{"id":766707,"date":"2026-07-16T17:51:13","date_gmt":"2026-07-16T17:51:13","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/us\/766707\/"},"modified":"2026-07-16T17:51:13","modified_gmt":"2026-07-16T17:51:13","slug":"fun-stats-from-the-first-part-of-the-season","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/us\/766707\/","title":{"rendered":"Fun (?) stats from the first part of the season"},"content":{"rendered":"<p class=\"duet--article--dangerously-set-cms-markup duet--article--standard-paragraph _1upudxki _174s0un1 _174s0un0 _1mt21p01\">Remember May 1st? I don\u2019t. But on that date, <a href=\"https:\/\/www.mccoveychronicles.com\/san-francisco-giants-analysis\/105960\/fun-stats-from-the-first-month-of-the-season-san-francisco-giants-2026\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\" target=\"_blank\">I wrote this<\/a> about March &amp; April:<\/p>\n<p class=\"duet--article--dangerously-set-cms-markup _1bij9g78 _1mt21p01\">The Giants were not a good baseball team, which doesn\u2019t necessarily mean that they will be a bad baseball team going forward. Nobody wants to root for a bad team anyway.<\/p>\n<p class=\"duet--article--dangerously-set-cms-markup duet--article--standard-paragraph _1upudxki _174s0un1 _174s0un0 _1mt21p01\">That was the start of a post that looked at some of the fun\/not fun stats from a bad first month of the season. Look at that language! Reader, I am an eternal pessimist, and the Giants have been so bad for so long (sorry, 2021 team!) that my default expectation for them is to come off more like a 100-loss team every season than a successful one, and it\u2019s a belief that\u2019s served me well. But sometimes, I have to pretend that We Can\u2019t Predict Baseball just to conjure a thesis and compose an article about this <a href=\"https:\/\/www.mccoveychronicles.com\/san-francisco-giants-discussion\/109139\/the-five-worst-moments-from-the-giants-first-half\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\" target=\"_blank\">increasingly putrid organization<\/a>. This was one of those times.<\/p>\n<p class=\"duet--article--dangerously-set-cms-markup duet--article--standard-paragraph _1upudxki _174s0un1 _174s0un0 _1mt21p01\">And yet, here we are, midway through July, <a href=\"https:\/\/www.mccoveychronicles.com\/san-francisco-giants-discussion\/109178\/how-many-games-do-the-san-francisco-giants-need-to-win-in-the-second-half-to-have-a-respectable-season\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\" target=\"_blank\">a hopeless 66 games ahead of us<\/a>. There are plenty of numbers to look at to explain how we arrived at this bleak place, but in putting the post together, I was surprised to find one positive worth examining. So, let\u2019s start there before getting into all the obviously bad stuff.<\/p>\n<p class=\"duet--article--dangerously-set-cms-markup duet--article--standard-paragraph _1upudxki _174s0un1 _174s0un0 _1mt21p01\">I spent some time gushing about Luis Arraez yesterday as he\u2019s the only plausible MVP case on the Giants\u2019 roster here in 2026, but for the purposes of examining the team\u2019s numbers from the first part of the season, it\u2019s basically just Luis Arraez. He\u2019s the 8th-most valuable player in Major League Baseball mainly because of his defense, yes, but his .330 batting average is second only to former Giant Otto Lopez (.334), the same 1-2 as the MLB Hits leaderboard (Lopez: 127, Arraez: 119); plus, his 4% strikeout rate is the lowest in the sport (Nico Hoerner is second with 7.9%). His 7 triples trail only Corbin Carroll. His 87 singles are #1 in MLB and he\u2019s 20th in doubles.<\/p>\n<p class=\"duet--article--dangerously-set-cms-markup duet--article--standard-paragraph _1upudxki _174s0un1 _174s0un0 _1mt21p01\">While he probably won\u2019t stay at 127 wRC+, I\u2019ll take the opportunity to list all the Giants who\u2019ve hit that or better since 2017 (min. 200 PA):<\/p>\n<p>Buster Posey, 2017 (128 wRC+)Mike Yastrzemski, 2020 (158)Brandon Belt, 2021 (159)Darin Ruf, 2021 (144)Buster Posey, 2021 (141)Brandon Crawford, 2021 (140)Joc Pederson, 2022 (144)Wilmer Flores, 2023 (134)Tyler Fitzgerald, 2024 (132)<\/p>\n<p class=\"duet--article--dangerously-set-cms-markup duet--article--standard-paragraph _1upudxki _174s0un1 _174s0un0 _1mt21p01\">Rafael Devers wound up with a 135 wRC+ between the Red Sox and Giants, but specifically with the Giants he hit to a 126 wRC+. Yes, this is an arbitrary cutoff line, and it\u2019s not as though Arraez is one of the top-top hitters (36th), but I declare this season of his to be fun!<\/p>\n<p class=\"duet--article--dangerously-set-cms-markup duet--article--standard-paragraph _1upudxki _174s0un1 _174s0un0 _1mt21p01\">Meanwhile, the Giants have scored the second-fewest runs in the National League (395 to San Diego\u2019s 379). They have the sixth-lowest total in the sport just ahead of this weekend\u2019s opponent, the Seattle Mariners (392).<\/p>\n<p class=\"duet--article--dangerously-set-cms-markup duet--article--standard-paragraph _1upudxki _174s0un1 _174s0un0 _1mt21p01\">The team\u2019s walk rate has inched up to 6.7%. Still worst in the sport, but they have the sixth-best strikeout rate (20.6%), trailing the Cardinals (20.5%), Dodgers (20.3%), Diamondbacks (19.6%), Blue Jays (19.6%) and Rays (18.9%). And it\u2019s not like they\u2019re just hitting a bunch of singles. Their team ISO of .164 is 9th in MLB, 5th in the NL. The 106 homers is a mere 21st, but they\u2019re tied for 1st with the Rockies in doubles (179) and tied for 2nd with the Diamondbacks in triples (21). Fun!<\/p>\n<p class=\"duet--article--dangerously-set-cms-markup duet--article--standard-paragraph _1upudxki _174s0un1 _174s0un0 _1mt21p01\">They\u2019ve also managed to do okay avoiding the double play, with just 58 grounded into so far (14th in MLB). Knock out 2020 (51 GIDP), and these 2026 Giants are on pace for the fewest GIDPs by a Giants team since 2017. Last year, they hit into just 103, which is the fewest of the Oracle Park era when you remove 2020. The 2001 team is 2nd-best with 108. They\u2019ve come a long way since Casey McGehee. Fun!<\/p>\n<p class=\"duet--article--dangerously-set-cms-markup duet--article--standard-paragraph _1upudxki _174s0un1 _174s0un0 _1mt21p01\">And after Willy Adames ended a decades-long drought of a 30-home run hitter in the lineup, the team looks like it could have two or (if Adames gets really hot in the final two months) even three 30-home run dudes in the lineup. Devers and Schmitt already have 19 and Adames has 15. It was at this exact point last season that he went on his tear, hitting .232\/.335\/.494 (.828 OPS) with 18 homers over his final 64 games. Fun!<\/p>\n<p class=\"duet--article--dangerously-set-cms-markup duet--article--standard-paragraph _1upudxki _174s0un1 _174s0un0 _1mt21p01\">As I\u2019ve said before, I tend to ignore Baseball Reference\u2019s Wins Above Replacement in favor of FanGraphs\u2019 fWAR (since FanGraphs contributors are hired by MLB teams more frequently), but every so often, rWAR will stick out to me. For instance, the Giants have 16 pitchers with negative rWARs. Yes, among those are Christian Koss (-0.1) and Buddy Kennedy (-0.1) , but even taking them out of the picture leaves us with 14 pitchers, which I\u2019d say is a lot.<\/p>\n<p>Ryan Walker, -0.9 rWARMatt Gage, -0.4Adrian Houser, -0.3Tyler Mahle, -0.3Trevor McDonald, -0.3Carson Seymour, -0.3Ryan Borucki, -0.2Jose Butto, -0.2Wilkin Ramos, -0.2Caleb Kilian, -0.1Tristan Beck, -0.1Gregory Santos, -0.1Reiver Sanmartin, -0.1Spencer Bivens, -0.1<\/p>\n<p class=\"duet--article--dangerously-set-cms-markup duet--article--standard-paragraph _1upudxki _174s0un1 _174s0un0 _1mt21p01\">The total value is -3.8 wins above replacement. I\u2019ll be that guy and do this: +4 wins for the Giants is 45-51. That would put them 6.5\/7 games back of a Wild Card, sure, but it would\u2019ve saved everyone a lot of embarrassment. Still, this is where the rWAR vs. fWAR is meaningful. I don\u2019t think the Giants are four wins short because of the pitching staff. I think the negative values given to the position players or, like, Spencer Bivens is sort of not worth examining and I\u2019m not sure that Houser, Mahle, and McDonald add up to -0.9 wins. That\u2019s 1.2 rWAR right there.<\/p>\n<p class=\"duet--article--dangerously-set-cms-markup duet--article--standard-paragraph _1upudxki _174s0un1 _174s0un0 _1mt21p01\">For comparison, FanGraphs has only 6 pitchers with negative values: Matt Gage (-0.8 fwAR), Ryan Walker (-0.3), Reiver Sanmartin (-0.3), Jose Butto (-0.2), Ryan Borucki (-0.1), and Carson Seymour (-0.1). That\u2019s about 2 wins lost to relief pitching, which would be 43-53 and seems a bit more correct if we\u2019re just looking at which model can best help us diagnose the problem. The starting pitching has been top heavy (Landen Roupp @ +2.1 fWAR, Logan Webb @ 1.9), but the rest basically replacement level, and that feels more correct.<\/p>\n<p class=\"duet--article--dangerously-set-cms-markup duet--article--standard-paragraph _1upudxki _174s0un1 _174s0un0 _1mt21p01\">Having said that, the Baseball Reference numbers sent me to Stathead to conduct this search: how many teams in the San Francisco era have featured a sub-replacement pitching staff? The current Giants\u2019 staff is at 2.2 rWAR, and maybe thanks to Logan Webb alone they might manage to stay in the positive, but I was curious. Unfortunately, the only two results that came up were 1996 (-2.3) and 1995 (-10.4). So, I expanded the scope a bit to see which teams had below 5 wins above replacement in value. That list was a bit more illustrative. 9 teams registered:<\/p>\n<p class=\"duet--article--dangerously-set-cms-markup duet--article--standard-paragraph _1upudxki _174s0un1 _174s0un0 _1mt21p01\">9. 1992, +4.9<br \/>8. 1994, +4.5<br \/>7. 2013, +4.1<br \/>6. 1991, +3.8<br \/>5. 1997, +2.4<br \/>4. 2026, +2.2<br \/>3. 2020, +2.0<br \/>2. 1996, -2.3<br \/>1. 1995, -10.4 rWAR<\/p>\n<p class=\"duet--article--dangerously-set-cms-markup duet--article--standard-paragraph _1upudxki _174s0un1 _174s0un0 _1mt21p01\">Just one winning team in the bunch and all pretty (in)famous teams to some degree. That 2020 might\u2019ve been something had there been some good in the bullpen. That got corrected for 2021.<\/p>\n<p class=\"duet--article--dangerously-set-cms-markup duet--article--standard-paragraph _1upudxki _174s0un1 _174s0un0 _1mt21p01\">Now, contrast this with FanGraphs\u2019 bottom 9 of the San Francisco era:<\/p>\n<p class=\"duet--article--dangerously-set-cms-markup duet--article--standard-paragraph _1upudxki _174s0un1 _174s0un0 _1mt21p01\">9. 2013, +7.1<br \/>8. 1991, +6.9<br \/>7. 1984, +6.3<br \/>6. 1994, +6.1<br \/>5. 1979, +5.8<br \/>4. 2026, +5.4<br \/>3. 1996, +4.7<br \/>2. 2020, +3.8<br \/>1. 1995, +2.2<\/p>\n<p class=\"duet--article--dangerously-set-cms-markup duet--article--standard-paragraph _1upudxki _174s0un1 _174s0un0 _1mt21p01\">Okay, so, some actual agreement between the systems here. The four worst pitching staffs in San Francisco Giants history were in 1995, 2020, 1996, and 2026, with the only real controversy being 2020 vs. 1996. But at the end of the day, Zack &amp; Buster\u2019s Pitching Staff has been a top-5 worst of the San Francisco era. Fun!(?)<\/p>\n<p class=\"duet--article--dangerously-set-cms-markup duet--article--standard-paragraph _1upudxki _174s0un1 _174s0un0 _1mt21p01\">The Giants wound up one of the worst fielding teams in the sport. They have the distinction of being \u201cfirst worst,\u201d as their -6 Outs Above Average (18th in MLB) trails Houston\u2019s +0. They\u2019re followed by an eclectic mix of teams \u2014 Nationals (-8), Rockies (-10), Pirates (-11), Rays (-11), Phillies (-15)\u2026 Tigers (-19), Twins (-19)\u2026 Mariners (-30; yes, they\u2019re dead last) \u2014 so, maybe Outs Above Average isn\u2019t the best measure? Or, defense hasn\u2019t been the deciding factor in team success this year\u2026 unless you\u2019re the Mariners?<\/p>\n<p class=\"duet--article--dangerously-set-cms-markup duet--article--standard-paragraph _1upudxki _174s0un1 _174s0un0 _1mt21p01\">They were particularly bad (-12) against left-handed batters, which makes sense because of (1) Oracle Park and (2) Jung Hoo Lee, who is -2 in right field but -6 in Fielding Run Value overall thanks to also being -2 in CF.<\/p>\n<p class=\"duet--article--dangerously-set-cms-markup duet--article--standard-paragraph _1upudxki _174s0un1 _174s0un0 _1mt21p01\">And, to be clear, it is the outfield that\u2019s hurt them, especially in left field (-8, 29th in MLB). On the infield, they\u2019re +5 Outs Above Average (13th in MLB), and even there, the number has been dragged down by Willy Adames (-12) and first base (-2).<\/p>\n<p class=\"duet--article--dangerously-set-cms-markup duet--article--standard-paragraph _1upudxki _174s0un1 _174s0un0 _1mt21p01\">Okay, I\u2019ve taken a break from gushing about Luis Arraez, but now it\u2019s back to the gushing. His +10 Outs Above Average is 6th-best in the sport of any position. He\u2019s 11th in terms of Fielding Run Value, which Statcast defines:<\/p>\n<p class=\"duet--article--dangerously-set-cms-markup _1bij9g78 _1mt21p01\">Fielding Run Value is Statcast\u2019s metric for capturing a player\u2019s measurable defensive performance by converting all of Statcast\u2019s individual defensive metrics from different scales onto the same run-based scale, which can then be read as a player being worth X runs above or Y runs below average. Currently, the conversions for those metrics are as follows. (Unless otherwise noted, all metrics are available since 2016.)<\/p>\n<p class=\"duet--article--dangerously-set-cms-markup _1bij9g78 _1mt21p01\">How to read it: In 2024, Andr\u00e9s Gim\u00e9nez had a Fielding Run Value of +17 runs, which came from 14 runs on range and 3 runs via his involvement in double plays, making him the most valuable defender in baseball among non-catchers that season.<\/p>\n<p class=\"duet--article--dangerously-set-cms-markup duet--article--standard-paragraph _1upudxki _174s0un1 _174s0un0 _1mt21p01\">Matt Chapman still checks in 40th on the Fielding Run Value list at +5. His +4 Outs Above Average ranks 55th.<\/p>\n<p class=\"duet--article--dangerously-set-cms-markup duet--article--standard-paragraph _1upudxki _174s0un1 _174s0un0 _1mt21p01\">Regrettably, Willy Adames is in the bottom 3 of Outs Above Average (-11), behind Junior Caminero (-13) and CJ Abrams (-11). Moving Adames off of shortstop as soon as they trade Luis Arraez is probably the move, even if doing something like that in-season is tricky\/inadvisable.<\/p>\n<p class=\"duet--article--dangerously-set-cms-markup duet--article--standard-paragraph _1upudxki _174s0un1 _174s0un0 _1mt21p01\">And the less said about Heliot Ramos\u2019s defense (-2 Outs Above Average &amp; -3.6 Defensive Runs Above Average in 58 games), the better. Yikes. He\u2019ll need to hit like he did in 2024 \u2014 20% better than the league average \u2014 to be a valuable player. Fun!(?)<\/p>\n<p class=\"duet--article--dangerously-set-cms-markup duet--article--standard-paragraph _1upudxki _174s0un1 _174s0un0 _1mt21p01\">It hasn\u2019t gone well and what\u2019s a little amusing about the whole situation is that it was entirely predictable. Sometimes, it\u2019s fun to predict outcomes and be right, regardless of if it\u2019s a positive or negative outcome. But bad bullpens are really hard to watch. And the team\u2019s continuing inability to develop pitching prospects at a useful rate has really added insult to injury. Oh well.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"Remember May 1st? I don\u2019t. But on that date, I wrote this about March &amp; April: The Giants&hellip;\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":766708,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[65],"tags":[363,318588,99],"class_list":["post-766707","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","category-mlb","tag-mlb","tag-san-francisco-giants-analysis","tag-sports"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/766707","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=766707"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/766707\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/766708"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=766707"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=766707"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=766707"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}