{"id":620989,"date":"2026-05-03T12:06:08","date_gmt":"2026-05-03T12:06:08","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/us\/620989\/"},"modified":"2026-05-03T12:06:08","modified_gmt":"2026-05-03T12:06:08","slug":"why-the-united-states-should-pursue-a-long-term-agreement-and-security-partnership-with-iran-middle-east-monitor","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/us\/620989\/","title":{"rendered":"Why the United States should pursue a long-term agreement and security partnership with Iran \u2013 Middle East Monitor"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Look, the Middle East keeps being this expensive, messy headache for American foreign policy. It\u2019s unstable, it drains resources, and it keeps dragging us into stuff that doesn\u2019t really serve our big-picture interests. So Washington has a pretty straightforward choice right now: keep leaning on those small, super-dependent Gulf monarchies, or finally make the shift toward a long-term agreement and a gradual security partnership with Iran. I know it sounds politically crazy to a lot of people, but the Iran option is honestly more realistic, more sustainable, and way better for letting us focus on the one competition that actually matters \u2014 China.<\/p>\n<p>For years we\u2019ve built our whole regional strategy around these smaller Gulf states. They\u2019ve been handy in some ways, sure. But they\u2019ve got real limits. Small populations, not much land, and zero ability to protect themselves without us babysitting them with bases, ships, and constant crisis management. That setup means America is stuck paying the bill \u2014 money, troops, and political capital \u2014 for problems that aren\u2019t even central to our security. And let\u2019s be honest, some of these allies have made risky moves that pulled everyone deeper into long wars, like the one in <a href=\"https:\/\/www.crisisgroup.org\/qna\/middle-east-north-africa\/yemen-iran-israelpalestine-united-states-saudi-arabia\/houthis-enter-middle-east-war-what-comes-next\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\" target=\"_blank\">Yemen<\/a> that\u2019s still grinding on.<\/p>\n<p>The core problem? These states are security consumers, not producers. They can\u2019t create or hold a stable order on their own. So the US ends up carrying the whole load while they sit back. That imbalance has been expensive and exhausting for decades, and it\u2019s just not sustainable anymore.<\/p>\n<p>Iran is a totally different animal. Big population, huge territory, and centuries of running a real state. It\u2019s a genuine heavyweight in the region that can actually generate its own security and project power.<\/p>\n<p>That changes everything. If we recalibrate the relationship, Iran could actually help lighten America\u2019s burden instead of adding to it. Its reach in places like Iraq and Afghanistan means any lasting stability has to include Tehran \u2014 think tanks like the Carnegie Endowment have been pointing this out for a long time.<\/p>\n<p>People love to paint Iran as purely crazy and ideological, but if you look at how it actually behaves, it\u2019s usually pretty cold and calculating \u2014 weighing costs against benefits. Remember the JCPOA? When the deal was alive and the incentives were clear, Iran stuck to the rules (the IAEA tracked it closely: Yeah, the whole thing fell apart later, but the years it worked proved that real engagement is possible when both sides get something tangible.<\/p>\n<p>The military option is the dangerous fantasy. A straight-up U.S.-Iran war would almost certainly blow up into a bigger regional mess. Iran\u2019s missiles, its networks across the region, and its ability to threaten the Strait of Hormuz could spike oil prices overnight, choke global energy, and tank economies. We\u2019ve seen this movie before in Iraq and Afghanistan \u2014 quick wins that turned into endless, expensive traps.<\/p>\n<p>A long-term agreement, on the other hand, gives us an actual off-ramp. It opens the door to de-escalation, better ways to manage crises, and slow confidence-building steps. It doesn\u2019t have to mean best friends or full diplomatic hugs. Even limited deals on specific issues could cut the risk of mistakes and free up a ton of U.S. bandwidth.<\/p>\n<p>And then there\u2019s the China angle \u2014 probably the strongest reason to do this. The Middle East is turning into a big playground for Chinese money and influence, especially through Belt and Road projects. Because we\u2019ve kept Iran boxed out, Tehran has leaned hard into deals with Beijing. Continued hostility just hands China more leverage and strengthens an anti-American bloc. A smart agreement with Iran could break that pattern, pull Tehran back toward the global economy, and give it space to balance its foreign policy.<\/p>\n<p>At the same time, it would let Washington ease some of its military and diplomatic load in the Gulf so we can actually prioritise the Indo-Pacific where the real long-term contest is happening.<\/p>\n<p>Even a limited, quiet understanding between Washington and Tehran could help build a more stable setup. Iran\u2019s size and position mean it could help keep local flare-ups in check while the U.S. moves to more of an offshore balancing role. It\u2019s a shift away from fragile alliances and endless zero-sum games toward something more practical: deterrence where needed, de-escalation tools, and a shared interest in keeping the region from exploding.<\/p>\n<p>Sure, the path is full of landmines \u2014 deep mistrust on both sides, domestic politics that make compromise hard, and pushback from neighbors who like things the way they are. But history shows old enemies can find practical ways forward when the incentives line up. Look at how the U.S. eventually normalized with Vietnam or opened up to China in the 1970s.<\/p>\n<p>The realistic way in is to start small: targeted deals on concrete problems, quiet confidence-building moves, and steady diplomacy. Those pieces can grow over time.<\/p>\n<p>At the end of the day, this isn\u2019t about picking between a perfect world and disaster. It\u2019s about choosing between a costly, overextended status quo that keeps failing and a tougher but far smarter path. Sticking with the small Gulf states just locks us into more instability and overstretch. A long-term agreement and gradual security partnership with Iran could lower tensions, cut costs, and finally let the U.S. focus on the defining challenge of this century \u2014 managing competition with China. In that bigger picture, engaging Iran isn\u2019t some idealistic side project. It\u2019s plain strategic common sense.<\/p>\n<p class=\"disclaimer\">The views expressed in this article belong to the author and do not necessarily reflect the editorial policy of Middle East Monitor.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"Look, the Middle East keeps being this expensive, messy headache for American foreign policy. It\u2019s unstable, it drains&hellip;\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":620990,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[18],"tags":[23,3,21,19,22,20,25,24],"class_list":["post-620989","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","category-united-states","tag-america","tag-news","tag-united-states","tag-united-states-of-america","tag-unitedstates","tag-unitedstatesofamerica","tag-us","tag-usa"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/620989","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=620989"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/620989\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/620990"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=620989"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=620989"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=620989"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}