{"id":901611,"date":"2026-11-01T00:44:19","date_gmt":"2026-11-01T00:44:19","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/us\/901611\/"},"modified":"2026-11-01T00:44:19","modified_gmt":"2026-11-01T00:44:19","slug":"if-california-matched-texas-on-taxing-property-it-would-raise-more-revenue-than-the-billionaire-tax","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/us\/901611\/","title":{"rendered":"If California matched Texas on taxing property, it would raise more revenue than the billionaire tax"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>California voters will decide on Proposition 40 soon, but looming over the controversial billionaire wealth tax proposal is another state ballot measure from nearly 50 years ago.<\/p>\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">In 1978, voters approved Proposition 13, which capped property taxes at just 1% of assessed value, limited annual hikes to 2%, and allowed reassessments to market value only after sales or substantial renovations.<\/p>\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">It came amid a wider tax revolt leading up to Ronald Reagan\u2019s election as president and an era of conservative governance in America. After Prop 13\u2019s passage, the state had to find other ways to raise more revenue and relied more on taxing incomes, including capital gains.\u00a0<\/p>\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">California now has the most progressive income-tax structure in the country with a top marginal rate of 13.3%. When combined with federal income tax rates, that can send the total to more than 50%.<\/p>\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The <a aria-label=\"Go to https:\/\/fortune.com\/2026\/10\/09\/california-billionaire-wealth-tax-prop-40-trojan-horse-income-wealth-assets\/\" href=\"https:\/\/fortune.com\/2026\/10\/09\/california-billionaire-wealth-tax-prop-40-trojan-horse-income-wealth-assets\/\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\" target=\"_blank\">top 1% of earners<\/a> account for up to half of state revenue, though it also means state coffers are volatile and swing on stock market returns. At the same time, the ultra-wealthy often don\u2019t receive much income and instead leverage assets to finance their lifestyles, avoiding some taxes.<\/p>\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Now enter the billionaire tax, which calls for residents worth more than $1 billion to pay a one-time tax equivalent to 5% of their assets. The union pushing Prop 40 has said the wealth tax could raise $100 billion in revenue and help offset federal cuts to health spending. <\/p>\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Supporters point to the AI boom and say California\u2019s ultra-rich would still be among the world\u2019s wealthiest. Opponents have warned about the impact the tax could have on economic growth and startups. They have also said\u00a0<a aria-label=\"Go to https:\/\/fortune.com\/2025\/12\/28\/california-tech-founders-billionaire-state-wealth-tax-ballot-measure\/\" href=\"https:\/\/fortune.com\/2025\/12\/28\/california-tech-founders-billionaire-state-wealth-tax-ballot-measure\/\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\" target=\"_blank\">it would force founders to sell<\/a>\u00a0big pieces of their companies and eventually cause the wealthy to flee to another state, <a aria-label=\"Go to https:\/\/fortune.com\/2026\/10\/21\/california-billionaire-tax-prop-40-stanford-study-39-billion-loss\/\" href=\"https:\/\/fortune.com\/2026\/10\/21\/california-billionaire-tax-prop-40-stanford-study-39-billion-loss\/\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\" target=\"_blank\">resulting in a net loss of revenue<\/a> over time. <\/p>\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">If California is looking for a large source of undertaxed wealth, \u201ca much better, bigger target lies right beneath their feet,\u201d according to Princeton economist Owen Zidar and University of Chicago Booth School of Business economist Eric Zwick, authors of the book <a aria-label=\"Go to https:\/\/www.everywheremillionaire.com\" href=\"https:\/\/www.everywheremillionaire.com\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\" target=\"_blank\">The Everywhere Millionaire<\/a>.<\/p>\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">\u201cThe original sin underlying California\u2019s tax structure is Prop 13, the 1978 law that rewrote the rules of property ownership,\u201d they wrote in a recent\u00a0<a aria-label=\"Go to https:\/\/www.nytimes.com\/2026\/10\/29\/opinion\/california-wealth-tax-billionaires.html\" href=\"https:\/\/www.nytimes.com\/2026\/10\/29\/opinion\/california-wealth-tax-billionaires.html\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\" target=\"_blank\">New York Times\u00a0op-ed<\/a>. \u201cGetting rid of it would be a more efficient and durable way to make the rich pay their fair share.\u201d<\/p>\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Prop 13 also contributed to rapidly increasing home values, which have risen faster than property taxes. As a result, California homeowners pay an average of just 0.8% tax on their property, Zidar and Zwick estimated, generating $100 billion in revenue in fiscal 2025.<\/p>\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">By contrast, Texas homeowners pay 2% on average. If California matched Texas, overall residential property tax revenue would more than double, while also easing home prices by around 13%, they added. <\/p>\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">To be sure, property taxes in Texas have stirred their own voter revolt during the midterm election season. While the state doesn\u2019t levy income taxes, Texans complain that the overall tax burden remains onerous due to property taxes, which are levied by local governments as well.<\/p>\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">And getting rid of Prop 13 in California wouldn\u2019t go down well with voters either as many would suffer big increases on their property taxes. Still, California\u2019s tax base is already narrow, and Prop 40 would make it even more top-heavy. Meanwhile, the state plans to spend $540 billion this fiscal year.<\/p>\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">\u201cIt is simply not possible to fund the state\u2019s needs by leaning on a few hundred people, as politically appealing as that may be,\u201d Zidar and Zwick argued. \u201cFor California to tax wealth in a progressive fashion and meaningfully improve its fiscal position, it needs to broaden the aperture beyond billionaires to the hundreds of thousands of other very wealthy people who could easily afford to contribute more by paying a real estate tax that finally works.\u201d<\/p>\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Laura Tyson, a former White House economic adviser, and Lenny Mendonca, a former chief economic adviser to California Governor Gavin Newsom, warned billionaires\u00a0respond strongly to estate taxes when deciding where to live. <\/p>\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Already, six billionaires who would have owed about one-quarter of Prop 40\u2019s expected revenues left the state before the proposed effective date on the wealth tax, they pointed out in a <a aria-label=\"Go to https:\/\/www.project-syndicate.org\/commentary\/california-billionaire-tax-prop-40-more-harm-than-good-by-laura-tyson-and-lenny-mendonca-2026-10?utm_source=substack&amp;utm_medium=oganic-social&amp;utm_campaign=page-posts-october2030&amp;utm_term=economics&amp;utm_content=image-link\" href=\"https:\/\/www.project-syndicate.org\/commentary\/california-billionaire-tax-prop-40-more-harm-than-good-by-laura-tyson-and-lenny-mendonca-2026-10?utm_source=substack&amp;utm_medium=oganic-social&amp;utm_campaign=page-posts-october2030&amp;utm_term=economics&amp;utm_content=image-link\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\" target=\"_blank\">Project Syndicate column<\/a>.<\/p>\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">And since Prop 40 proposes a new, untested method of taxation based on all assets, it would fuel a \u201ctidal wave of litigation, rendering the promised funding both speculative and unreliable,\u201d they wrote.<\/p>\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">\u201cInstead of a tax on billionaires, the U.S. needs to raise taxes on the capital income that feeds wealth,\u201d Tyson and Mendonca argued. \u201cThere are a variety of ways to do so: through higher corporate tax rates; through taxes on realized and unrealized capital gains; by closing the most egregious loopholes, like carried interest; and by increasing inheritance taxes.\u201d<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"California voters will decide on Proposition 40 soon, but looming over the controversial billionaire wealth tax proposal is&hellip;\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":901612,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[18],"tags":[23,13652,2356,3,1548,1022,21,19,22,20,25,24],"class_list":["post-901611","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","category-united-states","tag-america","tag-billionaires","tag-california","tag-news","tag-taxes","tag-texas","tag-united-states","tag-united-states-of-america","tag-unitedstates","tag-unitedstatesofamerica","tag-us","tag-usa"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/901611","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=901611"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/901611\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/901612"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=901611"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=901611"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=901611"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}