![\"The](\"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/us\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/08\/GettyImages-1227068215-1.jpg\")
UCLA\u2019s lease with the Rose Bowl runs through the 2043 football season. Getty Images<\/p>\n
There\u2019s no point in dragging this out any further as the embarrassing court setbacks<\/a> \u2014 and untold millions in attorney fees \u2014 continue to pile up.<\/p>\n Show some integrity and acknowledge that your word is your word.<\/p>\n UCLA\u2019s latest amendment to a stadium lease that runs through the end of the 2043 season was signed in 2014 by Janet Napolitano, the onetime U.S. secretary of Homeland Security who was then president of the University of California system.<\/p>\n Napolitano was also once the Arizona attorney general and governor of that state, meaning that the amendment wasn\u2019t signed by someone who doesn\u2019t fully understand contracts. The contract locked in UCLA for decades to come and did not include an opt-out clause \u2014 something the school has refused to recognize as part of its efforts to defect to a newer, shinier stadium closer to campus.<\/p>\n Sure, the Rose Bowl isn\u2019t the jewel that it once was. Its historic splendor can\u2019t mask cramped seating or outdated bathrooms. In a telling sign of how the century-old stadium stacks up against modern venues, it did not host a single game in the recently completed World Cup.\u00a0<\/p>\n There\u2019s also the not-so-insignificant matter of all that revenue that could go to UCLA via suite sales and other sources being pocketed by the stadium.<\/p>\n But that\u2019s all part of the deal. The Rose Bowl isn\u2019t charging rent and has paid a fortune for stadium renovations and upgrades. That\u2019s why it needed assurances that the Bruins would remain tenants for the long haul.<\/p>\n Showing that it understands UCLA\u2019s financial concerns, the stadium agreed to allow the school to keep revenue generated from the sale of premium seats associated with a new field-level club<\/a> in one end zone. Sales of those seats ahead of the home opener against San Diego State <\/a>on Sept. 12 have been brisk, according to school officials.<\/p>\n Let\u2019s also not forget that the Rose Bowl is as much a part of UCLA\u2019s fabric as the eight-clap. The pavilion that houses suites is named for Terry Donahue. A bronze sculpture of the legendary coach stands inside the venue\u2019s gates. The home locker room is named for late Chancellor Charles Young. Tailgating on the surrounding golf course is a cherished fall tradition.<\/p>\n So, what\u2019s the holdup on UCLA saying that it\u2019s staying?<\/p>\n Back in February, the school committed to remaining at the Rose Bowl through the 2026 season. That\u2019s not nearly enough.<\/p>\n Now that Stephen Agostini, the university\u2019s chief financial officer and primary driver of the proposed move to SoFi Stadium, has departed, there\u2019s no tangible reason not to resolve this thing now. While officials from both sides have discussed a resolution behind the scenes, there\u2019s no finish line in sight.<\/p>\n That must change.<\/p>\n \t\t\t\t\t\t\tSign up for the California Morning Report newsletter\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/p>\n \n\t\t\t\t\t\t\tCalifornia’s top news, sports and entertainment delivered to your inbox every day.\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/p>\n \t\t\t\t\t\tThanks for signing up!\n\t\t\t\t<\/p>\n Sustaining this court battle<\/a> just to extract some small, face-saving measure \u2014 like a morsel of additional revenue \u2014 makes as much sense as leaving in the starting quarterback in the final minutes of a blowout loss. The Rose Bowl has all the leverage given the way things have gone in court and doesn\u2019t have to concede anything except out of goodwill.<\/p>\n A quick recounting of the ledger since the Rose Bowl <\/a>and City of Pasadena sued UCLA in late October, contending that the school had breached its contract by even contemplating a move to SoFi Stadium:<\/p>\n UCLA tried to get the dispute resolved in arbitration. It lost.<\/p>\n UCLA tried to dismiss the lawsuit on a demurrer and an Anti-SLAPP motion. It lost.<\/p>\n UCLA asked the court to stay the case three times. It lost.<\/p>\n That\u2019s a stack of setbacks that should put any legal team on the hottest of seats, yet UCLA keeps shelling out big bucks to the law firm of Gibson Dunn.<\/p>\n The plaintiffs contend this all started with a phone exchange involving Jeffrey Moorad, the former CEO of the Padres and Diamondbacks who also happens to be a partner in the law firm of Morgan Lewis. Representing himself as a consultant for UCLA, Moorad purportedly told Rose Bowl lawyers that the Bruins were moving on from playing games there, essentially tipping the school\u2019s hand.<\/p>\n The Rose Bowl sued UCLA soon thereafter \u2014 and Morgan Lewis, which appeared at an initial court hearing on behalf of the school, disappeared from the proceedings like a linebacker who had been stiff-armed.<\/p>\n Nothing has gone UCLA\u2019s way since this mess started.<\/p>\n While the next court date isn\u2019t until September, there\u2019s no need for UCLA to wait that long to end this insanity. Draft a settlement agreement. Commit to staying.<\/p>\n Your word is your word.<\/p>\n Now live up to it.<\/p>\n Download The California Post App, follow us on social, and subscribe to our newsletters <\/p>\n California Post News: Facebook<\/a>, Instagram<\/a>, TikTok<\/a>, X<\/a>, YouTube<\/a>, WhatsApp<\/a>, LinkedIn<\/a> \t\t\t\t\t\t![\"The](\"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/us\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/08\/GettyImages-2254344026.jpg\")
The Bruins contemplated a move to SoFi Stadium. The next court date is scheduled for September. Getty Images<\/p>\n
California Post Sports Facebook<\/a>, Instagram<\/a>, TikTok<\/a>, YouTube<\/a>, X<\/a>
California Post Opinion<\/a>
California Post Newsletters: Sign up here!<\/a>
California Post App: Download here!<\/a>
Home delivery: Sign up here!<\/a>
<\/a>Page Six Hollywood: Sign up here!<\/a><\/p>\n