Stanier, R. Y., Doudoroff, M. & Adelberg, E. A. The Microbial World (Prentice-Hall, 1963).
Vosseberg, J. et al. The emerging view on the origin and early evolution of eukaryotic cells. Nature 633, 295–305 (2024).
Betts, H. C. et al. Integrated genomic and fossil evidence illuminates life’s early evolution and eukaryote origin. Nat. Ecol. Evol. 2, 1556–1562 (2018).
Mahendrarajah, T. A. et al. ATP synthase evolution on a cross-braced dated tree of life. Nat. Commun. 14, 7456 (2023).
Cox, C. J., Foster, P. G., Hirt, R. P., Harris, S. R. & Embley, T. M. The archaebacterial origin of eukaryotes. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 105, 20356–20361 (2008).
Eme, L., Spang, A., Lombard, J., Stairs, C. W. & Ettema, T. J. G. Archaea and the origin of eukaryotes. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 15, 711–723 (2017).
Roger, A. J., Muñoz-Gómez, S. A. & Kamikawa, R. The origin and diversification of mitochondria. Curr. Biol. 27, R1177–R1192 (2017).
Martijn, J. & Ettema, T. J. G. From archaeon to eukaryote: the evolutionary dark ages of the eukaryotic cell. Biochem. Soc. Trans. 41, 451–457 (2013).
Schwartz, R. M. & Dayhoff, M. O. Origins of prokaryotes, eukaryotes, mitochondria, and chloroplasts: a perspective is derived from protein and nucleic acid sequence data. Science 199, 395–403 (1978).
Yang, D., Oyaizu, Y., Oyaizu, H., Olsen, G. J. & Woese, C. R. Mitochondrial origins. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 82, 4443–4447 (1985).
Tamarit, D. et al. Description of Asgardarchaeum abyssi gen. nov. spec. nov., a novel species within the class Asgardarchaeia and phylum Asgardarchaeota in accordance with the SeqCode. Syst. Appl. Microbiol. 47, 126525 (2024).
Spang, A. et al. Complex archaea that bridge the gap between prokaryotes and eukaryotes. Nature 521, 173–179 (2015).
Zaremba-Niedzwiedzka, K. et al. Asgard archaea illuminate the origin of eukaryotic cellular complexity. Nature 541, 353–358 (2017).
Williams, T. A., Cox, C. J., Foster, P. G., Szöllősi, G. J. & Embley, T. M. Phylogenomics provides robust support for a two-domains tree of life. Nat. Ecol. Evol. 4, 138–147 (2020).
Eme, L. et al. Inference and reconstruction of the heimdallarchaeial ancestry of eukaryotes. Nature 618, 992–999 (2023).
Hartman, H. & Fedorov, A. The origin of the eukaryotic cell: a genomic investigation. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 99, 1420–1425 (2002).
Akıl, C. & Robinson, R. C. Genomes of Asgard archaea encode profilins that regulate actin. Nature 562, 439–443 (2018).
Akıl, C. et al. Insights into the evolution of regulated actin dynamics via characterization of primitive gelsolin/cofilin proteins from Asgard archaea. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 117, 19904–19913 (2020).
Survery, S. et al. Heimdallarchaea encodes profilin with eukaryotic-like actin regulation and polyproline binding. Commun. Biol. 4, 1024 (2021).
Hatano, T. et al. Asgard archaea shed light on the evolutionary origins of the eukaryotic ubiquitin-ESCRT machinery. Nat. Commun. 13, 3398 (2022).
Imachi, H. et al. Isolation of an archaeon at the prokaryote–eukaryote interface. Nature 577, 519–525 (2020).
Rodrigues-Oliveira, T. et al. Actin cytoskeleton and complex cell architecture in an Asgard archaeon. Nature 613, 332–339 (2023).
Liu, Y. et al. Expanded diversity of Asgard archaea and their relationships with eukaryotes. Nature 593, 553–557 (2021).
Rost, B. Twilight zone of protein sequence alignments. Protein Eng. 12, 85–94 (1999).
Illergård, K., Ardell, D. H. & Elofsson, A. Structure is three to ten times more conserved than sequence—a study of structural response in protein cores. Proteins 77, 499–508 (2009).
Vanni, C. et al. Unifying the known and unknown microbial coding sequence space. eLife 11, e67667 (2022).
Jumper, J. et al. Highly accurate protein structure prediction with AlphaFold. Nature 596, 583–589 (2021).
van Kempen, M. et al. Fast and accurate protein structure search with Foldseek. Nat. Biotechnol. 42, 243–246 (2024).
Ruperti, F. et al. Cross-phyla protein annotation by structural prediction and alignment. Genome Biol. 24, 113 (2023).
Seong, K. & Krasileva, K. V. Prediction of effector protein structures from fungal phytopathogens enables evolutionary analyses. Nat. Microbiol. 8, 174–187 (2023).
K.E. Appler et al. Oxygen metabolism in descendants of the archaeal-eukaryotic ancestor. Nature https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-026-10128-z (2026).
Valentin-Alvarado, L. E. et al. Asgard archaea modulate potential methanogenesis substrates in wetland soil. Nat. Commun. 15, 6384 (2024).
Mirdita, M. et al. ColabFold: making protein folding accessible to all. Nat. Methods 19, 679–682 (2022).
Lin, Z. et al. Evolutionary-scale prediction of atomic-level protein structure with a language model. Science 379, 1123–1130 (2023).
Tran, L. T., Akıl, C., Senju, Y. & Robinson, R. C. The eukaryotic-like characteristics of small GTPase, roadblock and TRAPPC3 proteins from Asgard archaea. Commun. Biol. 7, 273 (2024).
Klinger, C. M., Spang, A., Dacks, J. B. & Ettema, T. J. G. Tracing the archaeal origins of eukaryotic membrane-trafficking system building blocks. Mol. Biol. Evol. 33, 1528–1541 (2016).
Vosseberg, J. et al. Timing the origin of eukaryotic cellular complexity with ancient duplications. Nat. Ecol. Evol. 5, 92–100 (2021).
Swarts, D. C. et al. The evolutionary journey of Argonaute proteins. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 21, 743–753 (2014).
Bastiaanssen, C. et al. RNA-guided RNA silencing by an Asgard archaeal Argonaute. Nat. Commun. 15, 5499 (2024).
Leão, P. et al. Asgard archaea defense systems and their roles in the origin of eukaryotic immunity. Nat. Commun. 15, 6386 (2024).
Koonin, E. V. & Yutin, N. The dispersed archaeal eukaryome and the complex archaeal ancestor of eukaryotes. Cold Spring Harb. Perspect. Biol. 6, a016188 (2014).
Prokopchuk, G. et al. Lessons from the deep: mechanisms behind diversification of eukaryotic protein complexes. Biol. Rev. Camb. Philos. Soc. 98, 1910–1927 (2023).
Berger, W., Steiner, E., Grusch, M., Elbling, L. & Micksche, M. Vaults and the major vault protein: novel roles in signal pathway regulation and immunity. Cell. Mol. Life Sci. 66, 43–61 (2009).
Frascotti, G. et al. The Vault nanoparticle: a gigantic ribonucleoprotein assembly involved in diverse physiological and pathological phenomena and an ideal nanovector for drug delivery and therapy. Cancers 13, 707 (2021).
Daly, T. K., Sutherland-Smith, A. J. & Penny, D. In silico resurrection of the major vault protein suggests it is ancestral in modern eukaryotes. Genome Biol. Evol. 5, 1567–1583 (2013).
Casañas, A. et al. New features of vault architecture and dynamics revealed by novel refinement using the deformable elastic network approach. Acta Crystallogr. D 69, 1054–1061 (2013).
Healy, M. D. et al. Structure of the endosomal Commander complex linked to Ritscher–Schinzel syndrome. Cell 186, 2219–2237 (2023).
Healy, M. D. et al. Structural insights into the architecture and membrane interactions of the conserved COMMD proteins. eLife 7, e35898 (2018).
Laulumaa, S., Kumpula, E.-P., Huiskonen, J. T. & Varjosalo, M. Structure and interactions of the endogenous human Commander complex. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 31, 925–938 (2024).
Komatsu, M. et al. A novel protein-conjugating system for Ufm1, a ubiquitin-fold modifier. EMBO J. 23, 1977–1986 (2004).
Zhou, X. et al. UFMylation: a ubiquitin-like modification. Trends Biochem. Sci 49, 52–67 (2024).
Lovejoy, C. A. et al. Functional genomic screens identify CINP as a genome maintenance protein. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 106, 19304–19309 (2009).
Grishina, I. & Lattes, B. A novel Cdk2 interactor is phosphorylated by Cdc7 and associates with components of the replication complexes. Cell Cycle 4, 1120–1126 (2005).
Ni, C. et al. Labeling of heterochronic ribosomes reveals C1ORF109 and SPATA5 control a late step in human ribosome assembly. Cell Rep. 38, 110597 (2022).
Durairaj, J. et al. Uncovering new families and folds in the natural protein universe. Nature 622, 646–653 (2023).
Barrio-Hernandez, I. et al. Clustering predicted structures at the scale of the known protein universe. Nature 622, 637–645 (2023).
Yutin, N., Makarova, K. S., Mekhedov, S. L., Wolf, Y. I. & Koonin, E. V. The deep archaeal roots of eukaryotes. Mol. Biol. Evol. 25, 1619–1630 (2008).
Rivera, M. C. & Lake, J. A. The ring of life provides evidence for a genome fusion origin of eukaryotes. Nature 431, 152–155 (2004).
Brueckner, J. & Martin, W. F. Bacterial genes outnumber archaeal genes in eukaryotic genomes. Genome Biol. Evol. 12, 282–292 (2020).
Molina, C. S., Williams, T. A., Snel, B. & Spang, A. Chimeric origins and dynamic evolution of central carbon metabolism in eukaryotes. Nat. Ecol. Evol. 9, 613–627 (2025).
Friedberg, I. & Margalit, H. Persistently conserved positions in structurally similar, sequence dissimilar proteins: roles in preserving protein fold and function. Protein Sci. 11, 350–360 (2002).
Sayers, E. W. et al. Database resources of the National Center for Biotechnology Information. Nucleic Acids Res. 50, D20–D26 (2022).
Parks, D. H., Imelfort, M., Skennerton, C. T., Hugenholtz, P. & Tyson, G. W. CheckM: assessing the quality of microbial genomes recovered from isolates, single cells, and metagenomes. Genome Res. 25, 1043–1055 (2015).
Chaumeil, P.-A., Mussig, A. J., Hugenholtz, P. & Parks, D. H. GTDB-Tk v2: memory friendly classification with the genome taxonomy database. Bioinformatics 38, 5315–5316 (2022).
Seemann, T. Prokka: rapid prokaryotic genome annotation. Bioinformatics 30, 2068–2069 (2014).
Rinke, C. et al. A standardized archaeal taxonomy for the Genome Taxonomy Database. Nat. Microbiol. 6, 946–959 (2021).
Parks, D. H. et al. Recovery of nearly 8,000 metagenome-assembled genomes substantially expands the tree of life. Nat. Microbiol. 2, 1533–1542 (2017).
Tahon, G. et al. Phylogenomics and ancestral reconstruction of Korarchaeota reveals genomic adaptation to habitat switching. Preprint at bioRxiv https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/2023.09.28.559970v2 (2023).
Petitjean, C., Deschamps, P., López-García, P., Moreira, D. & Brochier-Armanet, C. Extending the conserved phylogenetic core of archaea disentangles the evolution of the third domain of life. Mol. Biol. Evol. 32, 1242–1254 (2015).
Schäffer, A. A. et al. Improving the accuracy of PSI-BLAST protein database searches with composition-based statistics and other refinements. Nucleic Acids Res. 29, 2994–3005 (2001).
Katoh, K. & Standley, D. M. MAFFT multiple sequence alignment software version 7: improvements in performance and usability. Mol. Biol. Evol. 30, 772–780 (2013).
Capella-Gutiérrez, S., Silla-Martínez, J. M. & Gabaldón, T. trimAl: a tool for automated alignment trimming in large-scale phylogenetic analyses. Bioinformatics 25, 1972–1973 (2009).
Minh, B. Q. et al. IQ-TREE 2: new models and efficient methods for phylogenetic inference in the genomic era. Mol. Biol. Evol. 37, 1530–1534 (2020).
Kalyaanamoorthy, S., Minh, B. Q., Wong, T. K. F., von Haeseler, A. & Jermiin, L. S. ModelFinder: fast model selection for accurate phylogenetic estimates. Nat. Methods 14, 587–589 (2017).
Hoang, D. T., Chernomor, O., von Haeseler, A., Minh, B. Q. & Vinh, L. S. UFBoot2: improving the ultrafast bootstrap approximation. Mol. Biol. Evol. 35, 518–522 (2018).
Guindon, S. et al. New algorithms and methods to estimate maximum-likelihood phylogenies: assessing the performance of PhyML 3.0. Syst. Biol. 59, 307–321 (2010).
Viklund, J., Ettema, T. J. G. & Andersson, S. G. E. Independent genome reduction and phylogenetic reclassification of the oceanic SAR11 clade. Mol. Biol. Evol. 29, 599–615 (2012).
Wang, H.-C., Minh, B. Q., Susko, E. & Roger, A. J. Modeling site heterogeneity with posterior mean site frequency profiles accelerates accurate phylogenomic estimation. Syst. Biol. 67, 216–235 (2018).
Steinegger, M. & Söding, J. MMseqs2 enables sensitive protein sequence searching for the analysis of massive data sets. Nat. Biotechnol. 35, 1026–1028 (2017).
Steinegger, M. & Söding, J. Clustering huge protein sequence sets in linear time. Nat. Commun. 9, 2542 (2018).
Huerta-Cepas, J. et al. eggNOG 5.0: a hierarchical, functionally and phylogenetically annotated orthology resource based on 5090 organisms and 2502 viruses. Nucleic Acids Res. 47, D309–D314 (2019).
R Core Team. R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing (R Foundation for Statistical Computing, 2021).
Deorowicz, S., Debudaj-Grabysz, A. & Gudyś, A. FAMSA: fast and accurate multiple sequence alignment of huge protein families. Sci. Rep. 6, 33964 (2016).
Steinegger, M. et al. HH-suite3 for fast remote homology detection and deep protein annotation. BMC Bioinformatics 20, 473 (2019).
Biegert, A., Mayer, C., Remmert, M., Söding, J. & Lupas, A. N. The MPI Bioinformatics Toolkit for protein sequence analysis. Nucleic Acids Res. 34, W335–W339 (2006).
Jones, P. et al. InterProScan 5: genome-scale protein function classification. Bioinformatics 30, 1236–1240 (2014).
Eberhardt, R. Y. et al. AntiFam: a tool to help identify spurious ORFs in protein annotation. Database 2012, bas003 (2012).
Lu, S. et al. CDD/SPARCLE: the conserved domain database in 2020. Nucleic Acids Res. 48, D265–D268 (2020).
Linding, R. et al. Protein disorder prediction: implications for structural proteomics. Structure 11, 1453–1459 (2003).
Lees, J. et al. Gene3D: a domain-based resource for comparative genomics, functional annotation and protein network analysis. Nucleic Acids Res. 40, D465–D471 (2012).
Necci, M., Piovesan, D., Dosztányi, Z. & Tosatto, S. C. E. MobiDB-lite: fast and highly specific consensus prediction of intrinsic disorder in proteins. Bioinformatics 33, 1402–1404 (2017).
Thomas, P. D. et al. PANTHER: making genome-scale phylogenetics accessible to all. Protein Sci. 31, 8–22 (2022).
Mistry, J. et al. Pfam: the protein families database in 2021. Nucleic Acids Res. 49, D412–D419 (2021).
Wu, C. H. et al. PIRSF: family classification system at the Protein Information Resource. Nucleic Acids Res. 32, D112–114 (2004).
Attwood, T. K. The PRINTS database: a resource for identification of protein families. Brief. Bioinform. 3, 252–263 (2002).
Akiva, E. et al. The Structure–Function Linkage Database. Nucleic Acids Res. 42, D521–D530 (2014).
Letunic, I., Doerks, T. & Bork, P. SMART 7: recent updates to the protein domain annotation resource. Nucleic Acids Res. 40, D302–D305 (2012).
Wilson, D. et al. SUPERFAMILY—sophisticated comparative genomics, data mining, visualization and phylogeny. Nucleic Acids Res. 37, D380–D386 (2009).
Haft, D. H., Selengut, J. D. & White, O. The TIGRFAMs database of protein families. Nucleic Acids Res. 31, 371–373 (2003).
de Potter, B., Raas, M. W. D., Seidl, M. F., Verrijzer, C. P. & Snel, B. Uncoupled evolution of the Polycomb system and deep origin of non-canonical PRC1. Commun. Biol. 6, 1144 (2023).
Manni, M., Berkeley, M. R., Seppey, M., Simão, F. A. & Zdobnov, E. M. BUSCO update: novel and streamlined workflows along with broader and deeper phylogenetic coverage for scoring of eukaryotic, prokaryotic, and viral genomes. Mol. Biol. Evol. 38, 4647–4654 (2021).
Sokolskyi, T. H. Bacterial Major Vault Protein homologs shed new light on origins of the enigmatic organelle. Preprint at bioRxiv https://doi.org/10.1101/872010 (2019).
Pei, J. & Grishin, N. V. PROMALS3D: multiple protein sequence alignment enhanced with evolutionary and three-dimensional structural information. Methods Mol. Biol. 1079, 263–271 (2014).
Holm, L. Dali server: structural unification of protein families. Nucleic Acids Res. 50, W210–W215 (2022).
Criscuolo, A. & Gribaldo, S. BMGE (Block Mapping and Gathering with Entropy): a new software for selection of phylogenetic informative regions from multiple sequence alignments. BMC Evol. Biol. 10, 210 (2010).
Letunic, I. & Bork, P. Interactive Tree Of Life (iTOL) v5: an online tool for phylogenetic tree display and annotation. Nucleic Acids Res. 49, W293–W296 (2021).
Meng, E. C. et al. UCSF ChimeraX: tools for structure building and analysis. Protein Sci. 32, e4792 (2023).
Rego, N. & Koes, D. 3Dmol.js: molecular visualization with WebGL. Bioinformatics 31, 1322–1324 (2015).
Dataset for: Prediction of eukaryotic cellular complexity in Asgard archaea using structural modelling. figshare https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.26057632 (2026).