WASHINGTON \u2014 Congress is struggling to make progress in negotiations to avoid a shutdown of the Department of Homeland Security next week, leaving the two parties squabbling as the House and the Senate left town for a long weekend.<\/p>\n
DHS funding expires Feb. 13, and the talks are stuck in neutral.<\/p>\n
Democrats insisted on a short leash for the department in the recent government funding package as they make demands to rein in ICE and U.S. Border Patrol after federal agents killed two American citizens in Minneapolis.<\/p>\n
House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries and Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer, both New York Democrats, issued a list of 10 demands<\/a> Wednesday evening. They include requiring immigration agents to conduct operations unmasked; show identification; obtain judicial warrants for various operations, which ICE does not require<\/a> to forcibly enter homes; and steer clear of sensitive locations like schools and churches.<\/p>\n Senate Majority Leader John Thune, R-S.D., swiftly dismissed the Democratic proposal.<\/p>\n \u201cIt\u2019s totally unrealistic. Their demand list went from three items to 10 items. It just shows you they\u2019re not, they\u2019re not serious yet,\u201d Thune told reporters, warning that some policies making agents identify themselves would just \u201cset them up to get doxxed.\u201d<\/p>\n \u201cThere\u2019s just a bunch of stuff in there that\u2019s a nonstarter, and they know it,\u201d he added. \u201cThere are a few things that, actually, there\u2019s probably some room to maneuver on there, to negotiate on. But a lot of that stuff, obviously, just wasn\u2019t serious.\u201d<\/p>\n Thune did not say which proposals allowed room for negotiation. Earlier this week, he said the two-week window Democrats sought to reach a deal on DHS changes was \u201can impossibility.\u201d<\/p>\n If Congress misses the deadline, DHS will shut down. Operations that the Trump administration deems essential would continue, like the Transportation Security Administration, the Federal Emergency Management Agency and the Coast Guard, but employees would go without pay. ICE, meanwhile, was given $75 billion under President Donald Trump’s “big, beautiful bill,” which would be unaffected by a shutdown.<\/p>\n Another complication is that Republicans have demands of their own, most notably cutting off funds for \u201csanctuary cities<\/a>,\u201d which refuse to turn in undocumented immigrants to federal authorities.<\/p>\n \u201cWe\u2019re not going to do anything that kneecaps ICE\u2019s ability to do their jobs and enforce the laws that both Republicans and Democrats have voted on and presidents of both parties have enforced,\u201d said Sen. Eric Schmitt, R-Mo. \u201cIf you want to have a real conversation, to me, it starts with ending sanctuary cities.\u201d<\/p>\n Democrats firmly oppose that idea, saying cities are safer if residents can report crimes without fear of deportation.<\/p>\n \u201cObviously, we\u2019re having trouble figuring out the path forward,\u201d Sen. Chris Murphy, D-Conn., who chairs the Appropriations subcommittee overseeing DHS, told reporters.<\/p>\n Sen. Katie Britt, R-Ala., the chair of that panel, said it may be above her pay grade.<\/p>\n \u201cWith a week gone by, it looks like that it needs to go ahead and head to the White House now,\u201d Britt said.<\/p>\n Others agreed that Trump needs to get involved to negotiate a solution with only eight days until DHS funding expires.<\/p>\n \u201cI think that that\u2019s going to help us get this resolved,\u201d said Sen. Lisa Murkowski, R-Alaska.<\/p>\n At times, the Senate appeared to turn into a real-life Spider-Man meme<\/a>, with each senator pointing at someone else on the question of whose responsibility it is to act next.<\/p>\n \u201cI think it\u2019s a little strange that Thune does not want to negotiate,\u201d Murphy said. \u201cHe\u2019s probably right that the White House needs to be involved.\u201d<\/p>\n Said Schumer: \u201cNothing will get done until we know what the Republicans are for, OK? They have to get their act together.\u201d<\/p>\n He added, however, that \u201cour appropriations committees are talking\u201d about the matter, suggesting that staff-level discussions are taking place.<\/p>\n