The leak doesn’t say what the price will be, but I can estimate it from the hardware. If Motorola keeps it at $1,499 or less, the Razr Flex could replace my Google Pixel 10.<\/p>\n
<\/a><\/p>\n Related<\/p>\n \t\t Premium features, premium price<\/p>\n A flip phone folds too small for how I use my phone<\/p>\n The cover screen is the problem<\/p>\n Motorola’s Razr Ultra 2026 folds down to 88.1mm tall, which is about as pocketable as a modern phone gets.<\/p>\n Its cover screen is 4 inches at 1272 x 1080, which makes it nearly square.<\/p>\n That screen handles notifications and quick replies, but most apps feel cramped in a square. I would open the phone for anything longer than a quick glance, so I’d spend most of my day on the larger inner screen.<\/p>\n What I want is a phone that I can use closed for most tasks, but that still takes up less space than a standard brick.<\/p>\n The Razr Flex fits between a flip and my Pixel 10<\/p>\n Shorter than a slab, thinner than a flip<\/p>\n The Razr Flex reportedly measures 110 x 76 x 12.6mm folded and weighs 215 grams. That makes it about 22mm taller than the Razr Ultra and about 43mm shorter than my 152.8mm-tall Pixel 10.<\/p>\n It would also be thinner when closed than Motorola’s flip, which measures 15.7mm folded. Reports suggest it would be shorter and narrower than the Galaxy Z Fold 8.<\/p>\n Its 4.97-inch cover screen is reportedly 1736 x 1140, which is a regular phone shape instead of a square. At that size, I could text, check maps, and answer emails without opening the phone.<\/p>\n However, the Flex weighs 11 grams more than my Pixel 10 and is 4mm thicker. So its advantage is height and pocket space, not weight.<\/p>\n I used a Samsung Galaxy S21+ for a long time before it was damaged, and I’ve always preferred its 6.7-inch screen to my Pixel 10’s 6.3-inch display.<\/p>\n The Flex reportedly opens to a 6.92-inch inner OLED screen with a 2364 x 1728 resolution and a 165Hz refresh rate.<\/p>\n The difference is shape, because the Flex screen is much more square than the tall S21+ display. Landscape videos should fill more of the screen, and web pages should read more like they do on a small tablet.<\/p>\n <\/a><\/p>\n Read our review<\/p>\n \t\t It’s an excellent phone, but there’s more fun elsewhere<\/p>\n What I would give up for the Razr Flex<\/p>\n The camera costs the most<\/p>\n Leaving the Pixel 10 means losing its 5x telephoto camera. The Flex reportedly has only a 50MP main camera and a 50MP ultrawide.<\/p>\n I’ve never been a camera person (10 photos in a year is already a lot), so this doesn’t sting too much.<\/p>\n The Pixel 10 is also rated IP68, while the Flex is reportedly rated IP48 and IP49, but this is the same rating as the Galaxy Z Fold 8.<\/p>\n Compared to the Fold 8, the Flex has a smaller inner screen and a reportedly thicker body. Samsung’s phone has a 7.6-inch inner display and measures 9.7mm thick when folded.<\/p>\n Reports also disagree on the chip. Android Headlines says the Flex uses the Snapdragon 8 Gen 5 from the Razr Fold, while GSMArena lists the Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5.<\/p>\n Why $1,499 is my limit for the Razr Flex<\/p>\n Anything more favors the Fold 8<\/p>\n I don’t expect Motorola to price the Flex below the Razr Ultra 2026, which costs $1,499 with 16GB of RAM and 512GB of storage.<\/p>\n The Flex reportedly ships with 12GB of RAM and 256GB of storage, so matching the Ultra’s price is realistic.<\/p>\n Memory costs have also pushed phone prices up this year, so I won’t be expecting a bargain. At $1,499, the Flex would cost $400 less than both the Fold 8 and Motorola’s $1,899 book-style Razr Fold<\/a>. <\/p>\n If the Flex costs more than $1,499, the gap to the Fold 8 becomes small enough that Samsung’s bigger screen and thinner body just make more sense.<\/p>\n I’ve been trying to ditch Samsung after losing three phones to the same class of screen issues. So if I break a foldable, I’d be happier losing $1,499 than $1,899.<\/p>\n <\/a><\/p>\n Related<\/p>\n
\n ![\"The](\"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/us\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/10\/moto-razr-ultra-review-6.jpg\"\/)
<\/p>\n
\n\t\t\tMotorola’s Razr Ultra is as impressive as it is expensive
\n\t\t<\/a><\/p>\n![\"The](\"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/us\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/10\/galaxy-z-flip-6-next-to-moto-razr-plus-24.jpg\")
<\/p>\n
\n ![\"A](\"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/us\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/10\/samsung-galaxy-z-fold-8-ultra-back-hand.JPG\"\/)
<\/p>\n
\n\t\t\tI reviewed the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 8 Ultra and it has a problem. It’s called the Galaxy Z Fold 8
\n\t\t<\/a><\/p>\n![\"Using](\"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/us\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/10\/pixel-10-camera-coach-reframe.JPG\"){kind=tracking}
<\/p>\n![\"The](\"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/us\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/10\/galaxy-z-fold-8-moto-razr-flex.JPG\")
<\/p>\n
\n ![\"Motorola](\"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/us\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/10\/motorola-razr-fold-smartphone-with-a-moto-pen-ultra.png\"\/)
<\/p>\n