![\"How](\"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/us\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/07\/iphone-20th-anniversary-color-wave.jpg\")
<\/p>\n\t<\/p>\n
Former Apple<\/a> design chief Jony Ive always described his long-term vision for the iPhone design as \u201ca single slab of glass.\u201d Apple is believed to have retained that goal long after Ive left the company, with Liquid Glass<\/a> representing the company\u2019s software prep ahead of the new hardware.<\/p>\n We\u2019ve already seen reports of a number of ways in which the 20th anniversary iPhone<\/a> could take us significantly closer to Apple\u2019s vision, and the latest of these may provide another piece of the puzzle \u2026 <\/p>\n What we\u2019re expecting<\/p>\n It had initially been thought that Apple might create a standalone special edition 20th anniversary iPhone, although more recent reports<\/a> suggest that it will instead be the iPhone 19 Pro<\/a> that gets all the design features intended to create that glass slab look. To further complicate matters, some believe Apple will skip the iPhone 19 naming in order to mark the anniversary, calling it the iPhone 20 Pro.<\/p>\n This far ahead, the reports are highly speculative in nature, but the key design feature is expected to be a display which curves away from the front on all four sides in order to create the illusion of no bezel at all.<\/p>\n It\u2019s looking near-certain that this will be the year when Apple is finally able to embed the Face ID module<\/a> beneath the display, with hopes that the front-facing camera<\/a> and speaker will likewise sit under the screen.<\/p>\n A combination of all of these would provide a very convincing single slab of glass look.<\/p>\n Glass back<\/p>\n Leaker Fixed Focus Digital<\/a> now says there will be another component to the look: namely a return to a glass back instead of the aluminium seen on recent models.<\/p>\n For next year\u2019s Apple iPhone 20, the preferred approach is a return to a glass back, with manufacturing quality likely on par with the first-generation Air. The production facilities have already been prepared.<\/p>\n While a glass back makes for a more fragile device, it would for sure contribute to that single slab of glass look. Would you consider this an acceptable trade-off for a highly futuristic design? Please share your thoughts in the comments.<\/p>\n
![\"Add](\"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/us\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/06\/google-preferred-source-badge-dark.png\"){kind=icon}
![\"Add](\"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/us\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/06\/google-preferred-source-badge-light.png\"){kind=icon}