{"id":447139,"date":"2026-02-03T20:03:09","date_gmt":"2026-02-03T20:03:09","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/us\/447139\/"},"modified":"2026-02-03T20:03:09","modified_gmt":"2026-02-03T20:03:09","slug":"new-epstein-files-fail-to-quell-outrage-as-advocates-claim-documents-are-being-withheld-jeffrey-epstein","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/us\/447139\/","title":{"rendered":"New Epstein files fail to quell outrage as advocates claim documents are being withheld | Jeffrey Epstein"},"content":{"rendered":"<p class=\"dcr-130mj7b\">The release of about 3m <a href=\"https:\/\/www.theguardian.com\/us-news\/jeffrey-epstein\" data-link-name=\"in body link\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\" target=\"_blank\">Jeffrey Epstein<\/a> investigative files has failed to quell outrage over justice department officials\u2019 handling of these disclosures, with advocates claiming potentially millions of documents are still being withheld.<\/p>\n<p class=\"dcr-130mj7b\">Donald Trump\u2019s Department of Justice was required to disclose all investigative files by 19 December under the Epstein Files Transparency Act (EFTA). While the justice department did release some documents on that date, last week\u2019s disclosure came nearly six weeks after this deadline.<\/p>\n<p class=\"dcr-130mj7b\">The deputy attorney general, Todd Blanche, who served as Trump\u2019s criminal defense lawyer, told reporters last week that this disclosure marked \u201cthe end of a very comprehensive document identification and review process to ensure transparency to the American people and compliance with the act\u201d.<\/p>\n<p class=\"dcr-130mj7b\">\u201cAfter submitting the final report to Congress as required under the act and publishing the written justifications for redactions in the Federal Register, the department\u2019s obligations under the act will be completed,\u201d Blanche said.<\/p>\n<p class=\"dcr-130mj7b\">He also said that while the justice department had found \u201cmore than 6m pages being identified as potentially responsive\u201d that was because \u201cwe erred on the side of over-collection of materials from various sources to best ensure maximum transparency\u201d.<\/p>\n<p class=\"dcr-130mj7b\">\u201cThe number of responsive pages is significantly smaller than the total number of pages initially collected,\u201d Blanche added. \u201cThat\u2019s why I mentioned a moment ago we\u2019re releasing more than 3m pages today and not the 6m pages that we collected.\u201d<\/p>\n<p class=\"dcr-130mj7b\">The missed deadline and up to 3m files that remain unreleased have prompted criticism and calls for further disclosure to answer how Epstein sexually abused girls with impunity for decades and landed a sweetheart plea deal about 20 years ago that allowed him to avoid federal prosecution.<\/p>\n<p class=\"dcr-130mj7b\">\u201cThe government continues to avoid accountability and has argued that they are not responsible for Epstein\u2019s abuse of hundreds of victims,\u201d said Jennifer Plotkin of Merson Law, which represents more than 30 victims, said. \u201cThe release of the files proves the government failed the victims over and over again.\u201d<\/p>\n<p class=\"dcr-130mj7b\">Dr Ann Olivarius, a women\u2019s rights attorney and founder of the law firm McAllister Olivarius, said the disclosures have not lifted the veil on Epstein\u2019s ongoing evasion of justice until his 2019 prosecution.<\/p>\n<p class=\"dcr-130mj7b\">\u201cWe have plenty of files on Epstein\u2019s depravity. What we are missing are the files on his immunity,\u201d she said. \u201cThe question isn\u2019t just \u2018who was on [Epstein\u2019s] plane?\u2019 but \u2018who made the phone call that stopped the 2007 investigation?\u2019<\/p>\n<p class=\"dcr-130mj7b\">\u201cA disclosure is not complete if it tells us something about the criminal but nothing about the shield.\u201d<\/p>\n<p class=\"dcr-130mj7b\">Olivarius also pointed to the dramatic difference between how many documents were identified as possibly pertinent versus how many were published.<\/p>\n<p class=\"dcr-130mj7b\">\u201cThe DoJ initially identified over 6m pages of interest, yet we have seen roughly half of that. They claim the rest are duplicates or non-responsive,\u201d Olivarius said. \u201cAs an attorney who has spent my career fighting for transparency in cases of systemic abuse, I am suspicious of this. Because the determination of what is responsive is made by the party holding the documents, it is ripe for tactical misuse.\u201d<\/p>\n<p class=\"dcr-130mj7b\">The news website Radar Online, which <a href=\"https:\/\/www.theguardian.com\/us-news\/2025\/aug\/03\/trump-epstein-legal-cases\" data-link-name=\"in body link\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\" target=\"_blank\">filed<\/a> a lawsuit more than eight years ago after the FBI failed to disclosure Epstein files under an April 2017 public records (Foia) request, also said last week\u2019s disclosure was insufficient.<\/p>\n<p class=\"dcr-130mj7b\">\u201cIn addition to the many questionable redactions the public has identified, the DOJ has acknowledged that millions of Epstein records were fully withheld,\u201d a spokesperson for Radar said. \u201cWe have asked the Second Circuit Court of Appeals to send our FOIA case back to the District Court so we directly challenge any efforts to undermine transparency.\u201d<\/p>\n<p class=\"dcr-130mj7b\">Jennifer Freeman, the Marsh Law Firm attorney representing Maria Farmer, has said these disclosures had been \u201ca mess from the start, filled with missed deadlines and ham-fisted redactions, while exposing the identities of survivors\u201d.<\/p>\n<p class=\"dcr-130mj7b\">\u201cThis fight isn\u2019t over \u2013 we won\u2019t allow the federal government to simply dump a couple million documents and wash their hands of one of the largest law enforcement failures in US history,\u201d Freeman said. \u201cAt this point, we have more questions than answers. Where is the rest of Maria Farmer\u2019s FBI file? Where are the records of complaints that so many other women made to FBI and how the FBI investigated those complaints? And why is the DoJ hiding the names of perpetrators while exposing survivors?\u201d<\/p>\n<p class=\"dcr-130mj7b\">Top Democrats, meanwhile, have <a href=\"https:\/\/www.theguardian.com\/us-news\/2026\/feb\/02\/new-epstein-files-democrats-call-cover-up\" data-link-name=\"in body link\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\" target=\"_blank\">slammed<\/a> the handling of these files as Blanche doubled down on the justice department\u2019s work, with him telling ABC News on Sunday:<a href=\"https:\/\/www.theguardian.com\/us-news\/2026\/feb\/01\/epstein-files-todd-blanche-deputy-ag\" data-link-name=\"in body link\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\" target=\"_blank\"> \u201cThis review is over<\/a>.\u201d<\/p>\n<p class=\"dcr-130mj7b\">\u201cWe are witnessing a full-blown cover-up,\u201d congressman Jamie Raskin, the Maryland Democrat, said on CNN\u2019s State of the Union.<\/p>\n<p class=\"dcr-130mj7b\">\u201cThey\u2019ve said there are 6m potentially responsive documents there. They\u2019ve only released 3m with more than 10,000 redactions. What about the other 3m files?\u201d said Raskin, who is the ranking member of the House judiciary committee. \u201cWe\u2019re just getting the dribs and drabs of information coming out, the stuff that they want us to see.\u201d<\/p>\n<p class=\"dcr-130mj7b\">The Guardian contacted the Department of Justice for comment about criticism. A justice department official said in an email: \u201cThis is a tired narrative. Just because you wish something to be true, doesn\u2019t mean it is. This Department produced more than 3.5 million pages in compliance with the law and has disclosed to the public and to Congress what items were not responsive, in accordance with the Act.\u201d<\/p>\n<p class=\"dcr-130mj7b\">The official also said, \u201cI assume all members of Congress read the actual language before voting on it, but if not, our <a href=\"https:\/\/www.justice.gov\/opa\/pr\/department-justice-publishes-35-million-responsive-pages-compliance-epstein-files\" data-link-name=\"in body link\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\" target=\"_blank\">press release<\/a> and letter to Congress clearly spells this out.\u201d<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"The release of about 3m Jeffrey Epstein investigative files has failed to quell outrage over justice department officials\u2019&hellip;\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":447140,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[18],"tags":[23,3,21,19,22,20,25,24],"class_list":{"0":"post-447139","1":"post","2":"type-post","3":"status-publish","4":"format-standard","5":"has-post-thumbnail","7":"category-united-states","8":"tag-america","9":"tag-news","10":"tag-united-states","11":"tag-united-states-of-america","12":"tag-unitedstates","13":"tag-unitedstatesofamerica","14":"tag-us","15":"tag-usa"},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/447139","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=447139"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/447139\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/447140"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=447139"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=447139"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=447139"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}