Cancer<\/a> is a great example of this. Cancer rates have been stable or falling<\/a> for decades. Even better, cancer mortality<\/a> \u2013 that is, how likely you are to die from cancer if you get it \u2013 has plummeted.<\/p>\n There are many cancers that were death sentences in the 90s which are now considered a form of chronic disease<\/a> like diabetes<\/a> or emphysema due to new treatments. <\/p>\n There’s one place where the disease seems to buck this trend \u2013 colorectal cancer in young people. <\/p>\n<\/p>\n While rates of colorectal cancer \u2013 which includes both colon and rectal cancers \u2013 have fallen overall<\/a>, there’s been a recent uptick<\/a> in cases in people under the age of 50, which is considered young when it comes to cancer. <\/p>\n This has almost no impact on the total number of colorectal cancer diagnoses, because the absolute number of people getting colorectal cancer at young ages is still very low. <\/p>\n However, it’s a very confusing finding. <\/p>\n Rates of colorectal cancer are generally a bit lower in older people<\/a>, but rising in younger people, and we have no good idea why that’s happening.<\/p>\n There are, of course, some proposed explanations. <\/p>\n Some people point to pesticides or herbicides<\/a> like picloram, which have been linked<\/a> to colorectal cancer risk. There are two problems with this idea.<\/p>\n “While rates of colorectal cancer \u2013 which includes both colon and rectal cancers \u2013 have fallen overall, there’s been a recent uptick<\/a> in cases in people under the age of 50 which is considered young when it comes to cancer.\u00a0” \u2013 Gideon Meyerowitz-Katz, Epidemiologist<\/p>\n For one thing, picloram and many other chemicals are used a bit less<\/a> today than they were in the 80s and 90s. It’s unclear how those chemicals could cause more cancer in a specific age group in the 2020s even though they aren’t being used as much as they used to be.<\/p>\n Also, older people tend to have more exposure<\/a> to these chemicals. This makes sense \u2013 regulation was much looser in past decades and it’s quite likely that your parents had more pesticides in their food than you do. <\/p>\n It makes no sense for colorectal cancer to be increasing in young people but decreasing in older people if this sort of environmental issue is to blame.\u00a0<\/p>\n The same general problem holds true for many environmental exposures. People have linked<\/a> per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS, often called ‘forever chemicals’) to colorectal cancer<\/a>.<\/p>\n Again, however, exposure to PFAS is not neatly divided by age<\/a> and in some cases older people may have been far more exposed to these chemicals than the younger group who is getting more cancer.<\/p>\n It’s hard to find an exposure that could explain this increase. <\/p>\n Most of the things that we know are possible causes of colorectal cancer are more common for older people than younger ones. There are very few environmental issues that are more common now than they were when older generations were growing up.\u00a0<\/p>\n Another potential explanation is obesity. We know that obesity causes more colorectal cancer<\/a>, and younger people are definitely more obese now than they were in the past.<\/p>\n Again, this is not a compelling explanation because older people are also more obese<\/a>, so it can’t be the only impact on cancer risk. Modeling suggests that at most 15 percent<\/a> of colorectal cancer is explained by people gaining weight, perhaps less. <\/p>\n The colorectal cancer mystery is made more confusing by the fact that the trend is not consistent across countries. It’s not even consistent in groupings of countries. <\/p>\n A 2019 study<\/a> found that colorectal cancer rates in young people were stable or decreasing in nearly half of the countries analyzed.<\/p>\n A more recent study from 2025<\/a> had similar findings. This just muddies the water further \u2013 it’s unclear what could be causing colorectal cancer rates to increase in young people in the UK and US but decline in Italy and Lithuania.<\/p>\n Perhaps the most likely explanation of all of this complexity is that it’s all down to testing. <\/p>\n While we know that screening recommendations are unlikely<\/a> to be the main reason for the increase \u2013 if nothing else, screening recommendations have only recently changed to include younger age groups but the trend has been going since the 90s \u2013 but these aren’t the only changes to the healthcare system in recent decades.<\/p>\n It could be that young people are simply more likely to get a test for colorectal cancer for all sorts of reasons, and that this has impacted the number of people who get diagnosed.<\/p>\n Related: Drug Stops 90% of Pancreatic Cancer Migration in Lab Tests<\/a><\/p>\n It’s also possible that the trend is related to how countries report data. When we talk about disease statistics, we are always talking about the measured rate of a condition. Cancer registries have been improving for a long time, which may be part of the reason that younger people are being recorded as having more cancer.<\/p>\n However, even these explanations are not that convincing. It’s hard to understand how they could impact younger people and older people in different ways. <\/p>\n There is definitely an increase in recorded rates of colorectal cancer in young people in some countries, but the reason remains a bit of a mystery. We know that many explanations are a bit unlikely, but the true cause is very hard to identify.\u00a0<\/p>\n Gideon Meyerowitz-Katz\u00a0is an epidemiologist working in chronic disease in Sydney, Australia. He writes a regular health\u00a0blog<\/a>\u00a0covering science communication, public health, and what that new study you’ve read about actually means.\u00a0He’s\u00a0previously helped ScienceAlert<\/a>\u00a0break down the real science behind the most\u00a0viral papers.<\/a><\/p>\n This article was fact-checked by Clare Watson<\/a> and edited by Fiona MacDonald<\/a>. While we pride ourselves on our process, we are only human. If you spot a mistake, please let us know<\/a>.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"As a general rule, you are lucky to be living in 2026. It’s a good time to be…\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":813130,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[34],"tags":[97,1352],"class_list":["post-813129","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","category-health","tag-health","tag-msft-content"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/813129","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=813129"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/813129\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/813130"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=813129"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=813129"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=813129"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}![\"Drug](\"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/us\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/08\/PancreaticCancerDrug.png\")
(koto_feja\/Getty Images)<\/p>\n![\"Subscribe](\"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/us\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/05\/FOMO-1200x628-_Dont-miss-the-next-breakthrough_-cosmic-colourful-642x336.jpg\")
<\/a><\/p>\n