Today\u2019s notice: Sleepy senators finally pass a bill. We\u2019re all just doing our best at the first public House Ethics Committee hearing in quite a while. IVF legislation gets off the ground. Conflicting messages on wildlife protection from the administration. Plus: What do you think Eric Swalwell\u2019s pitch deck looks like?<\/p>\n
THE LATEST<\/p>\n
The partial government shutdown is now in the House\u2019s hands after the Senate essentially threw up their hands and passed a bill by voice vote that would fund most of the department. If signed into law, TSA workers would be officially back on the payroll, and the hours-long security lines at airports would ease up. But the most contentious issue \u2014 Immigration and Customs Enforcement \u2014 remains unfunded.<\/p>\n
After much back-and-forth throughout the week, Republicans presented what they called their \u201clast and final offer\u201d yesterday afternoon. When Democrats didn\u2019t bite \u2014 and instead came back with a bill with a lot of non-starters to Republicans \u2014 the majority pivoted to the bill that was passed<\/a> without opposition around 2:30 a.m.<\/p>\n The bill would fund all of DHS except for parts of Customs and Border Protection, and, of course, ICE, which remains the sticking point. The bill doesn\u2019t include changes to the way immigration agents operate \u2014 something Democrats have been demanding. Democrats have previously said they wouldn\u2019t fund the agency without major reforms after the killings of Alex Pretti and Renee Good at the hands of immigration agents. There hasn\u2019t been a lot of movement so far: Democratic Sen. Chris Coons called it \u201ca real standoff\u201d early Thursday.<\/p>\n But the Senate will get their Spring Break: they can depart for their two-week recess. As for ICE and CBP: Senate Majority Leader John Thune said there\u2019s a \u201cgood possibility\u201d they\u2019ll get funded as part of a reconciliation bill in the coming months.<\/p>\n While the bill still needs to go through the House, President Donald Trump said last night DHS could pay TSA agents while Congress sorted itself out. Democrats claimed they could have done this all along: Sen. Patty Murray, the top Democrat on the Appropriations Committee said Friday\u2019s bill out of the Senate \u201cmirrored\u201d legislation she\u2019d introduced weeks ago and was repeatedly blocked by Republicans. So why didn\u2019t POTUS do this sooner? A senior administration official shifted the blame, telling NOTUS that Republicans have been asking for Democratic votes to fund TSA, but believed Democrats \u201cnegotiated in bad faith.\u201d<\/p>\n \u201cThe administration, after a lengthy review process, identified a pathway out of the Democrat-caused crisis.\u201d<\/p>\n Open tabs: Trump Is Putting His Signature on U.S. Dollar Bills<\/a> (NOTUS); Judge pauses Anthropic\u2019s supply chain risk designation<\/a> (Politico); Middle East Conflict Drags Nasdaq Into a Correction<\/a> (WSJ); As Trump skips CPAC, MAGA\u2019s rifts over Iran war are on display<\/a> (WaPo)<\/p>\n From the Hill<\/p>\n After a nearly seven-hour Ethics Committee hearing yesterday, the panel adjourned without rendering a judgement against Democratic Rep. Sheila Cherfilus-McCormick, who stands accused of nearly 30 ethics violations stemming from allegations that she improperly funneled close to $5 million in COVID-19 relief funds to her 2021 congressional campaign. The committee said it would release its findings as soon as this morning, after which the House can decide if it wants to censure or expel her.<\/p>\n A master class in lawyering, it was not. At one point, Cherfilus-McCormick\u2019s attorney, William Barzee, raised his voice, trying to convince the panel that its finding could taint the jury pool in the congresswoman\u2019s upcoming criminal trial on federal corruption charges. The press, he said, exasperatedly, \u201cis going to say, \u2018Congresswoman guilty.\u2019\u201d<\/p>\n \u201cCandidly, that\u2019s the job of the defense counsel, to ensure that standards are met,\u201d Republican committee member Brad Knott, a former prosecutor, said.<\/p>\n \u201cI agree with you, sir,\u201d Barzee responded, collecting himself. \u201cI\u2019m doing my best.\u201d<\/p>\n First on NOTUS: Last year, Oriana revealed<\/a> Republican Rep. Zach Nunn\u2019s efforts to get White House support for a bill that would fulfill one of the president\u2019s (so far) unkept campaign promises: requiring health insurers to cover the costs of IVF. That effort has now resulted in a bipartisan legislative proposal co-sponsored by Rep. Debbie Wasserman Schultz, Oriana reports<\/a>. In total, a group of 13 lawmakers have signed on.<\/p>\n Will the White House back them? A spox said the administration has not taken a position on the bill yet. Kaylen Silverberg of Americans for IVF helped draft the bill. He\u2019s been in touch with the White House and is holding out hope for Trump\u2019s support. \u201cWhat they want us to do is to go and garner support for the legislation,\u201d he said.<\/p>\n From the coastal waters<\/p>\n Do not protect whales from energy production: Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth has requested a federal panel to exempt oil and gas producers operating in the Gulf of Mexico from restrictions designed to protect the highly endangered Rice\u2019s whale population. NOTUS\u2019 Anna Kramer<\/a> reports that the request is the first time national security has been cited as a reason for an Endangered Species Act exemption.<\/p>\n On the other hand, do protect whales from energy production: The Trump administration\u2019s ongoing war on wind power<\/a> has often cited protecting whales<\/a> as a reason to ban offshore wind farms.<\/p>\n NOTUS INVESTIGATIONS<\/p>\n Swalwell\u2019s pitch: \u201cHe\u2019s peddling the shit out of that thing,\u201d a Democratic operative told NOTUS\u2019 Samuel Larreal<\/a> of Rep. Eric Swalwell\u2019s efforts to lure customers to his AI campaign app, Findraiser.<\/p>\n If you work in Democratic politics, you\u2019ve probably heard about it. Being approached to check out the product is \u201csurprisingly universal,\u201d a Democratic consultant said. Swalwell co-founded the company with Yardena Wolf, his former chief of staff who left his office in December. The pair have sent Democratic lawmakers and staffers texts and emails about their company and talk about it IRL when they can.<\/p>\n Problem? House of Representatives rules prohibit using members\u2019 public office to make money in a side hustle, and strongly discourage even the appearance of it. \u201cHe is a public official who should not be in the business of promoting a private interest of his own or other private interests, regardless of pay,\u201d Meredith McGehee, a congressional ethics watchdog, said.<\/p>\n Swalwell\u2019s team said the congressman and Wolf met with the House Ethics Committee recently and said Swalwell receives no income from Findraiser.<\/p>\n \u201cCongressman Swalwell is working to help Democrats win up and down the ticket. Whether that\u2019s through utilizing 21st Century technology or talking to voters directly about the issues that matter most \u2014 he will continue to use every tool he can to fight Donald Trump and his MAGA cronies,\u201d a spox for Swalwell\u2019s California gubernatorial campaign said.<\/p>\n Our previous reporting found that Findraiser\u2019s customers include Swalwell\u2019s personal friends and political allies, such as Sens. Ruben Gallego and Adam Schiff. The company has received $60,000 from more than a dozen campaigns and Swalwell values it at $200,000 to $500,000 in his congressional disclosures.<\/p>\n NEW ON NOTUS<\/p>\n Violating the STOCK Act while championing it: Sen. Susan Collins\u2019 husband purchased a Pfizer corporate bond worth $15,001 to $50,000 on Feb. 3, but she didn\u2019t disclose it until Wednesday, NOTUS\u2019 Dave Levinthal reports<\/a>. That\u2019s too long a wait to be in compliance with the STOCK Act, which requires many financial transactions by lawmakers and their families to be reported within a 45-day window.<\/p>\n Collins is one of the few lawmakers who worked especially hard to pass that law. \u201cThroughout her entire service in the Senate, Senator Collins has never bought, sold, or owned any individual shares of stock,\u201d a spox told Dave.<\/p>\n