Lori Kelley\u2019s deteriorating vision has made it hard for her to find steady work.<\/p>\n
The 59-year-old, who lives in Harrisburg, North Carolina, closed her nonprofit circus arts school last year because she could no longer see well enough to complete paperwork. She then worked making dough at a pizza shop for a bit. Currently, she sorts recyclable materials, including cans and bottles, at a local concert venue. It is her main source of income \u2015 but the work isn\u2019t year-round.<\/p>\n
\u201cThis place knows me, and this place loves me,\u201d Kelley said of her employer. \u201cI don\u2019t have to explain to this place why I can\u2019t read.\u201d<\/p>\n
Kelley, who lives in a camper, survives on less than $10,000 a year. She says that\u2019s possible, in part, because of her Medicaid health coverage, which pays for arthritis and anxiety medications and has enabled doctor visits to manage high blood pressure.<\/p>\n
But she worries about losing that coverage next year, when rules take effect requiring millions of people like Kelley to work, volunteer, attend school, or perform other qualifying activities for at least 80 hours a month.<\/p>\n
\u201cI\u2019m scared right now,\u201d she said.<\/p>\n
Before the coverage changes were signed into law, Republican lawmakers suggested that young, unemployed men were taking advantage of the government health insurance program that provides coverage to millions of low-income or disabled people. Medicaid is not intended for \u201c29-year-old males sitting on their couches playing video games,\u201d House Speaker Mike Johnson told CNN.<\/p>\n
But, in reality, adults ages 50 to 64, particularly women, are likely to be hit hard by the new rules, said Jennifer Tolbert, deputy director of the Program on Medicaid and the Uninsured at KFF, a health information nonprofit that includes KFF Health News. For Kelley and others, the work requirements will create barriers to keeping their coverage, Tolbert said. Many could lose Medicaid as a result, putting their physical and financial health at risk.<\/p>\n
Starting next January, some 20 million low-income Americans in 42 states and Washington, D.C., will need to meet the activity requirements to gain or keep Medicaid health coverage.<\/p>\n
Alabama, Florida, Kansas, Mississippi, South Carolina, Tennessee, Texas, and Wyoming didn\u2019t expand their Medicaid programs to cover additional low-income adults under the Affordable Care Act, so they won\u2019t have to implement the work rules.<\/p>\n
The nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office predicts the work rules will result in at least 5 million fewer people with Medicaid coverage over the next decade. Work rules are the largest driver of coverage losses in the GOP budget law, which slashes nearly $1 trillion to offset the costs of tax breaks that mainly benefit the rich and increase border security, critics say.<\/p>\n
\u201cWe\u2019re talking about saving money at the expense of people\u2019s lives,\u201d said Jane Tavares, a gerontology researcher at the University of Massachusetts Boston. \u201cThe work requirement is just a tool to do that.\u201d<\/p>\n
Department of Health and Human Services spokesperson Andrew Nixon said requiring \u201cable-bodied adults\u201d to work ensures Medicaid\u2019s \u201clong-term sustainability\u201d while safeguarding it for the vulnerable. Exempt are people with disabilities, caregivers, pregnant and postpartum individuals, veterans with total disabilities, and others facing medical or personal hardship, Nixon told KFF Health News.<\/p>\n
Medicaid expansion has provided a lifeline for middle-aged adults who otherwise would lack insurance, according to Georgetown University researchers. Medicaid covers 1 in 5 Americans ages 50 to 64, giving them access to health coverage before they qualify for Medicare at age 65.<\/p>\n
Among women on Medicaid, those ages 50 through 64 are more likely to face challenges keeping their coverage than their younger female peers and are likely to have a greater need for health care services, Tolbert said.<\/p>\n
These middle-aged women are less likely to be working the required number of hours because many serve as family caregivers or have illnesses that limit their ability to work, Tolbert said.<\/p>\n