{"id":806912,"date":"2026-08-08T14:51:32","date_gmt":"2026-08-08T14:51:32","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/us\/806912\/"},"modified":"2026-08-08T14:51:32","modified_gmt":"2026-08-08T14:51:32","slug":"watching-too-much-tv-harms-brain-volume-study-finds","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/us\/806912\/","title":{"rendered":"Watching too much TV harms brain volume, study finds"},"content":{"rendered":"

\n Do you suspect that spending hours every day in front of the television isn\u2019t doing your brain any favors? A new study<\/a> suggests you may be onto something.\n <\/p>\n

\n Researchers found that people who reported watching television more often in midlife had smaller brain volumes decades later in areas involved in language and thinking. On the other hand, sitting at work was linked to healthier brain measures.\n <\/p>\n

\n What should people make of these findings? Does this mean it\u2019s time to turn off the television for good? To help answer these questions, I spoke with CNN wellness expert Dr. Leana Wen, an emergency physician and clinical associate professor at George Washington University. She previously served as Baltimore\u2019s health commissioner.\n <\/p>\n

\n CNN: Is watching television really associated with changes in the brain years later?\n <\/p>\n

\n Dr. Leana Wen: That\u2019s what this study found, although it\u2019s important to understand exactly what the researchers measured and what conclusions we can draw from it.\n <\/p>\n

\n Investigators analyzed data from more than 1,700 participants in a long-running study<\/a> funded by the National Institutes of Health. Middle-aged participants reported how often they watched television and how much they sat at work during the previous year. For television viewing, they self-reported in a standardized questionnaire how often they watched television by classifying their habits into one of five categories: never, seldom, sometimes, often or very often. Participants ranged from 45 to 64 at the start of the study, with an average age of 53. More than two decades later, they underwent brain MRI scans.\n <\/p>\n

\n People who reported watching television \u201cvery often\u201d often had smaller volumes in several brain regions, including in parts involved in cognitive control and language as well as areas that are especially vulnerable early in Alzheimer\u2019s disease. These viewers also had more white matter hyperintensities, which are changes seen on MRI that reflect injury to the brain\u2019s small blood vessels and have been linked to<\/a> cognitive decline and dementia.\n <\/p>\n

\n CNN: One of the most surprising findings was that sedentary activity in another context \u2014 at work \u2014 wasn\u2019t linked to the same brain changes. Why might watching television be different from sitting at work?\n <\/p>\n

\n Wen: This interesting finding suggests that not all sedentary activities are the same. Watching television is a cognitively passive activity because viewers are primarily receiving information rather than actively processing it. Sitting at work often involves very different mental demands. You may be responding to emails, working on projects and interacting with colleagues. Those activities engage multiple brain networks even though you\u2019re sitting.\n <\/p>\n

\"Watching<\/p>\n

\n The study doesn\u2019t prove that mentally stimulating activities protect the brain, but the findings fit with a growing body of research suggesting that cognitive engagement helps reduce the risk of dementia. Previous studies<\/a> also have found differences between passive sedentary behaviors, such as television watching, and more mentally active ones, including solving puzzles and being mentally engaged during work.\n <\/p>\n

\n CNN: Does this study prove that watching television causes negative brain changes?\n <\/p>\n

\n Wen: No. This was an observational study, which means it can identify associations but cannot establish cause and effect.\n <\/p>\n

\n It is possible that people who watched more television differed from those who watched less in ways the researchers could not fully account for, despite already adjusting for many factors including age, education, physical activity, smoking, alcohol use, diabetes, high blood pressure and body mass index.\n <\/p>\n

\n It also may be that subtle changes in brain health influenced people\u2019s habits years before the MRI scans were performed such that people with brain matter changes were more likely to spend their days watching television than those participants who didn\u2019t display the brain matter changes.\n <\/p>\n

\n Still, this was a well-conducted study that followed participants for more than two decades and used detailed brain MRI scans rather than subjective testing. While the findings should not be interpreted as proof that television damages the brain, they add to growing evidence that prolonged passive, sedentary behavior is not ideal for long-term brain health.\n <\/p>\n

\n CNN: The researchers adjusted for physical activity. Does that mean going to the gym isn\u2019t enough to offset hours spent watching television?\n <\/p>\n

\n Wen: It\u2019s an interesting point because we know that staying physically active<\/a> helps to reduce the risk of dementia. But regular exercise doesn\u2019t offset all other risk factors.\n <\/p>\n

\n In this study, the association between heavy television viewing and brain changes remained even after the researchers accounted for physical activity. In other words, someone who exercises regularly but also spends many hours each day watching television still has additional risks for worse cognitive health because of their passive sedentary behavior. Staying physically active and limiting this kind of prolonged passive sedentary behavior both appear to be important.\n <\/p>\n

\n CNN: Should people swear off watching TV? What about other forms of passive screen time, such as scrolling on a phone or tablet?\n <\/p>\n

\n Wen: I don\u2019t think this study means people should stop all screen consumption. Watching a sporting event, following a favorite show or going to a movie can be fun and relaxing, and these pastimes help us to connect with family and friends, which is good for our health on many levels.\n <\/p>\n

\n In my view, the key takeaway is to think about how much time is spent in passive screen-based activities and what those activities may be replacing. If several hours of television or scrolling through social media are taking the place of exercise, in-person social interactions, reading or other mentally stimulating activities<\/a>, that\u2019s not ideal for brain health.\n <\/p>\n

\n People should consider that not all screen time is the same. For example, participating in an online language class in which you are learning a new skill and actively communicating with others engages the brain differently than passively watching TV shows or mindlessly scrolling through internet content. And it\u2019s always a good idea to avoid sitting<\/a> for long, uninterrupted periods by getting up periodically to stretch and walk around.\n <\/p>\n

\n CNN: Besides reducing passive screen time, what are evidence-based ways to protect brain health as we age?\n <\/p>\n

\n Wen: Regular physical activity is one of the strongest interventions<\/a> supported by research. So is controlling blood pressure, treating chronic conditions such as diabetes, avoiding smoking, limiting excessive alcohol use, getting enough sleep and maintaining a healthy weight. A Mediterranean-style eating pattern<\/a> rich in fruits, vegetables, whole grains, legumes, nuts, fish and healthy fats also has been associated with better brain health.\n <\/p>\n

\n Staying socially connected is also essential, as is treating hearing loss, depression and other factors that can prevent people from spending time with loved ones. No single activity can guarantee protection against dementia, but the combination of everyday choices, including how we spend our leisure time<\/a>, can add up over the course of decades.\n <\/p>\n

\n Get inspired by a weekly roundup on living well, made simple. Sign up for CNN\u2019s Life, But Better newsletter<\/a> for information and tools designed to improve your well-being.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"Do you suspect that spending hours every day in front of the television isn\u2019t doing your brain any…\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":806913,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[34],"tags":[97],"class_list":["post-806912","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","category-health","tag-health"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/806912","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=806912"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/806912\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/806913"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=806912"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=806912"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=806912"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}