![\"REDMAGIC](\"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/us\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/11\/REDMAGIC-11-Pro-with-box.jpg\"\/ "\\"REDMAGIC")
<\/p>\n<\/p>\n
Nick Fernandez \/ Android Authority<\/p>\n
TL;DR<\/p>\n
The REDMAGIC 11 Pro phones have been delisted from various 3DMark benchmark rankings.
\nThe phones apparently engaged in benchmark cheating or manipulation.
\nA YouTube video suggests that the phone reaches a ridiculous 55 degrees Celsius in stress tests.<\/p>\n
Update: April 8, 2026 (8:56 AM ET): Nubia has responded following the publication of this article. The company asserted that it views benchmarking as an indicator of potential performance under \u201ccontrolled, high-load conditions.\u201d Check out our article to read the full response<\/a>.<\/p>\n Original article: April 8, 2026 (3:11 AM ET): REDMAGIC<\/a> is one of the few gaming phone manufacturers still on the market, offering devices with capacitive shoulder triggers, active cooling, and a host of other additions. Unfortunately, it looks like the brand\u2019s latest phones have been delisted from a series of benchmark rankings.<\/p>\n Don\u2019t want to miss the best from Android Authority?<\/p>\n \u201cDevices are delisted when the manufacturer has not complied with our benchmark rules,\u201d reads an excerpt of a banner seen on the REDMAGIC 11 Pro series benchmark page.<\/p>\n So what exactly did REDMAGIC do that resulted in its delisting? Well, a Japanese-language YouTube video<\/a> posted last month might have the answer. The channel apparently found a huge gulf between scores achieved with the standard version of the benchmark app and a disguised or stealth version. In fact, the video showed that the REDMAGIC 11 Pro series couldn\u2019t complete its stress test via the standard app, while the stealth version ran to completion.<\/p>\n The YouTube channel also found that the stealth test achieved peak temperatures of roughly 40 degrees Celsius (104 degrees Fahrenheit) while the standard test topped out at a scorching 55 degrees Celsius (131 degrees Fahrenheit). It\u2019s worth noting that this phone has a cooling fan and a liquid-cooling system. So even these radical measures weren\u2019t enough to prevent the phone from getting ridiculously hot.<\/p>\n This is a familiar method of benchmark manipulation, though, as some manufacturers recognize benchmark apps and subsequently boost device performance to achieve maximum scores. This usually has the side effect of much higher device temperatures, which can eventually lead to the phone shutting down the benchmark app for safety reasons. This is clearly the case for the YouTube channel\u2019s test. However, these same manufacturers don\u2019t recognize a disguised version of the same benchmark app, so the phone defaults to a more conservative performance profile with less heating.<\/p>\n This type of behavior is against the rules, as UL Solutions notes on its website:<\/p>\n A platform must run the benchmark without modification as if it were any other application.<\/p>\n There\u2019s nothing technically wrong with having an allowlist of apps and optimizing performance for them accordingly. This happens all the time for games and general apps, allowing your phone to strike the right balance between performance and efficiency for a given task. After all, you don\u2019t need maximum performance for WhatsApp or Google Keep.<\/p>\n What do you think of benchmark cheating\/manipulation?<\/p>\n 45 votes<\/p>\n I’m fine with it, it’s a benchmark after all<\/p>\n 13%<\/p>\n I hate it, as it doesn’t reflect real-world results<\/p>\n 87%<\/p>\n However, this practice is particularly problematic for benchmark apps, as the performance achieved in these benchmarks won\u2019t reflect real-world usage for most people. These inflated scores can find their way into official marketing materials, as brands claim that their phone has the best performance. Oddly enough, some mobile gamers have used this practice to their advantage by running emulators disguised as benchmark apps<\/a> to achieve maximum performance. But this approach comes with a huge rise in device temperature and dramatically shorter battery life.<\/p>\n This isn\u2019t the first time we\u2019ve heard of benchmark manipulation. The realme GT7 Pro previously engaged in similar behavior<\/a> over a year ago, while there have been numerous other cases over the years. Nevertheless, I don\u2019t think REDMAGIC will be the last phone maker accused of benchmark cheating.<\/p>\n We\u2019ve asked REDMAGIC and UL Solutions about this apparent benchmark manipulation and will update the article as soon as the companies respond to our queries.<\/p>\n![\"UL](\"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/us\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/04\/UL-Solution-3DMark-RedMagic-11-Pro-series-page.jpg\"\/ "\\"UL")
<\/p>\n![\"google](\"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/us\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/01\/google_preferred_source_badge_light@2x.png\"\/ "\\"google"){kind=icon}
![\"google](\"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/us\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/01\/google_preferred_source_badge_dark@2x.png\"\/ "\\"google"){kind=icon}
<\/a><\/p>\n![\"Saityo](\"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/us\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/04\/Saityo-Redmagic-11-Pro-series-benchmark-cheating.jpg\"\/ "\\"Saityo")
<\/p>\n