![\"FILE](\"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/us\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/09\/UGBLPPPBSNDEJGLOWZFG5LJF4M.jpg\")
<\/p>\nThe Trump administration on Thursday asked the Supreme Court to reject an order by a federal judge that halts it from implementing a new rule regulating mail ballots, hours after being unable to tell that judge whether the computer system that would govern the entire project was operational yet.<\/p>\n
<\/p>\n
FILE – Delivery vans are parked during a protest staged as part of a countrywide National Day of Action Tuesday, July 28, 2026, outside the main United States Postal Service headquarters in northeast Denver.<\/p>\n
David Zalubowski \/ AP<\/p>\n
The administration filed its appeal the afternoon before mail ballots were scheduled to be sent out by North Carolina, which on Friday kicks off a wave of states shipping ballots out for the rapidly approaching midterm election<\/a>. Its appeal was part of a flurry of last-minute litigation as the federal government struggles to implement President Donald Trump\u2019s restrictions on mail ballots<\/a> before the midterm elections<\/a> in November, and came even as legal wrangling over Trump\u2019s executive order continued in lower courts. <\/p>\n The high court\u2019s conservative majority previously allowed the president\u2019s plan<\/a> to move ahead, but they have not decided whether it is legal. <\/p>\n Under Trump\u2019s executive order, the U.S. Postal Service<\/a> could refuse to deliver ballots from states that do not follow a uniform envelope style and submit lists of eligible voters to an online portal that was apparently still inactive Thursday.<\/p>\n During a hearing in Boston, U.S. District Court Judge Indira Talwani repeatedly questioned Department of Justice attorney Michael Velchik about whether the Postal Service could actually implement Trump\u2019s plan from an executive order he issued last spring. The key piece is the online portal, which would track tens of millions of mail ballots. States would be required to upload their list of mail voters to the portal to have ballots delivered, and if the data there didn\u2019t match what was on the envelopes, the ballots would not be sent.<\/p>\n Unclear if key system has been set up<\/p>\n \u201cI don\u2019t even have a declaration from the Postal Service: \u2018This is how it will work.\u2019 I don\u2019t have it. I have nothing,\u201d Talwani said, adding later that it felt like the government was running an \u201cexperiment\u201d to see if the system would work in the upcoming election.<\/p>\n \u201cAs you sit here today, you can\u2019t tell me the government has a program ready to go?\u201d Talwani asked.<\/p>\n Velchik repeated that the Postal Service would \u201cfully implement the rule\u201d that it published last month, triggering the latest round of litigation. He argued the main issue is whether Talwani has the legal power to stop it.<\/p>\n \u201cThe $64,000 question is, is this authorized by the statute?\u201d Velchik said.<\/p>\n Talwani is considering whether to extend her temporary order barring the Postal Service<\/a> from requiring use of the system through Sept. 10. The first state to send out all its mail ballots, North Carolina, is scheduled to begin shipping them out Friday, with other states quickly following.<\/p>\n Talwani has been here before. In June, she prohibited the administration<\/a> from implementing Trump\u2019s executive order for the November election, ruling the changes came too close to voting for the federal government to embark on such a project.<\/p>\n But the Supreme Court<\/a> late last month ruled that Talwani\u2019s order was premature because the Postal Service had not yet published regulations governing how it would apply Trump\u2019s order. The agency did so<\/a> just before the high court ruling came down, prompting Democrats and voting rights groups to swiftly re-file their lawsuits.<\/p>\n They counter that the president has no authority to set election rules, which is a power designated by the Constitution to the states and, in some cases, to Congress.<\/p>\n Tangled legal fight goes up to election deadlines<\/p>\n They won an initial victory with Talwani\u2019s 14-day restraining order. In a sign of the pressures on the administration, its lawyers already appealed<\/a> that order to the 1st Circuit Court of Appeals in Boston, but they added the Supreme Court appeal Thursday and urged the top justices to act quickly.<\/p>\n Illustrating the challenge, Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson, the high court justice designated to deal with appeals from the region, set a Sept. 8 deadline for the plaintiffs to file their arguments, likely pushing any decision into the middle of next week at the earliest.<\/p>\n Trump has long opposed mail voting<\/a> and falsely blamed it<\/a> for his 2020 election loss to Democrat Joe Biden, even though he often uses that method<\/a> to cast his own ballot.<\/p>\n Election officials say there\u2019s simply no way they can comply with the Postal Service directives, which could require a complete overhaul of their operations. Before it delivers mail ballots for any state, the Postal Service would have to approve the design of the envelopes that contain them and have the state upload a list of voters receiving them to an online portal<\/a>.<\/p>\n Some ballots have already gone out. A few municipalities in Wisconsin opted to send mail ballots to voters earlier this week, but Friday marks the full kickoff of voting as North Carolina starts shipping its mail ballots to all voters who requested them.<\/p>\n The administration has contended the changes are relatively minor and legal. <\/p>\n \u201cWhile the States have primary authority to regulate the manner of elections, they cannot choose to use the federal mails to carry out their elections but then insist that their election-related mail is somehow exempt from the Postal Service\u2019s rulemaking authority, conferred by Congress, to regulate envelope design and addressee information,\u201d Trump\u2019s solicitor general, John Sauer, wrote in the appeal.<\/p>\n Sophia Lin Lakin of the ACLU, one of the organizations that sued to block the plan, said the administration is simply generating more uncertainty. <\/p>\n \u201cThe only emergency here is the one the administration created,\u201d Lakin said in a statement. \u201cThe court\u2019s temporary order preserves the voting procedures Americans have relied on for years, and it should stand.\u201d <\/p>\n No red states have said they\u2019ll use system<\/p>\n Thursday\u2019s hearing before Talwani focused more on practicalities \u2014 especially that the portal was still not active, while most election offices have already printed their envelopes and ballots.<\/p>\n Velchik told the judge that the federal government is offering states the choice to opt into the system, but the Postal Service has yet to identify a single state that has done so. None of the 12 states that intervened in the lawsuit to argue the Trump administration has the right to require the program have announced that they have voluntarily opted into it.<\/p>\n Talwani scolded Missouri Solicitor General Lou Capozzi for arguing on behalf of the project.<\/p>\n \u201cYou want the voters in your states to be disenfranchised,\u201d Talwani said. \u201cI don\u2019t understand the interest.\u201d<\/p>\n Capozzi said that was misinformation: \u201cThere is no risk that people would be disenfranchised.\u201d<\/p>\n