Wright, S. J. The future of tropical forests. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 1195, 1–27 (2010).
Gatti, R. C. et al. The number of tree species on Earth. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 119, e2115329119 (2022).
Díaz, S. et al. Assessing nature’s contributions to people. Science 359, 270–272 (2018).
Steffen, W. et al. Planetary boundaries: guiding human development on a changing planet. Science 347, 1259855–1259855 (2015).
Rockström, J. et al. A safe operating space for humanity. Nature 461, 472–475 (2009).
Guz, J. & Kulakowski, D. Forests in the Anthropocene. Ann. Am. Assoc. Geogr. 111, 869–879 (2020).
Randhir, T. O. & Erol, A. Emerging threats to forests: resilience and strategies at system scale. Am. J. Plant Sci. 04, 739–748 (2013).
Deutsch, C. A. et al. Impacts of climate warming on terrestrial ectotherms across latitude. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 105, 6668–6672 (2008).
Colwell, R. K., Brehm, G., Cardelús, C. L., Gilman, A. C. & Longino, J. T. Global warming, elevational range shifts, and lowland biotic attrition in the wet tropics. Science 322, 258–261 (2008).
Silva, C. V. J. et al. Drought-induced Amazonian wildfires instigate a decadal-scale disruption of forest carbon dynamics. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. B Biol. Sci. 373, 20180043 (2018).
Berenguer, E. et al. Tracking the impacts of El Niño drought and fire in human-modified Amazonian forests. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 118, e2019377118 (2021).
Hubau, W. et al. Asynchronous carbon sink saturation in African and Amazonian tropical forests. Nature 579, 80–87 (2020).
Pereira, H. M. et al. Essential biodiversity variables. Science 339, 277–278 (2013).
What are EBVs? GEO BON https://geobon.org/ebvs/what-are-ebvs/ (2026).
Skidmore, A. K. et al. Environmental science: agree on biodiversity metrics to track from space. Nature 523, 403–405 (2015).
Skidmore, A. K. et al. Priority list of biodiversity metrics to observe from space. Nat. Ecol. Evol. 5, 896–906 (2021).
Fassnacht, F. E., White, J. C., Wulder, M. A. & Næsset, E. Remote sensing in forestry: current challenges, considerations and directions. For. Int. J. For. Res. 97, 11–37 (2023).
Cleemput, E. V. et al. Scaling-up ecological understanding with remote sensing and causal inference. Trends Ecol. Evol. 40, 122–135 (2025).
Chambers, J. Q. et al. Regional ecosystem structure and function: ecological insights from remote sensing of tropical forests. Trends Ecol. Evol. 22, 414–423 (2007).
Sader, S., Stone, T. & Joyce, A. Remote sensing of tropical forests — an overview of research and applications using non-photographic sensors. Photogramm. Eng. Remote Sens. 56, 1343–1351 (1990).
Duncanson, L. et al. Aboveground biomass density models for NASA’s Global Ecosystem Dynamics Investigation (GEDI) lidar mission. Remote Sens. Environ. 270, 112845 (2022).
Dubayah, R. et al. The Global Ecosystem Dynamics Investigation: high-resolution laser ranging of the Earth’s forests and topography. Sci. Remote Sens. 1, 100002 (2020).
Wulder, M. A. et al. Fifty years of Landsat science and impacts. Remote Sens. Environ. 280, 113195 (2022).
Pettorelli, N. et al. Framing the concept of satellite remote sensing essential biodiversity variables: challenges and future directions. Remote Sens. Ecol. Conserv. 2, 122–131 (2016).
Nguyen, T. H., Jones, S., Soto-Berelov, M., Haywood, A. & Hislop, S. Landsat time-series for estimating forest aboveground biomass and its dynamics across space and time: a review. Remote Sens. 12, 98 (2019).
Komatsu, K. et al. Quantifying carbon stock and tree community composition in tropical forests through combining satellite and UAV analyses. Sci. Rep. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-34938-9 (2026).
Aguirre-Gutiérrez, J. et al. Functional susceptibility of tropical forests to climate change. Nat. Ecol. Evol. 6, 878–889 (2022).
Yano, S. et al. Effects of logging on landscape-level tree diversity across an elevational gradient in Bornean tropical forests. Glob. Ecol. Conserv. 29, e01739 (2021).
Takeshige, R. et al. Influences of fern and vine coverage on the above-ground biomass recovery in a Bornean logged-over degraded secondary forest. J. For. Res. 28, 260–270 (2023).
Jetz, W. et al. Essential biodiversity variables for mapping and monitoring species populations. Nat. Ecol. Evol. 3, 539–551 (2019).
Wang, R. & Gamon, J. A. Remote sensing of terrestrial plant biodiversity. Remote Sens. Environ. 231, 111218 (2019).
Féret, J.-B. & Asner, G. P. Mapping tropical forest canopy diversity using high-fidelity imaging spectroscopy. Ecol. Appl. 24, 1289–1296 (2014).
Gastauer, M. et al. Spectral diversity allows remote detection of the rehabilitation status in an Amazonian iron mining complex. Int. J. Appl. Earth Obs. Geoinf. 106, 102653 (2022).
Kishore, B. S. P. C., Kumar, A., Saikia, P. & Khan, M. L. Alpha and beta diversity mapping in Indian tropical deciduous forests using high-fidelity imaging spectroscopy. Adv. Space Res. 73, 1413–1426 (2024).
Banerjee, S., Sarker, S. K. & Pijanowski, B. Remotely sensed mapping of plant diversity in Earth’s largest mangrove forests: developing a spectral diversity metric with DESIS hyperspectral data and the ‘spectral species’ concept. Remote Sens. Appl.: Soc. Environ. 39, 101676 (2025).
Rocchini, D. et al. The spectral species concept in living color. J. Geophys. Res. Biogeosci. 127, e2022JG007026 (2022).
Laliberté, E. et al. Seeing the forest and the trees: a workflow for automatic acquisition of ultra-high resolution drone photos of tropical forest canopies to support botanical and ecological studies. Preprint at bioRxiv https://doi.org/10.1101/2025.09.02.673753 (2026).
Ball, J. G. C. et al. Towards comprehensive individual tree species mapping in diverse tropical forests by harnessing temporal and spectral dimensions. Preprint at bioRxiv https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.06.24.600405 (2025).
Carvalho, R. L. et al. Pervasive gaps in Amazonian ecological research. Curr. Biol. 33, 3495–3504 (2023).
Asner, G. P. & Martin, R. E. Airborne spectranomics: mapping canopy chemical and taxonomic diversity in tropical forests. Front. Ecol. Environ. https://doi.org/10.1890/070152 (2009).
Almeida, D. R. A. de et al. Monitoring restored tropical forest diversity and structure through UAV-borne hyperspectral and lidar fusion. Remote Sens. Environ. 264, 112582 (2021).
Asner, G. P. & Martin, R. E. Spectranomics: emerging science and conservation opportunities at the interface of biodiversity and remote sensing. Glob. Ecol. Conserv. 8, 212–219 (2016).
Guo, Y. et al. Plant species richness prediction from DESIS hyperspectral data: a comparison study on feature extraction procedures and regression models. ISPRS J. Photogramm. Remote Sens. 196, 120–133 (2023).
Rocchini, D. et al. From local spectral species to global spectral communities: a benchmark for ecosystem diversity estimate by remote sensing. Ecol. Inform. 61, 101195 (2021).
Lutz, J. A. et al. Global importance of large-diameter trees. Glob. Ecol. Biogeogr. 27, 849–864 (2018).
Violle, C. et al. Let the concept of trait be functional! Oikos 116, 882–892 (2007).
Díaz, S. et al. Functional traits, the phylogeny of function, and ecosystem service vulnerability. Ecol. Evol. 3, 2958–2975 (2013).
Wright, S. J. et al. Functional traits and the growth–mortality trade-off in tropical trees. Ecology 91, 3664–3674 (2010).
Rüger, N. et al. Demographic trade-offs predict tropical forest dynamics. Science 368, 165–168 (2020).
Eisenhauer, N., Hines, J., Maestre, F. T. & Rillig, M. C. Reconsidering functional redundancy in biodiversity research. npj Biodivers. 2, 9 (2023).
Aguirre-Gutiérrez, J. et al. Long-term droughts may drive drier tropical forests towards increased functional, taxonomic and phylogenetic homogeneity. Nat. Commun. 11, 3346 (2020).
Cadotte, M. W., Carscadden, K. & Mirotchnick, N. Beyond species: functional diversity and the maintenance of ecological processes and services. J. Appl. Ecol. 48, 1079–1087 (2011).
Aguirre-Gutiérrez, J. et al. Pantropical modelling of canopy functional traits using Sentinel-2 remote sensing data. Remote Sens. Environ. 252, 112122 (2021).
Aguirre-Gutiérrez, J. et al. Tropical forests in the Americas are changing too slowly to track climate change. Science 387, eadl5414 (2025).
Aguirre-Gutiérrez, J. et al. Canopy functional trait variation across Earth’s tropical forests. Nature https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-025-08663-2 (2025).
Schneider, F. D. et al. Towards mapping the diversity of canopy structure from space with GEDI. Environ. Res. Lett. 15, 115006 (2020).
Yachi, S. & Loreau, M. Biodiversity and ecosystem productivity in a fluctuating environment: the insurance hypothesis. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 96, 1463–1468 (1999).
Faith, D. P. Conservation evaluation and phylogenetic diversity. Biol. Conserv. 61, 1–10 (1992).
Souza, F. C. de et al. Evolutionary heritage influences Amazon tree ecology. Proc. R. Soc. B Biol. Sci. 283, 20161587 (2016).
Souza, F. C. de et al. Evolutionary diversity is associated with wood productivity in Amazonian forests. Nat. Ecol. Evol. 3, 1754–1761 (2019).
Wiens, J. J. et al. Niche conservatism as an emerging principle in ecology and conservation biology. Ecol. Lett. 13, 1310–1324 (2010).
Ackerly, D. D. & Reich, P. B. Convergence and correlations among leaf size and function in seed plants: a comparative test using independent contrasts. Am. J. Bot. 86, 1272–1281 (1999).
Chave, J. et al. Regional and phylogenetic variation of wood density across 2456 Neotropical tree species. Ecol. Appl. 16, 2356–2367 (2006).
Swenson, N. G. & Enquist, B. J. Ecological and evolutionary determinants of a key plant functional trait: wood density and its community-wide variation across latitude and elevation. Am. J. Bot. 94, 451–459 (2007).
Vitousek, P. M. Nutrient Cycling and Limitation: Hawai’i as a Model System (Princeton Univ. Press, 2004).
Weedon, J. T. et al. Global meta-analysis of wood decomposition rates: a role for trait variation among tree species? Ecol. Lett. 12, 45–56 (2009).
Cadotte, M. W., Cardinale, B. J. & Oakley, T. H. Evolutionary history and the effect of biodiversity on plant productivity. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 105, 17012–17017 (2008).
Finke, D. L. & Snyder, W. E. Niche partitioning increases resource exploitation by diverse communities. Science 321, 1488–1490 (2008).
Cavender-Bares, J. et al. Associations of leaf spectra with genetic and phylogenetic variation in oaks: prospects for remote detection of biodiversity. Remote Sens. 8, 221 (2016).
Schweiger, A. K. et al. Plant spectral diversity integrates functional and phylogenetic components of biodiversity and predicts ecosystem function. Nat. Ecol. Evol. 2, 976–982 (2018).
Jucker, T. et al. The global spectrum of tree crown architecture. Nat. Commun. 16, 4876 (2025).
Zhao, Y., Zeng, Y., Zhao, D., Wu, B. & Zhao, Q. The optimal leaf biochemical selection for mapping species diversity based on imaging spectroscopy. Remote Sens. 8, 216 (2016).
Schneider, F. D. et al. Mapping functional diversity from remotely sensed morphological and physiological forest traits. Nat. Commun. 8, 1441 (2017).
Hughes, A. R., Inouye, B. D., Johnson, M. T. J., Underwood, N. & Vellend, M. Ecological consequences of genetic diversity. Ecol. Lett. 11, 609–623 (2008).
Perry, A. et al. Resilient forests for the future. Tree Genet. Genomes 20, 17 (2024).
Chaves, M. M., Maroco, J. P. & Pereira, J. S. Understanding plant responses to drought — from genes to the whole plant. Funct. Plant Biol. 30, 239–264 (2003).
Booth, R. E. & Grime, J. P. Effects of genetic impoverishment on plant community diversity. J. Ecol. 91, 721–730 (2003).
Frieley, J. D., Grime, J. P. & Bilton, M. Genetic identity of interspecific neighbours mediates plant responses to competition and environmental variation in a species-rich grassland. J. Ecol. 95, 908–915 (2007).
Lankau, R. A. & Strauss, S. Y. Mutual feedbacks maintain both genetic and species diversity in a plant community. Science 317, 1561–1563 (2007).
Whitham, T. G. et al. Community and ecosystem genetics: a consequence of the extended phenotype. Ecology 84, 559–573 (2003).
Whitham, T. G. et al. A framework for community and ecosystem genetics: from genes to ecosystems. Nat. Rev. Genet. 7, 510–523 (2006).
Hughes, A. R. & Stachowicz, J. J. Genetic diversity enhances the resistance of a seagrass ecosystem to disturbance. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 101, 8998–9002 (2004).
Hartl, D. L. & Clark, A. G. Principles of Population Genetics Vol. 116 (Sinauer, 1997).
Jennings, S. B., Brown, N. D., Boshier, D. H., Whitmore, T. C. & Lopes, J. do C. A. Ecology provides a pragmatic solution to the maintenance of genetic diversity in sustainably managed tropical rain forests. For. Ecol. Manag. 154, 1–10 (2001).
Vilas, A., Pérez-Figueroa, A., Quesada, H. & Caballero, A. Allelic diversity for neutral markers retains a higher adaptive potential for quantitative traits than expected heterozygosity. Mol. Ecol. 24, 4419–4432 (2015).
González, A. V., Gómez-Silva, V., Ramírez, M. J. & Fontúrbel, F. E. Meta-analysis of the differential effects of habitat fragmentation and degradation on plant genetic diversity. Conserv. Biol. 34, 711–720 (2020).
Kort, H. D., Mergeay, J., Jacquemyn, H. & Honnay, O. Transatlantic invasion routes and adaptive potential in North American populations of the invasive glossy buckthorn, Frangula alnus. Ann. Bot. 118, 1089–1099 (2016).
Jordan, R., Hoffmann, A. A., Dillon, S. K. & Prober, S. M. Evidence of genomic adaptation to climate in Eucalyptus microcarpa: implications for adaptive potential to projected climate change. Mol. Ecol. 26, 6002–6020 (2017).
Charlesworth, B., Charlesworth, D. & Barton, N. H. The effects of genetic and geographic structure on neutral variation. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Evol. Syst. 34, 99–125 (2003).
Shaw, R. E. et al. Halting genetic diversity loss, from local to international action and policy. Nat. Rev. Biodivers. https://doi.org/10.1038/s44358-026-00162-0 (2026).
Hoban, S. et al. Global commitments to conserving and monitoring genetic diversity are now necessary and feasible. BioScience 71, 964–976 (2021).
Corbin, J. P. M. et al. Hyperspectral leaf reflectance detects interactive genetic and environmental effects on tree phenotypes, enabling large-scale monitoring and restoration planning under climate change. Plant Cell Environ. 48, 1842–1857 (2025).
Blonder, B. et al. Remote sensing of ploidy level in quaking aspen (Populus tremuloides Michx.). J. Ecol. 108, 175–188 (2020).
Blonder, B. et al. Remote sensing of cytotype and its consequences for canopy damage in quaking aspen. Glob. Change Biol. 28, 2491–2504 (2022).
Czyż, E. A. et al. Intraspecific genetic variation of a Fagus sylvatica population in a temperate forest derived from airborne imaging spectroscopy time series. Ecol. Evol. 10, 7419–7430 (2020).
Czyż, E. A. et al. Genetic constraints on temporal variation of airborne reflectance spectra and their uncertainties over a temperate forest. Remote Sens. Environ. 284, 113338 (2023).
Chen, Y., Monks, L., Rubio, V. E., Cox, A. J. & Swenson, N. G. Linking leaf hyperspectral reflectance to gene expression. Commun. Earth Environ. 6, 694 (2025).
Ollinger, S. V. Sources of variability in canopy reflectance and the convergent properties of plants. N. Phytol. 189, 375–394 (2011).
Aitken, S. N. & Bemmels, J. B. Time to get moving: assisted gene flow of forest trees. Evol. Appl. 9, 271–290 (2016).
Hernández, M. et al. Population structure and genetic diversity of Magnolia cubensis subsp. acunae (Magnoliaceae): effects of habitat fragmentation and implications for conservation. Oryx 54, 451–459 (2020).
Rocchini, D. et al. Measuring β-diversity by remote sensing: a challenge for biodiversity monitoring. Methods Ecol. Evol. 9, 1787–1798 (2018).
Asner, G. P., Martin, R. E., Anderson, C. B. & Knapp, D. E. Quantifying forest canopy traits: imaging spectroscopy versus field survey. Remote Sens. Environ. 158, 15–27 (2015).
Chadwick, K. D. & Asner, G. P. Tropical soil nutrient distributions determined by biotic and hillslope processes. Biogeochemistry 127, 273–289 (2016).
Singh, A., Serbin, S. P., McNeil, B. E., Kingdon, C. C. & Townsend, P. A. Imaging spectroscopy algorithms for mapping canopy foliar chemical and morphological traits and their uncertainties. Ecol. Appl. 25, 2180–2197 (2015).
Toan, T. L. et al. The BIOMASS mission: mapping global forest biomass to better understand the terrestrial carbon cycle. Remote Sens. Environ. 115, 2850–2860 (2011).
Saatchi, S., Marlier, M., Chazdon, R. L., Clark, D. B. & Russell, A. E. Impact of spatial variability of tropical forest structure on radar estimation of aboveground biomass. Remote Sens. Environ. 115, 2836–2849 (2011).
Torres, R. et al. GMES Sentinel-1 mission. Remote Sens. Environ. 120, 9–24 (2012).
Bussinguer, J. et al. Understanding the spatio-temporal behavior of Sentinel-1 SAR vegetation indices over the Brazilian savanna. IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sens. 62, 1–18 (2024).
Reiche, J., Hamunyela, E., Verbesselt, J., Hoekman, D. & Herold, M. Improving near-real time deforestation monitoring in tropical dry forests by combining dense Sentinel-1 time series with Landsat and ALOS-2 PALSAR-2. Remote Sens. Environ. 204, 147–161 (2018).
Lefsky, M. A., Cohen, W. B., Parker, G. G. & Harding, D. J. Lidar remote sensing for ecosystem studies. BioScience 52, 19–30 (2002).
Johnstone, J. F. et al. Changing disturbance regimes, ecological memory, and forest resilience. Front. Ecol. Environ. 14, 369–378 (2016).
Senf, C. et al. Canopy mortality has doubled in Europe’s temperate forests over the last three decades. Nat. Commun. 9, 4978 (2018).
Vierling, K. T., Vierling, L. A., Gould, W. A., Martinuzzi, S. & Clawges, R. M. Lidar: shedding new light on habitat characterization and modeling. Front. Ecol. Environ. 6, 90–98 (2008).
Mitsuhashi, R. et al. in Tropical Peatland Eco-evaluation (eds Osaki, M. et al.) 271–293 (Springer Nature, 2023).
Sakae, T., Sakaizawa, D., Imai, T. & Sumita, T. Development status of MOLI project. In Proc. SPIE Sensors, Systems, and Next-Generation Satellites XXIX, 136670P (SPIE, 2025).
Dubayah, R., Armston, J. D. & Blair, J. B. Advancing ecosystem structure observation: insights from GEDI and the path to EDGE. AGU Fall Meeting Abstracts https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2024AGUFMGC13W..01D (2024).
Fricker, H. A. & Armston, J. D. Advances in tracking global change: insights from NASA’s satellite laser altimetry missions (ICESat, ICESat-2, and GEDI) and the path to EDGE I. AGU2024 https://agu.confex.com/agu/agu24/meetingapp.cgi/Session/229145 (2024).
Quegan, S. et al. The European Space Agency BIOMASS mission: measuring forest above-ground biomass from space. Remote Sens. Environ. 227, 44–60 (2019).
Rosen, P. et al. The NASA-ISRO SAR (NISAR) mission dual-band radar instrument preliminary design. In 2017 IEEE International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium (IGARSS) https://doi.org/10.1109/igarss.2017.8127836 (IEEE, 2017).
Asner, G. P. et al. Spectroscopy of canopy chemicals in humid tropical forests. Remote Sens. Environ. 115, 3587–3598 (2011).
Jetz, W. et al. Monitoring plant functional diversity from space. Nat. Plants 2, 16024 (2016).
Zanne, A. E. et al. Three keys to the radiation of angiosperms into freezing environments. Nature 506, 89–92 (2014).
Malhi, Y. et al. New perspectives on the ecology of tree structure and tree communities through terrestrial laser scanning. Interface Focus 8, 20170052 (2018).
Nunes, M. H. et al. Edge effects on tree architecture exacerbate biomass loss of fragmented Amazonian forests. Nat. Commun. 14, 8129 (2023).
Nunes, M. H. et al. Forest fragmentation impacts the seasonality of Amazonian evergreen canopies. Nat. Commun. 13, 917 (2022).
Martínez-García, E. et al. Drought response of the boreal forest carbon sink is driven by understorey–tree composition. Nat. Geosci. 17, 197–204 (2024).
Pinagé, E. R. et al. Forest structure and solar-induced fluorescence across intact and degraded forests in the Amazon. Remote Sens. Environ. 274, 112998 (2022).
Wigneron, J.-P. et al. Tropical forests did not recover from the strong 2015–2016 El Niño event. Sci. Adv. 6, eaay4603 (2020).
Hernández-Blanco, M. et al. Ecosystem health, ecosystem services, and the well-being of humans and the rest of nature. Glob. Change Biol. 28, 5027–5040 (2022).
Kamoske, A. G. et al. Towards mapping biodiversity from above: can fusing lidar and hyperspectral remote sensing predict taxonomic, functional, and phylogenetic tree diversity in temperate forests? Glob. Ecol. Biogeogr. 31, 1440–1460 (2022).
Manfreda, S. et al. On the use of unmanned aerial systems for environmental monitoring. Remote Sens. 10, 641 (2018).
Anderegg, W. R. L. et al. Hydraulic diversity of forests regulates ecosystem resilience during drought. Nature 561, 538–541 (2017).
Langan, L., Scheiter, S., Hickler, T. & Higgins, S. I. Amazon forest resistance to drought is increased by diversity in hydraulic traits. Nat. Commun. 16, 8246 (2025).
Griffith, D. M. et al. Capturing patterns of evolutionary relatedness with reflectance spectra to model and monitor biodiversity. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 120, e2215533120 (2023).
Hansen, M. C. et al. High-resolution global maps of 21st-century forest cover change. Science 342, 850–853 (2013).
Diniz, C. G. et al. DETER-B: the new amazon near real-time deforestation detection system. IEEE J. Sel. Top. Appl. Earth Obs. Remote Sens. 8, 3619–3628 (2015).
Zeng, Y. et al. Structural complexity biases vegetation greenness measures. Nat. Ecol. Evol. 7, 1790–1798 (2023).
Asner, G. P. et al. A universal airborne LiDAR approach for tropical forest carbon mapping. Oecologia 168, 1147–1160 (2012).
Doughty, C. E. et al. Satellite derived trait data slightly improves tropical forest biomass, NPP and GPP estimates. J. Geophys. Res. Biogeosci. 129, e2024JG008108 (2024).
Conto, T., de, Armston, J. & Dubayah, R. Characterizing the structural complexity of the Earth’s forests with spaceborne lidar. Nat. Commun. 15, 8116 (2024).
Satapathy, T. & Dutta, D. Characterizing the vertical variability of canopy structure from space: implications for biodiversity, productivity, and ecosystem functioning. Agric. For. Meteorol. 372, 110710 (2025).
Wu, Y., Chen, Y., Tian, C., Yun, T. & Li, M. Estimation of subtropical forest aboveground biomass using active and passive sentinel data with canopy height. Remote Sens. 17, 2509 (2025).
Bourgoin, C. et al. Human degradation of tropical moist forests is greater than previously estimated. Nature 631, 570–576 (2024).
Holcomb, A., Burns, P., Keshav, S. & Coomes, D. A. Repeat GEDI footprints measure the effects of tropical forest disturbances. Remote Sens. Environ. 308, 114174 (2024).
Forkel, M. et al. Burning of woody debris dominates fire emissions in the Amazon and Cerrado. Nat. Geosci. 18, 140–147 (2025).
Lima, R. B. de et al. Mapping the density of giant trees in the Amazon. N. Phytol. 249, 152–168 (2026).
Lei, Y. et al. Quantification of selective logging in tropical forest with spaceborne SAR interferometry. Remote Sens. Environ. 211, 167–183 (2018).
Qi, W. et al. Mapping large-scale pantropical forest canopy height by integrating GEDI lidar and TanDEM-X InSAR data. Remote Sens. Environ. 318, 114534 (2025).
Potapov, P. et al. Mapping global forest canopy height through integration of GEDI and Landsat data. Remote Sens. Environ. 253, 112165 (2021).
Guan, K. et al. Photosynthetic seasonality of global tropical forests constrained by hydroclimate. Nat. Geosci. 8, 284–289 (2015).
Giardina, F. et al. Tall Amazonian forests are less sensitive to precipitation variability. Nat. Geosci. 11, 405–409 (2018).
Koren, G. et al. Widespread reduction in sun-induced fluorescence from the Amazon during the 2015/2016 El Niño. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. B Biol. Sci. 373, 20170408 (2018).
Moura, Y. M. de et al. Seasonality and drought effects of Amazonian forests observed from multi-angle satellite data. Remote Sens. Environ. 171, 278–290 (2015).
Moura, Y. M. de et al. Spectral analysis of amazon canopy phenology during the dry season using a tower hyperspectral camera and MODIS observations. ISPRS J. Photogramm. Remote Sens. 131, 52–64 (2017).
Zhou, L. et al. Widespread decline of Congo rainforest greenness in the past decade. Nature 509, 86–90 (2014).
Liu, L. et al. The novel microwave temperature vegetation drought index (MTVDI) captures canopy seasonality across Amazonian tropical evergreen forests. Remote Sens. 13, 339 (2021).
Tao, S. et al. Increasing and widespread vulnerability of intact tropical rainforests to repeated droughts. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 119, e2116626119 (2022).
Bernardino, P. N. et al. Estimating vegetation water content from Sentinel-1 C-band SAR data over savanna and grassland ecosystems. Environ. Res. Lett. 19, 034019 (2024).
Pinagé, E. R. et al. Surface energy dynamics and canopy structural properties in intact and disturbed forests in the southern Amazon. J. Geophys. Res. Biogeosci. 128, e2023JG007465 (2023).
Sumoinen, L., Ruokolainen, K., Pitkänen, T. & Tuomisto, H. Similar understorey structure in spite of edaphic and floristic dissimilarity in Amazonian forests. Acta Amaz. 45, 393–404 (2015).
Medeiros, E. S. e S., Machado, C. C. C., Galvíncio, J. D., Moura, M. S. B. de & Araujo, H. F. P. de Predicting plant species richness with satellite images in the largest dry forest nucleus in South America. J. Arid Environ. 166, 43–50 (2019).
Fagua, J. C. et al. Mapping tree diversity in the tropical forest region of Chocó-Colombia. Environ. Res. Lett. 16, 054024 (2021).
Marselis, S. M. et al. Evaluating the potential of full-waveform lidar for mapping pan-tropical tree species richness. Glob. Ecol. Biogeogr. 29, 1799–1816 (2020).
Marselis, S. M., Keil, P., Chase, J. M. & Dubayah, R. The use of GEDI canopy structure for explaining variation in tree species richness in natural forests. Environ. Res. Lett. 17, 045003 (2022).
Cao, R. et al. Global evidence for a positive relationship between tree species richness and ecosystem photosynthesis. Nat. Plants 11, 1429–1440 (2025).
Asner, G. P. et al. Landscape biogeochemistry reflected in shifting distributions of chemical traits in the Amazon forest canopy. Nat. Geosci. 8, 567–573 (2015).
Chadwick, D. K. & Asner, G. P. Organismic-scale remote sensing of canopy foliar traits in lowland tropical forests. Remote Sens. 8, 87 (2016).
Swinfield, T. et al. Imaging spectroscopy reveals the effects of topography and logging on the leaf chemistry of tropical forest canopy trees. Glob. Chang. Biol. 26, 989–1002 (2020).
Liu, S. et al. Mapping foliar photosynthetic capacity in sub-tropical and tropical forests with UAS-based imaging spectroscopy: scaling from leaf to canopy. Remote Sens. Environ. 293, 113612 (2023).
Schimel, D. et al. Pan-tropical plant functional trait variation from space. Preprint at https://doi.org/10.48550/arxiv.2505.19199 (2025).
Gauci, V. et al. Global atmospheric methane uptake by upland tree woody surfaces. Nature 631, 796–800 (2024).
Burt, A. et al. New insights into large tropical tree mass and structure from direct harvest and terrestrial lidar. R. Soc. Open Sci. 8, 201458 (2021).
Han, T. et al. Taller trees experienced less crown damage during a severe hurricane in a tropical forest. Glob. Change Biol. 32, e70709 (2026).
Huechacona-Ruiz, A. H. et al. Mapping tree species deciduousness of tropical dry forests combining reflectance, spectral unmixing, and texture data from high-resolution imagery. Forests 11, 1234 (2020).
Laurin, G. V. et al. Discrimination of tropical forest types, dominant species, and mapping of functional guilds by hyperspectral and simulated multispectral Sentinel-2 data. Remote Sens. Environ. 176, 163–176 (2016).
Cross, M. D., Scambos, T., Pacifici, F. & Marshall, W. E. Determining effective meter-scale image data and spectral vegetation indices for tropical forest tree species differentiation. IEEE J. Sel. Top. Appl. Earth Obs. Remote Sens. 12, 2934–2943 (2018).
Wagner, F. H. The flowering of Atlantic Forest Pleroma trees. Sci. Rep. 11, 20437 (2021).
Miura, T. et al. Utility of commercial high-resolution satellite imagery for monitoring general flowering in Sarawak, Borneo. Ecol. Res. 38, 386–402 (2023).
Ferreira, M. P., Wagner, F. H., Aragão, L. E. O. C., Shimabukuro, Y. E. & Filho, C. R. de S. Tree species classification in tropical forests using visible to shortwave infrared WorldView-3 images and texture analysis. ISPRS J. Photogramm. Remote Sens. 149, 119–131 (2019).
Cho, M. A., Malahlela, O. & Ramoelo, A. Assessing the utility WorldView-2 imagery for tree species mapping in South African subtropical humid forest and the conservation implications: Dukuduku forest patch as case study. Int. J. Appl. Earth Obs. Geoinf. 38, 349–357 (2015).
Ferreira, M. P. et al. Accurate mapping of Brazil nut trees (Bertholletia excelsa) in Amazonian forests using WorldView-3 satellite images and convolutional neural networks. Ecol. Inform. 63, 101302 (2021).
Chaves, P. P., Ruokolainen, K. & Tuomisto, H. Using remote sensing to model tree species distribution in Peruvian lowland Amazonia. Biotropica 50, 758–767 (2018).
José-Silva, L. et al. Improving the validation of ecological niche models with remote sensing analysis. Ecol. Model. 380, 22–30 (2018).
Deblauwe, V. et al. Remotely sensed temperature and precipitation data improve species distribution modelling in the tropics. Glob. Ecol. Biogeogr. 25, 443–454 (2016).
Thomas, R. Q., Kellner, J. R., Clark, D. B. & Peart, D. R. Low mortality in tall tropical trees. Ecology 94, 920–929 (2013).
Barber, C. et al. Species-level tree crown maps improve predictions of tree recruit abundance in a tropical landscape. Ecol. Appl. 32, e2585 (2022).
Khan, G. et al. Weak population structure and no genetic erosion in Pilosocereus aureispinus: a microendemic and threatened cactus species from eastern Brazil. PLoS ONE 13, e0195475 (2018).