{"id":737887,"date":"2026-07-02T00:15:10","date_gmt":"2026-07-02T00:15:10","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/us\/737887\/"},"modified":"2026-07-02T00:15:10","modified_gmt":"2026-07-02T00:15:10","slug":"eso-study-finds-that-no-more-than-100000-satellites-should-orbit-earth","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/us\/737887\/","title":{"rendered":"ESO Study Finds That No More Than 100,000 Satellites Should Orbit Earth"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>A first-of-its-kind study measured the extent to which bright constellations affect astronomers\u2019 view of the night sky, setting a proposed limit to how many satellites should be in Earth\u2019s orbit.<\/p>\n<p>There are currently over 14,000 satellites orbiting Earth, but that number is set to increase dramatically over the next few years. Companies like SpaceX and Reflect Orbital are proposing launching a combined total of 1.7 million satellites, which would have devastating consequences for astronomy, according to the European Southern Observatory (ESO).<\/p>\n<p>By measuring the impact of large satellite constellations, researchers at ESO suggest limiting the total number of existing and future satellites to 100,00 that are faint enough not to be seen with the naked eye from a dark site.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cThis is not a hard number, like 99\u00a0999 is good and 100\u00a0001 is bad: clearly I\u2019d prefer 50\u00a0000,\u201d Olivier Hainaut, an astronomer at ESO and lead author of the new study, said in an <a href=\"https:\/\/www.eso.org\/public\/news\/eso2607\/\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\" target=\"_blank\">ESO statement<\/a>. \u201cBut 100\u00a0000 causes losses at about the level of other technical losses, such as equipment failure.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>The findings are detailed in a <a href=\"https:\/\/www.eso.org\/public\/archives\/releases\/sciencepapers\/eso2607\/eso2607a.pdf\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\" target=\"_blank\">paper<\/a> that will appear in Astronomy &amp; Astrophysics.<\/p>\n<p> The dwindling night skies <\/p>\n<p>The number of satellites in Earth\u2019s orbit has nearly doubled in less than three years. Those bright satellites have already been a major nuisance for astronomers, often appearing as bright streaks in telescope images of the universe and tarnishing views of the night skies.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cSatellites, illuminated by the Sun, are much brighter than distant galaxies,\u201d Hainaut explained. \u201cWhen a satellite crosses what we observe, it makes a bright streak on our image, zapping whatever is behind it.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>\u201cUntil now we have managed, but it\u2019s getting worse,\u201d he added, stressing that current satellite proposals are going beyond the limit of what astronomy can withstand.<\/p>\n<p>Just last month, SpaceX founder and CEO Elon Musk revealed the company\u2019s plans to launch up to a million satellites. \u201cSpace is really big, so it\u2019s not like space is going to get crowded,\u201d Musk said in a <a href=\"https:\/\/x.com\/SpaceX\/status\/2064099405758906727?s=20\" rel=\"nofollow\">video<\/a> posted on X.<\/p>\n<p>SpaceX is not the only culprit in proposed plans to overcrowd Earth\u2019s orbit. Earlier this year, California-startup Reflect Orbital stated that it wants <a href=\"https:\/\/gizmodo.com\/california-startup-wants-to-launch-thousands-of-mirrors-to-space-for-the-dumbest-reason-ever-2000732370\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\" target=\"_blank\">deploy up to 50,000 in-space mirrors<\/a> mounted on satellites to create sunlight after dark.<\/p>\n<p>The proposed number of satellites would dramatically brighten the night sky and hinder our ability to observe faint cosmic targets like distant galaxies, Earth-like planets, as well as potentially dangerous asteroids, according to ESO.<\/p>\n<p> Is there a limit? <\/p>\n<p>To measure the impact of the proposed satellites, the researchers behind the new study simulated the positions, motion, and brightness of all present and planned constellations.<\/p>\n<p>The researchers found that SpaceX\u2019s megaconstellation would produce dozens of trails in each image taken two hours into the night with ESO\u2019s Very Large Telescope, leading to a field-of-view losses of up to 28%. That\u2019s if the satellites are faint enough not to be seen with the naked eye. If they were to be a little bit brighter, most images captured by the National Science Foundation\u2019s Vera C. Rubin Observatory would be rendered unusable for several hours each night.<\/p>\n<p>As for Reflect Orbital\u2019s proposed constellation, the trail from a single mirror-satellite could spoil an observation with a camera like that of the Rubin Observatory. The full fleet of Reflect Orbital\u2019s satellites, when illuminated by the Sun, would lead to the loss of every image from such a camera, according to the study.<\/p>\n<p>Based on these effects, the study proposes a limit of 100,000 satellites below the brightness magnitude 7. If some of them should fall above the minimum threshold for naked-eye visibility, then the limit would need to be much lower.<\/p>\n<p>As of today, both SpaceX and Reflect Orbital are waiting for approval to launch their satellite constellations from the Federal Communications Commission (FCC). \u201cThe ball is now in the FCC\u2019s court, and we wait to see the determinations they make on both filings,\u201d said ESO Institutional Affairs Officer Betty Kioko, who is responsible for coordinating ESO\u2019s response to the proposed constellations. \u201cFor optical astronomy, this is an existential threat, and we hope that the regulators will share that view.\u201d<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"A first-of-its-kind study measured the extent to which bright constellations affect astronomers\u2019 view of the night sky, setting&hellip;\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":737888,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[32],"tags":[6626,13540,79,1513,5408],"class_list":["post-737887","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","category-science","tag-astronomy","tag-satellites","tag-science","tag-spacex","tag-starlink"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/737887","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=737887"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/737887\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/737888"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=737887"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=737887"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=737887"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}