Five years later, do you believe the Los Angeles Lakers\u2019 2020 bubble championship should have an asterisk attached to it? Daryl Morey, the Philadelphia 76ers president of basketball operations, says so.<\/p>\n
\u201cHad the Rockets won the title, I absolutely would have celebrated it as legitimate, knowing the immense effort and resilience required,\u201d Morey, Houston\u2019s former general manager, told The Athletic\u2019s Joe Vardon in a piece this week<\/a> reflecting on the NBA\u2019s Orlando bubble experiment five years later. \u201cYet, everyone I speak to around the league privately agrees that it doesn\u2019t truly hold up as a genuine championship. Perhaps the lasting legacy of the NBA bubble is that the NBA should be proud of its leadership at both the beginning and end of the pandemic, even though the champion will forever be marked by an asterisk.\u201d<\/p>\n Maybe Morey is just poking fun at Lakers fans or LeBron James, trying to get the goat of a potential GOAT.<\/p>\n But the legitimacy of the Lakers\u2019 2020 title still generates debate among NBA fans. So we asked our staff where they stand on the conversation. Should the Lakers\u2019 accomplishment be looked at with skepticism, like Morey suggests? Seventeen Athletic NBA writers weighed in and, well, every single one voted no on whether the Lakers title should be considered in any way invalid.<\/p>\n That said, several of them argued the 2020 record books should carry a different kind of asterisk \u2014 just not for the reasons you might think.<\/p>\n Vardon<\/a>: There are no asterisks in any record book, in any major professional sport. Why would we apply one here? The Lakers didn\u2019t cheat. Rather, they won the game played by everyone else under the same rules.<\/p>\n Dan Woike:<\/a> The notion of \u201casterisks\u201d in sports should only apply if something cheapens an accomplishment due to things that are controllable. The bubble title is no better, no worse than any other in league history. It is the most different \u2014 and it was played under the same rules for the rest of the league. Under those conditions, the Lakers were the best.<\/p>\n Eric Koreen:<\/a> The 2019-20 NBA season was different than others, sure. There was a giant four-month break in the middle of the regular season, and no travel or crowds in the playoffs. Everybody faced the same obstacles, though. The teams played more than 70 regular-season games \u2014 more than a few lockout-shortened seasons in the last three decades. If anything, teams were healthier than usual. Unless a team cheated, I\u2019m not going to claim \u201casterisk.\u201d<\/p>\n Tony Jones<\/a>: The Lakers started that season 24-3. Right before the COVID-19 shutdown, they were 49-14. They breezed through the playoffs. Los Angeles was the best team in the NBA from Game 1 to Game 82 and from win 1 in the playoffs to win 16. The best team won the NBA title in 2020, without question.<\/p>\n Josh Robbins<\/a>: The notion there should be an asterisk next to the Lakers\u2019 title is hogwash. The Lakers entered the postseason as the Western Conference\u2019s top seed and entered the NBA Finals with a better regular-season win total than their finals opponent, the Miami Heat. If anything, playing in the bubble disadvantaged the Lakers because it robbed them of having four playoff series with home-court advantage. Granted, they didn\u2019t have to play postseason games in Denver when they faced the Nuggets in the conference finals but I think losing home-court advantage throughout the playoffs made the Lakers\u2019 road tougher, rather than easier.<\/p>\n Jon Krawczynski<\/a>: I actually think the Lakers deserve a different kind of asterisk. I think the bubble title needs an asterisk because it was harder than people want to acknowledge, not easier. It is well-documented how miserable teams were. Sequestered from family. Isolated. Doing something for society at large by going to work under very murky circumstances, with so many unanswered health questions, to try to give a shaken country some sense of normalcy. It was an mental endurance test the likes of which we have rarely seen.<\/p>\n Sam Amick<\/a>: Absolutely not. As someone who spent eight weeks inside the bubble, I can personally (and strongly) attest that the experience was mentally taxing in ways that are hard to explain unless you were there. So while I get the physically-based argument that the Lakers, and LeBron in particular, benefited from the lack of travel and increased rest time during that title run, I would counter that they handled the psychological aspect of the challenge far better than any of their counterparts (see: the LA Clippers, Milwaukee Bucks, etc.). That key factor, one that will always make this title even more impressive in my mind, should not be forgotten.<\/p>\n John Hollinger<\/a>: This title was harder than all the other ones, not easier. In addition to (gestures at everything going on at the time), consider this: Winning games meant you couldn\u2019t leave!<\/p>\n Jay King:<\/a> If the NBA appointed an arbiter of championships, Morey would not qualify for the position. As unique as the bubble was, the Lakers won under the same set of rules and circumstances every other team encountered that season. On their way to a championship, they beat Nikola Joki\u0107, James Harden, Russell Westbrook, Carmelo Anthony, Damian Lillard, Jamal Murray and Jimmy Butler, just to name a few. The Lakers\u2019 path was only made tougher by the mental challenges they faced while living away from civilization for months. Though I suppose Morey himself made that path a bit easier by building a center-less team that Los Angeles was able to easily dispose of in the second round.<\/p>\n Mike Vorkunov:<\/a> Putting an asterisk on the Lakers\u2019 championship borders on lawlessness. Let\u2019s put an asterisk on the 2021 Bucks too, since they played in a season where fans were mostly missing. Let\u2019s put an asterisk on every champion in a lockout-shortened season. Let\u2019s put an asterisk on every season where a title contender lost a star to injury. It\u2019s a slippery slope. Every title lives in a vacuum-sealed season, played out under its own conditions. Respect that and move on.<\/p>\n Christian Clark<\/a>: The best team won the championship in 2020. The Lakers were 49-14 before the shutdown. Someone trying to poke holes in their run might point out that Anthony Davis shot the ball unusually well (49.6 percent on midrange shots and 38.3 percent from 3) without fans in the stands. But again, every team was playing in those conditions. As long as the rules are the same for everyone, it\u2019s foolish to diminish the winner\u2019s accomplishments.<\/p>\n Shakeia Taylor<\/a>: The same way teams can only play who is in front of them (injuries, etc.), in this case, teams can only play in the circumstances in front of them.<\/p>\n Eric Nehm<\/a>: Given the context provided and the framing given to me for this question, the answer is clearly no. All championships count the exact same. At some point, though, we\u2019re going to need to have a conversation about what an asterisk means. It doesn\u2019t have a positive or negative connotation, it\u2019s just a symbol used in text to inform someone looking at a record book that there is more context needed to explain whatever precedes that asterisk. Whether we\u2019re talking about seasons shortened by a pandemic or lockouts, seasons played before the 3-point line or the NBA-ABA merger or early seasons that featured less than 10 teams, there are a lot of NBA championships that could use some more context.<\/p>\n Kelly Iko<\/a>: It\u2019s easy for front-office executives, the majority of whom were privileged to remain in the comfort of their homes during a global pandemic, to downplay and essentially discredit the bubble. I\u2019ve spoken to enough players who went through it to know it was one of the most difficult experiences of their professional careers. Between COVID-19 and heightening racial tensions from the outside world, NBA players were put through an awful lot in a relatively short period of time. The Lakers should be celebrated for winning it all \u2014 we\u2019re talking about a team that was on a 65-win pace prior to Orlando \u2014 they were elite and fully deserving of the Larry O\u2019Brien.<\/p>\n Law Murray<\/a>: Congratulations to everyone involved in the 2020 bubble, but I\u2019m good on never talking about this season again. It was a terrible time for everything, including basketball, and here we are discussing salty executive opinions. Yes, the season was different. It certainly benefited some teams more than others to get a four-month break, then have no travel while the postseason played out. But every team knew the circumstances going in. The Lakers got the 16 wins that no one else could get. Asterisk talk is always insufferable, and it all started with a Lakers coach trying to invalidate what Gregg Popovich and the 1999 San Antonio Spurs achieved. At least that team won another title within five years.<\/p>\n