{"id":850315,"date":"2026-09-16T23:24:13","date_gmt":"2026-09-16T23:24:13","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/us\/850315\/"},"modified":"2026-09-16T23:24:13","modified_gmt":"2026-09-16T23:24:13","slug":"tennis-mailbag-a-cloud-hangs-over-alexander-zverevs-breakout-season","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/us\/850315\/","title":{"rendered":"Tennis Mailbag: A Cloud Hangs Over Alexander Zverev\u2019s Breakout Season"},"content":{"rendered":"<p id=\"inline-text-0\" class=\"mt-[18px] md:mt-0 mb-[18px] [&amp;_a]:text-primary my-f-1.5\" q:key=\"0\" q:id=\"ad\">Submissions have been lightly edited for brevity and clarity<\/p>\n<p id=\"inline-text-1\" class=\"my-[18px] [&amp;_a]:text-primary my-f-1.5\" q:key=\"0\" q:id=\"ai\">As it is written, Wednesday is mailbag day.<\/p>\n<p id=\"inline-text-2\" class=\"my-[18px] [&amp;_a]:text-primary my-f-1.5\" q:key=\"0\" q:id=\"an\">Today, we are wrapping up the U.S. Open and looking ahead.<\/p>\n<p id=\"inline-text-3\" class=\"my-[18px] [&amp;_a]:text-primary my-f-1.5\" q:key=\"0\" q:id=\"as\">\u2022 Here\u2019s my <a href=\"https:\/\/www.si.com\/tennis\/50-parting-thoughts-from-2026-us-open\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\" target=\"_blank\">50 Thoughts column<\/a> from the U.S. Open.<\/p>\n<p id=\"inline-text-4\" class=\"my-[18px] [&amp;_a]:text-primary my-f-1.5\" q:key=\"0\" q:id=\"ax\">\u2022 Here\u2019s this week\u2019s Served podcast:<\/p>\n<p id=\"inline-text-6\" class=\"my-[18px] [&amp;_a]:text-primary my-f-1.5\" q:key=\"0\" q:id=\"b8\">\u2022 All hail the <a href=\"https:\/\/peterbodo.substack.com\/p\/the-us-open-hurtling-toward-the-abyss-c13\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\" target=\"_blank\">great Pete Bodo<\/a>, though we hope it\u2019s not farewell and will make every effort to prevent that!<\/p>\n<p id=\"inline-text-7\" class=\"my-[18px] [&amp;_a]:text-primary my-f-1.5\" q:key=\"0\" q:id=\"bd\">Let\u2019s hit the questions \u2026<\/p>\n<p id=\"inline-text-10\" class=\"my-[18px] [&amp;_a]:text-primary my-f-1.5\" q:key=\"0\" q:id=\"br\">First, let\u2019s rip off the Band-Aid. Predictably, there were a lot of \u201cwhat do we do about Zverev?\u201d questions. I\u2019d rather not be writing about this. Even specific to him, I\u2019d rather be writing about him winning his second major in 90 days or his fascinating trance, in which he lost track of the score while serving out a major final!<\/p>\n<p id=\"inline-text-11\" class=\"my-[18px] [&amp;_a]:text-primary my-f-1.5\" q:key=\"0\" q:id=\"bw\">But if part of this column is to reflect tennis\u2019s vox populi and address your concerns\/questions, we ought to do this.<\/p>\n<p id=\"inline-text-12\" class=\"my-[18px] [&amp;_a]:text-primary my-f-1.5\" q:key=\"0\" q:id=\"c1\">\u2022 A) Again, those looking for simple answers will be disappointed. Alexander Zverev has been accused of multiple instances of domestic violence by two former partners. To some, this is an indelible stain. There was no guilty verdict (<a href=\"https:\/\/apnews.com\/article\/germany-zverev-tennis-trial-settlement-737e216a21ce06ce35ba1e45eb21fce3\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\" target=\"_blank\">his case was settled out of court<\/a>). To some, that makes it a moot point, and there is no stain at all. Most of us fall in the middle. There is lingering discomfort. There are also insufficient grounds for a ban. And then what? Some fans won\u2019t watch Zverev play. Some fans find him to be a martyr who has endured allegations\u2014inevitably a \u201cwitch hunt\u201d\u2014that resulted in no conviction.<\/p>\n<p id=\"inline-text-13\" class=\"my-[18px] [&amp;_a]:text-primary my-f-1.5\" q:key=\"0\" q:id=\"c6\">B) For the media, there is no conversion chart here. Going a full best-of-five match without mentioning two serious charges seems like a dereliction of duty. (Note that<a href=\"https:\/\/www.sportskeeda.com\/tennis\/news-mary-carillo-talking-alexander-zverev-s-domestic-abuse-allegations-us-open-commentary-applauded-insider\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\" target=\"_blank\"> Mary Carillo<\/a> is an exception to this.) But allegations, however unseemly and severe, don\u2019t nullify his majors or his rankings, and don\u2019t need to be referenced every time he bounces the ball before serving.<\/p>\n<p id=\"inline-text-14\" class=\"my-[18px] [&amp;_a]:text-primary my-f-1.5\" q:key=\"0\" q:id=\"cb\">C) I say this not to condemn but to (I hope) elucidate. John McEnroe didn\u2019t mention the allegations against Zverev during the entire U.S. Open final broadcast, but when Zverev went to the net to shake hands with Ben Shelton, <a href=\"https:\/\/nypost.com\/2026\/09\/14\/sports\/john-mcenroe-blasted-for-belittling-comments-after-alexander-zverevs-us-open-win\/\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\" target=\"_blank\">McEnroe wished Carlos Alcaraz and Jannik Sinner a<\/a> full recovery. Only John knows his intent. Maybe he simply meant that Zverev, again, won a major without facing Alcaraz and Sinner. Maybe it was subconscious. But at the end of the triumphant match, he wasn\u2019t gushing over the No. 1 seed winning his second major in 90 days; instead, he pivoted to two other players. That encapsulates tennis\u2019s collective ambivalence and discomfort here.<\/p>\n<p id=\"inline-text-15\" class=\"my-[18px] [&amp;_a]:text-primary my-f-1.5\" q:key=\"0\" q:id=\"cg\">D) Me? In both New York and at Roland Garros, I noted the Zverev \u201ccloud\u201d in my columns about his title, but I mentioned it near the end of the story. Some of you wish I had not buried this reference. Others wish I had not tainted his major with a reference \u201cto allegations from years ago.\u201d<\/p>\n<p id=\"inline-text-16\" class=\"my-[18px] [&amp;_a]:text-primary my-f-1.5\" q:key=\"0\" q:id=\"cl\">E)\u00a0 <a href=\"https:\/\/slate.com\/culture\/2021\/08\/alexander-zverev-domestic-abuse-allegations-olga-sharypova.html\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\" target=\"_blank\">Facts matter<\/a>. (<a href=\"https:\/\/www.reddit.com\/r\/tennis\/comments\/1wg4uuc\/detailed_account_of_the_allegations_against\/\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\" target=\"_blank\">This<\/a> is as good a write-up as any.) He was never proven innocent, and the allegations were not proven false. Nor was he cleared. There was a settlement, and no guilty verdict is on the books. And if you believe in basic presumptions, you can\u2019t resume calls for a ban. (I put it this way to a casual fan colleague: You don\u2019t have to like him, but you have to acknowledge the absence of a finding of guilt.)\u00a0<\/p>\n<p id=\"inline-text-17\" class=\"my-[18px] [&amp;_a]:text-primary my-f-1.5\" q:key=\"0\" q:id=\"cq\">F)\u00a0 Truth serum? This, of course, is circumstantial (probably inadmissible in a criminal case) and proves nothing. But I always found this chilling: Zverev stood accused of heinous acts, predicated on violence, power and a lack of impulse control. His reputation has been stained. He has caused great unease within his own workforce. And in February 2022, he was kicked out of the Mexico Open after<a href=\"https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/watch?v=jD-FkGeeR-U\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\" target=\"_blank\"> attacking the umpire\u2019s chair<\/a> with his racket.\u00a0 Because he was displeased with the outcome of a doubles match in Acapulco? So often, when people are accused of bad acts, the first defense is, I simply don\u2019t have the capacity to do what has been alleged. It\u2019s not in me. It\u2019s not in my nature. I am not a rude\/mendacious\/violent person. Zverev took that card off the table. Again, it proves nothing. But especially given the tenuous context at the time, it was, to me, chilling and, at best, horrible optics.<\/p>\n<p id=\"inline-text-18\" class=\"my-[18px] [&amp;_a]:text-primary my-f-1.5\" q:key=\"0\" q:id=\"cv\">G) Here\u2019s<a href=\"https:\/\/www.gq.com\/story\/alexander-zverev-us-open\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\" target=\"_blank\"> a GQ piece<\/a> that was published after Zverev\u2019s U.S. Open win. (I was struck by the last paragraph.) Giri Nathan essentially makes this same point<a href=\"https:\/\/x.com\/girinathan\/status\/2099942228458135839?s=20\" rel=\"nofollow\"> here<\/a>. This is a horrible situation for tennis. This is a horrible situation for Zverev. No amount of majors won or declarations of no one can ask me about this again, will make this go away. But had he (then or now) acknowledged the severity of the allegations\u2014I categorically deny the accusations; this is particularly difficult, as I condemn domestic violence in the strongest terms possible and take seriously this unconscionable act and very real issue with no place in civil society\u2014I suspect it would go a long way in the eyes of many fans. (Speaking ahead of the London ATP Finals in 2020,<a href=\"https:\/\/www.skysports.com\/tennis\/news\/12110\/12131694\/alexander-zverev-denies-domestic-violence-allegations\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\" target=\"_blank\"> Zverev said:<\/a> \u201cThese accusations are just unfounded and untrue. We had our ups and downs, but the way our relationship is described in the public is not how it was. That\u2019s not who I am, that\u2019s not how I was raised by my parents. That\u2019s not just simply who I am as a person.\u201d) Getting accused of violence by two different women and then<a href=\"https:\/\/www.ubitennis.net\/2026\/06\/alexander-zverevs-lequipe-interview-cut-short-after-questions-over-domestic-abuse-accusations\/\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\" target=\"_blank\"> ending a prearranged interview<\/a> when the subject is broached? That doesn\u2019t help rehabilitate or reconcile.<\/p>\n<p id=\"inline-text-19\" class=\"my-[18px] [&amp;_a]:text-primary my-f-1.5\" q:key=\"0\" q:id=\"d0\">H) Social media is not real life. But here\u2019s what happens in real life. The No. 1 seed and winner of a major earlier this summer played a semifinal match\u2014at an event with affordability issues\u2014and ticket prices plummeted to less than the cost of a Honey Deuce. Brands scattered. Tournaments have strenuously avoided promoting a Hall of Fame player. Zverev may or may not give you pause, but it\u2019s disingenuous to suggest that there is no cloud, that this isn\u2019t a challenge for tennis as a whole.\u00a0<\/p>\n<p id=\"inline-text-20\" class=\"my-[18px] [&amp;_a]:text-primary my-f-1.5\" q:key=\"0\" q:id=\"d5\">I) Again, there are no simple answers. And as Zverev might become No. 1 and has won 20 of his 21 matches at majors, this discomfort is unlikely to ease. It\u2019s unsatisfying. But in the absence of true resolution (thanks, Byzantine German legal system), fans simply have to weigh the facts and circumstances and find their zone of comfort.<\/p>\n<p><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/us\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/09\/01m2nvabkqx0462t2gs7.jpg\" alt=\"Ben Shelton defeated Carlos Alcaraz in an epic U.S. Open quarterfinal match. \" title=\"Ben Shelton defeated Carlos Alcaraz in an epic U.S. Open quarterfinal match. \" width=\"360\" height=\"203\" class=\"undefined w-full w-full blur-[5px]\" q:id=\"dl\"\/><\/p>\n<p>Ben Shelton defeated Carlos Alcaraz in an epic U.S. Open quarterfinal match.  | REUTERS<\/p>\n<p id=\"inline-text-23\" class=\"my-[18px] [&amp;_a]:text-primary my-f-1.5\" q:key=\"0\" q:id=\"dr\">Jon, I heard there was an epic tennis match last night! Too bad no one saw it!\u00a0<\/p>\n<p id=\"inline-text-24\" class=\"my-[18px] [&amp;_a]:text-primary my-f-1.5\" q:key=\"0\" q:id=\"dw\">J.P.<\/p>\n<p id=\"inline-text-25\" class=\"my-[18px] [&amp;_a]:text-primary my-f-1.5\" q:key=\"0\" q:id=\"e1\">\u2022 There was an epic match in the morning in Spain? (This is in reference to the Alcaraz-Shelton U.S. Open semifinal barn burner.) No, this was such a squandered opportunity. Again, there\u2019s nothing cute or clever about a sporting event ending at 3:33 a.m. local time. The USTA must address this.<\/p>\n<p id=\"inline-text-27\" class=\"my-[18px] [&amp;_a]:text-primary my-f-1.5\" q:key=\"0\" q:id=\"ea\">Jon,<br \/>Great coverage of the U.S. Open and especially your \u201c50 Parting Shots\u201d column, which I always look forward to reading.\u00a0 Quick question from a tennis nerd who listens to Served, just finished Matthew Futterman\u2019s book, went to the qualifiers, and bought Week 1 upper deck Arthur Ashe tickets but did not spend a minute in Ashe, preferring to watch up close, i.e., Francisco Cer\u00fandolo vs. Jan-Lennard Struf and Zachary Svajda vs. Arthur G\u00e9a:\u00a0 There are by my count 29 ATP 250 tournaments and 16 ATP 500 tournaments yet only three 250s\u2014Delray, Beach, Houston and Winston-Salem\u2014and two 500s\u2014Dallas and D.C.\u2014are in the United States.\u00a0 I haven\u2019t checked but I suspect the same is true re: the WTA. Why is that? Has this always been the case? I suspect other tennis nerds like me would love to go see such tournaments if they were held here, especially given the prices and crowds at the US Open. <\/p>\n<p id=\"inline-text-28\" class=\"my-[18px] [&amp;_a]:text-primary my-f-1.5\" q:key=\"0\" q:id=\"ef\">Thanks, Andrew Lachow<\/p>\n<p id=\"inline-text-29\" class=\"my-[18px] [&amp;_a]:text-primary my-f-1.5\" q:key=\"0\" q:id=\"ek\">\u2022 The number of smaller tournaments in the U.S. is down dramatically from even 2001 (25 years ago), let alone the \u201980s. Some of this is the global spread of tennis, with events moving to countries that claim the best players. (Hey, Boris Becker and Steffi Graf are doing well in Germany? Let\u2019s set up shop.) Some of this is following the money. Some of this is the USTA taking its eye off the ball.<\/p>\n<p id=\"inline-text-31\" class=\"my-[18px] [&amp;_a]:text-primary my-f-1.5\" q:key=\"0\" q:id=\"et\">Wow! Super Saturday in \u201984 and now Terrific Tuesday in \u201926!!!<\/p>\n<p id=\"inline-text-32\" class=\"my-[18px] [&amp;_a]:text-primary my-f-1.5\" q:key=\"0\" q:id=\"ey\">All four matches went the distance and three of those matches went to a match tiebreak.<\/p>\n<p id=\"inline-text-33\" class=\"my-[18px] [&amp;_a]:text-primary my-f-1.5\" q:key=\"0\" q:id=\"f3\">I realize yesterday\u2019s matches on Arthur Ashe were over two sessions, but is this the first time that each match on Ashe went the distance?<\/p>\n<p id=\"inline-text-34\" class=\"my-[18px] [&amp;_a]:text-primary my-f-1.5\" q:key=\"0\" q:id=\"f8\">Rod <br \/>Toronto Canada\u00a0<\/p>\n<p id=\"inline-text-35\" class=\"my-[18px] [&amp;_a]:text-primary my-f-1.5\" q:key=\"0\" q:id=\"fd\">\u2022 Alas, it ended at 3:33 a.m. local time which not only meant few people saw the conclusion, but it complicated the best day narrative.<\/p>\n<p id=\"inline-text-37\" class=\"my-[18px] [&amp;_a]:text-primary my-f-1.5\" q:key=\"0\" q:id=\"fm\">I saw Ga\u00ebl Monfils and Elina Svitolina arriving to the practice courts to take over from Mirra Andreeva and Andrey Rublev\u2014Svitolina ignored both Russians and walked straight to the bench to drop off her stuff and Monfils greeted Rublev with a big hug and chatted for 30 seconds before joining her. I didn\u2019t notice if he said hello to Andreeva, but I\u2019d assume he knows Rublev far better. Obviously not the same as an on-court handshake, but I thought it was interesting!<\/p>\n<p id=\"inline-text-38\" class=\"my-[18px] [&amp;_a]:text-primary my-f-1.5\" q:key=\"0\" q:id=\"fr\">Anon<\/p>\n<p id=\"inline-text-39\" class=\"my-[18px] [&amp;_a]:text-primary my-f-1.5\" q:key=\"0\" q:id=\"fw\">\u2022 Funny, I asked a rep from the Monfils camp about this. The speculation was that he might have been inclined to shake the opponents\u2019 hands, but spousal pressure might have overwhelmed those instincts. Alas, we\u2019ll never know.<\/p>\n<p id=\"inline-text-41\" class=\"my-[18px] [&amp;_a]:text-primary my-f-1.5\" q:key=\"0\" q:id=\"g5\">Can we all just admit that Aryna Sabalenka is a sore loser?\u00a0<\/p>\n<p id=\"inline-text-42\" class=\"my-[18px] [&amp;_a]:text-primary my-f-1.5\" q:key=\"0\" q:id=\"ga\">P.\u00a0<\/p>\n<p id=\"inline-text-43\" class=\"my-[18px] [&amp;_a]:text-primary my-f-1.5\" q:key=\"0\" q:id=\"gf\">\u2022 I know I am likely in the minority here. My buddy, Chanda Rubin, and I argued about this (civilly) on the air the other day. But I can\u2019t get too worked up about Sabalenka in defeat. She lost the final, finishing the year with zero major titles for the first time since 2022. She lost the No. 1 ranking. She lost another three-set final, her fifth. She gave Elena Rybakina an appropriate handshake. Forgive her if she is frustrated.<\/p>\n<p id=\"inline-text-44\" class=\"my-[18px] [&amp;_a]:text-primary my-f-1.5\" q:key=\"0\" q:id=\"gk\">You know what should offend us? Athletes who don\u2019t care or don\u2019t honor their talents. Sabalenka cares. Deeply. Would it have been better if she waited until she got to the locker room before breaking equipment? (Not that it saved her in 2024 or <a href=\"https:\/\/www.espn.com\/video\/clip\/_\/id\/47742574\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\" target=\"_blank\">Coco Gauff in Australia<\/a>.) Yes. Would it have been better to verbalize frustration but not act on it? Sure. Would I like it if my own children had broken their toys in defeat? No. But I can\u2019t get too exercised.<\/p>\n<p><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/us\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/09\/01m2nvf8fmw25aaf64wv.jpg\" alt=\"Aryna Sabalenka fell to Elena Rybakina in the 2026 U.S. Open final and also lost the No. 1 ranking to her rival. \" title=\"Aryna Sabalenka fell to Elena Rybakina in the 2026 U.S. Open final and also lost the No. 1 ranking to her rival. \" width=\"360\" height=\"203\" class=\"undefined w-full w-full blur-[5px]\" q:id=\"gw\"\/><\/p>\n<p>Aryna Sabalenka fell to Elena Rybakina in the 2026 U.S. Open final and also lost the No. 1 ranking to her rival.  | IMAGN IMAGES via Reuters<\/p>\n<p id=\"inline-text-47\" class=\"my-[18px] [&amp;_a]:text-primary my-f-1.5\" q:key=\"0\" q:id=\"h6\">Hey Jon.\u00a0 Hope you are great. A couple of comments\/question regarding Aryna Sabalenka.\u00a0 Full disclosure, I&#8217;m a big fan, and it\u2019s been rough seeing her not win a major this year. It seems like her volatile temperament has been a factor in all of her losses, except for maybe the U.S. Open loss to Rybakina where Rybakina was the better player on the day. Knowing that she can get any combination of angry, despondent, panicky, rushed, or in one mode of playing, you\u2019d think that she would have developed and utilized some new mental tools for her arsenal.\u00a0 She\u2019ll never have the court demeanor of Chris Evert, but do you agree it would be to her benefit her to emulate Chris; i.e., slow down, not show her opponent she&#8217;s frustrated (thus giving them increased confidence and probably a game or two), and mentally dictate the match as much as she can physically? I know it all looks easier to an outsider, but I\u2019ve not seen her make these adjustments to her game, and am surprised her team hasn&#8217;t made them happen. Thanks!<\/p>\n<p id=\"inline-text-48\" class=\"my-[18px] [&amp;_a]:text-primary my-f-1.5\" q:key=\"0\" q:id=\"hb\">Scott, Charlotte, NC<\/p>\n<p id=\"inline-text-49\" class=\"my-[18px] [&amp;_a]:text-primary my-f-1.5\" q:key=\"0\" q:id=\"hg\">\u2022 With some boundaries, I think you have to let players be themselves. Clara Tauson is never going to be a serve-and-volleyer. Learner Tien is never going to be a servebot. Same with personalities. It\u2019s hard to take an expressive, extrovert and say, be more like Chris Evert.<\/p>\n<p id=\"inline-text-51\" class=\"my-[18px] [&amp;_a]:text-primary my-f-1.5\" q:key=\"0\" q:id=\"hp\">I know I write you too much \u2026\u00a0 so sorry about that but oh well. Anyway what in the world is going on Iga \u015awi\u0105tek? She won Wimbledon just last year and I just can\u2019t figure her out.\u00a0 Does she even want to play anymore? Does the fact that she made a very questionable coaching change a few years back have anything to do with this?<\/p>\n<p id=\"inline-text-52\" class=\"my-[18px] [&amp;_a]:text-primary my-f-1.5\" q:key=\"0\" q:id=\"hu\">Thanks. <br \/>Keith Jacobson <\/p>\n<p id=\"inline-text-53\" class=\"my-[18px] [&amp;_a]:text-primary my-f-1.5\" q:key=\"0\" q:id=\"hz\">\u2022 All good. \u015awi\u0105tek is a generational player. Full stop. But especially for an athlete with a full-time mental coach, her shortcomings\u2014and she speaks about this\u2014seem to stem from confidence issues, rather than physical injuries or bad technique.<\/p>\n<p id=\"inline-text-55\" class=\"my-[18px] [&amp;_a]:text-primary my-f-1.5\" q:key=\"0\" q:id=\"i8\">Hi Jon,<\/p>\n<p id=\"inline-text-56\" class=\"my-[18px] [&amp;_a]:text-primary my-f-1.5\" q:key=\"0\" q:id=\"id\">A couple of comments on your US Open 50 parting thoughts:<\/p>\n<p id=\"inline-text-57\" class=\"my-[18px] [&amp;_a]:text-primary my-f-1.5\" q:key=\"0\" q:id=\"ii\">You mentioned that \u201cIt\u2019s become axiomatic that college tennis is having a big impact on the professional game.\u201d However, the results of this tournament are a reminder that a college player hasn\u2019t won a major on the men\u2019s side since John McEnroe in 1984, and on the women\u2019s side since Billie Jean King in 1975! While many players who have been in the college system have had fine pro careers, it has not been an avenue for achieving greatness.<\/p>\n<p id=\"inline-text-58\" class=\"my-[18px] [&amp;_a]:text-primary my-f-1.5\" q:key=\"0\" q:id=\"in\">Lots of talk about high ticket prices, but per ticketdata.com, ticket prices across all sessions were similar to last year (except for the first Sunday), and cheaper than last year as the tournament wore on. The final get-in price (again, per ticketdata.com) for the men\u2019s semifinal featuring the player that ended up winning the tournament was a mere $ 40, about 10 times lower than the price of a grounds pass for Day 1 opening matches, so it goes both ways.<\/p>\n<p id=\"inline-text-59\" class=\"my-[18px] [&amp;_a]:text-primary my-f-1.5\" q:key=\"0\" q:id=\"is\">Your thoughts? <br \/>Sal G. MA<\/p>\n<p id=\"inline-text-60\" class=\"my-[18px] [&amp;_a]:text-primary my-f-1.5\" q:key=\"0\" q:id=\"ix\">\u2022 Yes, we came within a match of a college champion (note: as we did when Danielle Collins and Jennifer Brady made the Australian final). But I would still argue that as a matter of quantity and overall impact (including doubles), the college game has never been more relevant.<\/p>\n<p id=\"inline-text-61\" class=\"my-[18px] [&amp;_a]:text-primary my-f-1.5\" q:key=\"0\" q:id=\"j2\">The market economy is a fickle beast. U.S. Open grounds passes could be priced north of $400, and the tickets for the Zverev\u2013Karen Khachanov semifinal were available for under $20, i.e., cheaper than a Honey Deuce. Something is only worth what someone else will pay for it.<\/p>\n<p id=\"inline-text-63\" class=\"my-[18px] [&amp;_a]:text-primary my-f-1.5\" q:key=\"0\" q:id=\"jb\">Take us out, David, NYC, with a different perspective: <\/p>\n<p id=\"inline-text-64\" class=\"my-[18px] [&amp;_a]:text-primary my-f-1.5\" q:key=\"0\" q:id=\"jg\">\ufeffHI JON: I admire how consistently and vociferously you criticize the 12-day Masters 1000 format in your mailbags; however, I\u2019m afraid I must respectfully disagree.<\/p>\n<p id=\"inline-text-65\" class=\"my-[18px] [&amp;_a]:text-primary my-f-1.5\" q:key=\"0\" q:id=\"jl\">You mention that there\u2019s a proof-of-concept in that the format worked in Indian Wells and Miami, which is true: for years, they were the most popular M1000 events, and never once suffered from the \u201cbloated one-week event\u201d criticism the others receive. I personally see this as American bias (and I say that as an American). When the ATP downgraded Hamburg to a 500 event in 2009, European tournament directors complained that a North American tournament never would\u2019ve gotten the axe, and I agree with that. There is definitely a double standard applied to tennis tournaments in North America compared to the rest of the world, and seemingly brand-new criticism of this format is just another example of that.<\/p>\n<p id=\"inline-text-66\" class=\"my-[18px] [&amp;_a]:text-primary my-f-1.5\" q:key=\"0\" q:id=\"jq\">You also mention the toll it takes on players\u2019 schedules, which is an honorable concern that I share. But I remember players complaining just as much about playing every day as they are now about the new days off between matches. Sometimes you\u2019d get a final where one player was gassed from three straight 2.5-hour matches and clearly had nothing left in the tank. (And they still skipped M 1000 events at a decent rate under the old format.) It is also clear to me that the players complaining about schedule length have much easier ways to shorten their calendars without skipping M 1000s: for example, Casper Ruud played seven 500s last year; Alex de Minaur played eight; Ben Shelton and Taylor Fritz each played nine. For comparison, the ATP requirement for a top 30 player is only four 500s a year. These players could shave up to five weeks off their schedule without breaking any tour rules, which makes up for the additional five weeks of M 1000s that the past few years have given us. And crucially, these new weeks give us \u201cbest-on-best\u201d tennis instead of scattered appearances at smaller tournaments where top players are given big appearance fees to play in the first place. As someone from a city that recently lost a WTA 500 tournament, I care deeply about the continued success of the smaller events. But I also couldn\u2019t help but notice that some top seeds clearly weren\u2019t playing at maximum effort at my local event, since the goal of their appearance was to warm up for bigger tournaments and of course cash in the hefty appearance fee they received before hitting a single ball. There can\u2019t be that many ATP players who single-handedly keep tournaments in business by showing up\u2014perhaps only Alcaraz, Sinner, and Djokovic, none of whom play very many 500s and 250s to begin with. I\u2019d much rather see lower-ranked players get a chance at more ranking points (and prize money) while also getting to earn guaranteed main-draw prize money in the M 1000s. With the expanded format, 30 additional players are direct-acceptances in M 1000 main draws, and this is a massive pot of annual \u201csalary\u201d for players ranked 45-75 in the world. Not to mention that the expanded qualifying draws make it possible for more players to get their big break on the tour (Would any casual fan know Valentin Vacherot\u2019s name with a 56-draw Shanghai last year?). So the way I see it, the expanded M 1000 events are a tradeoff where more money is given to the \u201ctrench soldiers\u201d of the tour at the expense of bloated appearance fees for top players at smaller events. And that\u2019s a tradeoff I\u2019m willing to make.<\/p>\n<p id=\"inline-text-67\" class=\"my-[18px] [&amp;_a]:text-primary my-f-1.5\" q:key=\"0\" q:id=\"jv\">Perhaps there\u2019s room for compromise here: We could keep the draws at 96 and shorten the tournaments to 10 days. But that also has its drawbacks, because it isn\u2019t really fair to any tournament that occupies the previous week. We could have ATP 250 events coinciding with the second week of the M1000s. And we could increase the M1000 bonus pool to further incentivize the top players to prioritize those on their calendar over the smaller events. I wouldn\u2019t be opposed to any of these. But I believe reverting to the old M 1000 format would be detrimental to the product of professional tennis as a whole.<\/p>\n<p id=\"inline-text-68\" class=\"my-[18px] [&amp;_a]:text-primary my-f-1.5\" q:key=\"0\" q:id=\"k0\">Best, <br \/>David, NYC\u00a0<\/p>\n<p id=\"inline-text-69\" class=\"my-[18px] [&amp;_a]:text-primary my-f-1.5\" q:key=\"0\" q:id=\"k5\">HAVE A GOOD WEEK, EVERYONE!<\/p>\n<p><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" width=\"22\" height=\"22\" alt=\"\" src=\"https:\/\/assets.minutemediacdn.com\/platform\/google_discover_icon.svg\" class=\"shrink-0\"\/>Add us as a preferred source on Google<a aria-label=\"Follow si.com on Google News\" href=\"https:\/\/www.google.com\/preferences\/source?q=si.com\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer nofollow\" preventdefault:click=\"\" class=\"flex h-[30px] w-[30px] shrink-0 items-center justify-center rounded-full bg-primary font-group-large text-sm font-medium text-white transition-colors hover:bg-secondary focus:bg-secondary md:w-auto md:gap-2.5 md:px-4 md:py-[5px]\" on:pointerenter=\"q-DtmviDxZ.js#s_1NOcOpHWmT0\" on:touchstart=\"q-tPEhYbgC.js#s_R8AiGTDeM28\" on:focus=\"q-DLcswT2V.js#s_gxiTM6qMMu8\" on:click=\"q-BB9VQp3H.js#s_lDqay9E5m5g[0]\" q:id=\"kf\">Follow<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"Submissions have been lightly edited for brevity and clarity As it is written, Wednesday is mailbag day. Today,&hellip;\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":850316,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[72],"tags":[99,428],"class_list":["post-850315","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","category-tennis","tag-sports","tag-tennis"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/850315","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=850315"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/850315\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/850316"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=850315"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=850315"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=850315"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}