{"id":458932,"date":"2026-02-09T22:17:53","date_gmt":"2026-02-09T22:17:53","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/us\/458932\/"},"modified":"2026-02-09T22:17:53","modified_gmt":"2026-02-09T22:17:53","slug":"ai-coms-85-million-super-bowl-ad-campaign-falls-foul-as-traffic-crashes-servers-the-campaign-allegedly-cost-15-million-for-the-ads-70-million-for-the-domain-name","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/us\/458932\/","title":{"rendered":"AI.com’s $85 million Super Bowl ad campaign falls foul as traffic crashes servers \u2014 the campaign allegedly cost $15 million for the ads, $70 million for the domain name"},"content":{"rendered":"

AI.com bought its way onto the biggest advertising stage in the world on Sunday night, running a fourth-quarter Super Bowl ad spot that told tens of millions of sports fans worldwide to head to the site and create a handle. Hyped-up viewers arrived in droves, and then the site crashed<\/a>.<\/p>\n

Within minutes of the ad airing, users across social platforms reported that AI.com was either unreachable or stuck in failed sign-up loops, turning what was meant to be the site\u2019s big launch moment into an unexpected stress test that failed right before the eyes of millions. The company soon restored its service, but first impressions count.<\/p>\n

<\/p>\n

In a post on X.com<\/a>, co-founder and CEO Kris Marszalek, best known as the CEO of Crypto.com, said that the company had \u201cprepared for scale, but not for THIS,\u201d later attributing the disruption to external factors outside the company\u2019s control. Marszalek later wrote that the website was \u201chitting Google<\/a> rate limits (which are at their absolute global maximum).\u201d<\/p>\n

You may like<\/p>\n

domain: $70M1 minute superbowl ad: $15Mforgetting to turn on autoscaling right before launch: priceless pic.twitter.com\/pn8Xv6A43tFebruary 9, 2026<\/a><\/p>\n

That excuse might sound like your typical tech bro attempt to pass the buck to somebody else, but there\u2019s some plausibility to his claim given how AI.com\u2019s onboarding works. At launch, the site funnels new users through a single \u201ccontinue with Google\u201d authentication option. Once millions of users suddenly arrived and began attempting to create their AI agents, Google may have begun throttling requests, effectively making the site unusable.<\/p>\n

For a company that reportedly spent $70 million to secure the AI.com domain \u2014 a level of investment that suggests it\u2019s a business that wants to establish itself as a foundational platform \u2014 it\u2019s arguably inexcusable for its first mass-market test to expose a launch stack that had zero redundancy or meaningful margin for error. When the single point of failure gave way in the form of throttled Google authentication requests, it was lights out.<\/p>\n

AI.com is selling itself as a way to create personal AI agents<\/a> that can execute tasks across apps and operate with verifying levels of access depending on subscription tier. That\u2019s an ambitious promise, and that ultimately falls flat when the company behind it can\u2019t even get the basics like user authentication squared away right out of the gate.<\/p>\n

According to Adweek<\/a>, AI accounted for 23% of ads shown during this year\u2019s Super Bowl \u2014 a grim statistic for those of us who are fed up with the force-feeding<\/a>.<\/p>\n

Get Tom’s Hardware’s best news and in-depth reviews, straight to your inbox.<\/p>\n

<\/p>\n

\n

\"Google\n<\/p>\n

<\/a><\/p>\n

Follow Tom’s Hardware on Google News<\/a>, or add us as a preferred source<\/a>, to get our latest news, analysis, & reviews in your feeds.<\/p>\n