was going to shake things up. Not surprising that he made good on his word. It was also easier to make a play like this because the climate around the civil war has changed so dramatically. Long gone are the cries of ethical outrage over LIV and the source of its money. It\u2019s now all about winning the fight, not maintaining the moral high ground.\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>Schrock: Not surprised at all. Rolapp is an NFL guy. He carries none of the baggage that Jay Monahan and the rest of the old PGA Tour leadership do with LIV. He wants to improve the PGA Tour and make everyone more money. That\u2019s how the NFL operates and that\u2019s how he will run the PGA Tour. If I\u2019m a player who\u2019s in the middle and didn\u2019t turn down a big offer from LIV to jump, then I\u2019m not concerned by this move. It makes the Tour better and Koepka isn\u2019t taking anyone\u2019s spot and isn\u2019t eligible for sponsor invites into the Signature Events.\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>Was Monday\u2019s news bigger for the PGA Tour or worse for LIV Golf? And what does LIV Golf do now, especially if more players flip?<\/p>\n<p>Berhow: Worse for LIV. It hurt the Tour when Rahm left a couple of years ago, but LIV never made a splashy signing since. Now they are losing one of their few key guys, and if even one more of the three flip in the next two weeks, it would be disastrous. As for what LIV does now? They moved to 72 holes and reapplied for World Ranking points, which they need more than ever. A few more stars wouldn\u2019t hurt either, but at this point it almost seems like allegiances have been made for so many.<\/p>\n<p>Sens: Worse for LIV. The league wants to be seen as more than a well-funded novelty act. It wants to be seen as competitively relevant. It needs to attract big names, not lose them.\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>Schrock: It\u2019s worse for LIV. The offseason has seen them reportedly fail to land the likes of Akshay Bhatia and Si Woo Kim, and now they\u2019ve watched one of their big names walk back across the battlefield to the PGA Tour. If they lose Rahm or Bryson, that will probably end golf\u2019s civil conflict. They will limp forward and keep going because they have bottomless funds and have gained some popularity in markets like Australia, but with a roster of aging former stars and young could-bees, their dream of overtaking the PGA Tour will be buried even deeper than it is now. <\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;&gt;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"Check in\u00a0every week\u00a0for the unfiltered opinions of our writers and editors as they break down the hottest topics&hellip;\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":418335,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[71],"tags":[427,99],"class_list":{"0":"post-418334","1":"post","2":"type-post","3":"status-publish","4":"format-standard","5":"has-post-thumbnail","7":"category-golf","8":"tag-golf","9":"tag-sports"},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/418334","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=418334"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/418334\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/418335"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=418334"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=418334"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=418334"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}