Radzicka, A. & Wolfenden, R. Rates of uncatalyzed peptide bond hydrolysis in neutral solution and the transition state affinities of proteases. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 118, 6105–6109 (1996).
Dyer, R. P. & Weiss, G. A. Making the cut with protease engineering. Cell Chem. Biol. 29, 177–190 (2022).
Otto, H.-H. & Schirmeister, T. Cysteine proteases and their inhibitors. Chem. Rev. 97, 133–172 (1997).
Carter, P. & Wells, J. A. Dissecting the catalytic triad of a serine protease. Nature 332, 564–568 (1988.
Ménard, R. et al. Modification of the electrostatic environment is tolerated in the oxyanion hole of the cysteine protease papain. Biochemistry 34, 464–471 (1995).
Verma, S., Dixit, R. & Pandey, K. C. Cysteine proteases: modes of activation and future prospects as pharmacological targets. Front. Pharmacol. 7, 107 (2016).
Lauko, A. et al. Computational design of serine hydrolases. Science 388, eadu2454 (2025).
Kim, D. et al. Computational design of metallohydrolases. Nature 649, 246–253 (2026).
Ahern, W. et al. Atom-level enzyme active site scaffolding using RFdiffusion2. Nat. Methods 23, 96–105 (2026).
Bauer, M. S. et al. De novo design of phospho-tyrosine peptide binders. Preprint at bioRxiv https://doi.org/10.1101/2025.09.29.678898 (2025).
Mossessova, E. & Lima, C. D. Ulp1-SUMO crystal structure and genetic analysis reveal conserved interactions and a regulatory element essential for cell growth in yeast. Mol. Cell 5, 865–876 (2000).
Dauparas, J. et al. Robust deep learning-based protein sequence design using ProteinMPNN. Science 378, 49–56 (2022).
Abramson, J. et al. Accurate structure prediction of biomolecular interactions with AlphaFold 3. Nature 630, 493–500 (2024).
Bindels, D. S. et al. mScarlet: a bright monomeric red fluorescent protein for cellular imaging. Nat. Methods 14, 53–56 (2017).
Matayoshi, E. D., Wang, G. T., Krafft, G. A. & Erickson, J. Novel fluorogenic substrates for assaying retroviral proteases by resonance energy transfer. Science 247, 954–958 (1990).
Hofer, F., Kraml, J., Kahler, U., Kamenik, A. S. & Liedl, K. R. Catalytic site pKa values of aspartic, cysteine, and Serine proteases: Constant pH MD simulations. J. Chem. Inf. Model. 60, 3030–3042 (2020).
Zhai, X. & Meek, T. D. Catalytic mechanism of cruzain from Trypanosoma cruzi as determined from solvent kinetic isotope effects of steady-state and pre-steady-state kinetics. Biochemistry 57, 3176–3190 (2018).
Daniel, R. M. & Danson, M. J. A new understanding of how temperature affects the catalytic activity of enzymes. Trends Biochem. Sci 35, 584–591 (2010).
Xu, Z. et al. Molecular basis of the redox regulation of SUMO proteases: a protective mechanism of intermolecular disulfide linkage against irreversible sulfhydryl oxidation. FASEB J. 22, 127–137 (2008).
van Kempen, M. et al. Fast and accurate protein structure search with Foldseek. Nat. Biotechnol. 42, 243–246 (2024).
Zhang, Y. & Skolnick, J. Scoring function for automated assessment of protein structure template quality. Proteins 57, 702–710 (2004).
Anishchenko, I. et al. Modeling protein-small molecule conformational ensembles with PLACER. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 122, e2427161122 (2025).
LaLonde, J. M. et al. Use of papain as a model for the structure-based design of cathepsin K inhibitors: crystal structures of two papain-inhibitor complexes demonstrate binding to S′-subsites. J. Med. Chem. 41, 4567–4576 (1998).
Tsuge, H. et al. Inhibition mechanism of cathepsin L-specific inhibitors based on the crystal structure of papain-CLIK148 complex. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 266, 411–416 (1999).
Moldoveanu, T., Campbell, R. L., Cuerrier, D. & Davies, P. L. Crystal structures of calpain-E64 and -leupeptin inhibitor complexes reveal mobile loops gating the active site. J. Mol. Biol. 343, 1313–1326 (2004).
Falke, S. et al. Structural elucidation and antiviral activity of covalent cathepsin L inhibitors. J. Med. Chem. 67, 7048–7067 (2024).
Yamamoto, A. et al. Structural basis for development of cathepsin B-specific noncovalent-type inhibitor: crystal structure of cathepsin B-E64c complex. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1597, 244–251 (2002).
Pauly, T. A. et al. Specificity determinants of human cathepsin s revealed by crystal structures of complexes. Biochemistry 42, 3203–3213 (2003).
Huang, L., Brinen, L. S. & Ellman, J. A. Crystal structures of reversible ketone-Based inhibitors of the cysteine protease cruzain. Bioorg. Med. Chem. 11, 21–29 (2003).
Kapust, R. B. et al. Tobacco etch virus protease: mechanism of autolysis and rational design of stable mutants with wild-type catalytic proficiency. Protein Eng. 14, 993–1000 (2001).
Kenneson, J. R. et al. Exploring possible drug-resistant variants of SARS-CoV-2 main protease (Mpro) with noncovalent preclinical candidate, Mpro61. ACS Bio Med Chem Au 5, 215–226 (2025).
Mei, M. et al. A combinatorial strategy for HRV 3C protease engineering to achieve the N-terminal free cleavage. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 265, 131066 (2024).
Pearlman, D. A. et al. AMBER, a package of computer programs for applying molecular mechanics, normal mode analysis, molecular dynamics and free energy calculations to simulate the structural and energetic properties of molecules. Comput. Phys. Commun. 91, 1–41 (1995).
Shaffer, J. M. & Greenwald, I. SALSA, a genetically encoded biosensor for spatiotemporal quantification of Notch signal transduction in vivo. Dev. Cell 57, 930–944.e6 (2022).
Gao, X. J., Chong, L. S., Kim, M. S. & Elowitz, M. B. Programmable protein circuits in living cells. Science 361, 1252–1258 (2018).
Roybal, K. T. et al. Engineering T cells with customized therapeutic response programs using synthetic Notch receptors. Cell 167, 419–432 (2016).
Barnea, G. et al. The genetic design of signaling cascades to record receptor activation. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 105, 64–69 (2008).
Coukos, R. et al. An engineered transcriptional reporter of protein localization identifies regulators of mitochondrial and ER membrane protein trafficking in high-throughput CRISPRi screens. eLife 10, e69142 (2021).
Novinec, M. & Lenarčič, B. Papain-like peptidases: structure, function, and evolution. Biomol. Concepts 4, 287–308 (2013).
Hekkelman, M. L., Salmoral, D. Á, Perrakis, A. & Joosten, R. P. DSSP 4: FAIR annotation of protein secondary structure. Protein Sci. 34, e70208 (2025).
Bennett, N. R. et al. Improving de novo protein binder design with deep learning. Nat. Commun. 14, 2625 (2023).
Kuo, C.-J., Chi, Y.-H., Hsu, J. T.-A. & Liang, P.-H. Characterization of SARS main protease and inhibitor assay using a fluorogenic substrate. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 318, 862–867 (2004).
Kabsch, W. Integration, scaling, space-group assignment and post-refinement. Acta Crystallogr. D 66, 133–144 (2010).
Winn, M. D. et al. Overview of the CCP4 suite and current developments. Acta Crystallogr. D 67, 235–242 (2011).
McCoy, A. J. et al. Phaser crystallographic software. J. Appl. Crystallogr. 40, 658–674 (2007).
Adams, P. D. et al. PHENIX: a comprehensive Python-based system for macromolecular structure solution. In International Tables for Crystallography 539–547 (International Union of Crystallography, 2012).
Emsley, P. & Cowtan, K. Coot: model-building tools for molecular graphics. Acta Crystallogr. D 60, 2126–2132 (2004).
Williams, C. J. et al. MolProbity: more and better reference data for improved all-atom structure validation. Protein Sci. 27, 293–315 (2018).