Sign up to see the future, today<\/p>\n
Can\u2019t-miss innovations from the bleeding edge of science and tech<\/p>\n
Anyone who\u2019s sat through this year\u2019s NBA playoffs has probably noticed: the basketball league has a big problem with its referees.<\/p>\n
There\u2019s the poor flopping management<\/a> for starters, where players try to exaggerate or fabricate physical contact with opposing teams in order to draw penalty calls. Flopping has become something of an epidemic over the 2026 playoffs, with certain suspects<\/a> flailing to the floor on one in every ten field goal attempts.<\/p>\n Then there are the missed non-physical violations. During a critical game five matchup<\/a> in Oklahoma City earlier this week, refs flubbed a major out-of-bounds call at a crucial point in the later half of the game. Making matters worse, they refused to overturn the call even after huddling to review their decision. That kicked off some major discourse online<\/a> about the call in particular, and the quality of NBA refs in general.<\/p>\n Like his refs, NBA commissioner Adam Silver evidently has his eyes elsewhere. Speaking on the Pat McAfee Show<\/a>, Silver used that game five controversy as a springboard to soft-launch a new AI initiative, which he says could take over for human refs in critical moments.<\/p>\n \u201cThe officiating is incredible,\u201d Silver said, defending NBA officials. \u201cI think, in terms of replay, I think we\u2019re going to get to the point fairly quickly where, for example out-of-bounds\u2026 where, just like [when] you\u2019re a tennis fan and they have Hawk-Eye\u2026 we\u2019re gonna move to a system like that, where that whole category of calls will be automatic.\u201d<\/p>\n Hawk-Eye refers to a Sony-owned camera system which uses high-speed sensors to help refs in sports like baseball, cricket, and soccer make accurate calls on close plays. While Sony advertises the service as accurate within 0.1 inches<\/a>, it\u2019s had quite a few controversies<\/a> itself, and is certainly no substitute for solid refereeing in the moment \u2014 a distinction other major league sports commissioners seem well aware of<\/a>.<\/p>\n According to Silver, however, the NBA\u2019s automated system would supplement referees for line calls, not augment them. <\/p>\n \u201cThose calls will be done by an AI automated system, with cameras lined around the court, and it\u2019ll take all those so-called objective calls out of the hands of the referees,\u201d Silver explained. \u201cIt\u2019ll just be instantaneous, it\u2019ll be automatic, just play on, y\u2019know, let\u2019s go, Spurs in-bounds, and you move on.\u201d <\/p>\n Whether such a system is immediately in the works for the 2026-2027 season was not immediately clear, but the theory seems to be that AI would free up officials to pay more attention to physical issues, like flopping. But poor refereeing, many fans argue, could be better resolved by urging human officials to enforce existing rules<\/a> and simply admit when they get calls wrong<\/a> \u2014 not by cramming AI into the product.<\/p>\n \u201cIdc how much I complain about the refs, I don\u2019t want AI in my basketball game,\u201d one Los Angeles Lakers fan grumbled on X-formerly-Twitter<\/a>. \u201cSmh.\u201d<\/p>\n \u201cIt\u2019s like everything he says is supposed to be a way to decrease confidence in the product,\u201d mused<\/a> writer and New York Knicks devotee Noah Kulwin. \u201cWorst commish in sports or worst commish in sports?\u201d<\/p>\n