{"id":843897,"date":"2026-09-11T08:20:17","date_gmt":"2026-09-11T08:20:17","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/us\/843897\/"},"modified":"2026-09-11T08:20:17","modified_gmt":"2026-09-11T08:20:17","slug":"openai-wants-to-know-if-an-ai-industry-slowdown-would-even-be-legal","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/us\/843897\/","title":{"rendered":"OpenAI Wants to Know if an AI Industry Slowdown Would Even Be Legal"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>OpenAI has asked members of Congress in recent weeks for clear guidance about whether orchestrating an industry-wide <a href=\"https:\/\/www.wired.com\/story\/everyone-is-freaking-out-about-openai-and-anthropics-race-for-dominance\/\" class=\"text link\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\" target=\"_blank\">slowdown on frontier AI development<\/a> would be legal, people close to the company tell WIRED.<\/p>\n<p class=\"paywall\">Substantive coordination on safety between AI labs may risk running afoul of <a href=\"https:\/\/www.wired.com\/story\/tim-wu-age-of-extraction\/\" class=\"text link\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\" target=\"_blank\">antitrust law<\/a>, the people say, which poses a significant obstacle to bringing major tech giants on board with the effort.<\/p>\n<p class=\"paywall\">Last weekend, OpenAI\u2019s chief scientist, Jakub Pachocki, published a <a data-offer-url=\"https:\/\/openai.com\/index\/an-alien-mind\/\" class=\"external-link text link\" data-event-click=\"{&quot;element&quot;:&quot;ExternalLink&quot;,&quot;outgoingURL&quot;:&quot;https:\/\/openai.com\/index\/an-alien-mind\/&quot;}\" href=\"https:\/\/openai.com\/index\/an-alien-mind\/\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\" target=\"_blank\">blog post<\/a> arguing that the best path forward for the AI research world includes \u201ccoordinating to slow down future development,\u201d which he thinks will be key to ensuring that self-improving AI systems are safe. In the short term, he expects \u201c<a href=\"https:\/\/www.wired.com\/story\/openai-overhauls-safety-protocols-after-its-ai-agents-went-rogue\/\" class=\"text link\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\" target=\"_blank\">voluntary slowdowns<\/a> to become commonplace until shared safety bars are established.\u201d<\/p>\n<p class=\"paywall\">But some legal scholars say such an effort could conflict with US antitrust laws. Nicholas Felstead, assistant director of the Australian Competition and Consumer Commission and a former AI policy fellow at the Center for Law &amp; AI Risk, argued in a March <a data-offer-url=\"https:\/\/www.lawfaremedia.org\/article\/how-antitrust-can-promote-ai-safety-collaborations\" class=\"external-link text link\" data-event-click=\"{&quot;element&quot;:&quot;ExternalLink&quot;,&quot;outgoingURL&quot;:&quot;https:\/\/www.lawfaremedia.org\/article\/how-antitrust-can-promote-ai-safety-collaborations&quot;}\" href=\"https:\/\/www.lawfaremedia.org\/article\/how-antitrust-can-promote-ai-safety-collaborations\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\" target=\"_blank\">article<\/a> that a coordinated pause in AI development may amount to companies restricting output, potentially violating the Sherman Antitrust Act. It would depend \u201centirely on the precise details of any agreement,\u201d Felstead wrote. \u201cBut even if most safety collaborations would ultimately survive antitrust scrutiny, legal uncertainty can act as a powerful deterrent.\u201d<\/p>\n<p class=\"paywall\">OpenAI did not respond to a request for comment ahead of publication.<\/p>\n<p class=\"paywall\">There are some early signs that Congress is listening. In July, a bipartisan, bicameral group of lawmakers introduced a bill titled \u201cCollaboration on Adversarial Threats and Security Risks Act,\u201d which would explicitly permit AI labs to coordinate on security and safety work without the risk of violating antitrust statutes. The House version was referred to the Judiciary Committee but has yet to be taken up.<\/p>\n<p class=\"paywall\">Caleb Knapp, director of government affairs at the nonprofit AI Policy Network, which endorsed the bill, says it would create legal channels for AI labs to work together to address safety and security incidents. Knapp adds that Congress has a \u201cgrowing appetite to get something done\u201d on AI safety but says enacting anything into law may have to wait until after the upcoming midterm elections.<\/p>\n<p class=\"paywall\">While some AI executives may have genuine concerns about antitrust, another camp of AI leaders argue those worries are just convenient cover to avoid discussing the real reasons that AI developers may be wary about collaborating, which go far beyond potential legal liabilities.<\/p>\n<p class=\"paywall\">For one, AI is a massive business, and these companies are fiercely competing <a href=\"https:\/\/www.wired.com\/story\/openai-codex-race-claude-code\/\" class=\"text link\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\" target=\"_blank\">to capture a slice<\/a> of the nascent market for frontier models. Some executives share the Trump administration\u2019s view that <a href=\"https:\/\/www.wired.com\/story\/trump-signs-executive-order-ai-state-laws\/\" class=\"text link\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\" target=\"_blank\">staying ahead of China<\/a> in AI is crucial for national security. Perhaps most importantly, different AI developers have <a href=\"https:\/\/www.wired.com\/story\/anthropic-thinks-ai-can-only-be-safe-under-its-control\/\" class=\"text link\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\" target=\"_blank\">vastly different opinions<\/a> about the best way to develop safe artificial intelligence, and therefore may be reluctant to work with one another on the issue.<\/p>\n<p class=\"paywall\">\u201cFirst step is for industry leaders OpenAI and Anthropic to stop feuding and work on a pacing proposal together,\u201d John Schulman, an OpenAI cofounder who is now chief scientist at the rival AI lab Thinking Machines, wrote in <a data-offer-url=\"https:\/\/x.com\/johnschulman2\/status\/2097548011408961776?s=20\" class=\"external-link text link\" data-event-click=\"{&quot;element&quot;:&quot;ExternalLink&quot;,&quot;outgoingURL&quot;:&quot;https:\/\/x.com\/johnschulman2\/status\/2097548011408961776?s=20&quot;}\" href=\"https:\/\/x.com\/johnschulman2\/status\/2097548011408961776?s=20\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\" target=\"_blank\">a post<\/a> on X earlier this week. \u201cThey&#8217;ll cite antitrust, but that&#8217;s fake\u2014antitrust prohibits certain agreements, but not from jointly developing a proposal.\u201d<\/p>\n<p class=\"paywall\">Long-simmering fears about the race among AI companies to build and release ever more powerful models erupted into the national spotlight this summer. This week, former Anthropic and OpenAI researcher <a href=\"https:\/\/www.wired.com\/story\/anthropic-researcher-quits-jacob-coxon-ai-fears-humanity\/\" class=\"text link\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\" target=\"_blank\">Jacob Coxon added to the growing alarm<\/a> when he issued a stark public warning that AI developers were putting humanity at risk. In recent months, a number of security incidents, including <a href=\"https:\/\/www.wired.com\/story\/openai-safety-security-ai-agents-culture\/\" class=\"text link\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\" target=\"_blank\">OpenAI\u2019s agents hacking Hugging Face<\/a>, highlighted how the industry\u2019s safeguards have failed to keep pace with the rising capabilities of models. The succession of events has led many lawmakers to make urgent calls for AI regulation.<\/p>\n<p class=\"paywall\">This is an edition of <a href=\"https:\/\/www.wired.com\/author\/maxwell-zeff\/\" class=\"text link\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\" target=\"_blank\">Maxwell Zeff\u2019s<\/a> <a href=\"https:\/\/www.wired.com\/newsletter?sourceCode=editarticle\" class=\"text link\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\" target=\"_blank\">Model Behavior newsletter<\/a>. Read previous newsletters <a href=\"https:\/\/www.wired.com\/tag\/model-behavior\/\" class=\"text link\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\" target=\"_blank\">here.<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"OpenAI has asked members of Congress in recent weeks for clear guidance about whether orchestrating an industry-wide slowdown&hellip;\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":843898,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[27],"tags":[13208,184,35858,181,28,36026,1283,9107],"class_list":["post-843897","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","category-business","tag-ai-safety","tag-anthropic","tag-antitrust","tag-artificial-intelligence","tag-business","tag-model-behavior","tag-openai","tag-regulation"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/843897","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=843897"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/843897\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/843898"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=843897"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=843897"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=843897"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}