Every runner knows the feeling: you lace up for a workout, start your warm-up, and immediately feel like something is off. Your legs feel heavy and your pace feels harder than it usually does to keep up.
When this happens, it’s difficult to figure out whether you’re dealing with normal training fatigue or if your body is pleading with you to back off. But distinguishing between these two avenues matters if you want to get faster and avoid injury before race day.
Fatigue does fuel adaptation, especially for runners stacking mileage during marathon training, for example. But there’s a fine line between productive stress and digging yourself into a hole that tanks performance instead of improving it.
Despite the explosion of wearables and their interconnected recovery apps and training metrics, runners struggle to measure fatigue accurately.
To cut through the noise and determine the best way to figure out if your fatigue is normal or an alarm bell, we connected with performance scientist Andy Galpin, executive director of the Human Performance Centre at Parker University in Texas.
Here are the metrics that matter most in this process, and how to use the information to fine-tune your training and run your fastest race.
What’s the difference between normal and harmful fatigue?
Fatigue exists on a spectrum, and not all fatigue is bad.
At the most basic level, Galpin explains that a singular hard workout creates ‘acute overload’ on your body, which leads to ‘acute fatigue’. In other words, you stress your body with a workout, temporarily experience fatigue from that stress, recover from it and eventually adapt.
‘If you were to go do a big track workout today and then an hour later, you tried to exercise again, you would perform worse than your base level because you’re experiencing acute fatigue [from the first workout],’ Galpin explains. This is normal.
The next stage – what’s known as functional overreaching – pushes fatigue into a ‘chronic’ stage.
When following a training plan, runners live in the functional overreaching realm, Galpin explains. Think about it like this: as you progress through each week of your training, workouts accumulate stress. Functional overreaching happens when your body absorbs and adapts to all of that stress, and after a recovery or taper period, you arrive at race day ready to run faster than you ever have before.
But if the fatigue piles up and your recovery efforts no longer restore performance, you slide into nonfunctional overreaching.
Galpin says the difference between functional and nonfunctional overreaching comes down to what happens after recovery. If performance improves after backing off, the training stress was productive. If performance stagnates or declines, the athlete likely pushed too far. ‘Performance is king,’ Galpin says.
Importantly, fatigue doesn’t always mean feeling sleepy or tired. Runners often confuse ‘tired’ with ‘fatigued’, but Galpin says the sensations can vary. ‘You may or may not be sleepy, but your legs may just not have that extra gear.’
True overtraining syndrome– the severe fatigue condition that requires weeks or months of recovery – is actually quite rare, in Galpin’s experience.
When athletes panic and self-diagnose overtraining, ‘most of the time, athletes are looking at nonfunctional overreaching,’ Galpin says. ‘But a lot of the time it’s actually just acute overload.’ Essentially, a few additional recovery days usually take care of the nonfunctional overreaching.
The simplest way to measure fatigue
For most runners, the best fatigue test is surprisingly simple: ‘If you take a couple of days’ rest and then you come back to your routine and you feel better – that’s your metric,’ Galpin says.
Feeling better can mean several things, according to Galpin:
Your pace improves at the same effort level Your heart rate is lower at the same pace You simply feel more capable and confident during your workout than you did before
A few days of sluggish workouts don’t necessarily mean something is wrong, which is why Galpin says runners should instead judge fatigue based on how they perform after a few days of rest.
The key is not overreacting to isolated signals. ‘A mistake people make is they think, ‘Oh, my recovery score is low. I have to pull the plug [on this workout],’’ Galpin says. ‘I’d say not necessarily, because in order to induce adaptation, we have to create stress.’
Instead, Galpin recommends watching for consistent downward trends across multiple metrics. His general rule is, unless a recovery metric stays depressed by more than 10 per cent for roughly five days, he typically doesn’t make major adjustments.
The metrics that matter
Galpin says the most precise ways to identify fatigue aren’t as readily available as those on wearable devices. Blood tests, for example, can help identify whether fatigue is coming from underfuelling, inflammation, poor oxygen delivery, hydration issues, low iron or other physiological stressors.
‘The only way we can get really specific is if we have some actual internal measure,’ Galpin says.
But for most runners, frequent blood testing isn’t a realistic option. The good news is that many useful fatigue indicators are built into common running watches and wearables.
That comes with a caveat: you shouldn’t take everything you read on your watch as gospel. ‘I’d rather use the actual metrics rather than a composite score,’ Galpin says. Composite recovery scores come from an algorithm that is not specific to your body. With individual metrics, you bypass that generalised algorithm and get right to the measurements themselves.
Galpin recommends using the following three metrics to track and manage your fatigue.
Heart rate variability
Heart rate variability (HRV) – the amount of time between individual heartbeats – has become one of the most popular recovery metrics because it’s more sensitive than resting heart rate and often changes quickly in response to stress. Most wearable devices track it during sleep, and it can clue you into recovery and stress.
In general, a higher HRV is associated with better recovery, and therefore lower fatigue, while an unusually low HRV reading can signal accumulating stress.
Galpin says HRV is useful only when runners understand their personal baseline reading and focus on long-term trends, not isolated daily scores.
The biggest limitation is that HRV is ‘nonspecific’, Galpin says. In other words, it can tell you your body is experiencing stress or fatigue, but it can’t pinpoint exactly why.
Hard workouts, poor sleep, work stress, illness, travel complications, dehydration, alcohol consumption and even emotional hardship can affect HRV daily. That makes it an extremely sensitive metric – and a great red flag that something may be amiss – but not always a precise one.
‘If your HRV is up one day, don’t train harder than you had planned to,’ Galpin says. ‘And the same thing if it’s down one day, don’t do less. That doesn’t necessarily mean anything.’
Instead, focus on multiday trends and how your HRV compares to your personal baseline. Galpin says it typically takes about 30 days of recording data to establish what’s normal for you, and runners generally shouldn’t react unless their HRV stays meaningfully below that baseline (about 10 per cent or more) for at least five consecutive days.
Resting heart rate
Resting heart rate (RHR) measures how many times your heart beats per minute while your body is at rest (shocker!), usually during sleep or immediately after waking up. Because improving aerobic fitness usually lowers RHR over time, runners frequently use it to monitor recovery and overall training status.
RHR is a valuable metric because it’s relatively stable and easy to interpret. If a runner’s resting heart rate suddenly displays an upward trend over a few days, that’s almost certainly an indicator that something is wrong.
Unfortunately, RHR is also a nonspecific indicator. A higher reading doesn’t necessarily mean a runner is training too hard. It could reflect poor sleep, illness or dehydration, in addition to a tough training block.
It’s also not sensitive, which means it changes slowly. ‘If resting heart rate is moving, you’re already two weeks late,’ Galpin says.
Essentially, your body works hard to keep its heart rate stable, especially in trained endurance athletes. By the time RHR rises significantly, fatigue has often been building for weeks.
A steady increase in RHR (over that five-day period) paired with declining workout performance, heavy legs or poor sleep suggests that your body needs more time to recover from fatigue.
Respiratory rate
Respiratory rate measures how many breaths you take per minute, often while sleeping. Many new wearables track it automatically overnight, once again, making it convenient for those who already have watches with the capability built-in.
Galpin says that many runners pay more attention to HRV and RHR than respiratory rate, and that may be a mistake. ‘I like respiratory rate better than all of them,’ he says, referring to it in comparison to HRV and RHR.
Like HRV, respiratory rate fluctuates daily and is still considered nonspecific. But Galpin says it connects to physical overload more than HRV, which can fluctuate heavily from psychological stress alone.
When measured overnight, ‘if your respiratory rate moves more than 10 percent [from your baseline], we know something happened,’ Galpin says. In this case, the ‘something’ doesn’t include those mental stressors, but could come back to accumulated training fatigue, illness, or other respiratory issues. Because respiratory rate usually stays stable – it doesn’t fluctuate as much as HRV – even modest increases can indicate something is wrong, Galpin says.
Like the other metrics, you’ll have your personal baseline, but according to the Cleveland Clinic, 12 to 18 breaths per minute is within the normal range.
While certainly valuable, none of these metrics are 100 per cent of the fatigue-measuring equation. When combined with subjective feelings and actual workout performance, they can provide a valuable warning system that you’re training too hard.
Optimise your fatigue tracking
In Galpin’s experience, the biggest driver of excessive fatigue often shocks people.
‘If I had to draw you a pie chart [of the causes of fatigue], 80-plus per cent would be from [sleep issues],’ Galpin says. “Fifty to 60 per cent of athletes have a clinical sleep disorder, and don’t know.”
So the first step to avoiding too much fatigue is to dial in your sleep. In an episode of his podcast dedicated to the effects of sleep on athletes, Galpin recommends taking the athlete sleep screening questionnaire – a free, online tool – to get a baseline evaluation of your sleep quality. (Any runner can select ‘high performance athlete’ in the questionnaire.)
From there, you can start to work on optimising your sleep based on the recommendations provided, and then move on to clinical sleep tests, if necessary.
After sleep issues, underfuelling, dehydration and sudden spikes in training volume contribute the next largest slices of the chart, he says.
Galpin warns that many beginner runners don’t realise how quickly training loads can snowball. Adding just one extra mile per day may seem minor, but it can push weekly mileage from 15 miles to more than 20 miles – a jump large enough to significantly increase fatigue and injury risk.
To help avoid that build-up, Galpin recommends following the 10 per cent rule, which suggests increasing weekly mileage by no more than roughly 10 per cent at a time.
The most important tip that Galpin offers is simply keeping a training log. Tracking your mileage, workout difficulty, pace, heart rate and a quick 1-to-10 ‘how do I feel?’ score can help reveal trends long before fatigue becomes a larger issue.
Ultimately, no single wearable metric can tell you everything about your body. But combining select indicators with honest self-assessment and consistent training data can help you run smarter, recover faster and arrive at your next starting line feeling fresh instead of flat.