{"id":874615,"date":"2026-10-08T02:02:13","date_gmt":"2026-10-08T02:02:13","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/us\/874615\/"},"modified":"2026-10-08T02:02:13","modified_gmt":"2026-10-08T02:02:13","slug":"dna-puts-humans-in-the-americas-at-the-height-of-the-last-ice-age-but-the-debate-isnt-over","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/us\/874615\/","title":{"rendered":"DNA Puts Humans in the Americas at the Height of the Last Ice Age, but the Debate Isn&#8217;t Over"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Compared to the rest of the world, the American continent welcomed its first humans relatively later. You\u2019d think that this (relative) proximity to modern times should make it easier to study\u2014but reality isn\u2019t so straightforward, it seems.<\/p>\n<p>At least, that\u2019s one takeaway from a <a href=\"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.gde.2026.102534\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\" target=\"_blank\">recent review<\/a> of genomic research on the arrival of humans in the Americas based on a collection of relevant papers and datasets. From the analysis, the University of Kansas (KU) researchers outlined three migration models for when humans started to occupy the American continent: before, during, or after the last glacial maximum, or LGM (which the authors date to between 25,000 and 14,000 years ago, though it is <a href=\"https:\/\/www.science.org\/doi\/10.1126\/science.1172873\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\" target=\"_blank\">commonly dated<\/a> to about 26,000 and 19,000 years ago).<\/p>\n<p>The evidence pointed to human arrival no earlier than 21,000 years ago\u2014at the height of the last ice age\u2014although archaeological evidence may be consistent with an earlier date. Based on this research, it appears that humans living in Siberia or Beringia split into different groups during the last glacial maximum and possibly again roughly 16,000 years ago. For context, the last ice age ended about 11,700 years ago.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cThe results of this genomic synthesis align closely with our most reliable archaeological evidence,\u201d noted <a href=\"https:\/\/www.txst.edu\/anthropology\/people\/faculty-staff\/kilby.html\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\" target=\"_blank\">David Kilby<\/a>, an archaeologist at Texas State University uninvolved in the new work, to Gizmodo. \u201cThis paper is an excellent example of how that relationship [between archaeology and genomics] can work to solve one of our most stubborn questions\u2014how and when the ancestors of contemporary Native Americans came to occupy these last uninhabited continents.\u201d<\/p>\n<p> So, which is it? <img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"wp-image-2000822991 size-medium\" src=\"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/us\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/10\/pre-clovis-site-map-336x336.png\" alt=\"Pre Clovis Site Map\" width=\"336\" height=\"336\"  \/>A map of archaeological sites with disputed claims to the oldest evidence of humans in the Americas. \u00a9 Pratyeka via Wikimedia Commons <\/p>\n<p>The debate over human arrival in the Americas has progressed over the years. According to the paper, when the debate first started in the 19th century, archaeologists didn\u2019t agree on whether this migration occurred during the Pleistocene (from 2.58 million years to 11,700 years ago). But while it\u2019s now agreed that it happened during the Pleistocene, the exact timing remains elusive.<\/p>\n<p>Over the past 16 years, scientists have published 257 whole genomes of ancient Americans, the team explained in the study.\u00a0\u201cThat\u2019s more than one per month for 16 years,\u201d <a href=\"https:\/\/olemiss.edu\/profiles\/jwtune.php\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\" target=\"_blank\">Jesse Tune<\/a>, an archaeologist at the University of Mississippi who wasn\u2019t involved in the latest work, told Gizmodo. \u201cDuring that time an additional 1,204 genome-wide datasets have been published. Incredible.\u201d<\/p>\n<p> More to be desired <\/p>\n<p>But geneticists still observe significant limits, as study co-authors <a href=\"https:\/\/anthropology.ku.edu\/people\/jennifer-raff\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\" target=\"_blank\">Jennifer Raff<\/a>, <a href=\"https:\/\/anthropology.ku.edu\/people\/savannah-hay\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\" target=\"_blank\">Savannah Hay<\/a>, and <a href=\"https:\/\/www.blpotter.com\/\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\" target=\"_blank\">Bethany Potter<\/a> told Gizmodo in a joint response. For instance, samples from \u201cvery old but (thus far) well-validated sites\u201d like White Sands are dated to 23,000 years ago. However, genetic data suggests that this population didn\u2019t make that big of a contribution to modern Indigenous people, and relationships like these \u201ccomplicate our understanding of genetic data,\u201d the researchers explained.<\/p>\n<p> <img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"wp-image-2000822987 size-full\" src=\"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/us\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/10\/white-sands-footprints.jpg\" alt=\"White Sands Footprints\" width=\"1280\" height=\"853\"  \/>Human footprints found at the White Sands site in New Mexico. \u00a9 National Park Service via Wikimedia Commons <\/p>\n<p>To give another example, the oldest published genome in the Americas is the <a href=\"https:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Anzick-1\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\" target=\"_blank\">Anzick child<\/a>, dated to about 12,800 years old, but scientists can\u2019t tell if the child\u2019s genome is representative of earlier migratory waves, the team said. If the team\u2019s estimate of 21,000 years is correct, earlier populations would either belong to an undiscovered or near-decimated lineage or a lineage that\u2019s rare in modern Native Americans.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cThis paper is a literature review, so rather than contributing novel data, we compiled recent articles and considered their findings as a whole,\u201d the researchers said, adding that in general, the geographic distribution of genetic data is still quite uneven. Relatedly, the team decided to address three different models in the paper to reflect ongoing debates on the validity of certain sites dated to older than 13,000 years.<\/p>\n<p> One way to see things <\/p>\n<p>Of course, the latest analysis isn\u2019t necessarily an exhaustive account of different interpretations that exist\u2014which really speaks to the contested nature of this topic. <a href=\"https:\/\/www.uaf.edu\/anthro\/contact-us\/faculty\/ben-potter.php\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\" target=\"_blank\">Ben Potter<\/a>, an archaeologist at the University of Alaska Fairbanks uninvolved in the new work (and no relation to Bethany Potter), told Gizmodo that he found the paper\u2019s analysis of archaeological data and consensus \u201cless convincing\u201d compared to the review of genetic data. Potter suggested that reading the latest analysis in tandem with <a href=\"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1590\/1678-4685-gmb-2025-0231\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\" target=\"_blank\">similar<\/a> <a href=\"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1126\/sciadv.aat5473\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\" target=\"_blank\">reviews<\/a> may help provide a broader perspective.<\/p>\n<p> <img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"wp-image-2000823000 size-large\" src=\"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/us\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/10\/map-america-migration-1280x977.jpg\" alt=\"Map America Migration\" width=\"1280\" height=\"977\"  \/>Map depicting all published pre-contact whole-genome data in the Americas scaled by sample size. \u00a9 Raff et al., 2026 <\/p>\n<p>\u201cMy feeling is this review provides one perspective on the peopling, based largely on David Meltzer and Eske Willerslev\u2019s <a href=\"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1038\/s41586-021-03499-y\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\" target=\"_blank\">interpretations<\/a>, as well as a survey of some authors (and exclusion of others),\u201d Potter said. \u201cTo be transparent, most of my colleagues favor the post-LGM model, after 16,000 to 14,000 years ago, as do most archaeologists, from my experience. That said, I appreciate that the map does provide some alternative models.\u201d Meltzer is an archaeologist at Southern Methodist University, and\u00a0Willerslev is an evolutionary geneticist at the University of Cambridge in the U.K., both specializing in the peopling of the Americas.<\/p>\n<p> Looking onward <\/p>\n<p>Still, others commended the study for its demonstration of how paleogenomics has contributed to archaeology in the past couple of decades. Kilby said that the genetic pattern \u201ccorresponds to a satisfying degree with the currently known archaeological pattern\u2014very few compelling sites older than about 16,000 years, a small but growing number of sites that date between 14,000 and 16,000 years, and widespread occupation of the North American continent by 13,000 years ago.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>\u201cGenomic research is rapidly expanding and improving our understanding of human migrations,\u201d Tune added. \u201cAs [the researchers] state, the complex nature of this problem requires genomics and archaeology to work in tandem together to fully understand how the pieces of the puzzle fit together.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>\u201cThere is still a lot to learn, and it\u2019s important to be open-minded,\u201d said the KU team. \u201cOur biggest takeaway from this project is the need for additional data as we continue exploring the peopling of the Americas.\u201d<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"Compared to the rest of the world, the American continent welcomed its first humans relatively later. You\u2019d think&hellip;\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":874616,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[32],"tags":[18380,9171,368170,79],"class_list":["post-874615","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","category-science","tag-archaeology","tag-genomics","tag-peopling-of-americas","tag-science"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/874615","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=874615"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/874615\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/874616"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=874615"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=874615"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=874615"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}