![\"Protesters](\"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/us\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/03\/1774871410_473_.jpeg\")
<\/p>\n <\/p>\n
\n People participate in a protest outside the U.S. Supreme Court on May 15, 2025, over President Trump’s move to end birthright citizenship.<\/p>\n
Jim Watson\/AFP via Getty Images<\/p>\n
hide caption\n <\/p>\n
toggle caption<\/p>\n
Jim Watson\/AFP via Getty Images<\/p>\n
The Supreme Court will hear arguments Wednesday<\/a> on whether all children born in the United States can continue to automatically receive citizenship.<\/p>\n The decision, not expected for months, could reshape what had been a longtime, constitutionally enshrined practice that has been challenged by the Trump administration.<\/p>\n Public opinion on the issue is complicated. Americans are heavily in favor of granting citizenship to children born to parents who were also born in the U.S. \u2014 or to those who immigrated to the U.S. legally. But they are split on \u2014 or much less in support of \u2014 automatic citizenship for children born to parents who immigrated illegally.<\/p>\n Is birthright citizenship a common policy? <\/p>\n Only about three dozen countries<\/a> around the world, mostly in the Western Hemisphere, offer automatic birthright citizenship.<\/p>\n The legal term for the practice is jus sol\u00ed, Latin for “right of soil.” It has roots in colonialism, particularly in South America and Africa, when Western European countries needed more people for labor<\/a> and to outnumber native populations<\/a> in those places. Many African countries abandoned<\/a> the practice after gaining independence.<\/p>\n Other countries in recent decades have also abolished the practice. Ireland did so in 2005 after roughly 80% of voters rejected it<\/a>. The United Kingdom, Australia and New Zealand, India and Pakistan all also have done away with it.<\/p>\n Many countries offer citizenship instead via jus sanguinis, or “right of blood.” In other words, through familial lineage. This month, though, Italy even further restricted<\/a> who qualifies.<\/p>\n What does the Constitution say? <\/p>\n In the United States, birthright citizenship became part of the Constitution in 1868 as an effort to protect recently freed slaves.<\/p>\n It was enacted with the passage of the 14th Amendment. Section 1 of the amendment says<\/a>:<\/p>\n “All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside.”<\/p>\n But President Trump has taken aim at birthright citizenship, passing an executive order<\/a> on Day 1 of his second term to ban it.<\/p>\n Aimed at immigrants who cross the border illegally, the Trump administration argues that the Constitution’s clause is outdated and has been abused.<\/p>\n Where does the public stand? <\/p>\n Public opinion is nuanced on birthright citizenship and can depend on how pollsters ask the question.<\/p>\n When surveys ask about birthright citizenship in general, people largely say they are supportive. But that support begins to crumble when respondents are asked about the parents’ legal status \u2014 with significant divisions by party, race, age and how they get their information.<\/p>\n A Public Religion Research Institute survey<\/a> from December found two-thirds are in favor of granting citizenship “regardless of their parents’ citizenship status.” A large-sample poll by Civic Health and Institutions Project, or CHIP50<\/a>, a survey done in conjunction with multiple universities, found 59% in favor of keeping it.<\/p>\n But both showed higher support than other surveys, and both mentioned in their questions that the right is found in the U.S. Constitution.<\/p>\n Other surveys have found less support. For example:<\/p>\n An NPR\/Ipsos poll<\/a> last year found a slim majority (53%) against ending the practice with 28% in favor. (It asked if people supported or opposed ending the practice.)The Pew Research Center<\/a> showed that more than 9 in 10 support birthright citizenship for those born to parents who immigrated to the U.S. legally, but \u2014 by a 50%-49% margin \u2014 were divided on giving it to those born to parents who are in the country illegally. (Pew asked if certain groups should or should not be considered U.S. citizens.)A YouGov poll<\/a> had 51% in favor with 39% opposed. But that dropped considerably for those not in the country legally. Just 31% said they were in favor of granting citizenship to babies of people who are “undocumented,” as the survey put it, and only 25% for tourists visiting the U.S. (YouGov also did not mention that birthright citizenship is in the Constitution in its questions.)\u00a0Divides by party, race and more <\/p>\n Many polls fairly consistently show majorities of Democrats, Latinos, Black Americans and those who are younger are in favor of birthright citizenship, while majorities of Republicans, especially white Republicans, are against.<\/p>\n For example, Pew found three-quarters of Democrats in support of granting citizenship to children of those who immigrated illegally, but only a quarter of Republicans supported it.<\/p>\n There is a split among Republicans, though. Only 18% of white Republicans are in favor, but 55% of Republican Hispanics are in favor.<\/p>\n![\"An](\"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/us\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/03\/1774871410_219_.jpeg\")
<\/a> <\/p>\n![\"Cases](\"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/us\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/03\/1774871411_858_.jpeg\")
<\/a> <\/p>\n
![\"Travelers](\"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/us\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/03\/1774871412_513_.jpeg\")
<\/a> <\/p>\n![\"A](\"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/us\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/03\/1774871412_189_.jpeg\")
<\/a> <\/p>\n