Furlong, E. E. M. & Levine, M. Developmental enhancers and chromosome topology. Science 361, 1341–1345 (2018).
Zheng, H. & Xie, W. The role of 3D genome organization in development and cell differentiation. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 20, 535–550 (2019).
Schoenfelder, S. & Fraser, P. Long-range enhancer–promoter contacts in gene expression control. Nat. Rev. Genet. 20, 437–455 (2019).
Bonev, B. & Cavalli, G. Organization and function of the 3D genome. Nat. Rev. Genet. 17, 661–678 (2016).
De Laat, W. & Duboule, D. Topology of mammalian developmental enhancers and their regulatory landscapes. Nature 502, 499–506 (2013).
Uyehara, C. M. & Apostolou, E. 3D enhancer–promoter interactions and multi-connected hubs: organizational principles and functional roles. Cell Rep. 42, 112068 (2023).
Vermunt, M. W., Zhang, D. & Blobel, G. A. The interdependence of gene-regulatory elements and the 3D genome. J. Cell Biol. 218, 12–26 (2019).
Van Steensel, B. & Furlong, E. E. M. The role of transcription in shaping the spatial organization of the genome. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 20, 327–337 (2019).
Dekker, J. Two ways to fold the genome during the cell cycle: insights obtained with chromosome conformation capture. Epigenetics Chromatin 7, 25 (2014).
Naumova, N. et al. Organization of the mitotic chromosome. Science 342, 948–953 (2013).
Abramo, K. et al. A chromosome folding intermediate at the condensin-to-cohesin transition during telophase. Nat. Cell Biol. 21, 1393–1402 (2019).
Zhang, H. et al. Chromatin structure dynamics during the mitosis to G1-phase transition. Nature 576, 158–162 (2019).
Pelham-Webb, B. et al. H3K27ac bookmarking promotes rapid post-mitotic activation of the pluripotent stem cell program without impacting 3D chromatin reorganization. Mol. Cell 81, 1732–1748 (2021).
Nagano, T. et al. Cell-cycle dynamics of chromosomal organization at single-cell resolution. Nature 547, 61–67 (2017).
Hsiung, C. C.-S. et al. A hyperactive transcriptional state marks genome reactivation at the mitosis–G1 transition. Genes Dev. 30, 1423–1439 (2016).
Palozola, K. C. et al. Mitotic transcription and waves of gene reactivation during mitotic exit. Science 358, 119–122 (2017).
Pelham-Webb, B., Murphy, D. & Apostolou, E. Dynamic 3D chromatin reorganization during establishment and maintenance of pluripotency. Stem Cell Reports 15, 1176–1195 (2020).
Davidson, I. F. et al. DNA loop extrusion by human cohesin. Science 366, 1338–1345 (2019).
Mach, P. et al. Cohesin and CTCF control the dynamics of chromosome folding. Nat. Genet. 54, 1907–1918 (2022).
Makrantoni, V. & Marston, A. L. Cohesin and chromosome segregation. Curr. Biol. 28, R688–R693 (2018).
Hsieh, T.-H. S. et al. Enhancer–promoter interactions and transcription are largely maintained upon acute loss of CTCF, cohesin, WAPL or YY1. Nat. Genet. 54, 1919–1932 (2022).
Rao, S. S. P. et al. Cohesin loss eliminates all loop domains. Cell 171, 305–320 (2017).
Nora, E. P. et al. Targeted degradation of CTCF decouples local insulation of chromosome domains from genomic compartmentalization. Cell 169, 930–944 (2017).
Schwarzer, W. et al. Two independent modes of chromatin organization revealed by cohesin removal. Nature 551, 51–56 (2017).
Thiecke, M. J. et al. Cohesin-dependent and -independent mechanisms mediate chromosomal contacts between promoters and enhancers. Cell Rep. 32, 107929 (2020).
Goel, V. Y., Huseyin, M. K. & Hansen, A. S. Region capture Micro-C reveals coalescence of enhancers and promoters into nested microcompartments. Nat. Genet. 55, 1048–1056 (2023).
Narita, T. et al. Disentangling the architectural and non-architectural functions of CTCF and cohesin in gene regulation. Nat. Genet. 57, 3137–3151 (2025).
Guckelberger, P. et al. Cohesin-mediated 3D contacts tune enhancer–promoter regulation. Preprint at bioRxiv https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.07.12.603288 (2024).
Cheng, L., De, C., Li, J. & Pertsinidis, A. Mechanisms of transcription control by distal enhancers from high-resolution single-gene imaging. Preprint at bioRxiv https://doi.org/10.1101/2023.03.19.533190 (2023).
Heidinger-Pauli, J. M., Mert, O., Davenport, C., Guacci, V. & Koshland, D. Systematic reduction of cohesin differentially affects chromosome segregation, condensation, and DNA repair. Curr. Biol. 20, 957–963 (2010).
Matthey-Doret, C. et al. Computer vision for pattern detection in chromosome contact maps. Nat. Commun. 11, 5795 (2020).
Nuebler, J., Fudenberg, G., Imakaev, M., Abdennur, N. & Mirny, L. A. Chromatin organization by an interplay of loop extrusion and compartmental segregation. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 115, E6697–E6706 (2018).
Vu, H. & Ernst, J. Universal chromatin state annotation of the mouse genome. Genome Biol. 24, 153 (2023).
Kim, Y., Shi, Z., Zhang, H., Finkelstein, I. J. & Yu, H. Human cohesin compacts DNA by loop extrusion. Science 366, 1345–1349 (2019).
Gabriele, M. et al. Dynamics of CTCF- and cohesin-mediated chromatin looping revealed by live-cell imaging. Science 376, 496–501 (2022).
Kane, L. et al. Cohesin is required for long-range enhancer action at the Shh locus. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 29, 891–897 (2022).
Seneviratne, J. A., Ho, W. W. H., Glancy, E. & Eckersley-Maslin, M. A. A low-input high resolution sequential chromatin immunoprecipitation method captures genome-wide dynamics of bivalent chromatin. Epigenetics Chromatin 17, 3 (2024).
Murphy, D. et al. 3D enhancer–promoter networks provide predictive features for gene expression and coregulation in early embryonic lineages. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 31, 125–140 (2024).
Whyte, W. A. et al. Master transcription factors and mediator establish super-enhancers at key cell identity genes. Cell 153, 307–319 (2013).
Giammartino, D. C. D. et al. KLF4 is involved in the organization and regulation of pluripotency-associated three-dimensional enhancer networks. Nat. Cell Biol. 21, 1179–1190 (2019).
Teves, S. S. et al. A dynamic mode of mitotic bookmarking by transcription factors. eLife 5, e22280 (2016).
Liu, Y. et al. Widespread mitotic bookmarking by histone marks and transcription factors in pluripotent stem cells. Cell Rep. 19, 1283–1293 (2017).
Festuccia, N. et al. Mitotic binding of Esrrb marks key regulatory regions of the pluripotency network. Nat. Cell Biol. 18, 1139–1148 (2016).
Sun, F. et al. Promoter–enhancer communication occurs primarily within insulated neighborhoods. Mol. Cell 73, 250–263 (2019).
Dowen, J. M. et al. Control of cell identity genes occurs in insulated neighborhoods in mammalian chromosomes. Cell 159, 374–387 (2014).
Morgani, S., Nichols, J. & Hadjantonakis, A.-K. The many faces of pluripotency: in vitro adaptations of a continuum of in vivo states. BMC Dev. Biol. 17, 7 (2017).
Yang, P. et al. Multi-omic profiling reveals dynamics of the phased progression of pluripotency. Cell Syst. 8, 427–445 (2019).
Buecker, C. et al. Reorganization of enhancer patterns in transition from naive to primed pluripotency. Cell Stem Cell 14, 838–853 (2014).
Smith, A. Formative pluripotency: the executive phase in a developmental continuum. Development 144, 365–373 (2017).
Hansen, K. L. et al. Synergy between regulatory elements can render cohesin dispensable for distal enhancer function. Science 391, eadt4221 (2026).
Shah, R. et al. NIPBL dosage shapes genome folding by tuning the rate of cohesin loop extrusion. Preprint at bioRxiv https://doi.org/10.1101/2025.08.14.667581 (2025).
Aboreden, N. G. et al. De novo formation of cis-regulatory contacts in the absence of NIPBL-driven chromatin loop extrusion. Nat. Genet. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41588-026-02565-3 (2026).
Popay, T. M. et al. Acute NIPBL depletion reveals in vivo dynamics of loop extrusion and its role in transcription activation. Nat. Genet. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41588-026-02516-y (2026).
Ciosk, R. et al. Cohesin’s binding to chromosomes depends on a separate complex consisting of Scc2 and Scc4 proteins. Mol. Cell 5, 243–254 (2000).
Goel, V. Y. et al. Dynamics of microcompartment formation at the mitosis-to-G1 transition. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 32, 2614–2627 (2025).
Schooley, A. et al. Interphase chromosome conformation is specified by distinct folding programmes inherited through mitotic chromosomes or the cytoplasm. Nat. Cell Biol. 28, 82–97 (2026).
Weinert, B. T. et al. Time-resolved analysis reveals rapid dynamics and broad scope of the CBP/p300 acetylome. Cell 174, 231–244 (2018).
Ramasamy, S. et al. The Mediator complex regulates enhancer–promoter interactions. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 30, 991–1000 (2023).
Zhang, S., Ubelmesser, N., Barbieri, M. & Papantonis, A. Enhancer–promoter contact formation requires RNAPII and antagonizes loop extrusion. Nat. Genet. 55, 832–840 (2023).
Jiang, Y. et al. Genome-wide analyses of chromatin interactions after the loss of Pol I, Pol II, and Pol III. Genome Biol. 21, 158 (2020).
Crump, N. T. et al. BET inhibition disrupts transcription but retains enhancer–promoter contact. Nat. Commun. 12, 223 (2021).
Shimazoe, M. A. et al. Cohesin prevents local mixing of condensed euchromatic domains in living human cells. Preprint at bioRxiv https://doi.org/10.1101/2025.08.27.672592 (2025).
Cuartero, S. et al. Control of inducible gene expression links cohesin to hematopoietic progenitor self-renewal and differentiation. Nat. Immunol. 19, 932–941 (2018).
Sasca, D. et al. Cohesin-dependent regulation of gene expression during differentiation is lost in cohesin-mutated myeloid malignancies. Blood 134, 2195–2208 (2019).
Minderjahn, J. et al. Postmitotic differentiation of human monocytes requires cohesin-structured chromatin. Nat. Commun. 13, 4301 (2022).
Zhang, D. et al. Alteration of genome folding via contact domain boundary insertion. Nat. Genet. 52, 1076–1087 (2020).
Krijger, P. H. L., Geeven, G., Bianchi, V., Hilvering, C. R. E. & de Laat, W. 4C-seq from beginning to end: a detailed protocol for sample preparation and data analysis. Methods 170, 17–32 (2020).
Li, J. et al. Single-gene imaging links genome topology, promoter–enhancer communication and transcription control. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 27, 1032–1040 (2020).
Lee, U. Analysis code for Lee et al. Zenodo https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18765986 (2026).