{"id":877794,"date":"2026-10-10T20:04:12","date_gmt":"2026-10-10T20:04:12","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/us\/877794\/"},"modified":"2026-10-10T20:04:12","modified_gmt":"2026-10-10T20:04:12","slug":"fda-may-allow-some-toxic-chemicals-to-be-added-to-food-without-safety-review-experts-are-alarmed-trump-administration","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/us\/877794\/","title":{"rendered":"FDA may allow some toxic chemicals to be added to food without safety review. Experts are alarmed | Trump administration"},"content":{"rendered":"<p class=\"dcr-1s160rg\">The US <a href=\"https:\/\/www.theguardian.com\/food\" data-link-name=\"in body link\" data-component=\"auto-linked-tag\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\" target=\"_blank\">Food<\/a> and Drug Administration (FDA) is proposing to expand a controversial loophole to allow some of the world\u2019s most toxic chemicals to be added directly to food without a safety review.<\/p>\n<p class=\"dcr-1s160rg\">The \u201cthreshold of regulation\u201d (TOR) exemption currently allows dangerous compounds to be used without review in food contact materials, such as packaging or processing equipment, if they are not carcinogenic, and are added at levels below 0.5 parts per billion (ppb).<\/p>\n<p class=\"dcr-1s160rg\">But campaigners say many chemicals, especially hormone disruptors linked to brain damage and reproductive harm in children, are considered dangerous at levels far below 0.5ppb. Even in its limited form, the loophole has already raised alarm. One TOR exemption that allows the rocket fuel chemical perchlorate to be used in grain bags <a href=\"https:\/\/blogs.edf.org\/health\/2019\/01\/11\/fda-perchlorate-in-food\/\" data-link-name=\"in body link\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\" target=\"_blank\">dramatically increased<\/a> the amount of the compound found in kids\u2019 cereal, which advocates say could cause <a href=\"https:\/\/blogs.edf.org\/health\/2019\/10\/29\/edf-joins-court-challenge-of-fdas-refusal-to-ban-use-of-perchlorate-in-food-contact-materials\/\" data-link-name=\"in body link\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\" target=\"_blank\">brain damage<\/a>.<\/p>\n<p class=\"dcr-1s160rg\">The new proposed TOR expansion would allow companies to use the chemicals as an ingredient added directly to food, as flavorings, preservatives, emulsifiers, processing aids, enzymes, stabilizers and binders, and for myriad other uses, in ultra-processing.<\/p>\n<p class=\"dcr-1s160rg\">The revelation comes after Robert F Kennedy Jr and the FDA claimed victory and declared \u201c<a href=\"https:\/\/www.hhs.gov\/promisesmade-promiseskept\/index.html\" data-link-name=\"in body link\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\" target=\"_blank\">promises kept<\/a>\u201d in August for \u201cclosing\u201d a different controversial regulatory loophole called \u201cgenerally regarded as safe\u201d (Gras), which over the decades was used to send ingredients to the market that campaigners said could <a href=\"https:\/\/www.fda.gov\/food\/hfp-constituent-updates\/fda-update-post-market-assessment-tara-flour\" data-link-name=\"in body link\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\" target=\"_blank\">sicken<\/a>, injure or <a href=\"https:\/\/www.gao.gov\/assets\/hrd-93-28r.pdf\" data-link-name=\"in body link\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\" target=\"_blank\">kill<\/a> people.<\/p>\n<p class=\"dcr-1s160rg\">But Kennedy and the FDA did not mention in their public relations material that the proposed Gras rule <a href=\"https:\/\/www.govinfo.gov\/content\/pkg\/FR-2026-08-11\/pdf\/2026-16296.pdf\" data-link-name=\"in body link\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\" target=\"_blank\">submitted quietly to the Federal Register<\/a> includes the TOR expansion, which public health advocates warn will also send alarming levels of toxic chemicals to grocery store shelves. Some advocates have accused Kennedy of deception.<\/p>\n<p class=\"dcr-1s160rg\">Regardless, the proposal represents a major win for big food, advocates say, and is based on flawed science.<\/p>\n<p class=\"dcr-1s160rg\">\u201cThe FDA and industry have this position that if there\u2019s only a little bit of something in the diet, then it\u2019s not going to be problematic, but that isn\u2019t supported by science of any kind,\u201d said Maricel Maffini, an independent food consultant who worked on TOR issues.<\/p>\n<p class=\"dcr-1s160rg\">\u201cI don\u2019t know how they\u2019re going to square that circle because there are many ingredients that at very low levels also cause serious issues in the body,\u201d Maffini added.<\/p>\n<p class=\"dcr-1s160rg\">The FDA did not respond to a request for comment.<\/p>\n<p class=\"dcr-1s160rg\">The proposed rule states that \u201cany substance used in food (both directly or indirectly added) will be exempted from regulation as a food additive\u201d if there is \u201cno appreciable risk to human health\u201d.<\/p>\n<p class=\"dcr-1s160rg\">Advocates say the problem lies in the definition of \u201cappreciable risk\u201d. Chemicals like perchlorate, some phthalates, some bisphenols, some Pfas \u201cforever chemicals\u201d and some flame retardants are not classified as carcinogenic, but they can cause harm at doses far lower than 0.5ppb. These could in theory be used as TOR ingredients, as could chemicals that are neurotoxic, cause brain damage, attack the immune system, harm the microbiota or give rise to any number of other adverse health impacts.<\/p>\n<p class=\"dcr-1s160rg\">Maffini said she was particularly concerned about flavorings because ultra-processed food companies use chemicals that \u201cplay around with the nervous system and receptors in your mouth to try to make us eat more and more of something\u201d.<\/p>\n<p class=\"dcr-1s160rg\">Advocates say the rule also does not take into account cumulative effects \u2013 one small dose of a TOR-exempted chemical may not be harmful, but many small doses of multiple toxic chemicals could be a problem. It also creates a secondary loophole in allowing carcinogens if the substance is created as an impurity.<\/p>\n<p class=\"dcr-1s160rg\">Meanwhile, there is no way for consumers to know if a product contains a TOR-exempted chemical.<\/p>\n<p class=\"dcr-1s160rg\">\u201cThey\u2019re widening another loophole, but trying to say they made our food safer,\u201d said Maria Doa, a scientist with the Environmental Defense Fund (EDF) non-profit. \u201cThey did not make our food safer.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>How TOR led to children eating rocket fuel chemicals<\/p>\n<p class=\"dcr-1s160rg\">The problems with perchlorate in kids\u2019 cereal are a warning about TOR\u2019s risks, advocates say. In 2005, German chemical giant BASF used TOR to exempt perchlorate from regulations for use in \u201csuper sacks\u201d, which are one-ton polypropylene plastic storage bags used on farms to move grains, including rice, flour and oats.<\/p>\n<p class=\"dcr-1s160rg\">Perchlorate stops grains from sticking to super sacks. But the grains are loaded into and emptied from the sacks at high velocity, which can cause perchlorate and microplastics to break off. The <a href=\"https:\/\/www.fda.gov\/food\/environmental-contaminants-food\/preliminary-estimation-perchlorate-dietary-exposure-based-fda-20042005-exploratory-data\" data-link-name=\"in body link\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\" target=\"_blank\">FDA\u2019s own data published in 2017 showed<\/a> the number of samples of kids\u2019 cereal with perchlorate increased after the 2005 TOR exemption. The agency similarly detailed a broad increase in the levels in each sample.<\/p>\n<p class=\"dcr-1s160rg\">Perchlorate reduces the thyroid gland\u2019s ability to absorb iodine, which is a raw material needed to produce the hormone T4, an essential component of <a href=\"https:\/\/www.regulations.gov\/document?D=EPA-HQ-OW-2016-0438-0019\" data-link-name=\"in body link\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\" target=\"_blank\">proper brain development<\/a>. Very low levels of perchlorate exposure are <a href=\"https:\/\/pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov\/25057878\/\" data-link-name=\"in body link\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\" target=\"_blank\">linked to<\/a> lower T4 production, and lower IQ scores for children.<\/p>\n<p class=\"dcr-1s160rg\">Still, six months after it published its data, the FDA reapproved perchlorate for use in super sacks. Advocates say the agency used flawed science and manipulated the data. The FDA wrote that there was no meaningful increase in perchlorate across all the 250 foods it measured. But critics countered that the problem was not in all the food \u2013 the problem was in kids\u2019 cereal.<\/p>\n<p class=\"dcr-1s160rg\">The FDA largely ignored the cereal findings, and mostly does not consider endocrine system harms when developing regulations, said Tom Neltner, a former scientist with the EDF who is now director of the Unleaded Kids non-profit. He helped lead litigation over perchlorate, which was ultimately dismissed.<\/p>\n<p class=\"dcr-1s160rg\">\u201cThey put their blinders on and approved the exemption based on data that never considered the harms posed by endocrine disruptors,\u201d Neltner said.<\/p>\n<p>Kennedy deceived on Gras?<\/p>\n<p class=\"dcr-1s160rg\">Kennedy leads the Make America Healthy Again (Maha) movement, of which eliminating toxic chemicals from food is a cornerstone. During the run-up to the 2024 US presidential election, he held up the Gras standard as an example of the broken regulatory system that he would take bold steps to fix as he stands up to big food and makes America healthy again. The loophole drew outrage because campaigners say it <a href=\"https:\/\/www.theguardian.com\/us-news\/2026\/mar\/07\/fda-food-product-safety-checks-substances\" data-link-name=\"in body link\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\" target=\"_blank\">virtually eliminates regulatory oversight<\/a> for new ingredients, chemicals and products, allowing food companies to self-certify that substances are safe without alerting the FDA.<\/p>\n<p class=\"dcr-1s160rg\">The Gras standard does require companies to demonstrate a new food product is safe by making \u201c<a href=\"https:\/\/www.fda.gov\/food\/generally-recognized-safe-gras\/how-us-fdas-gras-notification-program-works\" data-link-name=\"in body link\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\" target=\"_blank\">widely accepted\u201d scientific evidence<\/a> to support its claim publicly available. But some companies bury the \u201cpublic\u201d announcement deep in their websites, push the boundaries of \u201cwidely accepted\u201d research or hire from a cottage industry of scientists who are paid to declare food products \u201csafe\u201d, advocates say.<\/p>\n<p class=\"dcr-1s160rg\">A <a href=\"https:\/\/www.ewg.org\/research\/secret-gras-how-100-food-chemicals-bypassed-government-safety-review\" data-link-name=\"in body link\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\" target=\"_blank\">2026 review<\/a> of FDA and other federal food records by Maffini and the Environmental Working Group non-profit found at least 111 food chemicals or substances exploited the Gras standard, and they are used across thousands of products. Upon his appointment to oversee Trump\u2019s health agency, the FDA and Kennedy <a href=\"https:\/\/www.fda.gov\/news-events\/fda-direct-podcast\/fda-direct-no-one-thinks-its-good-idea-kids-consume-petroleum-products?utm_source=chatgpt.com\" data-link-name=\"in body link\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\" target=\"_blank\">reiterated his promise to<\/a> \u201cclose the loophole\u201d, and in 2026 he appeared to make good on it. He and the FDA <a href=\"https:\/\/www.hhs.gov\/promisesmade-promiseskept\/index.html\" data-link-name=\"in body link\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\" target=\"_blank\">stated<\/a> that they were \u201cclosing critical information gaps\u201d.<\/p>\n<p class=\"dcr-1s160rg\">Critics warned the \u201cclosure\u201d was at best a modest loophole tightening that effectively only requires voluntary compliance, and the quiet opening of the TOR exemption counteracted any gains.<\/p>\n<p class=\"dcr-1s160rg\">Either the White House or the office of management and budget were involved in the Gras rule negotiations, though it is unclear who added the TOR expansion. Regardless, the controversial exemption is consistent with the administration\u2019s philosophy more broadly, Maffini said.<\/p>\n<p class=\"dcr-1s160rg\">\u201cThis administration is not keen on regulating anything,\u201d she said.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"The US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is proposing to expand a controversial loophole to allow some of&hellip;\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":877795,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[27],"tags":[28],"class_list":["post-877794","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","category-business","tag-business"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/877794","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=877794"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/877794\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/877795"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=877794"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=877794"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=877794"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}