Boland L, Kothari A, McCutcheon C, Graham ID. Building an integrated knowledge translation (IKT) evidence base: colloquium proceedings and research direction. Health Res Policy Syst. 2020;18(1):8.
Lawrence L, Bishop A, Curran J. Integrated knowledge translation with public health policy makers: a scoping review. Healthc Pol Politiques de Santé. 2019;14(3):55–77.
Minogue V, Matvienko-Sikar K, Hayes C, Morrissey M, Gorman G, Terres A. The usability and applicability of knowledge translation theories, models, and frameworks for research in the context of a national health service. Health Res Policy Syst. 2021;19(1):105.
Mäkelä P, Boaz A, Oliver K. A modified action framework to develop and evaluate academic-policy engagement interventions. Implement Sci. 2024;19(1):31.
Jull J, Giles A, Graham ID. Community-based participatory research and integrated knowledge translation: advancing the co-creation of knowledge. Implement Sci. 2017;12(1):150.
Kneale D, Rojas-García A, Thomas J. Obstacles and opportunities to using research evidence in local public health decision-making in England. Health Res Policy Syst. 2019;17(1):61.
Tabak RG, Padek MM, Kerner JF, Stange KC, Proctor EK, Dobbins MJ, et al. Dissemination and implementation science training needs: insights from practitioners and researchers. Am J Prevent Med. 2017;52(3, Suppl. 3):322–9.
Nyström ME, Karltun J, Keller C, Andersson Gäre B. Collaborative and partnership research for improvement of health and social services: researcher’s experiences from 20 projects. Health Res Policy Syst. 2018;16(1):46.
Belcher B, Hughes K. Understanding and evaluating the impact of integrated problem-oriented research programmes: concepts and considerations. Res Eval. 2020;30(2):154–68.
Zimmerman E, Concannon TW. Engaging patients and stakeholders in health research: an introduction. In: Zimmerman E, editor. Researching Health Together: Engaging Patients and Stakeholders, From Topic Identification to Policy Change [Internet]. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications, Inc.; 2021 [cited 2023 May 8]. p. 1–22. Available from: https://methods.sagepub.com/book/researching-health-together.
Green LW. Making research relevant: if it is an evidence-based practice, where’s the practice-based evidence? Fam Pract. 2008;25(Supplement 1):i20–4.
Green LW, Glasgow RE, Atkins D, Stange K. Making evidence from research more relevant, useful, and actionable in policy, program planning, and practice: slips “twixt cup and lip.” Am J Prev Med. 2009;37(6):S187–91.
Jessani NS, Valmeekanathan A, Babcock CM, Ling B. Academic incentives for enhancing faculty engagement with decision-makers—Considerations and recommendations from one School of Public Health. Humanit Soc Sci Commun. 2020;7(1):1–13.
National Institute for Health Research (NIHR). Patient and public involvement in health and social care research: a handbook for researchers. 2014.
Staniszewska S, Brett J, Simera I, Seers K, Mockford C, Goodlad S, et al. GRIPP2 reporting checklists: tools to improve reporting of patient and public involvement in research. BMJ. 2017;358:j3453.
Fergusson D, Monfaredi Z, Pussegoda K, Garritty C, Lyddiatt A, Shea B, et al. The prevalence of patient engagement in published trials: a systematic review. Res Involv Engag. 2018;4(1):17.
Graham ID, Kothari A, McCutcheon C. Moving knowledge into action for more effective practice, programmes and policy: protocol for a research programme on integrated knowledge translation. Implement Sci. 2018;13(1):22.
Hoekstra F, Mrklas KJ, Khan M, McKay RC, Vis-Dunbar M, Sibley KM, et al. A review of reviews on principles, strategies, outcomes and impacts of research partnerships approaches: a first step in synthesising the research partnership literature. Health Res Policy Syst. 2020;18(1):51.
Esmail L, Moore E, Rein A. Evaluating patient and stakeholder engagement in research: moving from theory to practice. J Comp Eff Res. 2015;4(2):133–45.
Yoong SL, Bolsewicz K, Reilly K, Williams C, Wolfenden L, Grady A, et al. Describing the evidence-base for research engagement by health care providers and health care organisations: a scoping review. BMC Health Serv Res. 2023;23:75.
Oliver K, Kothari A, Mays N. The dark side of coproduction: Do the costs outweigh the benefits for health research? Health Res Policy Syst. 2019;17(1):33.
Pizzo E, Doyle C, Matthews R, Barlow J. Patient and public involvement: how much do we spend and what are the benefits? Health Expect. 2015;18(6):1918–26.
Goodman MS, Ackermann N, Haskell-Craig Z, Jackson S, Bowen DJ, Sanders Thompson VL. Construct validation of the research engagement survey tool (REST). Res Involv Engag. 2022;8(1):26.
Hood NE, Brewer T, Jackson R, Wewers ME. Survey of community engagement in NIH-funded research. Clin Transl Sci. 2010;3(1):19–22.
Wilkins CH, Spofford M, Williams N, McKeever C, Allen S, Brown J, et al. Community representatives’ involvement in clinical and translational science awardee activities. Clin Transl Sci. 2013;6(4):292–6.
Forsythe L, Heckert A, Margolis MK, Schrandt S, Frank L. Methods and impact of engagement in research, from theory to practice and back again: early findings from the patient-centered outcomes research institute. Qual Life Res. 2018;27(1):17–31.
Spillane JP, Zuberi A. Designing and Piloting a Leadership Daily Practice Log: Using Logs to Study the Practice of Leadership. In: Oude Groote Beverborg A, Feldhoff T, Maag Merki K, Radisch F, editors. Concept and Design Developments in School Improvement Research: Longitudinal, Multilevel and Mixed Methods and Their Relevance for Educational Accountability [Internet]. Cham: Springer International Publishing; 2021 [cited 2023 Nov 17]. p. 155–95. (Accountability and Educational Improvement). Available from: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-69345-9_9.
Zych MM, Berta WB, Gagliardi AR. Initiation is recognized as a fundamental early phase of integrated knowledge translation (IKT): qualitative interviews with researchers and research users in IKT partnerships. BMC Health Serv Res. 2019;19(1):772.
Ohly S, Sonnentag S, Niessen C, Zapf D. Diary studies in organizational research: an introduction and some practical recommendations. J Pers Psychol. 2010;9(2):79–93.
Shiffman S, Stone AA, Hufford MR. Ecological momentary assessment. Annu Rev Clin Psychol. 2008;4(1):1–32.
Wheeler L, Reis HT. Self-recording of everyday life events: origins, types, and uses. J Personality. 1991;59(3):339–54.
Crosby RD, Lavender JM, Engel SG, Wonderlich SA. Ecological Momentary Assessment. In: Wade T, editor. Encyclopedia of Feeding and Eating Disorders [Internet]. Singapore: Springer Singapore; 2015 [cited 2023 Oct 24]. p. 1–3. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-287-087-2_159-1.
Wittau J, Seifert R. How to fight fake papers: a review on important information sources and steps towards solution of the problem. Naunyn-Schmiedebergs Arch Pharmacol. 2024;397:9281–94.
Glennie E, Charles K, Rice O. Teacher logs: a tool for gaining a comprehensive understanding of classroom practices. Sci Educ. 2017;25:88–96.
Bunger AC, Powell BJ, Robertson HA, MacDowell H, Birken SA, Shea C. Tracking implementation strategies: a description of a practical approach and early findings. Health Res Policy Syst. 2017;15:15.
Camburn EM, Spillane JP, Sebastian J. Assessing the utility of a daily log for measuring principal leadership practice. Educ Adm Q. 2010;46(5):707–37.
Pathways in Place. Pathways in Place-Victoria University [Internet]. [cited 2024 Oct 11]. Available from: https://www.pathwaysinplace.com.au/victoria-university.
Craike M, Klepac B, Mowle A, Riley T. Theory of systems change: a middle-range theory of public health research impact. Res Eval. 2023;00:1–19.
Maitland N, Wardle K, Whelan J, Jalaludin B, Creighton D, Johnstone M, et al. Tracking implementation within a community-led whole of system approach to address childhood overweight and obesity in south west Sydney, Australia. BMC Public Health. 2021;21(1):1233.
Chen H, Yu P, Hailey D, Cui T. Identification of the essential components of quality in the data collection process for public health information systems. Health Informatics J. 2020;26(1):664–82.
Chen H, Yu P, Hailey D, Cui T. Validation of 4D components for measuring quality of the public health data collection process: elicitation study. J Med Internet Res. 2021;23(5):e17240.
Hamilton CB, Leese JC, Hoens AM, Li LC. Framework for advancing the reporting of patient engagement in rheumatology research projects. Curr Rheumatol Rep. 2017;19(7):38.
Christensen TC, Barrett LF, Bliss-Moreau E, Lebo K, Christensen TC. A practical guide to experience-sampling procedures. J Happiness Stud. 2003;4(1):53–78.
Stone AA, Shiffman S. Capturing momentary, self-report data: a proposal for reporting guidelines. Ann Behav Med. 2002;24:236–43.
Goodman MS, Sanders Thompson VL. The science of stakeholder engagement in research: classification, implementation, and evaluation. Transl Behav Med. 2017;7(3):486–91.
Spaapen J, van Drooge L. Introducing ‘productive interactions’ in social impact assessment. Res Eval. 2011;20(3):211–8.
Wilsdon J et al. The metric tide: independent review of the role of metrics in research assessment and management [Internet]. 55 City Road, London; 2015. Available from: https://sk.sagepub.com/books/the-metric-tide.
Knight E, Mitchell V. The ‘how’ rather than the ‘what’ of research impact. High Educ Res Dev. 2023;42(2):336–49.
Morton S. Progressing research impact assessment: a ‘contributions’ approach. Res Eval. 2015;24(4):405–19.
Luger TM, Hamilton AB, True G. Measuring community-engaged research contexts, processes, and outcomes: a mapping review. Milbank Q. 2020;98(2):493–553.
Perkmann M, Salandra R, Tartari V, McKelvey M, Hughes A. Academic engagement: a review of the literature 2011–2019. Res Policy. 2021;50(1):104114.
Jessani NS, Valmeekanathan A, Babcock C, Ling B, Davey-Rothwell MA, Holtgrave DR. Exploring the evolution of engagement between academic public health researchers and decision-makers: from initiation to dissolution. Health Res Pol Syst. 2020;18(1):15.
Rashid SM, McCusker JP, Pinheiro P, Bax MP, Santos HO, Stingone JA, et al. The semantic data dictionary—An approach for describing and annotating data. Data Intell. 2020;2(4):443–86.
Dictionary of IBM and Computing Terminology.
Stone AA, Kessler RC, Haythornthwaite JA. Measuring daily events and experiences: decisions for the researcher. J Pers. 1991;59(3):575–607.
Wilson MG, Lavis JN, Travers R, Rourke SB. Community-based knowledge transfer and exchange: helping community-based organizations link research to action. Implement Sci. 2010;5(1):33.
Dawood S, Hallquist MN, Pincus AL, Ram N, Newman MG, Wilson SJ, et al. Comparing signal-contingent and event-contingent experience sampling ratings of affect in a sample of psychotherapy outpatients. J Psychopathol Behav Assess. 2020;42(1):13–24.
Ebner-Priemer UW, Trull TJ. Ambulatory assessment. Eur Psychol. 2009;14(2):109–19.
Bowen DJ, Ackermann N, Saunders Thompson V, Nederveld A, Goodman M. A study examining the usefulness of a new measure of research engagement. J Gen Intern Med. 2022;37(1):50–6.
Oliver K, Boaz A. Transforming evidence for policy and practice: creating space for new conversations. Palgrave Commun. 2019;5(1):1–10.