{"id":53212,"date":"2025-08-01T19:16:10","date_gmt":"2025-08-01T19:16:10","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/us\/53212\/"},"modified":"2025-08-01T19:16:10","modified_gmt":"2025-08-01T19:16:10","slug":"machine-learning-orbital-free-density-functional-theory-resolves-shell-effects-in-deformed-nuclei","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/us\/53212\/","title":{"rendered":"Machine learning orbital-free density functional theory resolves shell effects in deformed nuclei"},"content":{"rendered":"

Hohenberg, P. & Kohn, W. Inhomogeneous electron gas. Phys. Rev. 136, B864\u2013B871 (1964).<\/p>\n

ADS<\/a>\u00a0
\n MathSciNet<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Mardirossian, N. & M. H.-G. Thirty years of density functional theory in computational chemistry: an overview and extensive assessment of 200 density functionals. Mol. Phys. 115, 2315\u20132372 (2017).<\/p>\n

ADS<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Kryachko, E. S. & Lude\u00f1a, E. V. Energy density functional theory of many-electron systems, vol. 4 (Springer Science & Business Media, 2012).<\/p>\n

Bender, M., Heenen, P.-H. & Reinhard, P.-G. Self-consistent mean-field models for nuclear structure. Rev. Mod. Phys. 75, 121\u2013180 (2003).<\/p>\n

ADS<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Lalazissis, G. A., Ring, P. & Vretenar, D. Extended density functionals in nuclear structure physics, vol. 641 (Springer Science & Business Media, 2004).<\/p>\n

Meng, J. Relativistic density functional for nuclear structure, vol. 10 (World Scientific, 2016).<\/p>\n

Epelbaum, E., Hammer, H.-W. & Mei\u00dfner, U.-G. Modern theory of nuclear forces. Rev. Mod. Phys. 81, 1773\u20131825 (2009).<\/p>\n

ADS<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Nakatsukasa, T., Matsuyanagi, K., Matsuo, M. & Yabana, K. Time-dependent density-functional description of nuclear dynamics. Rev. Mod. Phys. 88, 045004 (2016).<\/p>\n

ADS<\/a>\u00a0
\n MathSciNet<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Bulgac, A., Forbes, M. M., Jin, S., Perez, R. N. & Schunck, N. Minimal nuclear energy density functional. Phys. Rev. C. 97, 044313 (2018).<\/p>\n

ADS<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Kohn, W. & Sham, L. J. Self-consistent equations including exchange and correlation effects. Phys. Rev. 140, A1133\u2013A1138 (1965).<\/p>\n

ADS<\/a>\u00a0
\n MathSciNet<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Brack, M., Guet, C. & Hakansson, H.-B. Selfconsistent semiclassical description of average nuclear properties-a link between microscopic and macroscopic models. Phys. Rep. 123, 275\u2013364 (1985).<\/p>\n

ADS<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Centelles, M., Schuck, P. & Vi\u00f1as, X. Thomas\u2013Fermi theory for atomic nuclei revisited. Ann. Phys. 322, 363 (2007).<\/p>\n

ADS<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Col\u00f2, G. & Hagino, K. Orbital-free density functional theory: differences and similarities between electronic and nuclear systems. Prog. Theor. Exp. Phys. 2023, 103D01 (2023).<\/p>\n


\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Centelles, M., Pi, M., Vinas, X., Garcias, F. & Barranco, M. Self-consistent extended Thomas-Fermi calculations in nuclei. Nucl. Phys. A 510, 397\u2013416 (1990).<\/p>\n

ADS<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Dutta, A., Arcoragi, J.-P., Pearson, J., Behrman, R. & Tondeur, F. Thomas-Fermi approach to nuclear mass formula: (i). spherical nuclei. Nucl. Phys. A 458, 77\u201394 (1986).<\/p>\n

ADS<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Aboussir, Y., Pearson, J., Dutta, A. & Tondeur, F. Nuclear mass formula via an approximation to the hartree-fock method. At. Data Nucl. Data Tables 61, 127 \u2013 176 (1995).<\/p>\n


\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Brack, M. et al. Funny hills: the shell-correction approach to nuclear shell effects and its applications to the fission process. Rev. Mod. Phys. 44, 320\u2013405 (1972).<\/p>\n

ADS<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Brack, M. & Pauli, H. On Strutinsky\u2019s averaging method. Nucl. Phys. A 207, 401\u2013424 (1973).<\/p>\n

ADS<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Strutinsky, V. Shell effects in nuclear masses and deformation energies. Nucl. Phys. A 95, 420\u2013442 (1967).<\/p>\n

ADS<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Strutinsky, V. “Shells\u201d in deformed nuclei. Nucl. Phys. A 122, 1\u201333 (1968).<\/p>\n

ADS<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Brack, M. & Quentin, P. Self-consistent average density matrices and the Strutinsky energy theorem. Phys. Lett. B 56, 421\u2013423 (1975).<\/p>\n

ADS<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Bohigas, O., Campi, X., Krivine, H. & Treiner, J. Extensions of the Thomas-Fermi approximation for finite nuclei. Phys. Lett. B 64, 381\u2013385 (1976).<\/p>\n

ADS<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Chu, Y., Jennings, B. & Brack, M. Nuclear binding energies and liquid drop parameters in the extended Thomas-Fermi approximation. Phys. Lett. B 68, 407\u2013411 (1977).<\/p>\n

ADS<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Tozer, D. J., Ingamells, V. E. & Handy, N. C. Exchange-correlation potentials. J. Chem. Phys. 105, 9200\u20139213 (1996).<\/p>\n

ADS<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Carleo, G. et al. Machine learning and the physical sciences. Rev. Mod. Phys. 91, 045002 (2019).<\/p>\n

ADS<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Boehnlein, A. et al. Colloquium: machine learning in nuclear physics. Rev. Mod. Phys. 94, 031003 (2022).<\/p>\n

ADS<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

He, W. et al. Machine learning in nuclear physics at low and intermediate energies. Sci. China Phys. Mech. Astron. 66, 282001 (2023).<\/p>\n

ADS<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Niu, Z. M. et al. Radial basis function approach in nuclear mass predictions. Phys. Rev. C. 88, 024325 (2013).<\/p>\n

ADS<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Utama, R., Piekarewicz, J. & Prosper, H. B. Nuclear mass predictions for the crustal composition of neutron stars: a Bayesian neural network approach. Phys. Rev. C. 93, 014311 (2016).<\/p>\n

ADS<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Niu, Z. M. & Liang, H. Z. Nuclear mass predictions based on Bayesian neural network approach with pairing and shell effects. Phys. Lett. B 778, 48 \u2013 53 (2018).<\/p>\n


\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Neufcourt, L., Cao, Y. C., Nazarewicz, W. & Viens, F. Bayesian approach to model-based extrapolation of nuclear observables. Phys. Rev. C. 98, 034318 (2018).<\/p>\n

ADS<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Pastore, A., Neill, D., Powell, H., Medler, K. & Barton, C. Impact of statistical uncertainties on the composition of the outer crust of a neutron star. Phys. Rev. C. 101, 035804 (2020).<\/p>\n

ADS<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Wu, X. H. & Zhao, P. W. Predicting nuclear masses with the kernel ridge regression. Phys. Rev. C. 101, 051301 (R) (2020).<\/p>\n

ADS<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Wu, X. H., Guo, L. H. & Zhao, P. W. Nuclear masses in extended kernel ridge regression with odd-even effects. Phys. Lett. B 819, 136387 (2021).<\/p>\n


\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Wu, X. H., Lu, Y. Y. & Zhao, P. W. Multi-task learning on nuclear masses and separation energies with the kernel ridge regression. Phys. Lett. B 834, 137394 (2022).<\/p>\n


\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Niu, Z. M. & Liang, H. Z. Nuclear mass predictions with machine learning reaching the accuracy required by r-process studies. Phys. Rev. C. 106, L021303 (2022).<\/p>\n

ADS<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Akkoyun, S., Bayram, T., Kara, S. O. & Sinan, A. An artificial neural network application on nuclear charge radii. J. Phys. G Nucl. Part. Phys. 40, 055106 (2013).<\/p>\n

ADS<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Utama, R., Chen, W.-C. & Piekarewicz, J. Nuclear charge radii: density functional theory meets Bayesian neural networks. J. Phys. G Nucl. Part. Phys. 43, 114002 (2016).<\/p>\n

Ma, Y. et al. Predictions of nuclear charge radii and physical interpretations based on the naive Bayesian probability classifier. Phys. Rev. C. 101, 014304 (2020).<\/p>\n

ADS<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Wu, D., Bai, C. L., Sagawa, H. & Zhang, H. Q. Calculation of nuclear charge radii with a trained feed-forward neural network. Phys. Rev. C. 102, 054323 (2020).<\/p>\n

ADS<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Ma, J.-Q. & Zhang, Z.-H. Improved phenomenological nuclear charge radius formulae with kernel ridge regression. Chin. Phys. C. 46, 074105 (2022).<\/p>\n

ADS<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Dong, X.-X., An, R., Lu, J.-X. & Geng, L.-S. Nuclear charge radii in Bayesian neural networks revisited. Phys. Lett. B 838, 137726 (2023).<\/p>\n


\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Niu, Z. M., Liang, H. Z., Sun, B. H., Long, W. H. & Niu, Y. F. Predictions of nuclear \u03b2-decay half-lives with machine learning and their impact on r-process nucleosynthesis. Phys. Rev. C. 99, 064307 (2019).<\/p>\n

ADS<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Lovell, A. E., Nunes, F. M., Catacora-Rios, M. & King, G. B. Recent advances in the quantification of uncertainties in reaction theory. J. Phys. G Nucl. Part. Phys. 48, 014001 (2020).<\/p>\n

ADS<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Wu, D., Bai, C. L., Sagawa, H., Nishimura, S. & Zhang, H. Q. \u03b2-delayed one-neutron emission probabilities within a neural network model. Phys. Rev. C. 104, 054303 (2021).<\/p>\n

ADS<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Saxena, G., Sharma, P. K. & Saxena, P. Modified empirical formulas and machine learning for alpha-decay systematics. J. Phys. G Nucl. Part. Phys. 48, 055103 (2021).<\/p>\n

ADS<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Neudecker, D. et al. Informing nuclear physics via machine learning methods with differential and integral experiments. Phys. Rev. C. 104, 034611 (2021).<\/p>\n

ADS<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Wang, X., Zhu, L. & Su, J. Modeling complex networks of nuclear reaction data for probing their discovery processes. Chin. Phys. C. 45, 124103 (2021).<\/p>\n

ADS<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Huang, T. X., Wu, X. H. & Zhao, P. W. Application of kernel ridge regression in predicting neutron-capture reaction cross-sections. Commun. Theor. Phys. 74, 095302 (2022).<\/p>\n

ADS<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Jiang, W. G., Hagen, G. & Papenbrock, T. Extrapolation of nuclear structure observables with artificial neural networks. Phys. Rev. C. 100, 054326 (2019).<\/p>\n

ADS<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Lasseri, R.-D., Regnier, D., Ebran, J.-P. & Penon, A. Taming nuclear complexity with a committee of multilayer neural networks. Phys. Rev. Lett. 124, 162502 (2020).<\/p>\n

ADS<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Yoshida, S. Nonparametric Bayesian approach to extrapolation problems in configuration interaction methods. Phys. Rev. C. 102, 024305 (2020).<\/p>\n

ADS<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Wang, X., Zhu, L. & Su, J. Providing physics guidance in Bayesian neural networks from the input layer: the case of giant dipole resonance predictions. Phys. Rev. C. 104, 034317 (2021).<\/p>\n

ADS<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Bai, J., Niu, Z., Sun, B. & Niu, Y. The description of giant dipole resonance key parameters with multitask neural networks. Phys. Lett. B 815, 136147 (2021).<\/p>\n


\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Neufcourt, L., Cao, Y., Nazarewicz, W., Olsen, E. & Viens, F. Neutron drip line in the CA region from Bayesian model averaging. Phys. Rev. Lett. 122, 062502 (2019).<\/p>\n

ADS<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Neufcourt, L. et al. Quantified limits of the nuclear landscape. Phys. Rev. C. 101, 044307 (2020).<\/p>\n

ADS<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Wang, Z.-A., Pei, J., Liu, Y. & Qiang, Y. Bayesian evaluation of incomplete fission yields. Phys. Rev. Lett. 123, 122501 (2019).<\/p>\n

ADS<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Lovell, A. E., Mohan, A. T. & Talou, P. Quantifying uncertainties on fission fragment mass yields with mixture density networks. J. Phys. G-Nucl. Part. Phys. 47, 114001 (2020).<\/p>\n

ADS<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Qiao, C. Y. et al. Bayesian evaluation of charge yields of fission fragments of 239U. Phys. Rev. C. 103, 034621 (2021).<\/p>\n

ADS<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Keeble, J. & Rios, A. Machine learning the deuteron. Phys. Lett. B 809, 135743 (2020).<\/p>\n


\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Adams, C., Carleo, G., Lovato, A. & Rocco, N. Variational Monte Carlo calculations of a \u22644 nuclei with an artificial neural-network correlator ansatz. Phys. Rev. Lett. 127, 022502 (2021).<\/p>\n

ADS<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Lovato, A., Adams, C., Carleo, G. & Rocco, N. Hidden-nucleons neural-network quantum states for the nuclear many-body problem. Phys. Rev. Res. 4, 043178 (2022).<\/p>\n


\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Yang, Y. & Zhao, P. A consistent description of the relativistic effects and three-body interactions in atomic nuclei. Phys. Lett. B 835, 137587 (2022).<\/p>\n


\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Yang, Y. L. & Zhao, P. W. Deep-neural-network approach to solving the ab initio nuclear structure problem. Phys. Rev. C. 107, 034320 (2023).<\/p>\n

ADS<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Rigo, M., Hall, B., Hjorth-Jensen, M., Lovato, A. & Pederiva, F. Solving the nuclear pairing model with neural network quantum states. Phys. Rev. E 107, 025310 (2023).<\/p>\n

ADS<\/a>\u00a0
\n MathSciNet<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Pederson, R., Kalita, B. & Burke, K. Machine learning and density functional theory. Nat. Rev. Phys. 4, 357\u2013358 (2022).<\/p>\n


\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Huang, B., von Rudorff, G. F. & von Lilienfeld, O. A. The central role of density functional theory in the ai age. Science 381, 170\u2013175 (2023).<\/p>\n

ADS<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Snyder, J. C., Rupp, M., Hansen, K., M\u00fcller, K.-R. & Burke, K. Finding density functionals with machine learning. Phys. Rev. Lett. 108, 253002 (2012).<\/p>\n

ADS<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Brockherde, F. et al. By-passing the Kohn-Sham equations with machine learning. Nat. Commun. 8, 872 (2017).<\/p>\n

ADS<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Nagai, R., Akashi, R. & Sugino, O. Completing density functional theory by machine learning hidden messages from molecules. npj Computational Mater. 6, 43 (2020).<\/p>\n

ADS<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Bogojeski, M., Vogt-Maranto, L., Tuckerman, M. E., M\u00fcller, K.-R. & Burke, K. Quantum chemical accuracy from density functional approximations via machine learning. Nat. Commun. 11, 5223 (2020).<\/p>\n

ADS<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Moreno, J. R., Carleo, G. & Georges, A. Deep learning the Hohenberg-Kohn maps of density functional theory. Phys. Rev. Lett. 125, 076402 (2020).<\/p>\n

ADS<\/a>\u00a0
\n MathSciNet<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Li, L. et al. Kohn-Sham equations as regularizer: building prior knowledge into machine-learned physics. Phys. Rev. Lett. 126, 036401 (2021).<\/p>\n

ADS<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Kirkpatrick, J. et al. Pushing the frontiers of density functionals by solving the fractional electron problem. Science 374, 1385\u20131389 (2021).<\/p>\n

ADS<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Margraf, J. T. & Reuter, K. Pure non-local machine-learned density functional theory for electron correlation. Nat. Commun. 12, 1\u20137 (2021).<\/p>\n

ADS<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Ma, H., Narayanaswamy, A., Riley, P. & Li, L. Evolving symbolic density functionals. Sci. Adv. 8, eabq0279 (2022).<\/p>\n

ADS<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Bai, Y., Vogt-Maranto, L., Tuckerman, M. E. & Glover, W. J. Machine learning the Hohenberg-Kohn map for molecular excited states. Nat. Commun. 13, 7044 (2022).<\/p>\n

ADS<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Wu, X. H., Ren, Z. X. & Zhao, P. W. Nuclear energy density functionals from machine learning. Phys. Rev. C. 105, L031303 (2022).<\/p>\n

ADS<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Hizawa, N., Hagino, K. & Yoshida, K. Analysis of a Skyrme energy density functional with deep learning. Phys. Rev. C. 108, 034311 (2023).<\/p>\n

ADS<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Chen, Y. Y. & Wu, X. H. Machine learning nuclear orbital-free density functional based on Thomas-Fermi approach. Int. J. Mod. Phys. E 33, 2450012 (2024).<\/p>\n

ADS<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Vautherin, D. Hartree-Fock calculations with Skyrme\u2019s interaction. ii. Axially deformed nuclei. Phys. Rev. C. 7, 296\u2013316 (1973).<\/p>\n

ADS<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Lee, S.-J. et al. Relativistic Hartree calculations for axially deformed nuclei. Phys. Rev. Lett. 57, 2916\u20132919 (1986).<\/p>\n

ADS<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Pannert, W., Ring, P. & Boguta, J. Relativistic mean-field theory and nuclear deformation. Phys. Rev. Lett. 59, 2420\u20132422 (1987).<\/p>\n

ADS<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Dobaczewski, J., Flocard, H. & Treiner, J. Hartree-Fock-Bogolyubov description of nuclei near the neutron-drip line. Nucl. Phys. A 422, 103\u2013139 (1984).<\/p>\n

ADS<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Bender, M., Rutz, K., Reinhard, P.-G. & Maruhn, J. A. Consequences of the center\u2013of\u2013mass correction in nuclear mean\u2013field models. Eur. Phys. J. A 7, 467\u2013478 (2000).<\/p>\n

ADS<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Beiner, M., Flocard, H., Van Giai, N. & Quentin, P. Nuclear ground-state properties and self-consistent calculations with the Skyrme interaction: (i). spherical description. Nucl. Phys. A 238, 29\u201369 (1975).<\/p>\n

ADS<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Slater, J. C. A simplification of the Hartree-Fock method. Phys. Rev. 81, 385\u2013390 (1951).<\/p>\n

ADS<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Staszczak, A., Stoitsov, M., Baran, A. & Nazarewicz, W. Augmented Lagrangian method for constrained nuclear density functional theory. Eur. Phys. J. A 46, 85\u201390 (2010).<\/p>\n

ADS<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

National Nuclear Data Center (NNDC), https:\/\/www.nndc.bnl.gov\/<\/a> (2025).<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"Hohenberg, P. & Kohn, W. Inhomogeneous electron gas. Phys. Rev. 136, B864\u2013B871 (1964). ADS\u00a0 MathSciNet\u00a0 Google Scholar\u00a0 Mardirossian,…\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":53213,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[45],"tags":[182,181,507,40599,257,199,74,37203],"class_list":{"0":"post-53212","1":"post","2":"type-post","3":"status-publish","4":"format-standard","5":"has-post-thumbnail","7":"category-artificial-intelligence","8":"tag-ai","9":"tag-artificial-intelligence","10":"tag-artificialintelligence","11":"tag-electronic-structure-of-atoms-and-molecules","12":"tag-general","13":"tag-physics","14":"tag-technology","15":"tag-theoretical-nuclear-physics"},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/53212","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=53212"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/53212\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/53213"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=53212"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=53212"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=53212"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}