{"id":585115,"date":"2026-04-15T05:32:09","date_gmt":"2026-04-15T05:32:09","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/us\/585115\/"},"modified":"2026-04-15T05:32:09","modified_gmt":"2026-04-15T05:32:09","slug":"a-bittersweet-20th-birthday-for-romneycare","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/us\/585115\/","title":{"rendered":"A Bittersweet 20th Birthday for Romneycare"},"content":{"rendered":"

\"\"<\/a>On April 12, 2006, then-Gov. Mitt Romney signed into law what would be dubbed \u201cRomneycare,\u201d as various state political leaders, including Sen. Edward M. Kennedy, looked on. (Photo by David L Ryan\/Boston Globe via Getty Images)<\/p>\n

Boston
MITT ROMNEY WAS BACK IN MASSACHUSETTS this week to celebrate an achievement that still doesn\u2019t get the credit it deserves\u2014both for how it improved people\u2019s lives and for how it modeled a kind of cooperative, solution-oriented governing that feels increasingly rare.<\/p>\n

The achievement was the 2006 Massachusetts health care reform law. The people who put it together call it \u201cChapter 58\u201d because that\u2019s the official title in the state legislative record. You may know it as \u201cRomneycare,\u201d because Romney was the conservative Republican governor who worked with liberal Democrats to craft and then enact it.<\/p>\n

On Monday, Romney and his former partners, along with dozens of other dignitaries, gathered<\/a> in Faneuil Hall<\/a>, the eighteenth-century meeting place where Romney had signed Chapter 58 almost exactly twenty years ago to the day. They were all there to hail<\/a> the law\u2019s sweeping effects, and to reminisce about how they\u2019d teamed up<\/a> to make it a reality<\/a>.<\/p>\n

\u201cPolitical rivals respected each other, buried political weapons and worked together to find solutions,\u201d Romney said in brief remarks\u2014which came, fittingly, after both the current Democratic governor (Maura Healey) and Romney\u2019s Democratic successor (Deval Patrick) had praised him, generating hearty applause from the audience.<\/p>\n

All that magnanimity wasn\u2019t just for show. It was a recognition of genuine, quantifiable progress. In just the first four years after Chapter 58 became law, the percentage of non-elderly adults without insurance in Massachusetts fell<\/a> from a state-estimated 13.4 percent to 5.8 percent, even as the percentage nationally was growing because the economy at the time had plunged into recession.<\/p>\n

As of 2024, that figure sits at 3.7 percent, according to the Census Bureau<\/a>. And while there are still people with insurance who have a hard time covering premiums and out-of-pocket costs, research has shown<\/a> that the law has reduced economic hardship while improving access to medical care, and that people seem to be<\/a> healthier.<\/p>\n

But Chapter 58 may be just as important for the way it reverberated in national politics, helping to launch a reform effort that eventually produced the Affordable Care Act<\/a>. Key architects of that law have described Chapter 58 as proof of concept\u2014both in the sense that the Massachusetts policy architecture was a prototype for what Obama and his allies ended up creating at the federal level, and in the sense that Chapter 58\u2019s passage demonstrated how enacting a quasi-universal coverage scheme was politically possible.<\/p>\n

In some ways, the impact of \u201cObamacare\u201d nationally has been similar to the impact of Romneycare in Massachusetts: The number of Americans without insurance has fallen to historic lows<\/a>, with data showing that Americans are better off<\/a> financially and medically as a result. But most of the rest of America hasn\u2019t gotten as close to universal coverage as Massachusetts has. A big reason for that is vitriolic opposition from Republicans.<\/p>\n

For starters, Florida, Texas, and eight other states where Republicans hold sway have refused to expand their Medicaid programs<\/a>, a step that more than half the states (including Massachusetts) took in 2014 and most of the remaining states did in the next few years. Because those states, preponderantly in the South, have held out, millions of Americans have remained without coverage, even though the Affordable Care Act means the federal government would pick up most of the cost.<\/p>\n

Share<\/a><\/p>\n

Then there were the repeated efforts to undo the law. During Trump\u2019s first term, Republicans came within one senator\u2019s vote<\/a> of repealing it outright, and when that failed Trump proceeded to use the levers of executive authority to undermine it<\/a>. Since returning to office last year, Trump has worked with Republicans to weaken the Affordable Care Act even more\u2014by enacting history\u2019s largest cuts to Medicaid<\/a>, by refusing to renew temporary extra subsidies<\/a> Joe Biden and the Democrats had put in place, and by dialing back<\/a> the requirements for what insurance must cover.<\/p>\n

In that sense, the story that Romney and the Massachusetts dignitaries were celebrating on Monday is bittersweet. It\u2019s a reminder of what could have been\u2014and what could still be\u2014with a different political mindset, especially in Washington. And probably nobody knows that better than Romney, whose journey through public life allowed him to see policymaking at both its most constructive and its most destructive.<\/p>\n

IF YOU DOUBT HOW IMPORTANT Chapter 58 is to Romney, all you have to do is glance at his portrait<\/a> hanging in the Massachusetts State House. At his request, the artist depicted a copy of the signed law on the desk. The only other item there (besides a lamp) is a portrait of Romney\u2019s wife, Ann.<\/p>\n

\"\"<\/a>The portrait of former Gov. Mitt Romney in the Massachusetts State House (Photo by John Wilcox\/MediaNews Group\/Boston Herald via Getty Images)<\/p>\n

But Romney had not come to office promising to tackle health care, and didn\u2019t take much interest in the issue until a longtime friend and business associate suggested it\u2014appealing to Romney\u2019s analytical side, as a former investment banker, by pointing out that the cost of treating uninsured patients in emergency rooms was likely raising costs for everybody else. \u201cThat began to grind in my mind,\u201d Romney told me in an interview after the anniversary event, \u201cand I began to wonder what in the world can we do.\u201d<\/p>\n

Even that might not have turned health care into Romney\u2019s legacy if not for another circumstance. Massachusetts was on the verge of losing hundreds of millions of dollars a year in extra hospital funding, which it had been receiving through a special program that the administration in Washington\u2014George W. Bush\u2019s\u2014didn\u2019t want to renew. The only way to keep the money was to use it differently, to pay for insurance rather than continue subsidizing hospitals directly.<\/p>\n

This was the point when Romney forged a partnership with Ted Kennedy, the iconic liberal Democratic senator from Massachusetts. It would be difficult to exaggerate how unlikely a pair<\/a> they made, characterologically as well as ideologically, and that\u2019s not to mention the fact that the two had faced off in a bitter, frequently nasty Senate race when Romney tried to unseat Kennedy in 1994.<\/p>\n

But \u201cwe were friendly on a personal basis,\u201d Romney told me, \u201cwe just had different ideas on how to get things done and what was the best thing to do for people.\u201d And the situation with federal funding meant both men could get a win. Romney would get a chance to keep state finances whole, without having to raise taxes or cut spending elsewhere. Kennedy would get a chance to see Massachusetts get close to universal coverage, as he\u2019d long wanted.<\/p>\n

Get 14 day free trial<\/a><\/p>\n

The two ended up visiting the then-outgoing secretary of health and human services on his last day before stepping down, then headed next door for a reception where\u2014by some accounts, though Romney told me he doesn\u2019t remember\u2014the two entertained a crowd by telling jokes about each other. But the Bush administration\u2019s agreement was only the beginning of the process. Massachusetts still had to come up with a new health insurance system, which meant Romney had to work with the overwhelmingly Democratic state legislature.<\/p>\n

They were far apart on everything from the role of employers to the generosity of insurance. They also had to wrangle interest groups\u2014hospitals, insurers, labor unions\u2014each with different agendas and the power to kill a deal. Motivated to save that extra federal money, and pushed by advocates<\/a> who had spent decades clamoring for universal coverage, Romney, legislative leaders, and their respective advisers worked through it all with weekly in-person meetings and daily phone calls. At one point, when negotiations were stalling out, Romney showed up\u2014unannounced\u2014on the doorstep of the House and Senate leaders to demonstrate his commitment to the project.<\/p>\n

\u201cI thought he was drunk and lost,\u201d former state Senate President Robert Travaglini<\/a> deadpanned in his remarks Monday, prompting loud laughter because Romney is an observant Mormon who doesn\u2019t drink alcohol. But Travaglini struck a serious note too, recalling that \u201cwe were capable of putting aside egos, personalities, party affiliations for the good of the people that we represented.\u201d<\/p>\n

They really were\u2014and a year later, all of them were together onstage at Faneuil Hall, where organizers had brought in a fife-and-drum corps and Kennedy quipped that his son had said \u201cwhen Kennedy and Romney support a piece of legislation, usually one of them hasn\u2019t read it.\u201d<\/p>\n

TED KENNEDY HAD MADE no secret of his hope the Massachusetts law would inspire national action\u2014and he would go on to play a key role in making that happen after Obama was elected, up through Kennedy\u2019s death in August 2009. It\u2019s safe to assume Romney also had visions of how the law might play nationally, though more as a signature accomplishment he could tout in his own future run for the presidency.<\/p>\n

A big part of that was the way Romney had insisted on an \u201cindividual mandate<\/a>\u201d\u2014that is, a financial penalty for people who didn\u2019t get insurance. Taking the advice of economists and analysts\u2014and after satisfying himself by poring over the data\u2014Romney was convinced the mandate was necessary in order to keep insurance pools stable. But he also believed it was true to his conservative principles on individual responsibility.<\/p>\n

\u201cIf you\u2019re a young person that\u2019s healthy, you\u2019ve got to have health insurance,\u201d Romney told me, making the same pitch he made countless times while promoting his plan. \u201cWe can\u2019t let you just be out there driving your car, skiing, paragliding and so forth\u2014and if you get hurt, expecting everyone else to pick up the bill.\u201d<\/p>\n

But by the time of his 2012 presidential campaign, fighting the Affordable Care Act had become a defining political cause among Republicans, with the mandate a particularly sore spot among conservatives and libertarians who saw it as the federal government\u2014and Democrats\u2014coercing people into being part of the system.<\/p>\n

Romney made the case<\/a> then (as he did to me Monday) that he too supported repealing the Affordable Care Act, because he never envisioned the Massachusetts system as appropriate for every state. But while he was able to get the nomination, it was yet one more way he never won over the party\u2019s emerging, more extreme wing\u2014which, years later, would become the MAGA base.<\/p>\n

\u201cIt strikes me as a Republican idea to say that if you can afford to buy insurance, you\u2019ve got to have insurance, rather than showing up and expecting to get free care\u2014that strikes me as conservative and Republican,\u201d Romney told me. \u201cBut as soon as Barack Obama started talking about this, Republicans ran for the exits.\u201d<\/p>\n

Republican anger at the Affordable Care Act didn\u2019t dissipate when Romney lost. It festered, and led to actions\u2014such as the elimination<\/a> of a federal fund designed to stabilize<\/a> the insurance market for the first few years of the program\u2019s operation\u2014that made the already difficult task of implementing such a complex law even more difficult.<\/p>\n

That attitude was a stark contrast to the way things unfolded in Massachusetts, where the spirit of cooperation across party and interest groups prevailed even after Romney\u2019s term ended. Early on, stakeholders and local leaders met regularly on how to publicize the law and encourage enrollment, with even the Red Sox<\/a> (through their charitable foundation) lending a hand with promotion.<\/p>\n

And Massachusetts lawmakers didn\u2019t stop trying to improve the system, with each successive governor after Romney (two of them Democratic, one of them Republican) pushing<\/a> for<\/a> reforms<\/a> to address underlying forces constantly making health care more expensive\u2014in part, to make the system more sustainable. That was actually a big theme of the festivities on Monday\u2014the recognition that extending coverage was just one step toward making health care more affordable for everybody, and that success would require the kind of effort that had first led to Chapter 58.<\/p>\n

\u201cWhat made that progress possible in Massachusetts is needed again for this next hurdle we face, which is really around cost and affordability,\u201d Audrey Morse Gasteier<\/a> told me. Gasteier is executive director of the Massachusetts Health Connector, which operates the state\u2019s insurance marketplace and which organized Monday\u2019s event. \u201cIt was part of our hope that this gathering would help remind the Massachusetts health care community that it has it in it to do hard things, and that progress is possible.\u201d<\/p>\n

ROMNEY IN HIS PREPARED REMARKS alluded to the rarity of that kind of cooperative spirit in national politics nowadays: \u201cHaving spent six years in Washington, I have greater appreciation for what we did here in Massachusetts.\u201d He was talking about his term in the U.S. Senate, representing Utah from early 2019 through 2025.<\/p>\n

That is when he carved out the identity for which he\u2019s probably best known today\u2014as a principled conservative who stood up to Trump in his first term, becoming the first senator in history to vote to convict on impeachment charges a president of his own party. That legacy-defining decision earned him all kinds of grief from within the party, especially back home among the MAGA faithful, some of whom famously harassed<\/a> him and chanted \u201ctraitor\u201d as he was flying back to Washington for the January 6, 2021 certification of Joe Biden\u2019s 2020 election win.<\/p>\n

Two years later, Romney announced that he wouldn\u2019t seek a second term\u2014lamenting<\/a> in a press briefing that \u201cthe Republican party today is in the shadow of Donald Trump.\u201d He went on to explain that<\/p>\n

my wing of the party talks about policy and about issues that will make a difference to the lives of the American people. The Trump wing of the party talks about resentments of various kinds, and getting even and settling scores and revisiting the 2020 election.<\/p>\n

Romney had said he was optimistic that his wing of the party would become ascendant again. On Monday, I asked him if he still felt that way. \u201cI\u2019m obviously hopeful, but, no, not optimistic\u2014not optimistic for anytime soon,\u201d he said, moving immediately to speculation on who would inherit the party\u2019s mantle after the president leaves the scene. \u201cI think Vice President Vance is very much in the footsteps of Donald Trump, and will pursue that course if he\u2019s the nominee. I\u2019m not sure about Marco Rubio, maybe he would as well. But I don\u2019t see a big departure.\u201d<\/p>\n

Romney did allow that both Vance and Rubio were \u201csmart guys\u201d who might not be prone to make the same sort of errors Trump has. (Romney didn\u2019t specify which errors, but it\u2019s not hard to imagine what he might have in mind.) And throughout our interview, Romney made clear he thinks Democrats deserve plenty of blame for the degradation of politics\u2014because, he said, they took actions (like using executive orders to wipe out student loans) that violated constitutional norms and staked out positions on cultural issues (like transgender athletes) that he believes made more Americans sympathetic to MAGA.<\/p>\n

But it says something that the MAGA base treats Romney as a persona non grata, while Democrats in one of America\u2019s bluest states will embrace him the way they did on Monday. It\u2019s not because those Massachusetts liberals see in Romney a kindred ideological spirit. It\u2019s because they came to know him as somebody who\u2014despite significant differences of opinion\u2014worked with them to achieve something they could all find worthwhile. That too is a legacy, one especially worth celebrating now.<\/p>\n

Leave a comment<\/a><\/p>\n

Share<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"On April 12, 2006, then-Gov. Mitt Romney signed into law what would be dubbed \u201cRomneycare,\u201d as various state…\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":585116,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[59],"tags":[97,252,253],"class_list":["post-585115","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","category-health-care","tag-health","tag-health-care","tag-healthcare"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/585115","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=585115"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/585115\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/585116"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=585115"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=585115"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=585115"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}