{"id":624063,"date":"2026-05-05T02:34:13","date_gmt":"2026-05-05T02:34:13","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/us\/624063\/"},"modified":"2026-05-05T02:34:13","modified_gmt":"2026-05-05T02:34:13","slug":"court-agrees-to-immediately-finalize-voting-rights-act-decision","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/us\/624063\/","title":{"rendered":"Court agrees to immediately finalize Voting Rights Act decision"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>The Supreme Court on Monday night <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scotusblog.com\/cases\/callais-v-louisiana\/\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\" target=\"_blank\">granted a request<\/a> to immediately finalize its opinion in <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scotusblog.com\/cases\/louisiana-v-callais-2\/\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\" target=\"_blank\">Louisiana v. Callais<\/a>, in which it struck down that state\u2019s congressional map, to allow Louisiana to draw a new map in time for the 2026 elections. That map is expected to favor Republicans, who currently hold four of the state\u2019s six seats in the U.S. House of Representatives but could pick up one or even two more under a revised map.<\/p>\n<p>The court\u2019s decision drew <a href=\"https:\/\/www.supremecourt.gov\/opinions\/25pdf\/25a1197_097c.pdf\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\" target=\"_blank\">sharp criticism<\/a> from Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson, the lone dissenter. Jackson argued that the court\u2019s ruling \u201chas spawned chaos in the State of Louisiana.\u201d Justice Samuel Alito, joined by Justices Clarence Thomas and Neil Gorsuch, wrote a concurring opinion that responded to Jackson with equally sharp words, countering that her rhetoric \u201clacks restraint.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>In an <a href=\"https:\/\/www.supremecourt.gov\/opinions\/25pdf\/25a1197_097c.pdf\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\" target=\"_blank\">unsigned, one-paragraph order<\/a>, the court explained that, to give the losing party time to ask the justices to reconsider their decision, the Supreme Court\u2019s clerk normally waits 32 days after a decision is issued before sending a copy of the opinion and the judgment to the lower court. But, the court wrote, in this case the Black voters defending the map at the center of the dispute \u201chave not expressed any intent to ask this Court to reconsider its judgment.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>The court issued <a href=\"https:\/\/www.supremecourt.gov\/opinions\/25pdf\/24-109_21o3.pdf\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\" target=\"_blank\">its decision<\/a> in <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scotusblog.com\/cases\/louisiana-v-callais-2\/\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\" target=\"_blank\">Louisiana v. Callais<\/a> on Wednesday, April 29. By a vote of 6-3, it invalidated a map adopted by the Louisiana Legislature in 2024, which created two majority-Black districts after two lower courts ruled that an earlier map with just one majority-Black district likely violated Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act, which bars racial discrimination in voting.<\/p>\n<p>Later that day, the \u201cnon-African-American\u201d voters who had challenged the 2024 map came to the Supreme Court, <a href=\"https:\/\/www.supremecourt.gov\/DocketPDF\/24\/24-109\/405667\/20260429182953938_4-29-2026_Application%20to%20Expedite.pdf\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\" target=\"_blank\">asking<\/a> the justices to bypass its normal 32-day waiting period and finalize the opinion as soon as possible. The voters told the justices that the Louisiana Legislature was \u201cconsidering pushing back\u201d the deadlines for the state\u2019s congressional primaries to allow them \u201cto occur under a remedial map.\u201d Finalizing the opinion immediately, they argued, could give the state more breathing room in which to operate, given the short timeframe in which the state would need to revise the map.<\/p>\n<p class=\"type-body-s text-text-secondary\">Recommended Citation: Amy Howe, Court agrees to immediately finalize Voting Rights Act decision , SCOTUSblog (May. 4, 2026, 9:06 PM), https:\/\/www.scotusblog.com\/2026\/05\/court-gives-immediate-effect-to-voting-rights-act-decision\/<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"The Supreme Court on Monday night granted a request to immediately finalize its opinion in Louisiana v. Callais,&hellip;\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":624064,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[18],"tags":[23,3,21,19,22,20,25,24],"class_list":["post-624063","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","category-united-states","tag-america","tag-news","tag-united-states","tag-united-states-of-america","tag-unitedstates","tag-unitedstatesofamerica","tag-us","tag-usa"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/624063","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=624063"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/624063\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/624064"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=624063"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=624063"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=624063"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}