{"id":497809,"date":"2026-03-01T16:47:10","date_gmt":"2026-03-01T16:47:10","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/us\/497809\/"},"modified":"2026-03-01T16:47:10","modified_gmt":"2026-03-01T16:47:10","slug":"maple-leafs-after-60-how-far-can-toronto-fall-after-a-trade-deadline-sell-off","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/us\/497809\/","title":{"rendered":"Maple Leafs after 60: How far can Toronto fall after a trade deadline sell-off?"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>It\u2019s over. The Toronto Maple Leafs are not making the playoffs and it\u2019s finally time to sell.<\/p>\n<p>Well, it\u2019s finally time for an improvident front office that didn\u2019t <a href=\"https:\/\/www.nytimes.com\/athletic\/6757963\/2025\/10\/29\/maple-leafs-after-10-craig-berube\/\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\" target=\"_blank\">see the signs early<\/a> in the season (or last season, for that matter) and failed to react when the odds were stacked against them. Toronto\u2019s playoff chances fell below 50 percent Nov. 11 and never meaningfully recovered. In the nearly four months since, the Leafs have done nothing to change that.<\/p>\n<p>That it took this long to react to what\u2019s been obvious for months is yet another blight on management that makes it difficult to atone for the last one: trading a pick with only top-five protection for a third-pair defender. With the Leafs\u2019 direction finally decided for them, is it too late to make up ground in the lottery race?<\/p>\n<p>Toronto entered Saturday\u2019s game eight points back of Boston \u2014 but also nine points ahead of fifth-last in the league. As difficult as it would be to sneak into the playoffs, the Leafs find themselves in just as difficult a position to sneak into the league\u2019s bottom five with only 22 games remaining. Their chances of making the playoffs are currently right in line with their chances of nabbing a top-five pick: 7 to 8 percent.<\/p>\n<p>In what\u2019s already a lost season, the likelihood of giving up a top-10 pick to a rival makes things only more bleak. Being bad is supposed to come with some reward for the future; not even getting that makes the season sting even more. To some extent, that\u2019s already a sunk cost, but being proactive in either direction could\u2019ve mitigated that.<\/p>\n<p>With 22 games left, the odds are completely stacked against the Leafs falling to the bottom five \u2014 even with a sell-off. Trading Bobby McMann, Scott Laughton and Oliver Ekman-Larsson only increases the team\u2019s chances of a top-five pick by 3 percentage points. Worse, it potentially cements their chances of giving up a top-10 pick to Boston, with the odds of that jumping from 28 percent to 37 percent. The worse Toronto gets, the more Boston benefits.<\/p>\n<p>Sure, that may be overselling the ability of a team that looks as if it has quit on its coach, a now essential cog in Toronto\u2019s losing goals. But the problem is the three likely players being traded don\u2019t move the needle enough to be bottom-five bad. And that\u2019s while ignoring the fact the teams below Toronto will also be selling.<\/p>\n<p>It\u2019s not just the lack of needle movers being moved, it\u2019s the lack of time to move down. To catch the other bottom-five teams, the Leafs have to be significantly worse than them. Some have suggested shutting down the team\u2019s best players who have been less than 100 percent all year, but we\u2019re now at a point where even that alone probably isn\u2019t enough.<\/p>\n<p>Shutting Matthew Knies down for the rest of the season boosts Toronto\u2019s top-five pick chances to 13 percent. Shutting William Nylander down as well gets them to 19 percent. Add Auston Matthews to that list and it helps a lot, but it\u2019s still not enough to make it a likelihood (Toronto\u2019s top-five pick odds would still be only 34 percent). All the while, the likelihood of a high pick going to Boston becomes only stronger (54 percent in that final scenario).<\/p>\n<p>The issue is that the bottom-five cutoff currently projects to be around 75 points and the Leafs already have 63. The Leafs would be the league\u2019s worst team without all those players in the lineup and expected to play at an abhorrent 61-point pace, but that would still leave them with 79 points, good for sixth-last. Even being the fifth-worst team wouldn\u2019t be hunky-dory due to the likelihood of dropping to sixth or seventh (58 percent) being higher than picking in the top three or fifth. And we all know that 58 percent undersells an extremely Leafy scenario.<\/p>\n<p>All of that leaves the Leafs in no-man\u2019s-land, the worst spot for a non-playoff team, made even uglier by the increasing likelihood that the Leafs will be giving up a premium pick to Boston.<\/p>\n<p>With proper foresight, planning, vision and execution \u2014 all things this management team lacks \u2014 it\u2019s something that this franchise had every opportunity to avoid all season. The front office decided to sit on its hands instead, allowing a poorly built ship to steer itself to its deserved conclusion. In all likelihood, it\u2019s too late to salvage this season\u2019s wreckage.<\/p>\n<p>That leads to one inevitable conclusion: Restock the cupboards for a retool with an eye toward next year\u2019s playoffs. Considering it\u2019ll be the same crew charting that course, don\u2019t hold your breath that they\u2019ll be able to avoid the same self-inflicted wreckage next season either.<\/p>\n<p>Stock watch<\/p>\n<p>The biggest changes in projected value over the last 10 games.<\/p>\n<p>Risers<\/p>\n<p>Max Domi<br \/>Net Rating: up 1.2<\/p>\n<p>Having Domi on the top line is far from ideal for the Leafs. He\u2019s still a defensive liability who struggles against top competition, and that hasn\u2019t changed the longer he\u2019s stayed there. But to Domi\u2019s credit, he has mostly delivered offensively. Over the last 10 games, he has eight points, and since Jan. 1, he has 14 points in 20 games. That\u2019s a 57-point pace.<\/p>\n<p>That trend has pushed his Offensive Rating up to an above-average level, but that still makes him a difficult fit given his below-average Defensive Rating. The question about whether he can drive his own line also remains unanswered. For now, we can just give Domi kudos for looking decent next to Matthews over the last little bit.<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/us\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/03\/USATSI_28168080-scaled.jpg\" rel=\"nofollow noopener noreferrer\"><img decoding=\"async\" loading=\"lazy\" class=\"wp-image-7078038 size-full\" src=\"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/us\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/03\/USATSI_28168080-scaled.jpg\" alt=\"Brandon Carlo of the Maple Leafs, in a white jersey with a blue crest, handles the puck.\" width=\"2560\" height=\"1707\"  \/><\/a><\/p>\n<p>\n      Things are finally starting to look up for Brandon Carlo. (Bob Frid \/ Imagn Images)<\/p>\n<p>Brandon Carlo<br \/>Net Rating: up 1.0<\/p>\n<p>When the Leafs traded for Carlo, fans were sold on him being a top-four solution on the right side despite Carlo being at least a year removed from playing at that level. Carlo had a strong start in Toronto but struggled in the playoffs and looked incredibly off to start the 2025-26 season. Things are finally starting to look up for him, though, as he\u2019s looked a lot better since returning from injury. Since Jan. 6, Carlo has a 49 percent xG rate and 47.5 percent of the goals \u2014 both sadly near the team leads on the blue line.<\/p>\n<p>Carlo has done what\u2019s asked of him defensively, and his Defensive Rating is now back up to average. While he\u2019s still rated as a No. 5 defender, that\u2019s a step up from where he was trending early in the season. If he can continue playing like this, he may be a part of the solution next season.<\/p>\n<p>Fallers<\/p>\n<p>Goaltending<br \/>Net Rating: down 1.8<\/p>\n<p>Goaltending was a big reason the Leafs were a contender last season, and that\u2019s unfortunately not something they\u2019ve been able to repeat this year. Anthony Stolarz\u2019s game has regressed heavily, while Joseph Woll is on a bit of a cold streak. Over the last 10 games, the duo has been well below average in terms of GSAx, Stolarz especially.<\/p>\n<p>Going into the season, the Leafs were projected to have top-five goaltending, even after forecasting some healthy regression. Instead, they\u2019ve been 22nd on the season. That\u2019s been a major part of the team\u2019s issues, and the Woll-Stolarz tandem now projects to rank No. 10 in the league. Good, but nowhere near good enough to salvage the rest.<\/p>\n<p>Troy Stecher<br \/>Net Rating: down 1.0<\/p>\n<p>Stecher was a fantastic story in the immediate aftermath of his waiver claim, but for the second 10-game segment in a row, we\u2019re starting to see why he was on waivers in the first place. Stecher was one of two Leafs defenders who failed to out-chance his opponents over the last 10, and he was badly outscored as well. Stecher\u2019s 3.34 xGA\/60 and 4.23 GA\/60 were both among the worst marks on the team.<\/p>\n<p>Stecher still grades out better than when the Leafs claimed him, but he\u2019s back to looking like a regular third-pair defender rather than a potential top-four solution. Sorry, no Gustav Forsling here.<\/p>\n<p>Stars and scrubs<\/p>\n<p>The top and bottom three Leafs over the last 10 games, relative to expectations.<\/p>\n<p>Stars<\/p>\n<p>William Nylander<br \/>Net Rating: +1.0<\/p>\n<p>Not a single regular Leaf outscored his opponents at five-on-five over the last 10 games, so give credit to Nylander and his almighty 46 percent. Nylander may have only scored one goal in five games, but he was above a point per game and had the team\u2019s strongest xG rate. Even amid injury issues, he\u2019s delivered.<\/p>\n<p>Brandon Carlo<br \/>Net Rating: +0.3<\/p>\n<p>Shoutout to Carlo, one of the few players who didn\u2019t get absolutely torched at five-on-five. That\u2019s especially impressive considering he took on the toughest minutes against a difficult schedule. For once, he looked top-four calibre \u2014 can he sustain that level?<\/p>\n<p>Matias Maccelli<br \/>Net Rating: +0.2<\/p>\n<p>It\u2019s still mystifying to recall that Craig Berube willingly didn\u2019t play Maccelli for a month. Maccelli was once again one of the better Leafs over the last 10 with some strong possession numbers on the second line. For the year, he now leads the Leafs in xG percentage and is producing 1.82 points per 60, a solid rate. With little left to play for, it would be nice to see him get another spin on the top line with Auston Matthews.<\/p>\n<p>Scrubs<\/p>\n<p>Simon Benoit<br \/>Net Rating: -2.3<\/p>\n<p>Sometimes I wonder what this team could\u2019ve accomplished if it hadn\u2019t continued to insist that Benoit was an everyday NHLer. Over the last 10 games, he was outscored 6-1 while posting a dismal 34 percent xG rate. For the season, Benoit has a minus-7.2 Net Rating, the 16th-worst mark in the league.<\/p>\n<p>Nicholas Robertson<br \/>Net Rating: -1.8<\/p>\n<p>I want to believe in Robertson as much as his biggest backers, but his defensive game continues to be spotty. It\u2019s the biggest thing holding him back from the top six. Over the last 10 games, he had a team-worst 3.43 xGA\/60 despite playing the softest minutes on the team.<\/p>\n<p>Nicolas Roy<br \/>Net Rating: -1.8<\/p>\n<p>After some solid stretches, the third line was simply not working over the last little bit. Roy got outscored badly and has been mostly invisible.<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/us\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/03\/Screenshot-2026-02-27-at-3.38.39\u202fPM.png\" rel=\"nofollow noopener noreferrer\"><img decoding=\"async\" class=\"alignnone size-full wp-image-7076266\" src=\"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/us\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/03\/Screenshot-2026-02-27-at-3.38.39\u202fPM.png\" alt=\"\"\/><\/a><\/p>\n<p>Quick questions<\/p>\n<p>A look at where the Leafs are and where they\u2019re going.<\/p>\n<p>Are the Leafs better than they were 10 games ago?<\/p>\n<p>Change in Offensive Rating: -7.0<br \/>Change in Defensive Rating: -1.6<br \/>Change in Net Rating: -8.6<\/p>\n<p>Despite top-five special teams and a 50 percent xG rate, the Leafs went 3-6-0 over the last nine games. A near league-worst 33 percent goal rate at five-on-five was the primary cause for that.<\/p>\n<p>Toronto\u2019s sputtering offense was the big issue here as the Leafs went through an unfortunately timed spell of regression. Toronto\u2019s five-on-five goal rate of 2.66 for the season has now fallen in line with its expected goal rate of 2.58.<\/p>\n<p>Where do the Leafs stand in the Atlantic?<\/p>\n<p>Chances of making the playoffs: 7.9 percent<br \/>Chances of finishing last in the division: 54.5 percent<br \/>Most likely landing spot: 8th<\/p>\n<p>With the top four cruising, the Bruins continuing their winning ways and likely strong finishes from Ottawa and Florida, the Leafs are now the odds-on favorite to finish at the bottom of the Atlantic. Mission accomplished!<\/p>\n<p>Are the Leafs a lottery contender?<\/p>\n<p>Chances of 75 points or fewer: 0.6 percent<br \/>Chances of picking in the top five: 6.9 percent<br \/>League-wide ranking: 18th in Net Rating, 21st in projected points<\/p>\n<p>No, not unless they make the trades they need to and a lot of things go really bad for them over the next month and a half.<\/p>\n<p>\u2014 Data via Evolving Hockey, Natural Stat Trick, and Hockey Stat Cards<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"It\u2019s over. The Toronto Maple Leafs are not making the playoffs and it\u2019s finally time to sell. Well,&hellip;\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":497810,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[66],"tags":[385,99,1788],"class_list":["post-497809","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","category-nhl","tag-nhl","tag-sports","tag-toronto-maple-leafs"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/497809","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=497809"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/497809\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/497810"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=497809"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=497809"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=497809"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}