Meineke, E. K., Davies, T. J., Daru, B. H. & Davis, C. C. Biological collections for understanding biodiversity in the Anthropocene. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B Biol. Sci. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2017.0386 (2018).

Arnold, S. J. Morphology, performance and fitness. Am. Zool. 23, 347–361 (1983).

Article 

Google Scholar
 

Wainwright, P. C. Functional versus morphological diversity in macroevolution. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Evol. Syst. 38, 381–401 (2007).

Article 

Google Scholar
 

Raxworthy, C. J. & Smith, B. T. Mining museums for historical DNA: advances and challenges in museomics. Trends Ecol. Evol. 36, 1049–1060 (2021).

Article 
CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar
 

Blagoderov, V., Kitching, I. J., Livermore, L., Simonsen, T. J. & Smith, V. S. No specimen left behind: industrial scale digitization of natural history collections. Zookeys 209, 133–146 (2012).

Article 

Google Scholar
 

Ströbel, B., Schmelzle, S., Blüthgen, N. & Heethoff, M. An automated device for the digitization and 3D modelling of insects, combining extended-depth-of-field and all-side multi-view imaging. Zookeys 759, 1–27 (2018).

Article 

Google Scholar
 

Plum, F. & Labonte, D. scAnt-an open-source platform for the creation of 3D models of arthropods (and other small objects). PeerJ 9, e11155 (2021).

Article 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar
 

Davies, T. G. et al. Open data and digital morphology. Proc. Biol. Sci. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2017.0194 (2017).

Short, A. E. Z., Dikow, T. & Moreau, C. S. Entomological collections in the age of big data. Annu Rev. Entomol. 63, 513–530 (2018).

Article 
CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar
 

Nelson, G. & Ellis, S. The history and impact of digitization and digital data mobilization on biodiversity research. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B Biol. Sci. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2017.0391 (2018).

Hedrick, B. P. et al. Digitization and the future of natural history collections. BioScience 70, 243–251 (2020).

Article 

Google Scholar
 

Wipfler, B., Pohl, H., Yavorskaya, M. I. & Beutel, R. G. A review of methods for analysing insect structures – the role of morphology in the age of phylogenomics. Curr. Opin. Insect Sci. 18, 60–68 (2016).

Article 
PubMed 

Google Scholar
 

Deans, A. R., Mikó, I., Wipfler, B. & Friedrich, F. Evolutionary phenomics and the emerging enlightenment of arthropod systematics. Invertebr. Syst. https://doi.org/10.1071/is12063 (2012).

Friedrich, F. et al. Insect morphology in the age of phylogenomics: innovative techniques and its future role in systematics. Entomol. Sci. 17, 1–24 (2014).

Article 

Google Scholar
 

Blackburn, D. C. et al. Increasing the impact of vertebrate scientific collections through 3D imaging: the openVertebrate (oVert) Thematic Collections Network. Bioscience 74, 169–186 (2024).

Article 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar
 

Sombke, A., Lipke, E., Michalik, P., Uhl, G. & Harzsch, S. Potential and limitations of X-Ray micro-computed tomography in arthropod neuroanatomy: a methodological and comparative survey. J. Comp. Neurol. 523, 1281–1295 (2015).

Article 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar
 

Metscher, B. D. MicroCT for comparative morphology: simple staining methods allow high-contrast 3D imaging of diverse non-mineralized animal tissues. BMC Physiol. 9, 11 (2009).

Article 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar
 

Gignac, P. M. et al. Diffusible iodine-based contrast-enhanced computed tomography (diceCT): an emerging tool for rapid, high-resolution, 3-D imaging of metazoan soft tissues. J. Anat. 228, 889–909 (2016).

Article 
CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar
 

Pauwels, E., Van Loo, D., Cornillie, P., Brabant, L. & Van Hoorebeke, L. An exploratory study of contrast agents for soft tissue visualization by means of high resolution X-ray computed tomography imaging. J. Microsc. 250, 21–31 (2013).

Article 
CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar
 

Muñoz, M. M. & Price, S. A. The future is bright for evolutionary morphology and biomechanics in the era of big data. Integr. Comp. Biol. 59, 599–603 (2019).

Article 
PubMed 

Google Scholar
 

Lösel, P. D. et al. Natural variability in bee brain size and symmetry revealed by micro-CT imaging and deep learning. PLoS Comput. Biol. 19, e1011529 (2023).

Toulkeridou, E., Gutierrez, C. E., Baum, D., Doya, K. & Economo, E. P. Automated segmentation of insect anatomy from micro-CT images using deep learning. Nat. Sci. https://doi.org/10.1002/ntls.20230010 (2023).

Handschuh, S., Beisser, C. J., Ruthensteiner, B. & Metscher, B. D. Microscopic dual-energy CT (microDECT): a flexible tool for multichannel ex vivo 3D imaging of biological specimens. J. Microsc. 267, 3–26 (2017).

Article 
CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar
 

van de Kamp, T. et al. Parasitoid biology preserved in mineralized fossils. Nat. Commun. 9, 3325 (2018).

Article 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar
 

Rühr, P. T. et al. Juvenile ecology drives adult morphology in two insect orders. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B Biol. Sci. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2021.0616 (2021).

Ward, P. S., Brady, S. G., Fisher, B. L. & Schultz, T. R. Phylogeny and biogeography of dolichoderine ants: effects of data partitioning and relict taxa on historical inference. Syst. Biol. 59, 342–362 (2010).

Article 
CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar
 

Ward, P. S., Blaimer, B. B. & Fisher, B. L. A revised phylogenetic classification of the ant subfamily Formicinae (Hymenoptera: Formicidae), with resurrection of the genera Colobopsis and Dinomyrmex. Zootaxa 4072, 343–357 (2016).

Article 
PubMed 

Google Scholar
 

Ward, P. S., Brady, S. G., Fisher, B. L. & Schultz, T. R. The evolution of myrmicine ants: phylogeny and biogeography of a hyperdiverse ant clade (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). Syst. Entomol. 40, 61–81 (2015).

Article 

Google Scholar
 

Schmidt, C. A. & Shattuck, S. O. The higher classification of the ant subfamily Ponerinae (Hymenoptera: Formicidae), with a review of ponerine ecology and behavior. Zootaxa 3817, 1–242 (2014).

Article 
CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar
 

Camacho, G. P. et al. UCE phylogenomics resolves major relationships among ectaheteromorph ants (Hymenoptera: Formicidae: Ectatomminae, Heteroponerinae): a new classification for the subfamilies and the description of a new genus. Insect Syst. Divers. https://doi.org/10.1093/isd/ixab026 (2022).

Blaimer, B. B., Ward, P. S., Schultz, T. R., Fisher, B. L. & Brady, S. G. Paleotropical diversification dominates the evolution of the hyperdiverse ant tribe Crematogastrini (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). Insect Syst. Divers. https://doi.org/10.1093/isd/ixy013 (2018).

Borowiec, M. L. Convergent evolution of the army ant syndrome and congruence in big-data phylogenetics. Syst. Biol. 68, 642–656 (2019).

Article 
CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar
 

Economo, E. P., Narula, N., Friedman, N. R., Weiser, M. D. & Guenard, B. Macroecology and macroevolution of the latitudinal diversity gradient in ants. Nat. Commun. 9, 1778 (2018).

Article 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar
 

Parr, C. L. et al. GlobalAnts: a new database on the geography of ant traits (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). Insect Conserv. Divers. 10, 5–20 (2017).

Article 

Google Scholar
 

Lach, L., Parr, C. L. & Abbott, K. L. Ant Ecology (Oxford Univ. Press, 2010).

Boomsma, J. J. et al. The Global Ant Genomics Alliance (GAGA). Myrmecol N. 25, 61–66 (2017).


Google Scholar
 

Vizueta, J. et al. Adaptive radiation and social evolution of the ants. Cell https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2025.05.030 (2025).

Bolton, B. An online catalog of the ants of the world. AntCat https://antcat.org (2026).

Mokso, R. et al. Advantages of phase retrieval for fast X-ray tomographic microscopy. J. Phys. D Appl. Phys. https://doi.org/10.1088/0022-3727/46/49/494004 (2013).

Lösel, P. D. et al. Introducing Biomedisa as an open-source online platform for biomedical image segmentation. Nat. Commun. 11, 5577 (2020).

Article 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar
 

Li, H. et al. Biomineral armor in leaf-cutter ants. Nat. Commun. 11, 5792 (2020).

Article 
CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar
 

Branstetter, M. G. et al. Dry habitats were crucibles of domestication in the evolution of agriculture in ants. Proc. Biol. Sci. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2017.0095 (2017).

Hanisch, P. E., Sosa-Calvo, J., Schultz, T. R. & Camacho, G. P. The last piece of the puzzle? Phylogenetic position and natural history of the monotypic fungus-farming ant genus Paramycetophylax (Formicidae: Attini). Insect Syst. Divers. https://doi.org/10.1093/isd/ixab029 (2022).

Beal-Neves, M., Mielke, A., Gamarra, S. d. P., Beier, C. & Fontana, C. S. A students’ opinion on the importance of natural history collections and taxonomy in Brazil. Zoologia (Curitiba) https://doi.org/10.1590/s1984-4689.v39.e21045 (2022).

Aibekova, L. The skeletomuscular system of the mesosoma of Formica rufa workers (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). Insect Syst. Divers. https://doi.org/10.1093/isd/ixac002 (2022).

Koch, S., Tahara, R., Vasquez-Correa, A. & Abouheif, E. Nano-CT imaging of larvae in the ant Pheidole hyatti reveals coordinated growth of a rudimentary organ necessary for soldier development. J. Exp. Zool. B Mol. Dev. Evol. 336, 540–553 (2021).

Lürig, M. D., Donoughe, S., Svensson, E. I., Porto, A. & Tsuboi, M. Computer vision, machine learning, and the promise of phenomics in ecology and evolutionary biology. Front. Ecol. Evol. https://doi.org/10.3389/fevo.2021.642774 (2021).

Cotte, M. et al. New opportunities offered by the ESRF to the cultural and natural heritage communities. Synchrotron Radiat. N. 35, 3–9 (2022).

Article 

Google Scholar
 

Spiecker, R. et al. Dose-efficient in vivo X-ray phase contrast imaging at micrometer resolution by Bragg magnifiers. Optica https://doi.org/10.1364/optica.500978 (2023).

Semple, T. L., Peakall, R. & Tatarnic, N. J. A comprehensive and user-friendly framework for 3D-data visualisation in invertebrates and other organisms. J. Morphol. 280, 223–231 (2019).

Article 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar
 

Buser, T. J. et al. The natural historian’s guide to the CT galaxy: step-by-step instructions for preparing and analyzing computed tomographic (CT) data using cross-platform, open access software. Integr. Org. Biol. https://doi.org/10.1093/iob/obaa009 (2020).

Poinapen, D. et al. Micro-CT imaging of live insects using carbon dioxide gas-induced hypoxia as anesthetic with minimal impact on certain subsequent life history traits. BMC Zool. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40850-017-0018-x (2017).

Alba-Tercedor, J., Hunter, W. B. & Alba-Alejandre, I. Using micro-computed tomography to reveal the anatomy of adult Diaphorina citri Kuwayama (Insecta: Hemiptera, Liviidae) and how it pierces and feeds within a citrus leaf. Sci. Rep. 11, 1358 (2021).

van de Kamp, T., dos Santos Rolo, T., Vagovič, P., Baumbach, T. & Riedel, A. Three-dimensional reconstructions come to life–interactive 3D PDF animations in functional morphology. PLoS ONE 9, e102355 (2014).

Matte, A. C. et al. The evolution of cheaper workers facilitated larger societies and accelerated diversification in ants. Sci. Adv. 11, eadx8068 (2025).

Article 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar
 

AntWiki https://www.antwiki.org (2026).

Rack, A. et al. The micro-imaging station of the TopoTomo beamline at the ANKA synchrotron light source. Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. B 267, 1978–1988 (2009).

Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar
 

Cecilia, A. et al. The IMAGE beamline at the KIT Light Source. J. Synchrotron Radiat. 32, 1036–1051 (2025).

Douissard, P. A. et al. A versatile indirect detector design for hard X-ray microimaging. J. Instrum. 7, P09016–P09016 (2012).

Article 

Google Scholar
 

Vogelgesang, M. et al. Real-time image-content-based beamline control for smart 4D X-ray imaging. J. Synchrotron Radiat. 23, 1254–1263 (2016).

Article 
PubMed 

Google Scholar
 

Paganin, D., Mayo, S. C., Gureyev, T. E., Miller, P. R. & Wilkins, S. W. Simultaneous phase and amplitude extraction from a single defocused image of a homogeneous object. J. Microsc. 206, 33–40 (2002).

Article 
CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar
 

Faragó, T. et al. syris: a flexible and efficient framework for X-ray imaging experiments simulation. J. Synchrotron Radiat. 24, 1283–1295 (2017).

Article 
PubMed 

Google Scholar
 

Vogelgesang, M., Chilingaryan, S., dos Santos Rolo, T. & Kopmann, A. UFO: a scalable GPU-based image processing framework for on-line monitoring. In Proc. IEEE 14th International Conference on High Performance Computing and Communication & IEEE 9th International Conference on Embedded Software and Systems 824–829 (IEEE, 2012).

Faragó, T. et al. Tofu: a fast, versatile and user-friendly image processing toolkit for computed tomography. J. Synchrotron Radiat. 29, 916–927 (2022).

Article 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar
 

Lowekamp, B. C., Chen, D. T., Ibanez, L. & Blezek, D. The design of SimpleITK. Front. Neuroinform. 7, 45 (2013).

Article 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar
 

Yaniv, Z., Lowekamp, B. C., Johnson, H. J. & Beare, R. SimpleITK image-analysis notebooks: a collaborative environment for education and reproducible research. J. Digit. Imaging 31, 290–303 (2018).

Article 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar
 

Lösel, P. & Heuveline, V. Enhancing a diffusion algorithm for 4D image segmentation using local information. Proc. SPIE Int. Soc. Opt. Eng. 9784, 97842L (2016).


Google Scholar
 

Ayachit, U. The Paraview Guide: A Parallel Visualization Application (Kitware, 2015).

Schindelin, J. et al. Fiji: an open-source platform for biological-image analysis. Nat. Methods 9, 676–682 (2012).

Article 
CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar
 

Lösel, P. D. GPU-basierte Verfahren zur Segmentierung biomedizinischer Bilddaten. PhD thesis, Heidelberg Univ. (2022); https://doi.org/10.11588/heidok.00031525