President Trump on Tuesday extended a cease-fire between the United States and Iran that had been set to expire within hours, saying he wanted to give Tehran a chance to come up with a new proposal to end the war.<\/p>\n
In a statement on Truth Social, Mr. Trump attributed his decision to divisions among Iranians about how to proceed and a request from Pakistan, which is attempting to mediate an end to the war. Earlier on Tuesday, Vice President JD Vance postponed his planned trip to Islamabad, where he was expected to lead negotiations with the Iranians.<\/p>\n
\u201cBased on the fact that the Government of Iran is seriously fractured, not unexpectedly so and, upon the request of Field Marshal Asim Munir, and Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif, of Pakistan, we have been asked to hold our Attack on the Country of Iran until such time as their leaders and representatives can come up with a unified proposal,\u201d Mr. Trump wrote.<\/p>\n
\u201cI have therefore directed our Military to continue the Blockade and, in all other respects, remain ready and able, and will therefore extend the Ceasefire until such time as their proposal is submitted, and discussions are concluded, one way or the other.\u201d<\/p>\n
The tone of Mr. Trump\u2019s message was starkly different from earlier in the day, when he had threatened a military attack if Iran did not agree to U.S. demands. \u201cI expect to be bombing,\u201d Mr. Trump said on CNBC on Tuesday morning. \u201cThe military is raring to go.\u201d<\/p>\n
The back-and-forth is part of a by-now familiar pattern by Mr. Trump of threatening and then pulling back, leaving the fate of the negotiations \u2014 and the war \u2014 in flux. It also marks yet another hurdle in the Trump administration\u2019s push to secure an agreement that would curb Iran\u2019s nuclear program, and it comes as the Pentagon has been reviewing military options should Mr. Trump conclude that Tehran is not negotiating in good faith.<\/p>\n
Still, a U.S. official with direct knowledge of the situation said a return to bombing was not imminent even as the Pentagon continued to game out options. The United States remains well-positioned to launch another wave of strikes, having kept its substantial military presence in the Middle East.<\/p>\n
The official also cautioned that Mr. Vance\u2019s trip to Pakistan could be back on at a moment\u2019s notice with the president\u2019s approval. U.S. officials also are looking for a clear sign that Iran\u2019s negotiators have been fully empowered to reach an agreement.<\/p>\n
The United States recently transmitted a written proposal to the Iranians intended to establish base-line points of agreement that could frame more detailed negotiations. The document covers a broad range of issues, but the core sticking points are the same ones that have bedeviled Western negotiators for more than a decade: the scope of Iran\u2019s uranium enrichment program and the fate of its stockpile of enriched uranium.<\/p>\n
It\u2019s unclear what exactly the United States has proposed or what the president would be willing to accept. On enrichment, the American position could range from demanding that Iran abandon enrichment entirely to allowing a limited civilian program under strict oversight by the International Atomic Energy Agency, paired with the closure of Iran\u2019s underground nuclear facilities.<\/p>\n
One of the ideas discussed during negotiations last year was a multinational consortium working with Iran to enrich uranium for civilian uses; potential locations included an island in the Persian Gulf. Regarding the stockpile, negotiators are weighing options including whether Iran should surrender its enriched uranium directly to the United States or transfer it to a third country.<\/p>\n
Also on the table is what the United States might offer in return. Iran has hundreds of billions of dollars in assets frozen under American sanctions as part of Mr. Trump\u2019s maximum-pressure campaign, and administration officials are debating whether releasing some of those funds could be part of a final deal. Officials have also discussed whether the United States and gulf partners such as Saudi Arabia and the United Arab Emirates might offer broader economic integration to Iran.<\/p>\n
Mr. Trump has been adamant in private conversations that his deal must be better than the one struck by President Barack Obama in 2015. Knowing that, Iran hawks close to the president have repeatedly invoked Mr. Obama\u2019s deal as a tactic to keep him from agreeing to what they view as dangerous concessions.<\/p>\n
Any American position on enrichment will have to contend with Iran\u2019s longstanding argument, rooted in its accession to the Nuclear Nonproliferation Treaty, that the pact guarantees signatories the right to enrich uranium for peaceful purposes.<\/p>\n
The negotiations have been run by a tight circle inside the administration. Mr. Vance, along with Jared Kushner and the envoy Steve Witkoff, have served as the principal American interlocutors, with Mr. Vance and Mr. Kushner, the president\u2019s son-in-law, doing most of the talking. On the Pakistani side, Field Marshal Syed Asim Munir has emerged as the critical channel to the Iranians.<\/p>\n
Back in Washington, Situation Room meetings on Iran have typically included Mr. Trump; the White House chief of staff, Susie Wiles; Secretary of State Marco Rubio; the director of national intelligence, John Ratcliffe; and Mr. Vance. Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth and Gen. Dan Caine, the chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, also participate.<\/p>\n
Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent has become increasingly involved as the economic dimensions of a potential deal have come into sharper focus, as has the energy secretary, Chris Wright, though Mr. Trump has vented frustrations with Mr. Wright in recent days after the energy secretary told CNN that gas prices might not drop below $3 until next year. Mr. Trump told The Hill that Mr. Wright was \u201ctotally wrong.\u201d<\/p>\n
The pause in talks caps a turbulent few days of public messaging from Mr. Trump, whose statements have at times appeared at odds with the state of the negotiations.<\/p>\n
In a telephone interview with CBS News on Friday, Mr. Trump declared that Iran had \u201cagreed to everything\u201d and described a joint operation to remove Iranian nuclear material. \u201cOur people, together with the Iranians, are going to work together to go get it. And then we\u2019ll take it to the United States,\u201d he said. Iranian officials quickly disputed the characterization.<\/p>\n