{"id":879364,"date":"2026-10-12T05:58:09","date_gmt":"2026-10-12T05:58:09","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/us\/879364\/"},"modified":"2026-10-12T05:58:09","modified_gmt":"2026-10-12T05:58:09","slug":"charting-how-green-madness-means-californians-pay-more","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/us\/879364\/","title":{"rendered":"Charting how \u2018green madness\u2019 means Californians pay more"},"content":{"rendered":"

California boasts some of the highest retail electricity rates<\/a> in the country, second only to Hawaii<\/a>, despite being the fourth-largest<\/a> electricity producer. <\/p>\n

California\u2019s high energy prices<\/a> are the direct consequence of a misguided policy that pushes renewables ahead of fossil fuels. An \u201call of the above\u201d approach that combined fossil fuels with renewables would naturally lower prices, prevent rate spikes, and ensure reliability. Such a balance is sorely needed.\u00a0<\/p>\n

Since the 2002 inception<\/a> of California\u2019s Renewable Portfolio Standard (RPS), which mandated that renewable energy would encompass 20% of all energy production in the state by 2017, the goalposts have moved <\/a>further to the extreme. <\/p>\n

\t\t\t\t\t\t\tSign up for the California Morning Report newsletter\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/p>\n

\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\tThe biggest news, opinion and culture shaping California right now.\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/p>\n

\t\t\t\t\t\tThanks for signing up!\n\t\t\t\t<\/p>\n

Solar panels are pictured in the Mojave Desert. andreiorlov \u2013 stock.adobe.com<\/p>\n

The goal was first expanded in 2015 to 50% by 2030, then in 2018 to 60% by 2030, with an ultimate goal of 100% by 2045. These rules require utilities to get a rising share of their power from renewables, at a cost higher than the market would otherwise choose. Utilities recover those extra costs by jacking up rates for consumers.<\/p>\n

The California Independent System Operator<\/a> (CAISO) operates the wholesale electricity market for about 80%<\/a> of California and a small portion of Nevada. In doing so, it supports Sacramento\u2019s renewable energy push, even as it creates reliability and pricing challenges. <\/p>\n

CAISO is supposed to provide the cheapest electricity available at any given time from the nearest, most affordable, and available source possible. Solar and wind are made to appear cheaper than natural gas and other traditional fuels, thanks to government subsidies to solar and wind<\/a>. Despite having its market share forcibly diminished by renewables, natural gas still provided 31%<\/a> of California\u2019s total net electricity generation in 2025.<\/p>\n

For example, the California Solar Initiative<\/a> provided billions in rooftop solar subsidies before shuttering in 2016. Those without solar energy paid billions<\/a> in costs until reforms were made in April 2023. . <\/p>\n

Curtailment<\/a> is another problem. It forces to utilities to buy excess solar energy even when consumers aren\u2019t using it. Consumers absorb this loss and pay higher rates<\/a> for wasted energy.<\/p>\n

Solar and wind are made to appear cheaper than natural gas and other traditional fuels, thanks to government subsidies to solar and wind. B.E. Lewis \u2013 stock.adobe.com<\/p>\n

And since solar energy is prioritized during the day, natural gas plants are forced to limit production even to the point of remaining idle. However, when the sun sets and demand increases substantially, natural gas power plants must ramp up production, which can be more costly than producing at a consistent rate.<\/p>\n

To address that issue, California has deployed large-scale utility battery storage to absorb excess midday solar energy, releasing that energy at night to reduce reliance on gas ramping. So far, 21,860 MW<\/a> of storage has come online, and California also uses batteries located out-of-state.<\/p>\n

But battery capacity is being stretched beyond the 4-to-8 hour<\/a> capability of current storage. That\u2019s because solar and wind are intermittent, and so gas plants are needed to cover seasonal lulls or multi-day periods when solar and wind are low. That increases maintenance costs, and makes gas power more expensive to maintain on a unit basis, even while the state depends on it for a reliable electricity supply.<\/p>\n

CAISO is supposed to provide the cheapest electricity available at any given time from the nearest, most affordable, and available source possible. Getty Images<\/p>\n

California\u2019s \u201ccap-and-invest\u201d program<\/a> to fight climate change adds significant compliance costs for producers. These costs are inevitably passed on to consumers as higher rates. To offset these cost increases, California started the California Climate Credit<\/a>, essentially a dividend returned to consumers. However, in California fashion, this does nothing to address the notoriously high rates and the policies that cause them; it simply puts a band-aid on a growing problem instead of providing meaningful financial relief.<\/p>\n

Despite the costs, Sacramento continues its years-long campaign to force consumers to accept a manipulated market that prioritizes environmental politics over affordability and reliability. <\/p>\n

Californians regularly pay unnecessarily high rates. The solution is simple: let the market provide all kinds of energy, and stop the renewable mandates and subsidies that drive costs higher.<\/p>\n

Caleb Jasso is a Senior Policy Advisor at the Institute for Energy Research.<\/p>\n

Download The California Post App, follow us on social, and subscribe to our newsletters <\/p>\n

California Post News: Facebook<\/a>, Instagram<\/a>, TikTok<\/a>, X<\/a>, YouTube<\/a>, WhatsApp<\/a>, LinkedIn<\/a>
California Post Sports Facebook<\/a>, Instagram<\/a>, TikTok<\/a>, YouTube<\/a>, X<\/a>
California Post Opinion<\/a>
California Post Newsletters: Sign up here!<\/a>
California Post App: Download here!<\/a>
Home delivery: Sign up here!<\/a>
<\/a>Page Six Hollywood: Sign up here!<\/a><\/p>\n

\t\t\t\t\t\t